Energy relations in cattle can be quantified using open-circuit gas-quantification systems
M. Caetano A , M. J. Wilkes A , W. S. Pitchford A , S. J. Lee A and P. I. Hynd A BA The University of Adelaide, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: philip.hynd@adelaide.edu.au
Animal Production Science 58(10) 1807-1813 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16745
Submitted: 15 November 2016 Accepted: 26 April 2017 Published: 6 June 2017
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the relationships between metabolisable energy (ME) intake and outputs of methane (CH4), rumen-derived carbon dioxide (rCO2), lung-derived carbon dioxide (lCO2), and total carbon dioxide output (tCO2) measured using an open-circuit gas-quantification system (GQS). Three trials were conducted to produce a wide range of energy intake and gas emissions to allow relationships between gas outputs and ME intake to be quantified. Gas emissions and ME intake were measured in eight Angus steers (455 ± 24.6 kg initial bodyweight; Trials 1 and 2), and in eight pregnant Angus heifers (503 ± 22.0 kg initial bodyweight; 5 months pregnant; Trial 3). Animals were fed twice daily to allow ad libitum intake in Trial 1, whereas in Trials 2 and 3, feed intake was restricted and energy density was varied to provide a wide range of ME intakes. Animals were allocated to individual pens during a 20-, 19- and 15-day experimental periods, and total faecal output was measured for the last 8, 4 and 4 days in Trials 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Gas emissions were measured for 16, 8 and 8 days after the adaptation period (4, 11 and 7 days) and each animal was allowed to visit the GQS every 2 h. Total CO2 in breath (tCO2) was separated into CO2 arising from rumen fermentation (rCO2) and CO2 in expired air from the lungs (lCO2) by manually identifying the eructations from normal breaths using the GQS gas-output trace. All CO2 outputs (lCO2, rCO2 and tCO2) were highly correlated with each other (r = 0.74–0.99; P < 0.01). Measurement of CO2 output was more repeatable with fewer days of measurement than was CH4 output. Metabolisable-energy intake was closely related to all three measures of CO2 output (rCO2, r = 0.69, P < 0.001; lCO2, r = 0.70, P < 0.001; and tCO2, r = 0.73, P < 0.001). Heat production was estimated from lCO2 output by assuming a value of 0.85 for the respiratory quotient of metabolised products. The heat production estimated at the extrapolated zero ME intake (0.52 MJ/kg0.75) was 60% higher than previous estimates of fasting heat production in cattle. However, our estimate was made under non-fasting, non-sedentary, non-thermoneutral conditions, so it may be a realistic estimate of maintenance energy requirement excluding heat increment of feeding. In conclusion, the open-circuit GQS can be used to provide estimates of the ME intake and heat production of cattle, and, as such, provides a valuable opportunity to describe the energy relations and efficiency of beef cattle in the field, with minimal interference to normal grazing patterns and behaviour.
Additional keywords: beef cattle, carbon dioxide, greenfeed, heat production, methane.
References
AOAC (2000) ‘Official methods of analysis.’ 17th edn. (AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD)Arbre M, Rochette Y, Guyader J, Lascoux C, Gómez LM, Eugene M, Morgavi DP, Renand G, Doreau M, Martin C (2016) Repeatability of enteric methane determinations from cattle using either the SF6 tracer technique or the GreenFeed system. Animal Production Science 56, 238–243.
| Repeatability of enteric methane determinations from cattle using either the SF6 tracer technique or the GreenFeed system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28Xis1amtLw%3D&md5=38da91f75051c9e010958c6abd06d89cCAS |
Brosh A, Aharoni Y, Sharir B, Gutman M, Choshniak I (2004) Energy balance of grazing beef cattle in Mediterranean pasture, the effects of stocking rate and season: 2. Energy expenditure as estimated from heart rate and oxygen consumption, and energy balance. Livestock Production Science 90, 101–115.
| Energy balance of grazing beef cattle in Mediterranean pasture, the effects of stocking rate and season: 2. Energy expenditure as estimated from heart rate and oxygen consumption, and energy balance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Corbett JL, Farrell DJ, Leng RA, McClymont GL (1971) Determination of energy expenditure of penned and grazing sheep from estimates of carbon dioxide energy rate. British Journal of Nutrition 26, 277–291.
| Determination of energy expenditure of penned and grazing sheep from estimates of carbon dioxide energy rate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaE3MXkvFKgsrk%3D&md5=c8f5172e59fe011e10ccace7c6690d65CAS |
Cordova FJ, Wallace JD, Pieper RD (1978) Forage intake by grazing livestock: a review. Journal of Range Management 31, 430–438.
| Forage intake by grazing livestock: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cottle DJ (2013) The trials and tribulations of estimating the pasture intake of grazing animals. Animal Production Science 53, 1209–1220.
| The trials and tribulations of estimating the pasture intake of grazing animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Exton S (2001) ‘Testing beef cattle for net feed efficiency: standards manual.’ (Performance Beef Breeders Association: Armidale, NSW)
Fancy SG, Blanchard JM, Holleman DF, Kokjer KJ, White RG (1986) Validation of the doubly-labelled water method using a ruminant. The American Journal of Physiology 251, R143–R149.
Graser HU, Tier B, Johnston DJ, Barwick SA (2005) Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 913–922.
| Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hammond KJ, Humphries DJ, Crompton LA, Green C, Reynolds CK (2015) Methane emissions from cattle: estimates from short-term measurements using a Greenfeed system compared with measurements obtained using respiration chambers or sulphur hexafluoride tracer. Animal Feed Science and Technology 203, 41–52.
| Methane emissions from cattle: estimates from short-term measurements using a Greenfeed system compared with measurements obtained using respiration chambers or sulphur hexafluoride tracer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXjvFeqtbc%3D&md5=ae663e93bbc9a06f062c7761a7505728CAS |
Herd RM, Pitchford WS (2011) ‘Residual feed intake selection makes cattle leaner and more efficient.’ Available at http://raan.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Recent-Advances-in-Animal-Nutrition-Australia-Vol-18-2011.pdf [Verified 10 July 2016]
Hristov AN, Oh J, Giallongo F, Frederick T, Harper MT, Weeks H, Branco AF, Price WJ, Moate PJ, Deighton MH, Williams SRO, Kindermann M, Duvall S (2016) Short communication: comparison of the GreenFeed system with the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique for measuring enteric methane emissions from dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 5461–5465.
| Short communication: comparison of the GreenFeed system with the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique for measuring enteric methane emissions from dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XntFClsL4%3D&md5=b4292f46f4a257e8334cc78b2f1ae938CAS |
Huhtanen P, Ahvenjärvi S, Broderick GA, Reynal SM, Shingfield KJ (2010) Quantifying ruminal digestion of organic matter and neutral detergent fiber using the omasal sampling technique in cattle – a meta-analysis. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 3203–3215.
| Quantifying ruminal digestion of organic matter and neutral detergent fiber using the omasal sampling technique in cattle – a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtVOhtrbO&md5=ad6a43bc0873749dffa676cefc4ebf97CAS |
Junghans P, Voigt J, Jentsch W, Metges CC, Derno M (2007) The 13C bicarbonate dilution technique to determine energy expenditure in young bulls validated by indirect calorimetry. Livestock Science 110, 280–287.
| The 13C bicarbonate dilution technique to determine energy expenditure in young bulls validated by indirect calorimetry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kaufmann LD, Münger A, Rérat M, Junghans P, Görs S, Metges CC, Dohme-Meier F (2011) Energy expenditure of grazing cows and cows fed grass indoors as determined by the 13C bicarbonate dilution technique using an automatic blood sampling system. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 1989–2000.
| Energy expenditure of grazing cows and cows fed grass indoors as determined by the 13C bicarbonate dilution technique using an automatic blood sampling system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXnvFChur8%3D&md5=31555df8f124083b3eac38123ab7e119CAS |
Lofgreen GP, Garrett WN (1968) A system for expressing net energy requirements and feed values for growing and finishing beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 27, 793–806.
| A system for expressing net energy requirements and feed values for growing and finishing beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Manafiazar G, Zimmerman S, Basarab JA (2017) Repeatability and variability of short-term spot measurement of methane and carbon dioxide emissions from beef cattle using GreenFeed emissions monitoring system. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 97, 118–126.
| Repeatability and variability of short-term spot measurement of methane and carbon dioxide emissions from beef cattle using GreenFeed emissions monitoring system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Montaño-Bermudez M, Nielsen MK (1990) Biological efficiency to weaning and to slaughter of crossbred beef cattle with different genetic potential for milk. Journal of Animal Science 68, 2297–2309.
| Biological efficiency to weaning and to slaughter of crossbred beef cattle with different genetic potential for milk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
NRC (2000) ‘Nutrient requirements of beef cattle.’ 7th edn. (National Academies Press: Washington, DC)
Osuji PO (1974) The physiology of eating and the energy expenditure of the ruminant at pasture. Journal of Range Management 27, 437–443.
| The physiology of eating and the energy expenditure of the ruminant at pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pinares-Patiño CS, Lassey KR, Martin RJ, Molano G, Fernandez M, MacLean S, Sandoval E, Luo D, Clark H (2011) Assessment of the sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique using respiration chambers for estimation of methane emissions from sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 201–209.
| Assessment of the sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique using respiration chambers for estimation of methane emissions from sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Van Soest PJ (1994) ‘Nutritional ecology of the ruminant.’ 2nd edn. (Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY)
Yamamoto S, Mclean JA, Downie AJ (1979) Estimation of heat-production from heart-rate measurements in Cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 42, 507–513.
| Estimation of heat-production from heart-rate measurements in Cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL3c%2FmsFGhuw%3D%3D&md5=fa867537da92c140cefd4e5fe6b651baCAS |
Young BA, Webster MED (1963) A technique for the estimation of energy expenditure in sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 867–873.
| A technique for the estimation of energy expenditure in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
