Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Socioeconomic impact of forage-technology adoption by smallholder cattle farmers in Cambodia

K. Ashley A C , J. R. Young A , P. Kea B , S. Suon B , P. A. Windsor A and R. D. Bush A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

B Department of Animal Health and Production, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

C Corresponding author. Email: katherine.ashley@sydney.edu.au

Animal Production Science 58(2) 393-402 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16164
Submitted: 30 July 2015  Accepted: 20 August 2016   Published: 14 October 2016

Abstract

In Cambodia, adoption of forage technology is recommended to smallholder cattle farmers as an alternative to the widespread practice of feeding nutritionally inferior rice straw and collected or grazed native grasses. Although field research has demonstrated the nutritional benefits to cattle of smallholders adopting forage technology in Cambodia, we extended these studies by investigating the impacts and financial metrics of forage technology adoption in January 2011 by 120 smallholder participants from the ‘Best practice health and husbandry of cattle Cambodia’ (AH/2005/086) project. Farmers were classified by intervention level (high (HI) or low (LI) intervention) and forage technology adoption (adopter HI, non-adopter HI and non-adopter LI). Information on cattle-feeding practices, including household labour demands of sourcing feed for cattle, plus input costs of forage-plot establishment by adopter HI farmers, was collected and analysed. Results were that while the establishment of forages did not have a significant effect on the use of traditional feed sources such as rice straw, crop bi-products and crop residues, grazing of cattle on native pastures was less common among adopter households. Adopter households also reported a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in daily time spent sourcing feed and reduced involvement of women and children in sourcing feed for cattle compared with non-adopter households. Average total cost of inputs to forage-plot establishment per 100 m2 ranged from US$1.40 to US$16.88, with an average cost of US$5.60. Seed costs were estimated at US$0.50 per 100 m2 for a total input cost of US$6.10 per 100 m2. Partial budget analysis was used to compare the value of forage feeding of the following two scenarios over a 6-month wet-season period: (1) forage-plot establishment and forage feeding across the herd; and (2) forage-plot establishment and target feeding (fattening) of one animal. A net profit of US$139.01 was indicated for Scenario 1 and US$152.94 for Scenario 2 and Monte Carlo simulation indicated similar financial outcomes for both scenarios, namely US$169.09 (95% CI: –17.00, 402.00) and US$172.33 (95% CI: 66.80, 305.80) respectively. We conclude that the reduced labour burden on women and children plus the potential increased household income from forage establishment and forage feeding, support recommendations of forage technology as a strategy to improve the livelihoods of smallholder cattle farmers in Cambodia.

Additional keywords: cattle-feeding practices, net profit, partial budget.


References

Adamson P, Bird J (2010) The Mekong: a drought-prone tropical environment? International Journal of Water Resources Development 26, 579–594.
The Mekong: a drought-prone tropical environment?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

ADB (2014) ‘Improving rice production and commercialization in Cambodia: findings from a farm investment climate assessment.’ (Asian Development Bank: Mandaluyong City, Philippines)

Bosma R, Roothaert R, Asis P, Saguinhon J, Binh L, Yen V (2003) ‘Economic and social benefits of new forage technologies in Mindanao, Philippines and Tuyen Quang, Vietnam. CIAT working document no. 191.’ (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical: Los Baños, Philippines)

Bush RD, Young JR, Suon S, Ngim MS, Windsor PA (2014a) Forage growing as an incentive to improve smallholder beef production in Cambodia. Animal Production Science 54, 1620–1624.
Forage growing as an incentive to improve smallholder beef production in Cambodia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bush RD, Page B, Macdonald T, Young JR, Nampanya S, Suon S, Khounsy S, Henry LA, Thomson PC, Windsor PA (2014b) Target feeding for improved smallholder beef production in the Mekong region: lessons from Cambodia and Lao PDR. Animal Production Science 54, 1219–1223.

Cook BG, Pengelly BC, Brown SD, Donnelly JL, Eagles DA, Franco MA, Hanson J, Mullen BF, Partridge IJ, Peters M, Schultze-Kraft R (2005) ‘Tropical forages: an interactive selection tool.’ Available at http://www.tropicalforages.info/Forages.html [Verified 15 June]

Dijkhuizen AA, Morris RS (1997) ‘Animal health economics: principles and applications.’ (Post Graduate Foundation in Veterinary Science, University of Sydney: Sydney)

Dimang S, Pen M, Sophal L, Mom S, Stuer W, Savage D (2009) Improved cattle nutrition increases the time available for children of small-holder farmers in Cambodia to attend school. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition 17, 192

Ho KLP, Corfield J, Nguyen XB, Parsons D (2013) The best-bet participatory approach and its impact on smallholder livelihoods. In ‘Sustainable and profitable crop and livestock systems in south-central coastal Vietnam. Proceedings of the final workshop held in Quy Nhon, Vietnam’, 5–6 March 2013. (Eds S Mann, MC Webb, RW Bell) pp. 208–218. (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra)

Ibrahim H, Olaloku E (2000) Improving cattle for milk, meat and traction. In ‘ILRI manual 4’. (ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute): Nairobi, Kenya)

Liese, B, Isvilanonda, S, Nguyen, K, Nguyen, L, Pananurak, P, Romnea, P, Shwe, T, Sombounkhanh, K, Möllmann, T, Zimmer, Y (2014) ‘Economics of Southeast Asian rice production.’ (Agri Benchmark: Braunschweig, Germany) Available at http://www.agribenchmark.org/fileadmin/Dateiablage/B-Cash-Crop/Reports/Report-2014-1-rice-FAO.pdf [Verified 26 September 2016]

Lisson S, MacLeod N, McDonald C, Corfield J, Pengelly B, Wirajaswadi L, Rahman R, Bahar S, Padjung R, Razak N, Puspadi K, Dahlanuddin , Sutaryono Y, Saenong S, Panjaitan T, Hadiawati L, Ash A, Brennan L (2010) A participatory, farming systems approach to improving Bali cattle production in the smallholder crop-livestock systems of eastern Indonesia. Agricultural Systems 103, 486–497.
A participatory, farming systems approach to improving Bali cattle production in the smallholder crop-livestock systems of eastern Indonesia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ly P, Jensen LS, Bruun TB, Rutz D, de Neergaard A (2012) The system of rice intensification: adapted practices, reported outcomes and their relevance in Cambodia. Agricultural Systems 113, 16–27.
The system of rice intensification: adapted practices, reported outcomes and their relevance in Cambodia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MacLeod N, Waldron S, Wen S-l (2015) A comprehensive approach for assessing the economic contribution of forage and livestock improvement options to smallholder farming enterprises. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 14, 1573–1580.
A comprehensive approach for assessing the economic contribution of forage and livestock improvement options to smallholder farming enterprises.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MAFF (2014) Annual report. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Phnom Penh.

Maxwell TW, You S, Ung B, Peou L, Reid J (2012) The social and other impacts of a cattle/crop innovation in Cambodia. Agricultural Systems 107, 83–91.
The social and other impacts of a cattle/crop innovation in Cambodia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Millar J, Connell J (2010) Strategies for scaling out impacts from agricultural systems change: the case of forages and livestock production in Laos. Agriculture and Human Values 27,
Strategies for scaling out impacts from agricultural systems change: the case of forages and livestock production in Laos.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mong S, Kea P, Hout S, Young J, Bush R (2013) Introduced forage productivity and quality in the smallholder environment. In ‘Cattle health, production and trade in Cambodia. Proceedings from three ACIAR-funded projects presented at an international workshop held in Phnom Penh’, Cambodia, 7–8 June 2011. (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra)

Moran J (2009) Budgeting for future farm development. In ‘Business management for tropical dairy farmers’. pp. 173–185. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Nguyen XB, Lane PA, Parsons D, Nguyen VH, Ho KLP, Corfield JP, Duong TT (2013) Forages improve livelihoods of smallholder farmers with beef cattle in south central coastal Vietnam. Tropical Grasslands – Forrajes Tropicales 1, 225–229.

NIS (2013) ‘Census of agriculture in Cambodia 2013.’ (National Institute of Statistics, Ministry of Planning in collaboration with Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries: Phnom Penh)

NIS (2014) ‘Cambodia socio-economic survey 2013.’ (National Institute of Statistics (NIS), Ministry of Planning: Phnom Penh)

NIS (2015) ‘Cambodia inter-censal economic survey 2014.’ (National Institute of Statistics (NIS), Ministry of Planning: Phnom Penh)

Pen M, Savage D, Stur W, Seng M (2013a) Cattle production of smallholder farmers in Kampong Cham Province, Cambodia. In ‘Cattle health, production and trade in Cambodia. Proceedings from three ACIAR-funded projects presented at an international workshop held in Phnom Penh, Cambodia’, 7–8 June 2011. (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra)

Pen M, Savage D, Nolan J, Seng M (2013b) Effect of Stylosanthes guianensis supplementation on intake and nitrogen metabolism of Bos indicus cattle offered a basal diet of mixed rice straw and tropical grass. In ‘Cattle health, production and trade in Cambodia. Proceedings from three ACIAR-funded projects presented at an international workshop held in Phnom Penh, Cambodia’, 7–8 June 2011. (Eds J Young, L Rast, S Sothoeun, P Windsor) pp. 22–28. (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra)

Priyanti A, Quigley S, Marsetyo, Pamungkas D, Dahlanuddin, Budisantoso E, Poppi D (2010) Economic analysis of on-farm feeding strategies to increase post-weaning live weight gain of Bali calves. In ‘Community empowerment and tropical animal industry. Proceedings of the 5th international seminar on tropical animal production, Yogyakarta, Indonesia’, 19–22 October 2010. (Ed. K Agung Santosa) pp. 702–708. (Faculty of Animal Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada: Yogyakarta, Indonesia)

Samkol P, Sath K, Patel M, Windsor P, Holtenius K (2015) Survey of smallholder beef cattle production systems in different agro-ecological zones of Cambodia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 47, 1299–1306.

Sath K, Borin K, Preston TR (2008) Survey on feed utilization for cattle production in Takeo province. Livestock Research for Rural Development 20,

Serey M, Mom S, Kouch T, Bunna C (2014) Cattle production systems in NW Cambodia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 26,

Stur W, Varney G (2007) ‘Best practice guide: cattle and buffalo fattening. Version 8.’ (CIAT – International Centre for Tropical Agriculture: Hanoi, Vietnam)

Stur W, Truong Tan K, Duncan A (2013) Transformation of smallholder beef cattle production in Vietnam. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 11, 363–381.
Transformation of smallholder beef cattle production in Vietnam.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thoeun HC (2015) Observed and projected changes in temperature and rainfall in Cambodia. Weather and Climate Extremes 7, 61–71.
Observed and projected changes in temperature and rainfall in Cambodia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Windsor PA (2011) Perspectives on Australian animal health aid projects in South-east Asia. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 58, 375–386.
Perspectives on Australian animal health aid projects in South-east Asia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3MfhsVeiug%3D%3D&md5=f3b23bc49ad20cd181bc6e0485c26c82CAS | 21426534PubMed |

Young JR, Rast L, Suon S, Loeung VI, Thong S, Windsor PA (2013) A longitudinal study on cattle health and production. In ‘Cattle health, production and trade in Cambodia. Proceedings from three ACIAR-funded projects presented at an international workshop held in Phnom Penh, Cambodia’, 7–8 June 2011. (Eds J Young, L Rast, S Sothoeun, P Windsor) pp. 29–33. (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra)

Young JR, Rast L, Suon S, Bush RD, Henry LA, Windsor PA (2014a) The impact of best practice health and husbandry interventions on smallholder cattle productivity in southern Cambodia. Animal Production Science 54, 629–637.
The impact of best practice health and husbandry interventions on smallholder cattle productivity in southern Cambodia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Young JR, O’Reilly RA, Ashley K, Suon S, Leoung IV, Windsor PA, Bush RD (2014b) Impacts on rural livelihoods in Cambodia following adoption of best practice health and husbandry interventions by smallholder cattle farmers. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 61, 11–24.
Impacts on rural livelihoods in Cambodia following adoption of best practice health and husbandry interventions by smallholder cattle farmers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24393407PubMed |

Young JR, Suon S, Rast L, Nampanya S, Windsor PA, Bush RD (2014c) Benefit–cost analysis of foot and mouth disease control in large ruminants in Cambodia. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
Benefit–cost analysis of foot and mouth disease control in large ruminants in Cambodia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25382391PubMed |

Yu B, Fan S (2009) ‘Rice production responses in Cambodia.’ IFPRI discussion paper 00939. (Development Strategy and Governance Division, International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC)