Comparing the profitability of a dairy business with alternative investments
J. W. Heard A , K. R. Lawrence B , C. K. M. Ho C D and B. Malcolm CA Agriculture Research, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Mount Napier Road, Hamilton, Vic. 3300, Australia.
B Agriculture Research, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, 1301 Hazeldean Road, Ellinbank, Vic. 3820, Australia.
C Agriculture Research, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, 32 Lincoln Square North, Carlton, Vic. 3053, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: christie.ho@ecodev.vic.gov.au
Animal Production Science 57(7) 1330-1335 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16478
Submitted: 22 July 2016 Accepted: 7 October 2016 Published: 2 December 2016
Abstract
In the present study, the profitability of a dairy-farm case study evaluated over the period 2003–2004 to 2014–2015 was compared with the performance of other dairy farms and other non-agricultural investments over the same time. Investments are generally made on the expectation that a net return will be earned that justifies using capital in one particular way rather than an alternative way. The expected, and actual, returns from capital invested in different assets will differ according to the risks involved. Investors choose an investment, and mixes of investments, that align with their goals, preferences for risk and anticipated returns over time. Dairy farming involves investing in assets, such as land and improvements, water, livestock, plant and equipment, and people, which are managed to produce milk and ultimately to earn a competitive return on capital. With uncertain seasonal conditions, fluctuating costs and prices, declining terms of trade, wide ranges of equity and management abilities, and a steady decline in the number of commercial farm businesses, it may be tempting to presume that investing in farming, and dairy farming in particular, is a hard road, leading to lower and more variable returns than investing in non-agricultural investment opportunities in the economy. This need not be the case. Analysis of how a dairy business in northern Victoria performed from 2003–2004 to 2014–2015 showed that this farm did well compared with (i) other dairy businesses in Victoria and (ii) alternative investments, such as shares, bonds and property, over the same time. Compound annual return to capital for the dairy farm over the 12 years studied was 12.4% (real, before tax). Over half the return came from the farming operations and the remainder came from owning assets that appreciated in value, particularly in this case, water. The dairy business that was studied was well managed and earned higher annual average returns than the average returns of investments with similar risk elsewhere in the economy, such as shares, and matched it with the best performing of these alternative investments.
Additional keywords: compound annual growth rate, equity, return to capital.
References
ABARES (2016) Agsurf. Available at http://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/surveys [Verified 30 June 2016]Ashton D, Oliver M (2015) Dairy farms in the Murray–Darling Basin. ABARES Research Report 15.12. ABARES, Canberra.
Clark D, Malcolm B, Jacobs J (2013) Dairying in the Antipodes: recent past, near prospects. Animal Production Science 53, 882–893.
| Dairying in the Antipodes: recent past, near prospects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cullen BR, Johnson IR, Eckard RJ, Lodge GM, Walker RG, Rawnsley RP, McCaskill MR (2009) Climate change effects on pasture systems in south-eastern Australia. Crop and Pasture Science 60, 933–942.
| Climate change effects on pasture systems in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Department of Economic Development Jobs, Transport and Resources (DEDJTR) (2015) Dairy farm monitor project: Victoria, Annual report 2014/15. Victorian Government Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Melbourne.
Department of Environment and Primary Industries (2014) Seasonal determinations. In ‘Victorian Water Register: water availability and use’. Available at http://waterregister.vic.gov.au/water-availability-and-use/seasonal-determinations [Verified 14 February 2014]
Doyle PT (2007) ‘Dairy Science 2006’: a perspective of likely benefits to farmers from new technologies and learning approaches. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 1059–1063.
| ‘Dairy Science 2006’: a perspective of likely benefits to farmers from new technologies and learning approaches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Heady EO (1952) ‘Economics of agricultural production and resource use.’ (Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
HMC Property Group (2010) ‘Changing land use in the GMID 2006–2010: where have all the dairies gone?’ (HMC Property Group: Shepparton, Vic.)
Ho CKM, Newman M, Dalley DE, Little S, Wales WJ (2013) Performance, return and risk of different dairy systems in Australia and New Zealand. Animal Production Science 53, 894–906.
Malcolm B, Makeham J, Wright V (2005) ‘The farming game: agricultural management and marketing.’ (Cambridge University Press: Melbourne)
Malcolm B, Ho CKM, Armstrong DP, Doyle PT, Tarrant KA, Heard JW, Leddin CM, Wales WJ (2012) Dairy directions: a decade of whole farm analysis of dairy systems. Australasian Agribusiness Review 20, 39–58.
Russell Investments/ASX (2015) ‘Long-term investing report.’ (Russell Investments: Sydney)
Sinnett A, Ho CKM, Malcolm B (2016) Expanding a dairy business affects business and financial risk. Animal Production Science
| Expanding a dairy business affects business and financial risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vanguard Investments Australia (2015) ‘Vanguard 2015 index chart.’ (Vanguard Investments Australia Ltd: Melbourne)
