Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Using temporal associations to determine maternal parentage in extensive beef herds

D. Menzies A B , K. P. Patison A , N. J. Corbet A and D. L. Swain A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Central Queensland University, School of Medical and Applied Sciences, Precision Livestock Management Research Group, Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: d.menzies@cqu.edu.au

Animal Production Science 58(5) 943-949 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16450
Submitted: 15 July 2016  Accepted: 28 October 2016   Published: 30 January 2017

Abstract

The assignment of maternal parentage, although time-consuming and expensive using traditional methods, is essential for genetic improvement. Within the sheep industry the recording of time-based (temporal) associations without human intervention has been routinely used to derive maternal parentage, however it has not been researched in extensive beef production systems. To determine whether temporal associations could be used to assign maternal parentage, cows and calves had their identity recorded as they walked to water over a 27-day trial. Two methods of association were investigated, being the half-weight index and the time difference between a cow and calf having their identity recorded. The half-weight index, which is a measure of the number of times two individuals are recorded together, correctly assigned greater than 90% of maternal pairs. When investigating the duration of data recording it was shown that 85% of maternal parentage could be achieved within only 21 days. Further work is required to determine the effect of calf age, herd and paddock size; however, the results showed that the half-weight index method of determining maternal associations is a labour-saving and accurate alternative to traditional methods used to identify maternal parentage.

Additional keywords: maternal parentage, mothering-up, Walk-over-Weighing technology.


References

Barnett N, Purvis I, Van Hest B, Franklin I (1999) The accuracy of current dam pedigree recording strategies employed by stud Merino breeders. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics. Mandurah, Western Australia. (Eds P Vercoe, N Adams, D Masters) pp. 373–376. (Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics)

Bell A, Henshall J, Gill S, Gore K, Kijas J, Villalobos N (2013) Success rates of commercial SNP based parentage assignment in sheep. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 20, 278–281.

Cairns SJ, Schwager SJ (1987) A comparison of association indices. Animal Behaviour 35, 1454–1469.
A comparison of association indices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cooperative Research Centre for Remote Economic Participation - Ninti-One (2016) Precision pastoral management tools | CRC-REP. Available at http://crc-rep.com/research/enterprise-development/precision-pastoral-management-tools [15 June 2016]

Corrigan L, Parnell P (2006) Application of genetics technology in the temperate Australian beef seedstock industry. In ‘Proceedings of Australian Beef–the Leader conference’. pp. 81–90. (Beef CRC: Armidale, NSW)

Court JE, Collins D, McLarty G (2010) Validation of Pedigree MatchMaker Using DNA profiling. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 28, 87

Dodds K, Tate M, Sise J (2005) Genetic evaluation using parentage information from genetic markers. Journal of Animal Science 83, 2271–2279.
Genetic evaluation using parentage information from genetic markers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtVKqsLvM&md5=53deaf5d9ef18590897a2dc71fcbf25fCAS |

Drake D, Van Eenennaam A, Lowe J (2009) Development and implementation of a vertically-integrated beef cattle data collection system. In ‘Proceedings of the American Society of Animal Science’, 16–18 June 2009. pp. 108–111 (Colorado State University)

Finger A, Patison K, Heath B, Swain D (2014) Changes in the group associations of free-ranging beef cows at calving. Animal Production Science 54, 270–276.
Changes in the group associations of free-ranging beef cows at calving.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hatcher S, Gardner G, Gill S, Lee S, Swan A, van der Werf J 2014. A science based approach to breeding the future Merino. In ‘Cape Wools 9th World Merino Conference’, 29 April–1 May 2014, Stellenbosch, South Africa. pp. 1–15.

International Society for Animal Genetics (ISAG) (2012) ‘Recommendations for cattle molecular markers and parentage testing workshop.’ pp. 1–7. (International Society for Animal Genetics: Cairns)

McKellar K (2012) Using NLIS as a management tool. Available at https://futurebeef.com.au/knowledge-centre/husbandry/using-nlis-as-a-management-tool/ [Verified 6 June 2016]

Northern Territory Government (2009) Cattle and land management best practices in the Katherine region. Available at https://nt.gov.au/industry/agriculture/livestock/cattle/cattle-land-management-practices [Verified 9 December 2016]

Padilla de la Torre M, Briefer EF, Ochocki BM, McElligott AG, Reader T (2016) Mother–offspring recognition via contact calls in cattle, Bos taurus. Animal Behaviour 114, 147–154.
Mother–offspring recognition via contact calls in cattle, Bos taurus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at http://www.R-project.org/ [Verified 10 July 2014]

Reinhardt V, Reinhardt A (1981) Natural sucking performance and age of weaning in zebu cattle (Bos indicus). The Journal of Agricultural Science 96, 309–312.
Natural sucking performance and age of weaning in zebu cattle (Bos indicus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Richards J, Atkins K (2007) Determining pedigree by association in Merino flocks. In ’Genetic improvement: making it happen. Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics’, 23–26 September 2007. pp. 403–406. (Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding Genetics: Armidale, NSW)

Richards J, Atkins K, Mortimer M, Semple S, Pope C (2007) Pedigree assignment by electronic matching of lambs and dams, Trangie QPLUS Merinos. In ‘Proceedings of the Trangie QPLUS Open Day, Trangie Agricultural Research Centre, Trangie, Australia’, 7 June 2007. (Ed. CE Pope) pp. 42–43. (NSW Department of Primary Industries)

Swain DL, Bishop-Hurley GJ (2007) Using contact logging devices to explore animal affiliations: Quantifying cow-calf interactions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102, 1–11.
Using contact logging devices to explore animal affiliations: Quantifying cow-calf interactions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tropical Beef Technology Services (2014) Increasing pedigree accuracy with DNA parent verification. Tech Talk, Tropical Beef Technology Services. Available at http://tbts.une.edu.au/pdfs/DNAParentVerification.pdf [Verified 6 June 2016]