Supplementary feeding options to alleviate the impacts of decreased water availability on dairy-farm economic performance in northern Victoria
C. K. M. Ho A C , B. Malcolm A and P. T. Doyle BA Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Parkville, 32 Lincoln Square North, Carlton, Vic. 3053, Australia.
B Peter Doyle Consulting, 4 Red Bean Close, Byron Bay, NSW 2481, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: Christie.Ho@depi.vic.gov.au
Animal Production Science 55(2) 194-200 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14287
Submitted: 13 March 2014 Accepted: 1 July 2014 Published: 12 December 2014
Abstract
The anticipated effects of climate change, competing demands from the environment, industry and urban users, and changes in water policy are likely to reduce the amount and increase the variability of water allocations to dairy farmers in northern Victoria. The way two irrigated dairy farms that differed in feedbase characteristics, herd size and farm area, would operate and perform with reduced and more variable water allocations was examined over 10 years. Strategies to manage the impact of changed water availability were tested; namely, increasing milk production by feeding more supplementary feed, changing the feed system to present supplements in a partial mixed ration (PMR), and increasing milk production by using a PMR. Neither farm was profitable under medium climate change, or if the conditions that generated the low inflows of water into irrigation supply dams between 1996–97 and 2006–07 prevailed, unless changes were made to the farm system. Feeding supplements in a well formulated mixed ration have the potential to increase the efficiency of metabolisable energy use and offers the opportunity to increase feed intake and milk production. A PMR system enabled one of the farms to maintain and increase profit under medium climate change conditions; however, risk, measured as variability in profit, also increased. Under more severe reductions in water availability, neither of the farms examined was profitable over the run of years. Changes to the farm system other than feeding additional supplementary feed to increase milk production and/or using a PMR system, would be needed to counteract the effects of reduced and more variable water availability and maintain profit.
Additional keywords: dairy, irrigation, partial mixed ration, profit.
References
ABARE (2008) ‘Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics: financial performance of dairy farms 2005–06 to 2007–08, September 2007.’ (ABARE: Canberra)Armstrong DA, Knee JE, Doyle PT, Pritchard KE, Gyles OA (2000) Water use efficiency on irrigated dairy farms in northern Victoria and southern New South Wales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40, 643–653.
| Water use efficiency on irrigated dairy farms in northern Victoria and southern New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bargo F, Muller LD, Delahoy JE, Cassidy TW (2002) Performance of high producing dairy cows with three different feeding systems combining pasture and total mixed rations. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 2948–2963.
| Performance of high producing dairy cows with three different feeding systems combining pasture and total mixed rations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xptlagt74%3D&md5=dd9bb77a8f9f22bdb1c3c5c0576778dfCAS | 12487461PubMed |
Beever DE, Doyle PT (2007) Feed conversion efficiency as a key determinant of dairy herd performance: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 645–657.
| Feed conversion efficiency as a key determinant of dairy herd performance: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chapman DF, Kenny SN, Beca D, Johnson IR (2008) Pasture and forage crop systems for non-irrigated dairy farms in southern Australia. 1. Physical production and economic performance. Agricultural Systems 97, 108–125.
| Pasture and forage crop systems for non-irrigated dairy farms in southern Australia. 1. Physical production and economic performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chapman DF, Dassanayake K, Hill JO, Cullen BR, Lane N (2012) Forage-based dairying in a water-limited future: use of models to investigate farming system adaptation in southern Australia. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 4153–4175.
| Forage-based dairying in a water-limited future: use of models to investigate farming system adaptation in southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XoslKitLk%3D&md5=0f7772550e1cf6108fc0fc8831103d83CAS | 22720972PubMed |
CSIRO (2007) ‘Nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
CSIRO (2012) ‘Climate and water availability in south-eastern Australia: a synthesis of findings from Phase 2 of the South Eastern Australian Climate Initiative (SEACI).’ (CSIRO: Canberra)
Department of Environment and Primary Industries (2014) Seasonal determinations. ‘In Victorian Water Register – water availability and use.’ Available at http://waterregister.vic.gov.au/water-availability-and-use/seasonal-determinations [Verified 14 February 2014]
Department of Sustainability and Environment (2008) ‘Northern Region Sustainable Water Strategy discussion paper.’ (Department of Sustainability and Environment: Melbourne)
Dharma S (2009) Australian dairy – financial performance of dairy producing farms 2006–07 to 2007–08. Research report 09.1. ABARES, Canberra.
Doyle PT, Stockdale CR, Lawson AR, Cohen DC (2000) ‘Pastures for dairy production in Victoria.’ 2nd edn. (Kyabram Dairy Centre: Kyabram, Vic.)
Doyle PT, Francis SA, Stockdale CR (2005) Associative effects between feeds when concentrate supplements are fed to grazing dairy cows: a review of likely impacts on metabolisable energy supply. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 1315–1329.
| Associative effects between feeds when concentrate supplements are fed to grazing dairy cows: a review of likely impacts on metabolisable energy supply.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greenwood KL, Mundy GN, Kelly KB (2008) On-farm measurement of the water use and productivity of maize. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 274–284.
| On-farm measurement of the water use and productivity of maize.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Heard JW, Doyle PT, Francis SA, Staines MvH, Wales WJ (2011) Calculating dry matter consumption of dairy herds in Australia: the need to fully account for energy requirements and issues with estimating energy supply. Animal Production Science 51, 605–614.
Ho CKM, Armstrong DP, Malcolm LR, Doyle PT (2007) Evaluating options for irrigated dairy farm systems in northern Victoria when irrigation water availability decreases and price increases. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 1085–1094.
| Evaluating options for irrigated dairy farm systems in northern Victoria when irrigation water availability decreases and price increases.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ho CKM, Malcolm B, Doyle PT (2013) Potential impacts of negative associative effects between concentrate supplements, pasture and conserved forage for milk production and dairy farm profit. Animal Production Science 53, 437–452.
| Potential impacts of negative associative effects between concentrate supplements, pasture and conserved forage for milk production and dairy farm profit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXlsVGlsbs%3D&md5=a293d4bee4216e64ef68c86f338d2f87CAS |
Lawson AR, Kelly KB (2007) Responses to the renovation of an irrigated perennial pasture in northern Victoria. 1. Pasture consumption and nutritive characteristics. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 149–158.
| Responses to the renovation of an irrigated perennial pasture in northern Victoria. 1. Pasture consumption and nutritive characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lawson AR, Greenwood KL, Kelly KB (2009) Irrigation water productivity of winter-growing annuals is higher than perennial forages in northern Victoria. Crop and Pasture Science 60, 407–419.
| Irrigation water productivity of winter-growing annuals is higher than perennial forages in northern Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Linehan CJ, Armstrong DP, Doyle PT, Johnson F (2004) A survey of water use efficiency on irrigated dairy farms in northern Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 131–136.
| A survey of water use efficiency on irrigated dairy farms in northern Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Melsen MG, Armstrong DP, Ho CKM, Malcolm LR, Doyle PT (2006) Case-study forty-year historical analysis of production and resource use of northern Victoria dairy farming. AFBM Journal 3, 21–29.
Neal JS, Fulkerson WJ, Hacker RB (2011) Differences in water use efficiency among annual forages used by the dairy industry under optimum and deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 98, 759–774.
| Differences in water use efficiency among annual forages used by the dairy industry under optimum and deficit irrigation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Palisade (2012) ‘@Risk – risk analysis add-in for Excel.’ (Palisade Corporation: Newfield, New York)
Standing Committee on Agriculture and Resource Management (1990) ‘Feeding standards for Australian livestock.’ (CSIRO: Melbourne)
Wales WJ, Heard JW, Ho CKM, Leddin CM, Stockdale CR, Walker GP, Doyle PT (2006) Profitable feeding of dairy cows on irrigated dairy farms in northern Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 743–752.
| Profitable feeding of dairy cows on irrigated dairy farms in northern Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
