Estimation of genetic parameters for lambing ease, birthweight and gestation length in Australian sheep
L. Li A B and D. J. Brown AA Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit (a joint venture of NSW Department of Primary Industries and the University of New England), University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: lli4@une.edu.au
Animal Production Science 56(5) 934-940 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14129
Submitted: 28 February 2014 Accepted: 24 October 2014 Published: 25 February 2015
Abstract
This study presents estimates of genetic parameters for lambing ease (LE), birthweight (BW) and gestation length (GL) in Australian terminal sire sheep breeds using data from the Sheep Genetics LAMBPLAN database. LE was scored on lambs on a 1–5 scale, with 1 being no assistance and 5 being other such as special veterinary assistance. The full dataset consisted of 43 448 records on LE and its two subsets (the single and twin subsets) based on the birth type of the litter were analysed. Four models with different combinations of random effects consisting of direct genetic, maternal genetic and maternal permanent environmental effects were compared. All traits were analysed using linear animal models and linear sire models with LE further analysed by threshold sire models for all datasets to evaluate the influence of datasets and models on the estimation of genetic parameters. The results showed that multiple-born lambs had shorter GL, less BW and less lambing difficulty than single-born lambs. Lambing difficulty decreased with the increase of dam age from 1.5 to 4.5 years, and then increased afterwards. Genetic parameters using linear animal models were similar to those using linear sire models for all traits. Phenotypic variance and direct heritability were higher for single-born lambs compared with twin-born lambs. No significant maternal permanent environmental effect was detected for LE. Based on results using linear animal models with the full dataset, the direct heritabilities were 0.06 ± 0.01, 0.15 ± 0.01 and 0.52 ± 0.02, the maternal heritabilities were 0.03 ± 0.01, 0.15 ± 0.01 and 0.13 ± 0.02 for LE, BW and GL, respectively. The proportions of maternal permanent environmental effects to the total variances were 0.13 ± 0.01 for BW. Low to moderate direct genetic correlations of 0.31 ± 0.09 (LE and BW), 0.24 ± 0.11 (LE and GL) and 0.08 ± 0.08 (BW and GL) were estimated using tri-variate analysis from the full dataset, indicating the trend that lambs with greater BW and longer GL would result in more lambing difficulty.
Additional keywords: heritability, linear model, threshold model.
References
Brien FD, Hebart ML, Smith DH, Edwards JEH, Greeff JC, Hart KW, Refshauge G, Bird-Gardiner TL, Gaunt G, Behrendt R, Robertson MW, Hinch GN, Geenty KG, van der Werf JHJ (2010) Opportunities for genetic improvement of lamb survival. Animal Production Science 50, 1017–1025.| Opportunities for genetic improvement of lamb survival.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown D (2007) Variance components for lambing ease and gestation length in sheep. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 17, 268–271.
Brown DJ, Huisman AE, Swan AA, Graser HU, Woolaston RR, Ball AJ, Atkins KD, Banks RG (2007) Genetic evaluation for the Australian sheep industry. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 17, 187–194.
Burfening PJ, Kress DD, Friedrich RL (1981) Calving ease and growth rate of Simmental-sired calves. III. Direct and maternal effects. Journal of Animal Science 53, 1210–1216.
Cervantes I, Gutierrez JP, Fernandez I, Goyache F (2010) Genetic relationships among calving ease, gestation length, and calf survival to weaning in the Asturiana de los Valles beef cattle breed. Journal of Animal Science 88, 96–101.
| Genetic relationships among calving ease, gestation length, and calf survival to weaning in the Asturiana de los Valles beef cattle breed.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXls1yktw%3D%3D&md5=600a3cb9a800305525a1b7c4fde1276cCAS | 19749015PubMed |
Cue RI, Hayes JF (1985) Correlations of various direct and maternal effects for calving ease. Journal of Dairy Science 68, 374–381.
| Correlations of various direct and maternal effects for calving ease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL2M7otlemtQ%3D%3D&md5=84c1039ee720842720e985841825e368CAS | 3989079PubMed |
Dematawena CMB, Berger PJ (1997) Effect of dystocia on yield, fertility, and cow losses and an economic evaluation of dystocia scores for Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 754–761.
| Effect of dystocia on yield, fertility, and cow losses and an economic evaluation of dystocia scores for Holsteins.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dwyer CM (2008) The welfare of the neonatal lamb. Small Ruminant Research 76, 31–41.
| The welfare of the neonatal lamb.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Eaglen SAE, Coffey MP, Woolliams JA, Mrode R, Wall E (2011) Phenotypic effects of calving ease on the subsequent fertility and milk production of dam and calf in UK Holstein-Friesian heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 5413–5423.
| Phenotypic effects of calving ease on the subsequent fertility and milk production of dam and calf in UK Holstein-Friesian heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhtl2qsLzE&md5=1be68fbc1476b7064f34c1d7dd4c7d1fCAS |
Eaglen S, Coffey M, Woolliams J, Wall E (2012) Evaluating alternate models to estimate genetic parameters of calving traits in United Kingdom Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle. Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 44, 23
| Evaluating alternate models to estimate genetic parameters of calving traits in United Kingdom Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22839757PubMed |
Eghbalsaied S, Abdullahpour R, Honarvar M (2012) Genetic evaluation for calving ease trait using linear and threshold models in first parity dairy cows. African Journal of Agricultural Research 7, 1395–1399.
Gianola D (1982) Theory and analysis of threshold characters. Journal of Animal Science 54, 1079–1096.
Gianola D, Foulley J (1983) Sire evaluation for ordered categorical data with a threshold model. Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 15, 201–224.
| Sire evaluation for ordered categorical data with a threshold model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC38fpvVagsg%3D%3D&md5=e7d63efb7492814df3fc865061d83184CAS |
Gilmour AR, Gogel B, Cullis B, Thompson R, Butler D (2009) ‘ASReml user guide release 3.0.’ (VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UK)
González-Recio O, de Maturana EL, Gutiérrez JP (2007) Inbreeding depression on female fertility and calving ease in Spanish dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 5744–5752.
| Inbreeding depression on female fertility and calving ease in Spanish dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18024768PubMed |
Graser H, Tier B, Johnston DJ, Barwick SA (2005) Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 913–921.
| Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hansen M, Lund MS, Pedersen J, Christensen LG (2004) Gestation length in Danish Holsteins has weak genetic associations with stillbirth, calving difficulty, and calf size. Livestock Production Science 91, 23–33.
| Gestation length in Danish Holsteins has weak genetic associations with stillbirth, calving difficulty, and calf size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hickey JM, Keane MG, Kenny DA, Cromie AR, Am PR, Veerkamp RF (2007) Heterogeneity of genetic parameters for calving difficulty in Holstein Heifers in Ireland. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 3900–3908.
| Heterogeneity of genetic parameters for calving difficulty in Holstein Heifers in Ireland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXot1Oluro%3D&md5=9bed7245c3c8a33f223c1be5b63e8a74CAS | 17639001PubMed |
Hoeschele I, Tier B, Graser HU (1995) Multiple-trait genetic evaluation for one polychotomous trait and several continuous traits with missing data and unequal models. Journal of Animal Science 73, 1609–1627.
Huisman AE, Brown DJ, Ball AJ, Graser H (2008) Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 1. Description of traits, model comparison, variance components and their ratios. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1177–1185.
| Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 1. Description of traits, model comparison, variance components and their ratios.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kadarmideen H, Thompson R, Simm G (2000) Linear and threshold model genetic parameters for disease, fertility and milk production in dairy cattle. Animal Science 71, 411–419.
Luo MF, Boettcher PJ, Dekkers JCM, Schaeffer LR (1999) Bayesian analysis for estimation of genetic parameters of calving ease and stillbirth for Canadian Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 1848.e1–1848.e11.
| Bayesian analysis for estimation of genetic parameters of calving ease and stillbirth for Canadian Holsteins.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Luo MF, Boettcher PJ, Schaeffer LR, Dekkers JC (2001) Bayesian inference for categorical traits with an application to variance component estimation. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 694–704.
| Bayesian inference for categorical traits with an application to variance component estimation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXit1OntL4%3D&md5=7936848543f090d598ea7356dbe2975cCAS | 11286423PubMed |
Luo MF, Boettcher PJ, Schaeffer LR, Dekkers JCM (2002) Estimation of genetic parameters of calving ease in first and second parities of Canadian Holsteins using Bayesian methods. Livestock Production Science 74, 175–184.
| Estimation of genetic parameters of calving ease in first and second parities of Canadian Holsteins using Bayesian methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Matilainen K, Mrode R, Strandén I, Thompson R, Mäntysaari EA (2009) Linear–threshold animal model for birth weight, gestation length and calving ease in United Kingdom Limousin beef cattle data. Livestock Science 122, 143–148.
| Linear–threshold animal model for birth weight, gestation length and calving ease in United Kingdom Limousin beef cattle data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) ‘Generalized Linear Models.’ 2nd edn. (Chapman and Hall: London)
Mujibi FDN, Crews DH (2009) Genetic parameters for calving ease, gestation length, and birth weight in Charolais cattle. Journal of Animal Science 87, 2759–2766.
| Genetic parameters for calving ease, gestation length, and birth weight in Charolais cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtFSqu7nO&md5=8088a6441b19054fee79743c4bfa5431CAS |
Olesen I, Perez-Enciso M, Gianola D, Thomas DL (1994) A comparison of normal and nonnormal mixed models for number of lambs born in Norwegian sheep. Journal of Animal Science 72, 1166–1173.
Phocas F, Sapa J (2004) Genetic parameters for growth, reproductive performance, calving ease and suckling performance in beef cattle heifers. Animal Science 79, 41–48.
Safari E, Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR (2005) A review of genetic parameter estimates for wool, growth, meat and reproduction traits in sheep. Livestock Production Science 92, 271–289.
| A review of genetic parameter estimates for wool, growth, meat and reproduction traits in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schaeffer LR, Wilton JW (1976) Methods of sire evaluation for calving ease. Journal of Dairy Science 59, 544–551.
| Methods of sire evaluation for calving ease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sheep-Genetics (2014) Understanding Lambing Ease ASBVs. Available at http://www.sheepgenetics.org.au/files/58ed7ad1-e2e8-492f-9bd3-a08500b37fc3/Understanding-Lambing-Ease-ASBVs-041109.pdf [Verified 6 November 2014]
van der Werf JHJ, Kinghorn BP, Banks RG (2010) Design and role of an information nucleus in sheep breeding programs. Animal Production Science 50, 998–1003.
| Design and role of an information nucleus in sheep breeding programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Varona L, Misztal I, Bertrand JK (1999) Threshold-linear versus linear-linear analysis of birth weight and calving ease using an animal model: II. Comparison of models. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2003–2007.
