Tracking livestock using global positioning systems – are we still lost?
D. L. Swain A F , M. A. Friend B , G. J. Bishop-Hurley C , R. N. Handcock D and T. Wark E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Centre for Environmental Management, CQUniversity, Rockhampton, Qld 4701, Australia.
B EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia.
C CSIRO Livestock Industries, QCAT, Pullenvale, Qld 4069, Australia.
D CSIRO Livestock Industries, Floreat, WA 6014, Australia.
E CSIRO ICT Centre, QCAT, Pullenvale, Qld 4069, Australia.
F Corresponding author. Email: d.swain@cqu.edu.au
This review paper (Harry Stobbs Memorial Lecture) is part of the ASAP Special Issue (Volume 50, Issues 5–6): ‘Livestock Production in a Changing Environment’
Animal Production Science 51(3) 167-175 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10255
Submitted: 18 November 2010 Accepted: 13 January 2011 Published: 7 March 2011
Abstract
Since the late 1980s, satellite-based global positioning systems (GPS) have provided unique and novel data that have been used to track animal movement. Tracking animals with GPS can provide useful information, but the cost of the technology often limits experimental replication. Limitations on the number of devices available to monitor the behaviour of animals, in combination with technical constraints, can weaken the statistical power of experiments and create significant experimental design challenges. The present paper provides a review and synthesis of using GPS for livestock-based studies and suggests some future research directions.
Wildlife ecologists working in extensive landscapes have pioneered the use of GPS-based devices for tracking animals. Wildlife researchers have focussed efforts on quantifying and addressing issues associated with technology limitations, including spatial accuracy, rate of data collection, battery life and environmental factors causing loss of data. It is therefore not surprising that there has been a significant number of methodological papers published in the literature that have considered technical developments of GPS-based animal tracking.
Livestock scientists have used GPS data to inform them about behavioural differences in free-grazing experiments. With a shift in focus from the environment to the animal comes the challenge of ensuring independence of the experimental unit. Social facilitation challenges independence of the individual in a group. The use of spatial modelling methods to process GPS data provides an opportunity to determine the degree of independence of data collected from an individual animal within behavioural-based studies. By using location and movement information derived from GPS data, researchers have been able to determine the environmental impact of grazing animals as well as assessing animal responses to management activities or environmental perturbations. Combining satellite-derived remote-sensing data with GPS-derived landscape preference indices provides a further opportunity to identify landscape avoidance and selection behaviours.
As spatial livestock monitoring tools become more widely used, there will be a greater need to ensure the data and associated processing methods are able to answer a broader range of questions. Experimental design and analytical techniques need to be given more attention if GPS technology is to provide answers to questions associated with free-grazing animals.
References
Agouridis C, Stombaugh T, Workman S, Koostra B, Edwards D, Vanzant E (2004) Suitability of a GPS collar for grazing studies. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 47, 1321–1329.Andrew MH (1988) Grazing impact in relation to livestock watering points. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 3, 336–339.
| Grazing impact in relation to livestock watering points.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M7gvFektg%3D%3D&md5=6691c427c608aab031768debe7f57734CAS |
Bailey TC, Gatrell AC (1995) ‘Interactive spatial data analysis.’ (Addison Wesley Longman: Harlow, Essex, UK)
Bailey D, VanWagoner H, Weinmeister R, Jensen D (2008) Comparison of low-moisture blocks and salt for manipulating grazing patterns of beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 86, 1271–1277.
| Comparison of low-moisture blocks and salt for manipulating grazing patterns of beef cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXltlWrurc%3D&md5=eb89e3ce28a7041122adb3e6f6a0d5cbCAS | 18203975PubMed |
Bejder L, Fletcher D, Brager S (1998) A method for testing association patterns of social animals. Animal Behaviour 56, 719–725.
| A method for testing association patterns of social animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9784222PubMed |
Betteridge K, Costall D, Balladur S, Upsdell M, Umemura K (2010) Urine distribution and grazing behaviour of female sheep and cattle grazing a steep New Zealand hill pasture. Animal Production Science 50, 624–629.
| Urine distribution and grazing behaviour of female sheep and cattle grazing a steep New Zealand hill pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Boe KE, Faerevik G (2003) Grouping and social preferences in calves, heifers and cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 80, 175–190.
| Grouping and social preferences in calves, heifers and cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bowman J, Kochanny C, Demarais S, Leopold B (2000) Evaluation of a GPS collar for white-tailed deer. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28, 141–145.
Cain J, Krausman P, Jansen B, Morgart J (2005) Influence of topography and GPS fix interval on GPS collar performance. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33, 926–934.
| Influence of topography and GPS fix interval on GPS collar performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cochran WW, Lord JRD (1963) A radio-tracking system for wild animals. The Journal of Wildlife Management 27, 9–24.
| A radio-tracking system for wild animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cooke SJ, Hinch SG, Wikelski M, Andrews RD, Kuchel LJ, Wolcott TG, Butler PJ (2004) Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19, 334–343.
| Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dettki H, Lofstrand R, Edenius L (2003) Modeling habitat suitability for moose in coastal northern Sweden: empirical vs process-oriented approaches. Ambio 32, 549–556.
Dussault C, Courtois R, Ouellet J, Huot J (1999) Evaluation of GPS telemetry collar performance for habitat studies in the boreal forest. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27, 965–972.
Dussault C, Courtois R, Ouellet JP, Huot J (2001) Influence of satellite geometry and differential correction on GPS location accuracy. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29, 171–179.
Edenius L (1997) Field test of a GPS location system for moose Alces alces under Scandinavian boreal conditions. Wildlife Biology 3, 39–43.
Fancy S, Pank L, Douglas D, Curby C, Garner G, Amstrup S, Regelin W (1988) Satellite telemetry: a new tool for wildlife research and management. United States Department of the Interior and Wildlife Service Resource Publication 172, 1–61.
Fielitz U, Renner U, Schulte R, Wolfel H (1996) Satellite telemetry on red deer in the Harz – A pilot study. Zeitschrift fur Jagdwissenschaft 42, 1–11.
| Satellite telemetry on red deer in the Harz – A pilot study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Foster D (1993) The position of GPS in wildlife and habitat mapping. Mapping Tomorrow’s Resources 2, 73–80.
Galanti V, Preatoni D, Martinoti A, Wauters L, Tosi G (2006) Space and habitat use of the African elephant in the Tarangire–Manyara ecosystem, Tanzania: implications for conservation. Mammalian Biology 71, 99–114.
| Space and habitat use of the African elephant in the Tarangire–Manyara ecosystem, Tanzania: implications for conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ganskopp D (2001) Manipulating cattle distribution with salt and water in large arid-land pastures: a GPS/GIS assessment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 73, 251–262.
| Manipulating cattle distribution with salt and water in large arid-land pastures: a GPS/GIS assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11434959PubMed |
Ganskopp D, Bohnert D (2009) Landscape nutritional patterns and cattle distribution in rangeland pastures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116, 110–119.
| Landscape nutritional patterns and cattle distribution in rangeland pastures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ganskopp DC, Johnson DD (2007) GPS error in studies addressing animal movements and activities. Rangeland Ecology and Management 60, 350–358.
| GPS error in studies addressing animal movements and activities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Girard I, Ouellet J, Courtois R, Dussault C, Breton L (2002) Effects of sampling effort based on GPS telemetry on home-range size estimations. The Journal of Wildlife Management 66, 1290–1300.
| Effects of sampling effort based on GPS telemetry on home-range size estimations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Graves T, Farley S, Goldstein M, Servheen C (2007) Identification of functional corridors with movement characteristics of brown bears on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska. Landscape Ecology 22, 765–772.
| Identification of functional corridors with movement characteristics of brown bears on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Guo Y, Poulton G, Corke P, Bishop-Hurley GJ, Wark T, Swain DL (2009) Using accelerometer, high sample rate GPS and magnetometer data to develop a cattle movement and behaviour model. Ecological Modelling 220, 2068–2075.
| Using accelerometer, high sample rate GPS and magnetometer data to develop a cattle movement and behaviour model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gustine D, Parker K (2008) Variation in the seasonal selection of resources by woodland caribou in northern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 86, 812–825.
| Variation in the seasonal selection of resources by woodland caribou in northern British Columbia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gustine D, Parker K, Lay R, Gillingham M, Heard D (2006) Interpreting resource selection at different scales for woodland caribou in winter. The Journal of Wildlife Management 70, 1601–1614.
| Interpreting resource selection at different scales for woodland caribou in winter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Handcock RN, Swain DL, Bishop-Hurley GJ, Patison KP, Wark T, Valencia P, Corke P, O’Neill CJ (2009) Monitoring animal behaviour and environmental interactions using wireless sensor networks, GPS collars and satellite remote sensing. Sensors 9, 3586–3603.
| Monitoring animal behaviour and environmental interactions using wireless sensor networks, GPS collars and satellite remote sensing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harrington F, Veitch A (1992) Calving success of woodland caribou exposed to low-level jet fighter overflights. Arctic 45, 213–218.
Hebblewhite M, Haydon D (2010) Distinguishing technology from biology: a critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. Biological Sciences 365, 2303–2312.
| Distinguishing technology from biology: a critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hessle AK (2009) Effects of social learning on foraging behaviour and live weight gain in first-season grazing calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116, 150–155.
| Effects of social learning on foraging behaviour and live weight gain in first-season grazing calves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hobbs NT, Bowden DC (1982) Confidence intervals on food preference indices. The Journal of Wildlife Management 46, 505–507.
| Confidence intervals on food preference indices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulbert I, French J (2001) The accuracy of GPS for wildlife telemetry and habitat mapping. Journal of Applied Ecology 38, 869–878.
| The accuracy of GPS for wildlife telemetry and habitat mapping.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Janeau G, Adrados C, Joachim J, Gendner J, Pepin D (2004) Performance of differential GPS collars in temperate mountain forest. Comptes Rendus Biologies 327, 1143–1149.
| Performance of differential GPS collars in temperate mountain forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15656356PubMed |
Kawamura K (2004) Application of satellite remote sensing and GIS/GPS for sustainable use of inner Mongolia grassland. PhD Thesis. Gifu University, Japan.
Koper N, Manseau M (2009) Generalized estimating equations and generalized linear mixed-effects models for modelling resource selection. Journal of Applied Ecology 46, 590–599.
| Generalized estimating equations and generalized linear mixed-effects models for modelling resource selection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lele S, Keim J (2006) Weighted distributions and estimation of resource selection probability functions. Ecology 87, 3021–3028.
| Weighted distributions and estimation of resource selection probability functions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17249227PubMed |
Loarie S, Aarde R, Pimm S (2009) Fences and artificial water affect African savannah elephant movement patterns. Biological Conservation 142, 3086–3098.
| Fences and artificial water affect African savannah elephant movement patterns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Long R, Kie J, Bowyer R, Hurley M (2009) Resource selection and movements by female mule deer Odocoileus hemionus: effects of reproductive stage. Wildlife Biology 15, 288–298.
| Resource selection and movements by female mule deer Odocoileus hemionus: effects of reproductive stage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moen R, Pastor J, Cohen Y (1997) Accuracy of GPS telemetry collar locations with differential correction. The Journal of Wildlife Management 61, 530–539.
| Accuracy of GPS telemetry collar locations with differential correction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mosnier A, Ouellet J, Courtois R (2008) Black bear adaptation to low productivity in the boreal forest. Ecoscience 15, 485–497.
| Black bear adaptation to low productivity in the boreal forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nams VO (2006) Detecting oriented movement of animals. Animal Behaviour 72, 1197–1203.
| Detecting oriented movement of animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Obbard M, Pond B, Perera A (1998) Preliminary evaluation of GPS collars for analysis of habitat use and activity patterns of black bears. Ursus 10, 209–217.
Otis D (1998) Analysis of the influence of spatial pattern in habitat selection studies. Journal of Agricultural Biological & Environmental Statistics 3, 254–267.
| Analysis of the influence of spatial pattern in habitat selection studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pepin D, Adrados C, Mann C, Janeau G (2004) Assessing real daily distance traveled by ungulates using differential GPS locations. Journal of Mammalogy 85, 774–780.
| Assessing real daily distance traveled by ungulates using differential GPS locations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Putfarken D, Dengler J, Lehmann S, Hardtle W (2008) Site use of grazing cattle and sheep in a large-scale pasture landscape: a GPS/GIS assessment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 111, 54–67.
| Site use of grazing cattle and sheep in a large-scale pasture landscape: a GPS/GIS assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rempel R, Rodgers A (1997) Effects of differential correction on accuracy of a GPS animal location system. The Journal of Wildlife Management 61, 525–530.
| Effects of differential correction on accuracy of a GPS animal location system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rempel R, Rodgers A, Abraham K (1995) Performance of a GPS animal location system under boreal forest canopy. The Journal of Wildlife Management 59, 543–551.
| Performance of a GPS animal location system under boreal forest canopy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rodgers A, Rempel R, Abraham K (1996) A GPS-based telemetry system. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24, 559–566.
Rodgers A, Tomkiewicz S, Lawson E, Stephenson T, Hundertmark K, Wilson P, White B, Rempel R (1998) New technology for moose management: a workshop. Alces 34, 239–244.
Rook AJ, Penning PD (1991) Synchronisation of eating, ruminating and idling activity by grazing sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32, 157–166.
| Synchronisation of eating, ruminating and idling activity by grazing sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rutter SM, Beresford NA, Roberts G (1997) Use of GPS to identify the grazing areas of hill sheep. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 17, 177–188.
| Use of GPS to identify the grazing areas of hill sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schwager M, Anderson DM, Butler Z, Rus D (2007) Robust classification of animal tracking data. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 56, 46–59.
| Robust classification of animal tracking data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stobbs TH (1970) Automatic measurement of grazing time by dairy cows on tropical grass and legume pastures. Tropical Grasslands 4, 237–244.
Stobbs TH, Cowper LJ (1972) Automatic measurement of the jaw movements of dairy cows during grazing and rumination. Tropical Grasslands 6, 107–112.
Swain DL, Bishop-Hurley GJ (2007) Using contact logging devices to explore animal affiliations: quantifying cow–calf interactions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102, 1–11.
| Using contact logging devices to explore animal affiliations: quantifying cow–calf interactions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Swain DL, Bishop-Hurley GJ, Wark T, Butler B, Guo Y (2008a) Understanding herbivore behaviour in rangelands: developing more accurate resource selection functions. In ‘A climate of change in the rangelands’. (Ed. DM Orr) pp. 356–359. (Australian Rangeland Society: Charters Towers, Qld)
Swain DL, Wark T, Bishop-Hurley GJ (2008b) Using high fix rate GPS data to determine the relationships between fix rate, prediction errors and patch selection. Ecological Modelling 212, 273–279.
| Using high fix rate GPS data to determine the relationships between fix rate, prediction errors and patch selection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thomas D, Wilmot M, Alchin M, Masters D (2008) Preliminary indications that Merino sheep graze different areas on cooler days in the southern rangelands of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 889–892.
| Preliminary indications that Merino sheep graze different areas on cooler days in the southern rangelands of Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tomkins NW, O’Reagain PJ, Swain DL, Bishop-Hurley GJ, Charmley E (2009) Determining the effect of stocking rate on the spatial distribution of cattle for the subtropical savannas. The Rangeland Journal 31, 267–276.
| Determining the effect of stocking rate on the spatial distribution of cattle for the subtropical savannas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tucker CJ (1979) Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment 8, 127–150.
| Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Turner L, Udal M, Larson B, Shearer S (2000) Monitoring cattle behavior and pasture use with GPS and GIS. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 80, 405–413.
| Monitoring cattle behavior and pasture use with GPS and GIS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ungar ED, Henkin Z, Gutman M, Dolev A, Genizi A, Ganskopp D (2005) Inference of animal activity from GPS collar data on free-ranging cattle. Rangeland Ecology and Management 58, 256–266.
| Inference of animal activity from GPS collar data on free-ranging cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Valcu M, Kempenaers B (2010) Spatial autocorrelation: an overlooked concept in behavioral ecology. Behavioral Ecology 21, 902–905.
| Spatial autocorrelation: an overlooked concept in behavioral ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wark T, Corke P, Sikka P, Klingbeil L, Ying G, Crossman C, Valencia P, Swain DL, Bishop-Hurley GJ (2007) Transforming agriculture through pervasive wireless sensor networks. IEEE Pervasive Computing/IEEE Computer Society [and] IEEE Communications Society 6, 50–57.
| Transforming agriculture through pervasive wireless sensor networks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wark T, Swain D, Crossman C, Valencia P, Bishop-Hurley GJ, Handcock R (2009) Sensor and actuator networks: protecting environmentally sensitive areas. IEEE Pervasive Computing/IEEE Computer Society [and] IEEE Communications Society 8, 30–36.
| Sensor and actuator networks: protecting environmentally sensitive areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Welch I, Rodgers A, McKinley R (2000) Timber harvest and calving site fidelity of moose in northwestern Ontario. Alces 36, 93–103.
Yasuda T, Arai N (2005) Fine-scale tracking of marine turtles using GPS-argos PTTs. Zoological Science 22, 547–553.
| Fine-scale tracking of marine turtles using GPS-argos PTTs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15930827PubMed |
Zerger A, Viscarra Rossel RA, Swain DL, Wark T, Handcock RN, Doerr VAJ, Bishop-Hurley GJ, Doerr ED, Gibbons PG, Lobsey C (2010) Environmental sensor networks for vegetation, animal and soil sciences. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 12, 303–316.
| Environmental sensor networks for vegetation, animal and soil sciences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhang H-h, Ma J-z (1999) Habitat preference of sables in winter. Zoological Research 20, 355–359.
