Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > AN22257
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 63(17)

Feeding behaviour of beef cattle in intensive finishing on pasture and supplemented with different additives

I. M. Xavier https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0735-9468 A * , D. H. Pereira A , D. dos S. Pina B , B. C. Pedreira https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4663-954X C , D. C. Bolson D , T. A. Prado D , A. C. de Faria A and H. D. R. Alba B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Mato Grosso Federal University, Sinop, Mato Grosso, Brazil.

B Department of Animal Science, Bahia Federal University, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

C University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.

D Fortuna Nutrição Animal, Nova Canaã do Norte, Mato Grosso, Brazil.

* Correspondence to: imacedox@gmail.com

Handling Editor: Andrew Fisher

Animal Production Science 63(17) 1782-1790 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN22257
Submitted: 30 June 2022  Accepted: 21 August 2023  Published: 11 September 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context

Concentrate supplementation at high rates represents a method used to improve the productive efficiency of the beef cattle grazing system. Further, the use of additives increases the nutrient-use efficiency of diets. In this sense, it is important to determine the impact of additives in grazing beef cattle fed with high-concentrate supplements to determine the appropriate management practices of the system.

Aim

This study aimed to evaluate the feeding behaviour of Nellore beef cattle (Bos taurus indicus) in intensive finishing on pasture and fed with different additives.

Methods

Twenty-eight Nellore cattle [with initial bodyweight (BW) of 480 ± 5 kg and age of 24 ± 2 months] were finished on Urochloa brizantha cv. BRS Piatã pastures. The animals were assigned to a completely randomised design with four experimental supplements: U (urea as non-protein nitrogen source), UO (slow-release urea partially replacing urea), UOL (supplement UO + Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast), and UOLP (supplement UOL + multi-strain probiotics).

Key results

Supplement intake and idleness time were most affected by the season (P < 0.001). The total dry-matter intake was higher in UOLP (P < 0.004), and this supplement also produced the least effects on feeding behaviour.

Conclusion

The beginning of the rains affected the feeding behaviour. The additive combination in intensive finishing on pasture, such as UOL and UOLP, improved the intake and did not affect the feeding behaviour during the day.

Implications

These results indicate that the use of additives in intensive finishing on pasture improves productive efficiency and does not change the animal’s behaviour, resulting in an important technology to be disseminated and applied by grazing beef cattle producers.

Keywords: beef cattle, feeding behaviour, high supplementation, intensive finishing, pasture, probiotic, ruminant nutrition, water.

References

Adams AL, Harris B, Jr., Van Horn HH, Wilcox CJ (1995) Effects of varying forage types on milk production responses to whole cottonseed, tallow, and yeast. Journal of Dairy Science 78, 573-581.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Allen VG, Batello C, Berretta EJ, Hodgson J, Kothmann M, Li X, McIvor J, Milne J, Morris C, Peeters A, Sanderson M, The Forage and Grazing Terminology Committee (2011) An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass and Forage Science 66(1), 2-28.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

AOAC (1990) ‘Official methods of analysis.’ 15th edn. (Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington DC, USA)

AOAC (2005) ‘Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists.’ 18th edn. (Association of Official Analytical Chemists Inc.: Gaithersburg, MD, USA)

Bach A, Iglesias C, Devant M (2007) Daily rumen pH pattern of loose-housed dairy cattle as affected by feeding pattern and live yeast supplementation. Animal Feed Science and Technology 136, 146-153.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Barford JP, Hall RJ (1979) An examination of the crabtree effect in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of respiratory adaptation. Journal of General Microbiology 114, 267-275.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Benvenutti MA, Pavetti DR, Poppi DP, Gordon IJ, Cangiano CA (2016) Defoliation patterns and their implications for the management of vegetative tropical pastures to control intake and diet quality by cattle. Grass and Forage Science 71(3), 424-436.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bráulio RdC, Mota DA, Oliveira AR, Pereira AA, Araújo SAdC, Melo TV, Passetti LCG, Nogueira MAdR (2019) Ingestive behavior of Holstein × Zebu cattle fed different physical forms of corn and urea. Caderno de Ciências Agrárias 11, 1-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Carvalho S, Dias FD, Pires CC, Brutti DD, Lopes JF, Santos D, Barcelos RD, Macari S, Wommer TP, Griebler L (2014) Ingestive behavior of lambs Texel and Ideal fed soybean hulls. Archivos de Zootecnia 63, 55-64.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cho S, Mbiriri DT, Shim K, Lee A-L, Oh S-J, Yang J, Ryu C, Kim Y-H, Seo K-S, Chae J-I, Oh YK, Choi N-J (2014) The influence of feed energy density and a formulated additive on rumen and rectal temperature in Hanwoo steers. Asian–Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 27, 1652-1662.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Costa CM, Difante GS, Costa ABG, Gurgel ALC, Ferreira MA, Jr, Santos GT (2021) Grazing intensity as a management strategy in tropical grasses for beef cattle production: a meta-analysis. Animal 15(4), 100192.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Fisher AD, Crowe MA, O’kiely P, Enright WJ (1997) Growth, behaviour, adrenal and immune responses of finishing beef heifers housed on slatted floors at 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 or 3.0 m2 space allowance. Livestock Production Science 51, 245-254.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Garcia Diaz T, Ferriani Branco A, Jacovaci FA, Cabreira Jobim C, Bolson DC, Pratti Daniel JL (2018) Inclusion of live yeast and mannan-oligosaccharides in high grain-based diets for sheep: ruminal parameters, inflammatory response and rumen morphology. PLoS ONE 13(2), e0193313.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Gonçalves AP, Nascimento CFMd, Ferreira FA, Gomes RdC, Manella MdQ, Marino CT, et al. (2015) Slow-release urea in supplement fed to beef steers. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 58, 22-30.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Greenwood PL (2021) Review: An overview of beef production from pasture and feedlot globally, as demand for beef and the need for sustainable practices increase. Animal 15(1), 100295.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hall MB (2000) ‘Neutral detergent soluble carbohydrates nutritional relevance and analysis: a laboratory manual.’ (University of Florida: Gainesville, FL, USA)

Licitra G, Hernandez TM, Van Soest PJ (1996) Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 57, 347-358.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Machado AMC, Janini APR, Vicent EF (2014) Evaluation of additives used to increase the nutritional efficiency in cattle culture. Revista Brasileira De Engenharia De Biossistemas 8, 250-254.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Machado WS, Brandao VLN, Morais VCL, Detmann E, Rotta PP, Marcondes MI (2019) Supplementation strategies affect the feed intake and performance of grazing replacement heifers. PLoS ONE 14(9), e0221651.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Martin SA, Nisbet DJ (1992) Symposium: direct-fed microbials and rumen fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 1736-1744.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Mendes CQ, Turino VdF, Susin I, Pires AV, Morais JBd, Gentil RS (2010) Lamb feeding behavior and nutrient digestibility of high concentrate diets with different neutral detergent fiber sources. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 39, 594-600.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Menezes LFG, Restle J, Kozloski GV, Brondani IL, Arboitte MZ, Silveira MF, Nörnberg JL (2014) Fatty acid profile in the meat of super young Devon steers finished under different feeding systems. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 35(6), 3273-3286.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Mertens DR (1994) Regulation of forage intake. In ‘Forage quality, evaluation and utilization’. (Ed. GC Fahey Jr) pp. 450–493. (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA)

Mertens DR (2002) Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International 85(6), 1217-1240.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |

Mombach MA, da Silva Cabral L, Lima LR, Ferreira DC, Pedreira BCe, Pereira DH (2021) Association of ionophores, yeast, and bacterial probiotics alters the abundance of ruminal microbial species of pasture intensively finished beef cattle. Tropical Animal Health and Production 53, 172.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Nascimento GVd, Cardoso EdA, Batista NL, Souza BBd, Cambuí GB (2013) Ingestive behavior of crossbred cows (Holstein/Zebu) under rotational grazing on Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu. Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology 1(2), 31-36.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Newbold CJ, Wallace RJ, Mcintosh FM (1996) Mode of action of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a feed additive for ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition 76, 249-261.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Oaigen RP, Barcellos JOJ, Christofari LF, Braccini Neto J, Oliveira TEd, Prates ÊR (2008) Organizational improvement in the beef calves production from of the cost centers. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37(3), 580-587.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Paulino MF, Detmann E, Valadares Filho SC (2006) Suplementação animal em pasto: energética ou proteica. In ‘Simpósio sobre manejo estratégico da pastagem’. (Eds OG Pereira, JA Obeid, DJr Nascimento, DM Fonseca) pp. 359–392. (UFV: Viçosa, MG, Brazil)

Penning PD, Rutter SM (2004) Ingestive behaviour. In ‘Herbage intake handbook’. (Ed. PD Penning) pp. 151–175. (The British Grassland Society: Reading, UK)

Porsch RV, Machado DS, Brondani IL, Cocco JM, Alves Filho DC, Oliveira LMd (2018) Nitrogen sources associated with different physical forms of corn grain in the diet for steers in feedlot. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences 40, e42541.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Provenza FD, Launchbaugh KL (1999) Foraging on the edge of chaos. In ‘Grazing behaviour of livestock and wildlife’. (Eds KL Launchbaugh, JC Mosley, KD Sanders) pp. 1–12. (University of Idaho)

Rodrigues E, Arrigoni MDB, Andrade CRM, Martins CL, Millen DD, Parra FS, Jorge AM, Andrighetto C (2013) Performance, carcass characteristics and gain cost of feedlot cattle fed a high level of concentrate and different feed additives. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 42, 61-69.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Saliba EdOS, Faria EP, Rodriguez NM, Moreira GR, Sampaio IBM, Saliba JS, Gonçalves LC, Borges I, Borges ALCC (2015) Use of infrared spectroscopy to estimate fecal output with marker Lipe®. International Journal of Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics 4(9), 1-10.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Silvestre AM, Pinto ACJ, Schleifer WF, Miranda LS, Silva LAF, Casali DM, Souza KLR, Gasparini VGL, Cruz GD, Suen G, Millen DD (2022) Relationships of the microbial communities with rumen epithelium development of Nellore cattle finished in feedlot differing in phenotypic residual feed intake. Animals 12(7), 820.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Sinclair LA, Blake CW, Griffin P, Jones GH (2012) The partial replacement of soyabean meal and rapeseed meal with feed grade urea or a slow-release urea and its effect on the performance, metabolism and digestibility in dairy cows. Animal 6(6), 920-927.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Slavov T, Radev V, Varlyakov I (2016) Effect of Optigen® on some parameters of rumen fermentation in yearling rams. Zhivotnov’dni Nauki/Bulgarian Journal of Animal Husbandry 53(3/6), 72-80.
| Google Scholar |

Sniffen CJ, O’Connor JD, Van Soest PJ, Fox DG, Russell JB (1992) A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal of Animal Science 70(11), 3562-3577.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Souza AP, Mota LL, Zamadei T, Martin CC, Almeida FT, Paulino J (2013) Climate classification and climatic water balance in Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Nativa 1, 34-43.
| Google Scholar |

Taiz L, Zeiger E (2009) ‘Fisiologia vegetal.’ (Artmed: Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil)

Tambara AAC, Härter CJ, Rabelo CHS, Kozloski GV (2021) Effects of supplementation on production of beef cattle grazing tropical pastures in Brazil during the wet and dry seasons: a meta-analysis. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 50, e20210020.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Torres LCL, Ferreira MdA, Guim A, Vilela MdS, Guimarães AV, Silva ECd (2009) Replacement of giant forage cactus by small forage cactus to growing dairy cattle diets and evaluation of internal markes. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38(11), 2264-2269.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Uyeno Y, Shigemori S, Shimosato T (2015) Effect of probiotics/prebiotics on cattle health and productivity. Microbes and Environments 30, 126-132.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Vohra A, Syal P, Madan A (2016) Probiotic yeasts in livestock sector. Animal Feed Science and Technology 219, 31-47.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Yang WZ, Beauchemin KA, Vedres DD, Ghorbani GR, Colombatto D, Morgavi DP (2004) Effects of direct-fed microbial supplementation on ruminal acidosis, digestibility, and bacterial protein synthesis in continuous culture. Animal Feed Science and Technology 114, 179-193.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |