Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparison of the growth and meat tenderness of Brahman and F1 Senepol × Brahman steers

T. J. Schatz A D , S. Thomas B and G. Geesink C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A NT Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries, GPO Box 3000, Darwin, NT 0801, Australia.

B NT Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries, DDRF, PMB 105, Winnellie, NT 0822, Australia.

C University of New England, Meat Science Department, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: tim.schatz@nt.gov.au

Animal Production Science 54(10) 1867-1870 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14243
Submitted: 12 March 2014  Accepted: 25 June 2014   Published: 19 August 2014

Abstract

The growth of 116 Brahman (BRAH) and 96 F1 Senepol × Brahman (F1 SEN) steers grazing improved Buffel pasture in the Northern Territory was compared. Average growth was 10 kg higher in F1 SEN during grazing in the 9 months following weaning. Twenty-five steers of each genotype were compared for feedlot performance and meat quality. There was no significant difference in feedlot growth over 73 days in a commercial feedlot. On average F1 SEN carcasses graded two boning groups lower in the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) grading system. While M. longissimus samples from both genotypes were quite tender (shear force <4 kg), F1 SEN samples were found to be significantly more tender than BRAH (−0.44 kg) by shear force testing. These results indicate that crossbreeding with a tropically adapted Bos taurus breed, such as the Senepol, may be a viable method for cattle producers with Brahman herds in northern Australia to improve the meat quality of the cattle they produce.

Additional keywords: Brahman cattle, feedlot growth, meat tenderness, Senepol cattle.


References

Butts WT (1999) Feedlot performance and carcass traits of purebred and crossbred Senepol cattle. In ‘Senepol cattle. Proceedings – International Senepol Research Symposium’. (Ed. S Wildeus) pp. 105–107. (University of the Virgin Islands: St Croix, US Virgin Islands)

Chase CC, Olson TA, Hammond AC, Menchaca MA, West RL, Johnson DD, Butts WT (1998) Preweaning growth traits for Senepol, Hereford, and reciprocal crossbred calves and feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of steers. Journal of Animal Science 76, 2967–2975.

Crouse JD, Cundiff LV, Koch RM, Koohmaraie M, Seideman SC (1989) Comparisons of Bos indicus and Bos taurus inheritance for carcass beef characteristics and meat palatability. Journal of Animal Science 67, 2661–2668.

Davis GP (1993) Genetic parameters for tropical beef in northern Australia: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 179–198.
Genetic parameters for tropical beef in northern Australia: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Frisch JE (1987) Physiological reasons for heterosis in growth of Bos inducus × Bos taurus. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 109, 213–230.
Physiological reasons for heterosis in growth of Bos inducus × Bos taurus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnson DD, Huffman RD, Williams SE, Hargrove DD (1990) Effects of percentage Brahman and Angus breeding, age-season of feeding and slaughter end point on meat palatability and muscle characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 68, 1980–1986.

O’Connor SF, Tatum JD, Wulf DM, Green RD, Smith GC (1997) Genetic effects on beef tenderness in Bos indicus composite and Bos taurus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 75, 1822–1830.

Perry D, Shorthose WR, Ferguson DM, Thompson JM (2001) Methods used in the CRC program for the determination of carcass yield and beef quality. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 953–957.
Methods used in the CRC program for the determination of carcass yield and beef quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Prayaga KC (2003) Evaluation of beef cattle genotypes and estimation of direct and maternal genetic effects in a tropical environment. 1. Growth traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 1013–1025.
Evaluation of beef cattle genotypes and estimation of direct and maternal genetic effects in a tropical environment. 1. Growth traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |