The effect of pre-graze mowing on milk production of dairy cows grazing grass–herb–legume pastures managed under contrasting spring defoliation regimes
G. S. Cun A B , G. R. Edwards A and R. H. Bryant AA Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln, Christchurch 7647, New Zealand.
B Corresponding author. Email: grace.cun@lincolnuni.ac.nz
Animal Production Science 57(7) 1414-1418 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16458
Submitted: 15 July 2016 Accepted: 29 March 2017 Published: 3 May 2017
Abstract
Strategies to increase herbage dry-matter (DM) production are sought for dairy systems. One proposed strategy is tactical spring defoliation with greater pre-grazing herbage mass and higher post-grazing heights. However, there are concerns over the effects of these strategies on herbage quality, DM intake and milk production. Irrigated, diverse pastures in Canterbury, New Zealand, containing perennial ryegrass, white clover, chicory, plantain and lucerne, were managed over two grazing rotations in spring under normal (grazed to 3.5 cm) or lax management (grazed to 5 cm, allowing early ryegrass seedhead development before normal grazing at anthesis ‘late control’). On the third grazing rotation, a milk production study was conducted. Thirty-six, mid-lactation spring calving Friesian × Jersey dairy cows were allocated to nine groups of four cows and randomly allocated to three replicates of the following three treatments: (1) normal grazing (Norm), (2) lax grazing of standing herbage (Lax) and (3) lax grazing with pre-graze mowing of herbage (Mow). Cows were offered a daily herbage allocation of 30 kg DM/cow above ground level, with milk production measured over 8 days. Pastures managed under lax management had higher pre-grazing herbage mass (4149 kg DM/ha) than did pastures managed under normal management (3105 kg DM/ha), but all treatments had similar metabolisable energy (~12.26 MJ ME/kg DM). Daily milksolid (MS) production tended to be lower (P = 0.07) for cows grazing pastures managed under Lax and Mow (2.34 and 2.24 MS/cow.day respectively) than with Norm (2.43 MS/cow.day). Although there was no difference in daily MS production between mowing and greater pre-graze herbage mass, switching from a high to low grazing residual managed by either grazing or mowing in late spring is likely to have a negative impact on milk production.
Additional keywords: late control, spring management.
References
Ball D, Collins M, Lacefield G, Martin N, Mertens D, Olson K, Putnam D, Undersander D, Wolf M (2001) ‘Understanding forage quality.’ (American Farm Bureau Federation: Park Ridge, IL, USA)Bryant AM (1982) Effects of mowing before or after grazing on milk production. In ‘Dairy production from pasture’. (Eds KL Macmillan, VK Taufa) pp. 381–382. (Clark and Matheson: Hamilton, New Zealand)
Corson D, Waghorn G, Ulyatt M, Lee J (1999) NIRS: forage analysis and livestock feeding. In ‘Proceedings of the conference of New Zealand Grassland Association’, Hawkes Bay, New Zealand. pp. 127–132.
Da Silva SC, Hodgon J, Matthews P, Matthew C, Holmes C (1994) Effect of contrasting spring grazing management on summer-autumn pasture and milk production of mixed ryegrass-clover dairy swards. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 54, 79–82.
Dairy Australia (2016) ‘Perennial ryegrass management. 1. Grazing management to maximise growth and nutritive value. Project 3030.’ Available at http://www.dairyaustralia.com.au/~/media/Documents/Pastures%20and%20feeding/Pasture/Perennial%20ryegrass%20management%20%20I%20-%20Grazing%20management%20to%20maximize%20growth%20and%20nutritive%20value.pdf [Verified 30 September 2016]
DairyNZ (2015) Dairy NZ annual report 2014/15. Strategy for sustainable dairy farming 2013–2020. DairyNZ, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Holmes CW, Hoogendoorn CJ (1983) Some effects of grazing management and of topping on the growth and quality of pasture. Dairyfarming Annual 35, 36–43.
Holmes CW, Hoogendoorn CJ, Ryan MP, Chu ACP (1992) Some effects of herbage composition, as influenced by previous grazing management, on milk production by cows grazing on ryegrass/white clover pastures. 1. Milk production in early spring: effects of different regrowth intervals during the preceding winter period. Grass and Forage Science 47, 309–315.
| Some effects of herbage composition, as influenced by previous grazing management, on milk production by cows grazing on ryegrass/white clover pastures. 1. Milk production in early spring: effects of different regrowth intervals during the preceding winter period.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Horadagoda A, Fulkerson WJ, Nandra KS, Barchia IM (2009) Grazing preferences by dairy cows for 14 forage species. Animal Production Science 49, 586–594.
| Grazing preferences by dairy cows for 14 forage species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Irvine L, Freeman M, Rawnsley R (2010) The effect of grazing residual control methods on cow intake and milk production in late spring. In ‘Australasian dairy science symposium: meeting the challenges for pasture-based dairying’, 31 August–2 September 2010. pp. 195–198. (Lincoln University: Christchurch, New Zealand)
Kolver E, Penno J, MacDonald K, McGrath J, Carter W (1999) Mowing pasture to improve milk production. In ‘Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association’, Hawkes Bay, New Zealand. pp. 139–145.
Matthew C (1991) ‘Late control: what is it and why should it work?’ (Massey University: Palmerston, New Zealand)
Matthew C, Xia J, Hodgson J, Chu A (1989) Effect of late spring grazing management on tiller age profiles and summer-autumn pasture growth rates in a perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) sward. In ‘Proceedings of XVI international grassland congress’, 4–11 October 1989, Nice, France.
McCarthy S, Wims C, Kay J, Chapman D, MacDonald K (2014) Grazing management-striking a balance. Dairy NZ Technical Series 13–16.
McDonald P, Edwards R, Greenhalgh J, Morgan C, Sinclair L, Wilkinson R (2010) ‘Animal nutrition.’ (Pearson Prentice Hall: London)
Pembleton KG, Tozer KN, Edwards GR, Jacobs JL, Turner LR (2015) Simple versus diverse pastures: opportunities and challenges in dairy systems. Animal Production Science 55, 893–901.
| Simple versus diverse pastures: opportunities and challenges in dairy systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rutter SM (2006) Diet preference for grass and legumes in free-ranging domestic sheep and cattle: current theory and future application. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 97, 17–35.
| Diet preference for grass and legumes in free-ranging domestic sheep and cattle: current theory and future application.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith D (1973) The nonstructural carbohydrates. In ‘Chemistry and biochemistry of herbage’. (Eds G Butler, R Bailey) pp. 105–155. (Academic Press: London)
Waite R, Boyd J (1953) The water-soluble carbohydrates of grasses. II. Grasses cut at grazing height several times during the growing season. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 4, 257–261.
| The water-soluble carbohydrates of grasses. II. Grasses cut at grazing height several times during the growing season.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaG3sXlt1SgtA%3D%3D&md5=5744f1d8e17f37c303427a3320904182CAS |
