Multi-trait assessment of early-in-life female, male and genomic measures for use in genetic selection to improve female reproductive performance of Brahman cattle
S. A. Barwick A B F , D. J. Johnston A B , R. G. Holroyd A C , J. R. W. Walkley A D and H. M. Burrow A E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Cooperative Research Centre for Beef Genetic Technologies.
B Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit (AGBU)1, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
C Queensland Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Rockhampton, Qld 4701, Australia.
D Livestock Systems Alliance, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.
E CSIRO Livestock Industries, Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia.
F Corresponding author. Email: steve.barwick@dpi.nsw.gov.au
Animal Production Science 54(1) 97-109 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13134
Submitted: 9 April 2013 Accepted: 1 August 2013 Published: 8 October 2013
Abstract
Early-in-life female and male measures with potential to be practical genetic indicators were chosen from earlier analyses and examined together with genomic measures for multi-trait use to improve female reproduction of Brahman cattle. Combinations of measures were evaluated on the genetic gains expected from selection of sires and dams for each of age at puberty (AGECL, i.e. first observation of a corpus luteum), lactation anoestrous interval in 3-year-old cows (LAI), and lifetime annual weaning rate (LAWR, i.e. the weaning rate of cows based on the number of annual matings they experienced over six possible matings). Selection was on an index of comparable records for each combination. Selection intensities were less than theoretically possible but assumed a concerted selection effort was able to be made across the Brahman breed. The results suggested that substantial genetic gains could be possible but need to be confirmed in other data. The estimated increase in LAWR in 10 years, for combinations without or with genomic measures, ranged from 8 to 12 calves weaned per 100 cows from selection of sires, and from 12 to 15 calves weaned per 100 cows from selection of sires and dams. Corresponding reductions in LAI were 60–103 days or 94–136 days, and those for AGECL were 95–125 or 141–176 days, respectively. Coat score (a measure of the sleekness or wooliness of the coat) and hip height in females, and preputial eversion and liveweight in males, were measures that may warrant wider recording for Brahman female reproduction genetic evaluation. Pregnancy-test outcomes from Matings 1 and 2 also should be recorded. Percentage normal sperm may be important to record for reducing LAI and scrotal size and serum insulin-like growth factor-I concentration in heifers at 18 months for reducing AGECL. Use of a genomic estimated breeding value (EBV) in combination with other measures added to genetic gains, especially at genomic EBV accuracies of 40%. Accuracies of genomic EBVs needed to approach 60% for the genomic EBV to be the most important contributor to gains in the combinations of measures studied.
Additional keywords: accuracy, tropical, anoestrus, genetic evaluation, genetic gain, lifetime, puberty, weaning rate.
References
Anon (2005) Bos indicus bulls – watch that sheath. Available at http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/livestock/beef/breeding/bulls/bos-indicus-sheath [Verified 5 July 2013]Anon (2011) Australian Brahman selection indexes. Available at http://breedplan.une.edu.au/tips/Interpreting%20Australian%20Brahman%20Selection%20Indexes.pdf [Verified 5 July 2013]
Archer JA, Arthur PF, Parnell PF, van de Ven RJ (1998) Effect of divergent selection for yearling growth rate on female reproductive performance in Angus cattle. Livestock Production Science 57, 33–40.
| Effect of divergent selection for yearling growth rate on female reproductive performance in Angus cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barwick SA, Henzell AL (2005) Development successes and issues for the future in deriving and applying selection indexes for beef breeding. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 923–933.
| Development successes and issues for the future in deriving and applying selection indexes for beef breeding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barwick SA, Johnston DJ, Burrow HM, Holroyd RG, Fordyce G, Wolcott ML, Sim WD, Sullivan MT (2009) Genetics of heifer performance in ‘wet’ and ‘dry’ seasons and their relationships with steer performance in two tropical beef genotypes. Animal Production Science 49, 367–382.
| Genetics of heifer performance in ‘wet’ and ‘dry’ seasons and their relationships with steer performance in two tropical beef genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Berry DP, Buckley F, Dillon P, Evans RD, Rath M, Veerkamp RF (2003) Genetic relationships among body condition score, body weight, milk yield, and fertility in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2193–2204.
| Genetic relationships among body condition score, body weight, milk yield, and fertility in dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXks1Giuro%3D&md5=538333036b31239f918842c29864db5bCAS | 12836956PubMed |
Bijma P, Van Arendonk JA, Woolliams JA (2001) Predicting rates of inbreeding for livestock improvement schemes. Journal of Animal Science 79, 840–853.
Bulmer MG (1971) The effect of selection on genetic variability. American Naturalist 105, 201–211.
| The effect of selection on genetic variability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burns BM, Corbet NJ, Corbet DH, Crisp JM, Venus BK, Johnston DJ, Li Y, McGowan MR, Holroyd RG (2013) Male traits and herd reproductive capability in tropical beef cattle 1. Experimental design and animal measures. Animal Production Science 53, 87–100.
| Male traits and herd reproductive capability in tropical beef cattle 1. Experimental design and animal measures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXns12jsA%3D%3D&md5=6d8a17ed159f91476b0507b7376925ceCAS |
Burrow HM, Seifert GW, Hetzel DJS (1991) Consequences of selection for weaning weight in Zebu, Bos taurus and Zebu × Bos taurus cattle in the tropics. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 295–307.
| Consequences of selection for weaning weight in Zebu, Bos taurus and Zebu × Bos taurus cattle in the tropics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burrow HM, Griffith GR, Barwick SA, Holmes WE (2003) Where to from Brahmans in the northern Australian herd? Maintaining the economic benefit of earlier infusions of Bos indicus. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 15, 294–297.
Chenoweth PJ (1994) Aspects of reproduction in female Bos indicus cattle: a review. Australian Veterinary Journal 71, 422–426.
| Aspects of reproduction in female Bos indicus cattle: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3hslSmtQ%3D%3D&md5=e811d715857dbdd391dc363424a60282CAS | 7702482PubMed |
Corbet NJ, Burns BM, Johnston DJ, Wolcott ML, Corbet DH, Venus BK, Li Y, McGowan MR, Holroyd RG (2013) Male traits and herd reproductive capability in tropical beef cattle 2. Genetic parameters of bull traits. Animal Production Science 53, 101–113.
| Male traits and herd reproductive capability in tropical beef cattle 2. Genetic parameters of bull traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXns12jtg%3D%3D&md5=d016b4a07f03cf3c3c9f05c5154f32feCAS |
Davis GP, Corbet NJ, Mackinnon MJ, Hetzel DJS, Entwistle KW, Dixon R (1993) Response in female fertility and calf growth to selection for pregnancy rate in tropical beef cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 1509–1521.
| Response in female fertility and calf growth to selection for pregnancy rate in tropical beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dempster ER, Lerner IM (1950) Heritability of threshold characters. Genetics 35, 212–236.
Entwistle KW (1983) Factors influencing reproduction in beef cattle in Australia. Australian Meat Research Committee Review 43, 1–30.
Fordyce G, Entwistle K, Norman S, Perry V, Gardiner B, Fordyce P (2006) Standardising bull breeding soundness evaluations and reporting in Australia. Theriogenology 66, 1140–1148.
| Standardising bull breeding soundness evaluations and reporting in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16620941PubMed |
Frisch JE, Munro RK, O’Neill CJ (1987) Some factors related to calf crops of Brahman, Brahman Crossbred and Hereford × Shorthorn cows in a stressful tropical environment. Animal Reproduction Science 15, 1–26.
| Some factors related to calf crops of Brahman, Brahman Crossbred and Hereford × Shorthorn cows in a stressful tropical environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL1cXpt1WlsQ%3D%3D&md5=11ff768f6b4740525544c653bedd57a7CAS |
Goddard ME (2009) Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximization of long term response. Genetica 136, 245–257.
| Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximization of long term response.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Graser H-U, Tier B, Johnston DJ, Barwick SA (2005) Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 913–921.
| Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hawken RJ, Zhang YD, Fortes MRS, Collis E, Barris WC, Corbet NJ, Williams PJ, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG, Walkley JRW, Barendse W, Johnston DJ, Prayaga KC, Tier B, Reverter A, Lehnert SA (2012) Genome-wide association studies of female reproduction in tropically adapted beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 90, 1398–1410.
| Genome-wide association studies of female reproduction in tropically adapted beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xns1eis7w%3D&md5=26fe31d2cf3508e453939dacb1436dd2CAS | 22100599PubMed |
Holroyd RG, Doogan VJ, de Faveri J, Fordyce G, McGowan MR, Bertram JD, Vankan DM, Fitzpatrick LA, Jayawardhane GA, Miller RG (2002) Bull selection and use in northern Australia 4. Calf output and predictors of fertility of bulls in multiple sire herds. Animal Reproduction Science 71, 67–79.
| Bull selection and use in northern Australia 4. Calf output and predictors of fertility of bulls in multiple sire herds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD383kvFSrtw%3D%3D&md5=79fca138f6e2f948fd7f73e46fd7fe91CAS | 11988372PubMed |
James JW (1987) Determination of optimal selection policies. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 104, 23–27.
| Determination of optimal selection policies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnston DJ, Bunter KL (1996) Days to calving in Angus cattle: genetic and environmental effects and covariances with other traits. Livestock Production Science 45, 13–22.
| Days to calving in Angus cattle: genetic and environmental effects and covariances with other traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Corbet NJ, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG, Williams PJ, Burrow HM (2009) Genetics of heifer puberty in two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia and associations with heifer and steer production traits. Animal Production Science 49, 399–412.
| Genetics of heifer puberty in two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia and associations with heifer and steer production traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnston DJ, Tier B, Graser H-U (2012) Beef cattle breeding in Australia with genomics: opportunities and needs. Animal Production Science 52, 100–106.
| Beef cattle breeding in Australia with genomics: opportunities and needs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG, Williams PJ, Corbet NJ, Grant T (2014a) Genetics of early and lifetime annual reproductive performance in cows of two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia. Animal Production Science 54, 1–15.
| Genetics of early and lifetime annual reproductive performance in cows of two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnston DJ, Corbet NJ, Barwick SA, Wolcott ML, Holroyd RG (2014b) Genetic correlations of young bull reproductive traits and heifer puberty traits with female reproductive performance in two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia. Animal Production Science 54, 74–84.
| Genetic correlations of young bull reproductive traits and heifer puberty traits with female reproductive performance in two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirkpatrick M (2009) Patterns of quantitative genetic variation in multiple dimensions. Genetica 136, 271–284.
| Patterns of quantitative genetic variation in multiple dimensions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18695991PubMed |
McCosker T, McLean D, Holmes P (2010) Northern beef situation analysis 2009. Meat and Livestock Australia Project Report B.NBP.0518. Meat and Livestock Australia, Sydney.
Meyer K, Johnston DJ (2003) Estimates of genetic correlations between live ultrasound scan traits and days to calving in Hereford cattle. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 15, 387–390.
Meyer K, Hammond K, Parnell PF, Mackinnon MJ, Sivarajasingam S (1990) Estimates of heritability and repeatability for reproductive traits in Australian beef cattle. Livestock Production Science 25, 15–30.
| Estimates of heritability and repeatability for reproductive traits in Australian beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meyer K, Hammond K, Mackinnon MJ, Parnell PF (1991) Estimates of covariances between reproduction and growth in Australian beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 69, 3533–3543.
Misztal I, Legarra A, Aguilar I (2009) Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 4648–4655.
| Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtVKqtr3L&md5=1b0802002f0169075b0e783218ba9b6bCAS | 19700728PubMed |
O’Rourke PK, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG, Sullivan RM (1995) Mortality, wastage, and lifetime productivity of Bos indicus cows under extensive grazing in northern Australia 3. Comparison of culling strategies Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35, 307–316.
| Mortality, wastage, and lifetime productivity of Bos indicus cows under extensive grazing in northern Australia 3. Comparison of culling strategiesCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Olson TA, Lucena C, Chase CC, Hammond AC (2003) Evidence of a major gene influencing hair length and heat tolerance in Bos taurus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 81, 80–90.
Prayaga KC, Corbet NJ, Johnston DJ, Wolcott ML, Fordyce G, Burrow HM (2009) Genetics of adaptive traits in heifers and their relationship to growth, pubertal and carcass traits in two tropical beef cattle genotypes. Animal Production Science 49, 413–425.
| Genetics of adaptive traits in heifers and their relationship to growth, pubertal and carcass traits in two tropical beef cattle genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Purvis IW, Atkins KD, Piper LR (1987) Genetic parameters for reproductive traits. In ‘Merino improvement programs in Australia’. (Ed. BJ McGuirk) pp. 229–242. (Australian Wool Corporation: Melbourne)
Rendel JM, Robertson A (1950) Estimation of genetic gain in milk yield by selection in a closed herd of dairy cattle. Journal of Genetics 50, 1–8.
| Estimation of genetic gain in milk yield by selection in a closed herd of dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Turner HN (1969) Genetic improvement of reproduction rate in sheep. Animal Breeding Abstracts 37, 545–563.
Turner HG, Schleger AV (1958) Field observations on associations between coat type and performance in cattle. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 2, 112–114.
Turner HG, Schleger AV (1960) The significance of coat type in cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 11, 645–663.
| The significance of coat type in cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Van Eenennaam AL, van der Werf JH, Goddard ME (2011) The value of using DNA markers for beef bull selection in the seedstock sector. Journal of Animal Science 89, 307–320.
| The value of using DNA markers for beef bull selection in the seedstock sector.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhvFSntb0%3D&md5=1c097ec01d47be95ac07e0357f6bb46bCAS | 21262975PubMed |
VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Schenkel FS (2009) Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 16–24.
| Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXlsVOrsw%3D%3D&md5=cd99aa80d881c0faef510dc53c1ad49aCAS | 19109259PubMed |
Vargas CA, Olson TA, Chase CC, Hammond AC, Elzo MA (1999) Influence of frame size and body condition score on performance of Brahman cattle. Journal of Animal Science 77, 3140–3149.
Wolcott ML, Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Corbet NJ, Williams PJ (2014a) The genetics of cow growth and body composition at first calving in two tropical beef genotypes. Animal Production Science 54, 37–49.
| The genetics of cow growth and body composition at first calving in two tropical beef genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wolcott ML, Johnston DJ, Barwick SA (2014b) Genetic relationships of female reproduction with growth, body composition, maternal weaning weight and tropical adaptation in two tropical beef genotypes. Animal Production Science 54, 60–73.
| Genetic relationships of female reproduction with growth, body composition, maternal weaning weight and tropical adaptation in two tropical beef genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wolcott ML, Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Corbet NJ, Burrow HM (2014c) Genetic relationships between steer performance and female reproduction and possible impacts on whole herd productivity in two tropical beef genotypes. Animal Production Science 54, 85–96.
| Genetic relationships between steer performance and female reproduction and possible impacts on whole herd productivity in two tropical beef genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhang YD, Johnston DJ, Bolormaa S, Hawken RJ, Tier B (2014) Genomic selection for female reproduction in Australian tropically adapted beef cattle. Animal Production Science 54, 16–24.
| Genomic selection for female reproduction in Australian tropically adapted beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
