Changing human behaviour to improve animal welfare outcomes
J. Pickering A , S. Moore
A and D. Wray B
A Evidn, 315 Brunswick Street, Fortitude Valley, Qld 4006, Australia.
B OBE Organic, 348 Edward Street, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia.
Animal Production Science - https://doi.org/10.1071/AN21558
Submitted: 1 November 2021 Accepted: 16 March 2022 Published online: 26 May 2022
© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing
Abstract
Context: Producers’ behaviour, attitudes, and ethics towards animal welfare emerge from a complex interplay of factors. Applying insights from behavioural science can therefore enrich our understanding of the myriad factors influencing animal welfare and can provide recommendations for creating a positive shift in producers’ behaviour.
Aims: The current paper documents a partnership between an organic beef exporter, OBE Organic, and a behavioural science company, Evidn. The partnership aimed to improve beef producers’ behaviours towards animal welfare by embedding behavioural science principles into producer feedback sheets that are completed post-slaughter by meat processors and beef exporters.
Methods: A five-stage approach was applied. Stage one involved a behavioural science ‘hackathon’ between OBE Organic and Evidn to refine project scope. Stage two reviewed producer communications at OBE Organic through five semi-structured interviews. Stage three analysed the behavioural science literature and other interventions relevant to animal welfare. Stage four pilot-tested recommendations with 10 stakeholders, followed by the re-design of producer feedback sheets throughout Stage five.
Key results: Qualitative results were collected from OBE Organic staff and producers to delineate the potential impacts of the re-designed feedback sheets on animal welfare. Results indicated that re-designed sheets reduced complexity, increased saliency of relevant information, and further motivated behaviour change by providing peer comparisons. Industry partners of OBE Organic responded positively to the company’s commitment to improving animal welfare, further enhancing their social licence to operate.
Conclusions: Behavioural science is a potentially useful tool for improving animal welfare by further enriching our understanding of the myriad factors influencing producers’ behaviour and providing evidence-based recommendations to enhance producers’ engagement with animal welfare information contained in producer feedback sheets.
Implications: Future work should focus on directly linking the re-designed feedback sheets to improvements in animal welfare (i.e. bruising, meat colour). This could involve a large-scale randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the impact of re-designed communications on animal welfare outcomes. A large qualitative engagement project could also help understand the system of factors influencing producer behaviour and develop a behaviour change program to further improve animal welfare. Ongoing work is also needed to ensure that engagement with feedback sheets is maintained in the long term.
Keywords: animal welfare, behaviour change, behavioural science, farmer adoption, farmer attitudes, human behaviour, practice change, social license.
References
Balzani A, Hanlon A (2020) Factors that influence farmers’ view on farm animal welfare: a semi-systematic review and thematic analysis. Animals 10, 1524| Factors that influence farmers’ view on farm animal welfare: a semi-systematic review and thematic analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bargh JA (1982) Attention and automaticity in the processing of self-relevant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43, 425–436.
| Attention and automaticity in the processing of self-relevant information.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barnes AP, Toma L, Willock J, Hall C (2013) Comparing a ‘budge’ to a ‘nudge’: farmer responses to voluntary and compulsory compliance in a water quality management regime. Journal of Rural Studies 32, 448–459.
| Comparing a ‘budge’ to a ‘nudge’: farmer responses to voluntary and compulsory compliance in a water quality management regime.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bartel R, Barclay E (2011) Motivational postures and compliance with environmental law in Australian agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies 27, 153–170.
| Motivational postures and compliance with environmental law in Australian agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bateman S, Teevan J, White RW (2012) The search dashboard: how reflection and comparison impact search behavior. In ‘Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems’. (Eds JA Konstan, EH Chi, K Höök) pp. 1785–1794. (Association for Computing Machinery)
Bhargava S, Manoli D (2015) Psychological frictions and the incomplete take-up of social benefits: evidence from an IRS field experiment. American Economic Review 105, 3489–3529.
| Psychological frictions and the incomplete take-up of social benefits: evidence from an IRS field experiment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bojko A (2006) Using eye tracking to compare web page designs: a case study. Journal of Usability Studies 1, 112–120.
Colman AM (2015) ‘A dictionary of psychology.’ (Oxford University Press)
Conway ARA, Cowan N, Bunting MF (2001) The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: the importance of working memory capacity. & Review 8, 331–335.
| The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: the importance of working memory capacity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
de Lauwere C, Van Asseldonk M, van’t Riet J, de Hoop J, ten Pierick E (2012) Understanding farmers’ decisions with regard to animal welfare: the case of changing to group housing for pregnant sows. Livestock Science 143, 151–161.
| Understanding farmers’ decisions with regard to animal welfare: the case of changing to group housing for pregnant sows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (2019) Australian Animal Welfare Strategy – AAWS. Available at https://www.awe.gov.au/agriculture-land/animal/welfare/aaws
Edge MK (2009) ‘Industry animal welfare standards.’ (MLA Ltd). Available at https://aawcs.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/33024_MLA_ind_Welfare_V4.pdf
Elliot AJ, Maier MA (2007) Color and psychological functioning. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16, 250–254.
| Color and psychological functioning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Enoch C (2015) ‘Project portfolio management: a model for improved decision making.’ (Business Expert Press). Available at https://portal.igpublish.com/iglibrary/search/BEPB0000394.html
Garza M, Ågren ECC, Lindberg A (2020) Nudging in animal disease control and surveillance: a qualitative approach to identify strategies used to improve compliance with animal health policies [original research]. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 7, 383
| Nudging in animal disease control and surveillance: a qualitative approach to identify strategies used to improve compliance with animal health policies [original research].Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32850995PubMed |
Giaffreda R, Antonelli F, Spada P (2019) Promoting sustainable agricultural practices through incentives. In ‘IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Agriculture and Forestry’. pp. 242–246.
| Crossref |
Glynn SM, Britton BK, Semurd-Clikeman M, Muth KD (1985) Typographic cues in text: management of the reader’s attention. The Technology of Text 2, 383–398.
Hallsworth M, List JA, Metcalfe RD, Vlaev I (2017) The behavioralist as tax collector: using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance. Journal of Public Economics 148, 14–31.
| The behavioralist as tax collector: using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hampton JO, Jones B, McGreevy PD (2020) Social license and animal welfare: development from the past decade in Australia. Animals 10, 2237
| Social license and animal welfare: development from the past decade in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263–291.
| Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kanjanida K, Jintavee K (2019) A visualization system using positive reinforcement theory to develop problem-solving skills and self-esteem in young college-educated farmers. Journal of Education Studies 47, 65–85.
Lee CK-C, Brown R, Blood D (2000) The effects of efficacy, cognitive processing and message framing on persuasion. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) 8, 5–17.
| The effects of efficacy, cognitive processing and message framing on persuasion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Marchand F, Debruyne L, Triste L, Gerrard C, Padel S, Lauwers L (2014) Key characteristics for tool choice in indicator-based sustainability assessment at farm level. Ecology and Society 19, 46
| Key characteristics for tool choice in indicator-based sustainability assessment at farm level.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McBride DM, Dosher BA (2002) A comparison of conscious and automatic memory processes for picture and word stimuli: a process dissociation analysis. Consciousness and Cognition 11, 423–460.
Meat and Livestock Australia (2020a) Annual report 2019–20 (building resilience, issue). Available at https://www.mla.com.au/globalassets/mla-corporate/about-mla/documents/planning--reporting/2019-20-ar/mla-annual-report-2019-20.pdf
Meat and Livestock Australia (2020b) The Australian red meat industry’s carbon neutral by 2030 roadmap. Available at https://www.mla.com.au/globalassets/mla-corporate/generic/about-mla/misp-2020.pdf
Meat and Livestock Australia (2020c) State of the industry report: the Australian red meat and livestock industry. Available at https://www.mla.com.au/globalassets/mla-corporate/prices--markets/documents/trends--analysis/soti-report/mla-state-of-industry-report-2020.pdf
Meat and Livestock Australia (2020d) The economic significance of Australia’s red meat and livestock industry. Available at https://www.mla.com.au/prices-markets/market-news/2020/the-economic-significance-of-australias-red-meat-and-livestock-industry/#
Murray-Prior R, Jennings J, King C (2006) Our Australian idol – Joan Tully. ExtensionNet 14, 1–2.
Nogami T, Takai J (2008) Effects of anonymity on antisocial behavior committed by individuals. Psychological Reports 102, 119–130.
| Effects of anonymity on antisocial behavior committed by individuals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18481673PubMed |
O’Donovan P, Agarwala A, Hertzmann A (2011) Color compatibility from large datasets. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 30, 1–12.
| Color compatibility from large datasets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ole Borgen S, Skarstad G (2007) Norwegian pig farmers’ motivations for improving animal welfare. British Food Journal 109, 891–905.
| Norwegian pig farmers’ motivations for improving animal welfare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Perlmuter LC, Langer EJ (1983) The effects of behavioral monitoring on the perception of control. Clinical Gerontologist 1, 37–43.
| The effects of behavioral monitoring on the perception of control.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pickering JA, Hong J, Hong D, Kealley M (2017) Applying behavioural science to the Queensland sugar cane industry and its relationship to the Great Barrier Reef. Rural Extension & Innovation Systems Journal 13, 1–10.
| Applying behavioural science to the Queensland sugar cane industry and its relationship to the Great Barrier Reef.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pickering J, Hong J, Stower R, Kealley M (2018) Using psychology to understand practice change among sugar cane growers. Rural Extension & Innovation Systems Journal 14, 62–72.
Pickering J, McIntosh T, Moore S, Priwitzer S, Haantera K, Preston G, Hong J, Win Law I, Simmons E, Ruzsicska N, Kealley M (2019) Project Cane Changer: using behavioural science to create practice change. In ‘Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists’, vol. 1. pp. 24–30.
Rare (2021) Lands for life: a tech-and behavior-centred solution for empowering farmers and safeguarding nature in Columbia and beyond. Available at https://rare.org/program/lands-for-life/
Reicher SD, Haslam SA, Spears R, Reynolds KJ (2012) A social mind: the context of John Turner’s work and its influence. European Review of Social Psychology 23, 344–385.
| A social mind: the context of John Turner’s work and its influence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sejian V, Lakritz J, Ezeji T, Lal R (2011) Assessment methods and indicators of animal welfare. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 6, 301–315.
| Assessment methods and indicators of animal welfare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Silic M, Cyr D (2016) Colour arousal effect on users’ decision-making processes in the warning message context. In ‘HCI in business, government, and organizations: information systems’. (Eds FF-H Nah, C-H Tan) pp. 99–109. (Springer: Cham, Switzerland)
Smith R (2008) ‘Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the American Association of Bovine Practitioners’, Charlotte, NC, USA, 25–27 September 2008.
Tajfel H (1974) Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information 13, 65–93.
| Social identity and intergroup behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thaler RJ, Sunstein CR (2008) ‘Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness.’ (Yale University Press)
Thorndike EL (1898) Animal intelligence: an experimental study of the associative processes in animals. The Psychological Review: Monograph Supplements 2, 1–109.
Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review 117, 440–463.
| Construal-level theory of psychological distance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20438233PubMed |
Turner JC (1975) Social comparison and social identity: some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology 5, 1–34.
Vigoroso L, Caffaro F, Cavallo E (2020)) Occupational safety and visual communication: user-centred design of safety training material for migrant farmworkers in Italy. Safety Science 121, 562–572.
| Occupational safety and visual communication: user-centred design of safety training material for migrant farmworkers in Italy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vigors B (2019) Citizens’ and farmers’ framing of ‘positive animal welfare’ and the implications for framing positive welfare in communication. Animals 9, 147
| Citizens’ and farmers’ framing of ‘positive animal welfare’ and the implications for framing positive welfare in communication.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wenzel M (2005) Misperceptions of social norms about tax compliance: from theory to intervention. Journal of Economic Psychology 26, 862–883.
| Misperceptions of social norms about tax compliance: from theory to intervention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
