The repeatability of textural wool handle
J. W. V. Preston A C D , S. Hatcher A B and B. A. McGregor A CA CRC for Sheep Industry Innovation, Homestead Building, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.
B NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange Agricultural Institute, Locked Bag 6006, Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.
C Australian Future Fibres Research and Innovation Centre, Institute for Frontier Materials, Deakin University, Vic. 3220, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: jwpresto@deakin.edu.au
Animal Production Science 57(4) 793-800 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15549
Submitted: 7 September 2015 Accepted: 27 January 2016 Published: 2 August 2016
Abstract
Merino breeders use textural greasy wool handle in ram buying and breeding decisions. The effectiveness of the current wool handle scoring system has not been objectively evaluated. The assessor repeatability of textural wool handle was quantified using three different methods of assessment (on the live animal, as a greasy wool mid-side sample, and as a clean (scoured) wool mid-side sample). The aim of the study was to determine which method of assessment is the most repeatable. Three separately defined repeatability estimates were calculated based on knowledge about the operator. The first estimate was based on the assessor repeatability from the operators used in this study. The second estimate was calculated using replicate values obtained from the same random assessor and the third estimate was based on two results from independent random assessors. The results demonstrated that the assessor repeatability was the greatest when handle was assessed on the clean wool mid-side method, followed by the greasy wool mid-side assessment, and least in the live-animal assessment. However, there was significant variation in the repeatability estimates between the four assessors used in the study. Accounting for fixed effects such as sex, sire group, birth type and rearing type, decreased the variation observed and thus had a negative impact on the assessor repeatability of textural wool handle. The results in this study indicate that non-wool constituents negatively impact on the ability of an assessor to consistently assign a score for textual handle in the greasy wool mid-side method. It is likely that the added cost and time required for scouring to assess handle in the clean state may not be economically viable in most situations. However, the increase in repeatability by assessing handle in greasy wool mid-side method compared with the live-animal assessment indicates that sheep producers should use this strategy when evaluating the trait on-farm.
Additional keywords: Merino, sheep production, tactile, wool quality.
References
Anon. (Eds MW Andrews, JG Downes) (1973) ‘Objective measurement of wool in Australia.’ (Australian Wool Corporation: Melbourne)Beggs HS (Eds M Wagg, B Luxford) (1984) ‘Breeding rams for wool production, evaluation of modern methods of sheep breeding.’ (The Australia Society of Animal Production: Adelaide)
Brown DJ, Ball A, Mortimer R, Oppenheimer M (2002) Incorporating subjectively assessed sheep and wool traits into genetic evaluations for Merino sheep. 2. Phenotypic and genetic correlations. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 50, 378–382.
Butler KL, Dolling M (1991) Fleece quality: what to assess? Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics. 10, 380–383.
Butler DG, Cullis BR, Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ (2009) ‘Mixed models for S language environments. ASReml-R reference manual.’ (VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UK)
Campbell WK, Lang WR (1965) An aspect of the hand of Geelong lambs’ wool. Textile Research Journal 35, 284–285.
| An aspect of the hand of Geelong lambs’ wool.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Casey AE (1991) Merino sire evaluation visual assessment Hay and Deniliquin 1991. International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science 39, 14–17.
Casey AE, Cousins P (2010) ‘Sheep scores – wool handle – texture.’ (NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange Agricultural Institute: Orange)
Fish VE (2012) ‘Solvent scouring methods for staples.’ (Victoria Fish, Australian Wool Testing Authority: Melbourne)
Fogarty NM, Banks RG, van der Werf JHJ, Ball AJ, Gibson JP (2007) The Information Nucleus – a new concept to enhance sheep industry genetic improvement. Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 17, 29–32.
Hatcher S, Atkins KD (2000) Breeding objectives which include fleece weight and fibre diameter do not need fibre curvature. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 13, 293–296.
James PJ, Ponzoni RW, Walkley JRW, Whiteley KJ (1990) Genetic parameters for wool production and quality traits in South Australian Merinos of the Collinsville family group. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 41, 583–594.
| Genetic parameters for wool production and quality traits in South Australian Merinos of the Collinsville family group.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lax J, Swan AA, Purvis IW (1995) Genetic and phenotypic relationships involving subjectively assessed style traits in hoggets from the CSIRO fine wool flock. Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 11, 521–524.
Lewer RP, Woolaston RR, Howe RR (1995) Studies on Western Australian Merino sheep. III. Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for subjectively assessed and objectively measured traits in ewe hoggets. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 379–388.
| Studies on Western Australian Merino sheep. III. Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for subjectively assessed and objectively measured traits in ewe hoggets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Love KJ, Clarke JD, Campbell IP (1987) The ram buying and selection strategies of Victorian Merino breeders and their implications for the better targeting of sheep breeding extension. In ‘Merino improvement programs in Australia. Leura, New South Wales’. (Ed. B McGuirk) pp. 63–66. (Australian Wool Corporation: Leura, NSW)
Morley FHW (1955) Selection for economic characters in Australian Merino sheep. VI. Inheritance and interrelationships of some subjectively graded characteristics. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 6, 873–881.
Mortimer SI, Robinson DL, Atkins KD, Brien FD, Swan AA, Taylor PJ, Fogarty NM (2009) Genetic parameters for visually assessed traits and their relationships to wool production and liveweight in Australian Merino sheep. Animal Production Science 49, 32–42.
| Genetic parameters for visually assessed traits and their relationships to wool production and liveweight in Australian Merino sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtVehtb0%3D&md5=d3379243550a6e71cbc53de78238d855CAS |
Mortimer SI, Atkins KD, Semple SJ, Fogarty NM (2010) Predicted responses in Merino sheep from selection combining visually assessed and measured traits. Animal Production Science 50, 976–982.
| Predicted responses in Merino sheep from selection combining visually assessed and measured traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mullaney PD, Brown GH, Young SSY, Hyland PG (1970) Genetic and phenotypic parameters for wool characteristics in fine-wool Merino, Corriedale, and Polwarth sheep. II. Phenotypic and genetic correlations, heritability, and repeatability. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 527–540.
| Genetic and phenotypic parameters for wool characteristics in fine-wool Merino, Corriedale, and Polwarth sheep. II. Phenotypic and genetic correlations, heritability, and repeatability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ponzoni RW, Grimson RJ, Jaensch KS, Smith DH, Gifford DR, Ancell PMC, Walkley JRW, Hynd PI (1995) The Turretfield sheep breeding project: messages on phenotypic and genetic parameters for South Australian Merino sheep. Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 11, 303–311.
Preston JWV, Hatcher S, McGregor BA (2014) Effects of site of assessment and variation in wool quality traits on the tactile assessment of textural greasy wool handle. Animal Production Science 54, 1665–1670.
| Effects of site of assessment and variation in wool quality traits on the tactile assessment of textural greasy wool handle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Preston JWV, Hatcher S, McGregor BA (2016) Fabric and greasy wool handle, their importance to the Australian wool industry: a review. Animal Production Science 56, 1–17.
| Fabric and greasy wool handle, their importance to the Australian wool industry: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Purvis I (1990) Fibre diameter variability and wool handle – their relevance in Merino breeding programmes. Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics. 8, 315–318.
R Development Core Team (2013) ‘A language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria)
Roberts NF (1956) The relation between the softness of handle of wool in the greasy and scoured states and its physical characteristics. Textile Research Journal 26, 687–697.
| The relation between the softness of handle of wool in the greasy and scoured states and its physical characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robinson DL, Mortimer SI, Swan AA, Purvis IW (2007) Genetic parameters for subjectively scored traits in yearling and adult fine wool Merinos. Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 17, 336–339.
Shah SMA, Whiteley KJ (1971) The influence of fibre characteristics on the tactile appraisal of loose wool part I. Journal of the Textile Institute 62, 361–374.
Stevens DKH (Eds JP Scanlan, RA Rottenbury) (1994) ‘Handle: Specifications and effects, Woolspec 94: Specification of Australian wool and its implication for marketing and processing.’ Sydney NSW. (CSIRO Division of Wool Technology)
Thai HT, Mentre F, Holford NHG, Veyrat-follet C, Comets E (2013) A comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimating uncertainty of parameters in linear mixed-effects models. Pharmaceutical Statistics 12, 129–140.
| A comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimating uncertainty of parameters in linear mixed-effects models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23457061PubMed |
van der Werf JHJ, Kinghorn BP, Banks RG (2010) Design and role of an Information Nucleus in sheep breeding programs. Animal Production Science 50, 998–1003.
| Design and role of an Information Nucleus in sheep breeding programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
