Intraspecific variation in biology and ecology of deer: magnitude and causation

References

[1]  Barash DP. In search of behavioral individuality. Hum Nat 1997; 8 153–69.
| In search of behavioral individuality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Stearns SC. The evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity. Bioscience 1989; 39 436–45.
| The evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  Piersma T, Drent J. Phenotypic flexibility and the evolution of organismal design. Trends Ecol Evol 2003; 18 228–33.
| Phenotypic flexibility and the evolution of organismal design.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Nussey DH, Wilson AJ, Brommer JE. The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations. J Evol Biol 2007; 20 831–44.
| The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17465894PubMed |

[5]  West-Eberhard MJ. Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 1989; 20 249–78.
| Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  Flueck WT, Smith-Flueck JM. Intraspecific phenotypic variation in deer: the role of genetic and epigenetic processes. Anim Prod Sci 2011; 51 365–74.
| Intraspecific phenotypic variation in deer: the role of genetic and epigenetic processes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Prosser CL. Physiological variation in animals. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 1955; 30 229–61.
| Physiological variation in animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8]  Nilssen KJ, Sundsfjord JA, Blix AS. Regulation of metabolic rate in Svalbard and Norwegian reindeer. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 1984; 247 R837–41.

[9]  Rosenmann M, Morrison P. Some effects of water deprivation in reindeer. Physiol Zool 1967; 40 134–42.

[10]  Danilkin AA. Capreolus pygargus. Mamm Species 1995; 512 1–7.
|  Capreolus pygargus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Schwartz CC, Hundertmark KJ. Reproductive characteristics of Alaskan moose. J Wildl Manage 1993; 57 454–68.
| Reproductive characteristics of Alaskan moose.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12]  Garcia AJ, Landete-Castillejos TS, Carrion D, Gaspar-Lopez E, Gallego L. Compensatory extension of gestation length with advance of conception in red deer (Cervus elaphus). J Exp Zool 2006; 305A 55–61.
| Compensatory extension of gestation length with advance of conception in red deer (Cervus elaphus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Asher GW. Gestation length in red deer: genetically determined or environmentally controlled? Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 2007; 64 255–60.
| 17491152PubMed |

[14]  Ohnishi N, Minami M, Nishiya R, Yamada K, Nishizuka H, Higuchi H. et al. Reproduction of female sika deer in Japan, with special reference to Kinkazan Island, Northern Japan. In: McCullough DR, Takatsuki S, Kaji K, editors. Sika deer: biology and management of native and introduced populations. Tokyo: Springer; 2009. pp. 101–10.

[15]  Rowell JE, Shipka MP. Variation in gestation length among captive reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus). Theriogenology 2009; 72 190–7.
| Variation in gestation length among captive reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19344943PubMed |

[16]  Poole KG, Serrouya R, Stuart-Smith K. Moose calving strategies in interior montane ecosystems. J Mammal 2007; 88 139–50.
| Moose calving strategies in interior montane ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Gillingham MP, Parker KL. The importance of individual variation in defining habitat selection by moose in northern British Columbia. Alces 2008; 44 7–20.

[18]  Edwards J. Diet shifts in moose due to predator avoidance. Oecologia 1983; 60 185–9.
| Diet shifts in moose due to predator avoidance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  Hernández L, Laundré JW. Foraging in the ‘landscape of fear’ and its implications for habitat use and diet quality of elk Cervus elaphus and bison Bison bison. Wildl Biol 2005; 11 215–20.
| Foraging in the ‘landscape of fear’ and its implications for habitat use and diet quality of elk Cervus elaphus and bison Bison bison.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[20]  Henry BAM. Diet of roe deer in an English conifer forest. J Wildl Manage 1978; 42 937–9.
| Diet of roe deer in an English conifer forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[21]  Jackson JE. The annual diet of the roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in the New Forest, Hampshire, as determined by rumen content analysis. J Zool 1980; 192 71–83.
| The annual diet of the roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in the New Forest, Hampshire, as determined by rumen content analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Hosey GR. Annual foods of the roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in the south of England. J Zool 1981; 194 276–8.
| Annual foods of the roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in the south of England.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  Tixier H, Duncan P. Are European roe deer browsers? A review of variations in the composition of their diets. Rev Ecol 1996; 51 3–17.

[24]  Hofmann RR. Digestive physiology of the deer – their morphophysiological specialisation and adaptation. In: Fennessy PF, Drew KR, editors. Biology of deer production. Royal Society of New Zealand Bulletin 1985; 22: 393–407.

[25]  Hanley TA. A nutritional view of understanding and complexity in the problem of diet selection by deer (Cervidae). Oikos 1997; 79 209–18.
| A nutritional view of understanding and complexity in the problem of diet selection by deer (Cervidae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[26]  Sormo W, Haga E, Gaare E, Langvatn R, Mathiesen SD. Forage chemistry and fermentation chambers in Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus). J Zool 1999; 247 247–56.

[27]  Challies CN. Red deer. In: King CM, editor. The handbook of New Zealand mammals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1990. pp. 436–58.

[28]  Takatsuki S. Geographical variations in food habits of sika deer: the northern grazer vs the southern browser. In: McCullough DR, Takatsuki S, Kaji K, editors. Sika deer: biology and management of native and introduced populations. Tokyo: Springer; 2009. pp. 231–7.

[29]  Linnell JDC, Zachos FE. Status and distribution patterns of European ungulates: genetics, population history and conservation. In: Putman RJ, Apollonio M, Andersen R, editors. Ungulate management in Europe: problems and practices. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 2011, in press.

[30]  Teplitsky C, Mills JA, Alho JS, Yarrall JW, Merila J. Bergmann’s rule and climate change revisited: disentangling environmental and genetic responses in a wild bird population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105 13 492–6.
| Bergmann’s rule and climate change revisited: disentangling environmental and genetic responses in a wild bird population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[31]  Beninde J. Zur Naturgeschichte des Rothirsches. Leipzig, Germany: Verlag Dr Paul Schoeps; 1937.

[32]  Geist V. Deer of the world. Pennsylvania: Stackpole Books; 1998.

[33]  Staines BW, Langbein J, Burkitt TD. Red deer. In: Harris S, Yalden DW, editors. Mammals of the British Isles: Handbook. 4th edn. London: The Mammal Society; 2008. pp. 573–86.

[34]  Skogland T. The effects of density-dependent resource limitations on size of wild reindeer. Oecologia 1983; 60 156–68.
| The effects of density-dependent resource limitations on size of wild reindeer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[35]  Staaland H, Olesen CR. Mineral nutrition and alimentary pools in muskoxen and caribou on the Angujaartorfiup Nunaa range in West Greenland. Rangifer 1999; 19 33–40.

[36]  Leberg PL, Smith MH. Influence of density on growth of white-tailed deer. J Mammal 1993; 74 723–31.
| Influence of density on growth of white-tailed deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[37]  Post E, Langvatn R, Forchhammer MC, Stenseth NC. Environmental variation shapes sexual dimorphism in red deer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96 4467–71.
| Environmental variation shapes sexual dimorphism in red deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10200285PubMed |

[38]  Rue LL. The deer of North America. Crown, New York: Outdoor Life Books; 1978.

[39]  McMahon TA. Allometry and biomechanics: limbbones in adult ungulates. Am Nat 1975; 109 547–63.
| Allometry and biomechanics: limbbones in adult ungulates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[40]  Scott KM. Allometric trends and locomotor adaptations in the Bovidae. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 1985; 179 197–288.

[41]  Lee MMC, Chu PC, Chan HC. Effects of cold on the skeletal growth of albino rats. Am J Anat 1969; 124 239–49.
| Effects of cold on the skeletal growth of albino rats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 5774652PubMed |

[42]  Scott KM. Allometry and habitat-related adaptions in the postcranial skeleton of cervidae. In: Wemmer CM, editor. Biology and management of the Cervidae. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1987. pp. 65–80.

[43]  Holliday TW, Ruff CB. Relative variation in human proximal and distal limb segment lengths. Am J Phys Anthropol 2001; 116 26–33.
| Relative variation in human proximal and distal limb segment lengths.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11536114PubMed |

[44]  Lilje KE, Tardieu C, Fischer MS. Scaling of long bones in ruminants with respect to the scapula. J Zoological Syst Evol Res 2003; 41 118–26.
| Scaling of long bones in ruminants with respect to the scapula.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[45]  Morejohn GV, Dailey CD. The identity and postcranial osteology of Odocoileus lucasi (Hay) 1927. Sierra College Natural History Museum Bulletin 2004; 1 1–54.

[46]  Klein DR, Meldgaard M, Fancy SG. Factors determining leg length in Rangifer tarandus. J Mammal 1987; 68 642–55.
| Factors determining leg length in Rangifer tarandus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[47]  Nieminen M, Helle T. Variations in body measurements of wild and semidomestic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) in Fennoscandia. Ann Zool Fenn 1980; 17 275–83.

[48]  Kuzyk GW, Farnell RS, Dehn MM. Body-size comparisons of alpine- and forest-wintering woodland caribou herds in the Yukon. Can J Zool 1999; 77 1017–24.
| Body-size comparisons of alpine- and forest-wintering woodland caribou herds in the Yukon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[49]  Kojola I, Huitu O, Toppinen K, Heikura K, Heikkinen S, Ronkainen S. Predation on European wild forest reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) by wolves (Canis lupus) in Finland. J Zool 2004; 263 229–35.
| Predation on European wild forest reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) by wolves (Canis lupus) in Finland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[50]  Parker KL, Robbins CT, Hanley TA. Energy expenditures for locomotion by mule deer and elk. J Wildl Manage 1984; 48 474–88.
| Energy expenditures for locomotion by mule deer and elk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[51]  Klein DR. Range-related differences in growth of deer reflected in skeletal ratios. J Mammal 1964; 45 226–35.
| Range-related differences in growth of deer reflected in skeletal ratios.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[52]  Brisbin IL, Lenarz MS. Morphological comparisons of insular and mainland populations of southeastern white-tailed deer. J Mammal 1984; 65 44–50.
| Morphological comparisons of insular and mainland populations of southeastern white-tailed deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[53]  Flueck WT. Relationship between body weight, lipid reserves, and ovulation rate in non-equatorial cervids: a hypothesis. Z Jagdwiss 1994; 40 12–21.

[54]  Ratcliffe PR. Population dynamics of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in Scottish commercial forests. Proc R Soc Edinb 1984; 82B 291–302.

[55]  Albon SD, Mitchell B, Staines BW. Fertility and body weight in female red deer; a density-dependent relationship. J Anim Ecol 1983; 52 969–80.
| Fertility and body weight in female red deer; a density-dependent relationship.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[56]  Albon SD, Mitchell B, Huby BJ, Brown D. Fertility in female red deer (Cervus elaphus): the effects of body composition, age and reproductive status. J Zool 1986; 209 447–60.

[57]  Mitchell B. The reproductive performance of wild Scottish red deer (Cervus elaphus). J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1973; 19 271–85.
| 4522380PubMed |

[58]  Mitchell B, Brown D. The effects of age and body size on fertility in female red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) Proceedings of the Congress of the International Union of Game Biologists 1974; 11 89–98.

[59]  Mitchell B, Staines BW, Welch D. Ecology of red deer: a research review relevant to their management. Cambridge, UK: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology; 1977.

[60]  Thomas DC. The relationship between fertility and fat reserves of Peary caribou. Can J Zool 1982; 60 597–602.
| The relationship between fertility and fat reserves of Peary caribou.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[61]  Saether BE, Andersen R, Hjeljord O, Heim M. Ecological correlates of regional variation in life history of the moose Alces alces. Ecology 1996; 77 1493–500.
| Ecological correlates of regional variation in life history of the moose Alces alces.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[62]  Sand H. Life history patterns in female moose (Alces alces): the relationship between age, body size, fecundity and environmental conditions. Oecologia 1996; 106 212–20.
| Life history patterns in female moose (Alces alces): the relationship between age, body size, fecundity and environmental conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[63]  Saether BE, Heim M. Ecological correlates of individual variation in age at maturity in female moose (Alces alces): the effect of environmental variability. J Anim Ecol 1993; 62 482–9.
| Ecological correlates of individual variation in age at maturity in female moose (Alces alces): the effect of environmental variability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[64]  Cothran EG, Chesser RK, Smith MH, Johns PE. Fat levels in female white-tailed deer during the breeding season and pregnancy. J Mammal 1987; 68 111–8.
| Fat levels in female white-tailed deer during the breeding season and pregnancy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[65]  Ozoga JJ. Maximum fecundity in supplementally-fed northern Michigan white-tailed deer. J Mammal 1987; 68 878–9.
| Maximum fecundity in supplementally-fed northern Michigan white-tailed deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[66]  Hewison AJM. The reproductive performance of roe deer in relation to environmental and genetic factors. PhD Thesis, University of Southampton; 1993.

[67]  Hewison AJM, Gaillard JM. Phenotypic quality and senescence affect different components of reproductive output in roe deer. J Anim Ecol 2001; 70 600–8.
| Phenotypic quality and senescence affect different components of reproductive output in roe deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[68]  Prior R. The roe deer of Cranborne Chase. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1968.

[69]  Hewison AJM. Isozyme variation in roe deer in relation to their population history in Britain. J Zool 1995; 235 279–88.
| Isozyme variation in roe deer in relation to their population history in Britain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[70]  Baker K. An investigation into the population genetic history of the British roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Proceedings of the 9th European Roe Deer Congress, Edinburgh; July 2009.

[71]  Hewison AJM. Evidence for a genetic component of female fecundity in British roe deer from studies of cranial morphometrics. Funct Ecol 1997; 11 508–17.
| Evidence for a genetic component of female fecundity in British roe deer from studies of cranial morphometrics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[72]  Hartl GB, Hewison AJM, Apollonio M, Kurt F, Wiehler J. Genetics of European roe deer. In: Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC, editors. The European roe deer: the biology of success. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press; 1998. pp. 71–90.

[73]  Cothran EG, Chesser RK, Smith MH, Johns PE. Influences of genetic variability and maternal factors on fetal growth in white-tailed deer. Evolution Int J Org Evolution 1983; 37 282–91.
| Influences of genetic variability and maternal factors on fetal growth in white-tailed deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[74]  Chesser RK, Smith MH. Relationship of genetic variation to growth and reproduction in the white-tailed deer. In: Wemmer CM, editor. Biology and management of the Cervidae. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1987. pp. 168–77.

[75]  Clutton Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD. Red deer: behaviour and ecology of two sexes. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press; 1982.

[76]  Staines BW. Factors affecting the seasonal distribution of red deer (Cervus elaphus) at Glen Dye, north-east Scotland. Ann Appl Biol 1977; 87 495–512.
| Factors affecting the seasonal distribution of red deer (Cervus elaphus) at Glen Dye, north-east Scotland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[77]  Langbein J. The ranging behaviour, habitat-use and impact of deer in oak woods and heather moors on Exmoor. Deer 1997; 10 516–21.

[78]  Hinge MDC. Ecology of red and roe deer in a mixed-aged conifer plantation. PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen; 1986.

[79]  Catt DC, Staines BW. Home range use and habitat selection by red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a Sitka spruce plantation as determined by radio-tracking. J Zool 1987; 211 681–93.
| Home range use and habitat selection by red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a Sitka spruce plantation as determined by radio-tracking.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[80]  Wahlström K. The significance of male-male aggression for yearling dispersal in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1994; 35 409–12.
| The significance of male-male aggression for yearling dispersal in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[81]  Vanpé C, Morellet N, Kjellander P, Goulard M, Liberg O, Hewison AJM. Access to mates in a territorial ungulate is determined by the size of a male’s territory, but not by its habitat quality. J Anim Ecol 2009; 78 42–51.
| Access to mates in a territorial ungulate is determined by the size of a male’s territory, but not by its habitat quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18752539PubMed |

[82]  Johnson TH. Habitat and social organisation of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). PhD Thesis, University of Southampton; 1984.

[83]  Putman RJ. The ecology and behaviour of European roe deer: a personal perspective. Plenary paper. In: 7th European Roe Deer Meeting. Jerez de la Frontera, Spain; 2005. pp. 7–26.

[84]  Tufto J, Andersen R, Linnell JDC. Habitat use and ecological correlates of home range size in a small cervid: the roe deer. J Anim Ecol 1996; 65 715–24.
| Habitat use and ecological correlates of home range size in a small cervid: the roe deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[85]  Vincent JP, Bideau E, Hewison AJM, Angibault JM. The influence of increasing density on body weight, kid production, home range and winter grouping in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). J Zool 1995; 236 371–82.
| The influence of increasing density on body weight, kid production, home range and winter grouping in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[86]  Ramanzin M, Zanon D, Sturaro E. Seasonal migration and home range of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in the Italian eastern Alps. Can J Zool 2007; 85 280–9.
| Seasonal migration and home range of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in the Italian eastern Alps.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[87]  Pepin D, Adrados C, Janeau G, Joachim J, Mann C. Individual variation in migratory and exploratory movements and habitat use by adult red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in a mountainous temperate forest. Ecol Res 2008; 23 1005–13.
| Individual variation in migratory and exploratory movements and habitat use by adult red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in a mountainous temperate forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[88]  Meyer DL, Filli F. Summer and winter ranges of red deer hinds Cervus elaphus in the Swiss National park. Nationalpark-Forschung Schweiz 2006; 93 79–103.

[89]  Watson A, Staines BW. Differences in the quality of wintering areas used by male and female red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Aberdeenshire. J Zool 1978; 186 544–50.

[90]  Tierson WC, Mattfeld GF, Sage RW, Behrend DF. Seasonal movements and home ranges of white-tailed deer in the Adirondacks. J Wildl Manage 1985; 49 760–9.
| Seasonal movements and home ranges of white-tailed deer in the Adirondacks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[91]  Sakuragi M, Igota H, Uno H, Kaji K. Benefit of migration in a female sika deer population in eastern Hokkaido, Japan. Ecol Res 2003; 18 347–54.
| Benefit of migration in a female sika deer population in eastern Hokkaido, Japan.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[92]  Pulliainen E. Occurrence and spread of the roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) in eastern Fennoscandia since 1970. Memoranda Societas Faua Flora Fennica 1980; 56 28–32.

[93]  Danilkin AA. Behavioural ecology of Siberian and European roe deer. London: Chapman and Hall; 1996.

[94]  Sokolov VE, Danilkin AA, Minayev AN. Home ranges of the European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) in the east of its area. Reports of the USSR Academy of Sciences 1986; 291 1267–71. [In Russian]

[95]  Rakov NV. Distribution and numbers of the roe deer in the Amur area. In: Game animals. Moscow. Rosselkhozizdat Publishers; 1965. pp. 93–107. [In Russian]

[96]  Kucherenko SP. Hoofed mammals of the Amur-Ussuri region. In: Bromley GF, editor. The fauna and wildlife management of the Far East. Vladivostok; 1976. pp. 97–125. [In Russian]

[97]  Bromley GF, Kucherenko SP. Ungulates of the southern Far East. Moscow: Nauka Publishers; 1983. [In Russian]

[98]  Barancheyev LM. Mass non-periodic migrations of roe deer in the Amursk region. In: Pokrovski VS, editor. Migrations of animals. Moscow: USSR Academy of Science; 1962. pp. 26–36. [In Russian]

[99]  Berger J. The last mile: how to sustain long-distance migration in mammals. Conserv Biol 2004; 18 320–31.
| The last mile: how to sustain long-distance migration in mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[100]  Hjeljord O. Dispersal and migration in northern forest deer – are there unifying concepts? Alces 2001; 37 353–70.

[101]  Igota H, Sakuragi M, Uno H, Kaji K, Kaneko M, Akamatsu R, et al Seasonal migration patterns of female sika deer in eastern Hokkaido, Japan. Ecol Res 2004; 19 169–78.
| Seasonal migration patterns of female sika deer in eastern Hokkaido, Japan.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[102]  Kokko H, Lopez-Sepulcre A. From individual dispersal to species ranges: perspectives for a changing world. Science 2006; 313 789–91.
| From individual dispersal to species ranges: perspectives for a changing world.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16902127PubMed |

[103]  Adams AW. Migration. In: Toweill DE, Ward Thomas J, editors. Elk of North America: ecology and management. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1982. pp. 301–21.

[104]  McCullough DR. Long range movements of large terrestrial mammals. Contrib Mar Sci 1985; 27 444–65.

[105]  Wasley T. Nevada’s Mule deer population dynamics: issues and influences. Nevada Department of Wildlife Biological Bulletin 2004; 14 1–70.

[106]  Sawyer H, Lindzey F. Mule deer and pronghorn migration in western Wyoming. Wildl Soc Bull 2005; 33 1266–73.
| Mule deer and pronghorn migration in western Wyoming.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[107]  Brinkman TJ, Deperno CS, Jenks JA, Haroldson BS, Osborn RG. Movement of female white-tailed deer: effects of climate and intensive row-crop agriculture. J Wildl Manage 2005; 69 1099–111.
| Movement of female white-tailed deer: effects of climate and intensive row-crop agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[108]  Leopold AS, Cain SA, Cottam C, Gabrielson IN, Kimball TL. Wildlife management in the National Parks. In: Trefethen JB, editor. Transactions of the 28th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference. Washington, DC: Wildlife Management Institute; 1963. pp. 29–45.

[109]  Geist V. Behaviour: adaptive strategies in Mule deer. In: Wallmo OC, editor. Mule and black-tailed deer of North America. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press; 1981. pp. 157–223.

[110]  Schmidt K. Winter ecology of nonmigratory Alpine red deer. Oecologia 1993; 95 226–33.
| Winter ecology of nonmigratory Alpine red deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[111]  Schmidt K. Alpine red deer – the feeding dilemma. Deer 2007; 14 38–40.

[112]  Hurst JE, Porter WF. Evaluation of shifts in white-tailed deer winter yards in the Adirondack region of New York. J Wildl Manage 2008; 72 367–75.
| Evaluation of shifts in white-tailed deer winter yards in the Adirondack region of New York.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[113]  Nelson ME, Mech LD. Demes within a northeastern Minnesota deer population. In: Chepko-Sade BD, Halpin ZT, editors. Mammalian dispersal patterns. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press; 1987. pp. 27–39.

[114]  Mysterud A. Seasonal migration pattern and home range of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in an altitudinal gradient in southern Norway. J Zool 1999; 247 479–86.
| Seasonal migration pattern and home range of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in an altitudinal gradient in southern Norway.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[115]  Hinkes MT, Collins GH, Van Daele LJ, Kovach SD, Aderman AR, Woolington JD, et al Influence of population growth on caribou herd identity, calving ground fidelity, and behaviour. J Wildl Manage 2005; 69 1147–62.
| Influence of population growth on caribou herd identity, calving ground fidelity, and behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[116]  Haller H. Der Rothirsch im Schweizerischen Nationalpark und dessen Umgebung. Eine alpine Population von Cervus elaphus zeitlich und räumlich dokumentiert. Nationalpark-Forschung Schweiz 2002; 91 1–144.

[117]  Heyer E, Sibert A, Austerlitz F. Cultural transmission of fitness: genes take the fast lane. Trends Genet 2005; 21 234–9.
| Cultural transmission of fitness: genes take the fast lane.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15797619PubMed |

[118]  Nelson ME, Mech LD. Deer social organization and wolf predation in northeastern Minnesota. Wildl Monogr 1981; 77 1–53.

[119]  Nelson ME. Development of migratory behaviour in northern white-tailed deer. Can J Zool 1998; 76 426–32.
| Development of migratory behaviour in northern white-tailed deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[120]  Nixon CM, Hansen LP, Brewer PA, Chelsvig JE. Ecology of white-tailed deer in an intensively farmed region of Illinois. Wildl Monogr 1991; 118 3–77.

[121]  Ruckstuhl KE, Neuhaus P. Sexual segregation in vertebrates: ecology of the two sexes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

[122]  Main MB, Weckerly FW, Bleich VC. Sexual segregation in ungulates: new directions for research. J Mammal 1996; 77 449–61.
| Sexual segregation in ungulates: new directions for research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[123]  Bon R, Campan R. Unexplained sexual segregation in polygamous ungulates: a defense of an ontogenetic approach. Behav Processes 1996; 38 131–54.
| Unexplained sexual segregation in polygamous ungulates: a defense of an ontogenetic approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[124]  Bonenfant C, Mysterud A, Langvatn R, Loe LE, Gaillard JM, Klein F, et al Multiple causes of sexual segregation in European red deer: enlightenments from varying breeding phenology at high and low latitude. Proc Biol Sci 2004; 271 883–92.
| Multiple causes of sexual segregation in European red deer: enlightenments from varying breeding phenology at high and low latitude.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15255042PubMed |

[125]  Yanushko PA. The way of life of the Crimean red deer and their influence on the natural cycle. Transactions of the Moscow Society of Naturalists 1957; 35 39–52.

[126]  Flueck WT. Spatio-temporal movements among red deer males, Cervus elaphus, introduced to Patagonia. In: Pohlmeyer K, editor. Extended Abstracts, XXVIIth Congress of the International Union of Game Biologists, Hannover. Hamburg: DSV-Verlag; 2005. pp. 330–32.

[127]  Thirgood SJ. Ecological factors influencing sexual segregation and group size in fallow deer (Dama dama). J Zool 1996; 239 783–97.
| Ecological factors influencing sexual segregation and group size in fallow deer (Dama dama).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[128]  Ciuti S, Davini S, Luccarini S, Apollonio M. Could the predation risk hypothesis explain large-scale spatial sexual segregation in fallow deer (Dama dama)? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2004; 56 552–64.
| Could the predation risk hypothesis explain large-scale spatial sexual segregation in fallow deer (Dama dama)?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[129]  Apollonio M, Ciuti S, Luccarini S. Long-term influence of human presence on spatial sexual segregation in fallow deer (Dama dama). J Mammal 2005; 86 937–46.
| Long-term influence of human presence on spatial sexual segregation in fallow deer (Dama dama).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[130]  Focardi S, Pecchioli E. Social cohesion and foraging decrease with group size in fallow deer (Dama dama). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2005; 59 84–91.
| Social cohesion and foraging decrease with group size in fallow deer (Dama dama).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[131]  Langbein J, Chapman NG, Putman RJ. Fallow deer, Dama dama. In: Harris S, Yalden DW, editors. Mammals of the British Isles; Handbook. 4th edn. London: The Mammal Society; 2008. pp. 595–604.

[132]  Thirgood SJ, Langbein J, Putman RJ. Intraspecific variation in ungulate mating strategies: the case of the flexible fallow deer. Adv Stud Behav 1999; 28 333–61.
| Intraspecific variation in ungulate mating strategies: the case of the flexible fallow deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[133]  Hirth DH. Social behaviour of white-tailed deer in relation to habitat. Wildl Monogr 1977; 53 1–55.

[134]  Richardson KE, Weckerly FW. Intersexual social behaviour of urban white-tailed deer and its evolutionary implications. Can J Zool 2007; 85 759–66.
| Intersexual social behaviour of urban white-tailed deer and its evolutionary implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[135]  Bowyer RT, McCullough DR, Belovsky GE. Causes and consequences of sociality in mule deer. Alces 2001; 37 371–402.

[136]  Kurt F. Das Sozialverhalten des Rehes (Capreolus capreolus). Hamburg: Paul Parey Verlag; 1968.

[137]  Villerette N, Pays O, Delorme D, Gerard JF, Marchal C. Do the sexes tend to segregate in roe deer in agricultural environments? An analysis of group composition. Can J Zool 2006; 84 787–96.
| Do the sexes tend to segregate in roe deer in agricultural environments? An analysis of group composition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[138]  Povilitis AJ. Social organization and mating strategy of the huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus). J Mammal 1983; 64 156–8.
| Social organization and mating strategy of the huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[139]  Povilitis A. Social behaviour of the huemul (Hippocamlus bisulcus) during the breeding season. Z Tierpsychol 1985; 68 261–86.
| Social behaviour of the huemul (Hippocamlus bisulcus) during the breeding season.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[140]  Frid A. Huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) sociality at a periglacial site: sexual aggregation and habitat effects on group size. Can J Zool 1999; 77 1083–91.
| Huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) sociality at a periglacial site: sexual aggregation and habitat effects on group size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[141]  Serret A, Borghiani F. Registros de avistajes y comportamiento de huemules en el seno Moyano, Parque Nacional Los Glaciares. Boletin Técnico No. 35. Buenos Aires: Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina; 1997. pp. 1–24.

[142]  Wensing D. Conservation study of the Huemul (Hippocamelus bisculcus) within the Bernardo O’Higgins National Park, Chile. Report NWS-I-2005–6. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University; 2005.

[143]  Frid A. Observations on habitat use and social organization of a huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) coastal population in Chile. Biol Conserv 1994; 67 13–9.
| Observations on habitat use and social organization of a huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) coastal population in Chile.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[144]  Peek JM, LeResche RE, Stevens DR. Dynamics of moose aggregations in Alaska, Minnesota, and Montana. J Mammal 1974; 55 126–37.
| Dynamics of moose aggregations in Alaska, Minnesota, and Montana.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[145]  Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD. Red deer in the Highlands. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1989.

[146]  Jarman PJ. The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 1974; 48 215–66.
| The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[147]  Putman RJ. The natural history of deer. Beckenham, UK: Christopher Helm; 1988.

[148]  Lagory KE. Habitat, group size and behavior of white-tailed deer. Behaviour 1986; 98 168–79.
| Habitat, group size and behavior of white-tailed deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[149]  Bresinski W. Grouping tendencies in roe deer under agrocenosis conditions. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 1982; 27 427–47.

[150]  Kaluzinski J. Dynamics and structure of a field roe deer population. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 1982; 27 385–408.

[151]  Maublanc ML, Bideau E, Vincent JP. Flexibilite de l’organisation sociale du chevreuil en fonction des caracteristiques de l’environnement. Rev Ecol 1987; 42 109–33.

[152]  Jepsen JU, Topping CJ. Modelling roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a gradient of forest fragmentation: behavioural plasticity and choice of cover. Can J Zool 2004; 82 1528–41.
| Modelling roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a gradient of forest fragmentation: behavioural plasticity and choice of cover.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[153]  Zejda J. Field grouping of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a lowland region. Folia Zool (Brno) 1978; 27 111–22.

[154]  Putman RJ. Flexibility of social organisation and reproductive strategy in deer. Deer 1993; 9 23–8.

[155]  Barrette C. The size of axis deer fluid groups in Wilpattu National Park, Sri Lanka. Mammalia 1991; 55 207–20.
| The size of axis deer fluid groups in Wilpattu National Park, Sri Lanka.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[156]  Raman TRS. Factors influencing seasonal and monthly changes in the group size of chital or axis deer in southern India. J Biosci 1997; 22 203–18.
| Factors influencing seasonal and monthly changes in the group size of chital or axis deer in southern India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[157]  Berger J, Cunningham C. Size-related effects on search times in North American grassland female ungulates. Ecology 1988; 69 177–83.
| Size-related effects on search times in North American grassland female ungulates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[158]  Smith-Flueck JM, Flueck WT, Jacobsen NK. Migratory patterns of black-tailed deer on a spring staging area: bias of herd composition estimates? Transactions of the Western Section of the Wildlife Society 1989; 25 81–4.

[159]  Lingle S. Group composition and cohesion in sympatric white-tailed deer and mule deer. Can J Zool 2003; 81 1119–30.
| Group composition and cohesion in sympatric white-tailed deer and mule deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[160]  Merkt JR. Reproductive seasonality and grouping patterns of the north Andean deer or taruca (Hippocamelus antisensis) in southern Peru. In: Wemmer CM, editor. Biology and management of the Cervidae. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1987. pp. 388–400.

[161]  Smith-Flueck J. The current situation of the Patagonian huemul. In: Díaz N, Smith-Flueck J, editors. The Patagonian huemul: a mysterious deer on the brink of extinction. Buenos Aires: LOLA; 2000. pp. 67–146.

[162]  Jiménez J, Guineo G, Corti P, Smith JA, Flueck W, Vila A., et al. Hippocamelus bisulcus. In: IUCN Red List of threatened species. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN; 2008. Available online at: http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/10054 [verified 9 February 2011]

[163]  Franklin WL, Dole M, Mossman AS. Social organization and home range of Roosevelt elk. J Mammal 1975; 56 102–18.
| Social organization and home range of Roosevelt elk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[164]  Bobek B, Kosobucka M, Perzanowski K, Rebisz S. Seasonal changes of the group size and sex ratio in various populations of red deer in southern Poland. In: Bobek B, Perzanowski K, Regelin WL, editors. Global trends in wildlife management. Vol. 2. Krakow, Poland: Swiat Press; 1992. pp. 185–92.

[165]  Gerard JF, Maublanc M-L, Loisel P, Marchal C, Bideau E. Herd size in large herbivores: encoded in the individual or emergent? Biol Bull 2002; 202 275–82.
| Herd size in large herbivores: encoded in the individual or emergent?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12087000PubMed |

[166]  Caughley G. Social organization and daily activity of the red kangaroo and the grey kangaroo. J Mammal 1964; 45 429–36.
| Social organization and daily activity of the red kangaroo and the grey kangaroo.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[167]  Ratcliffe PR. The management of red deer in the commercial forests of Scotland related to population dynamics and habitat changes. PhD Thesis, University of London; 1987.

[168]  Pays O, Benhamou S, Helder R, Gerard JF. The dynamics of group formation in large mammalian herbivores: an analysis in the European roe deer. Anim Behav 2007; 74 1429–41.
| The dynamics of group formation in large mammalian herbivores: an analysis in the European roe deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[169]  Horwood MT, Masters EH. Sika deer. Fordingbridge, UK: The British Deer Society; 1981.

[170]  Putman RJ, Mann JCE. Social organisation and behaviour of British sika deer in contrasting environments. Deer 1990; 8 90–4.

[171]  Bützler W. Kampf- und Paarungsverhalten, soziale Rangordnung und Aktivitaetsperiodik beim Rothirsch (Cervus elaphus L.). Berlin, Germany: Verlag Paul Parey; 1974.

[172]  Rubenstein DI. On the evolution of alternative mating strategies. In: Staddon J, editor. Limits to action: the allocation of individual behaviour. New York: Academic Press; 1980. pp. 1–44.

[173]  Clutton-Brock TH. Mammalian mating systems. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1989; 236 339–72.
| Mammalian mating systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 2567517PubMed |

[174]  Lott DF. Intraspecific variation in the social systems of wild vertebrates. Behaviour 1984; 88 266–325.
| Intraspecific variation in the social systems of wild vertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[175]  Lott DF. Intraspecific variation in the social systems of wild vertebrates. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1991.

[176]  Emlen ST, Oring LW. Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 1977; 197 215–23.
| Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 327542PubMed |

[177]  Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH. Mammals, resources and reproductive strategies. Nature 1978; 273 191–5.
| Mammals, resources and reproductive strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 347308PubMed |

[178]  Wrangham RW, Rubenstein DA. Social evolution in birds and mammals. In: Rubenstein DA, Wrangham RW, editors. Ecological aspects of social evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1986. pp. 452–70.

[179]  Davies NB. Mating systems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB, editors. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. 3rd edn. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1991. pp. 263–94.

[180]  DeYoung RW, Demarais S, Gonzales RA, Honeycutt RL, Gee KL. Multiple paternity in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) revealed by DNA microsatellite. J Mammal 2002; 83 884–92.
| Multiple paternity in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) revealed by DNA microsatellite.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[181]  Lingle S, Pellis SM. Fight or flight? Antipredator behaviour and the escalation of coyote encounters with deer. Oecologia 2002; 131 154–64.
| Fight or flight? Antipredator behaviour and the escalation of coyote encounters with deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[182]  Byers JA, Kitchen DW. Mating system shift in a pronghorn population. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1988; 22 355–60.

[183]  Gosling LM. The alternative mating strategies of male topi. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1991; 29 107–19.
| The alternative mating strategies of male topi.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[184]  Deutsch JC. Lekking by default: female habitat preferences and male strategies in Uganda kob. J Anim Ecol 1994; 63 101–15.
| Lekking by default: female habitat preferences and male strategies in Uganda kob.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[185]  Nefdt RJC, Thirgood SJ. Lekking, resource defence and harassment in two subspecies of lechwe antelope. Behav Ecol 1997; 8 1–9.
| Lekking, resource defence and harassment in two subspecies of lechwe antelope.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[186]  Langbein J, Thirgood SJ. Variation in mating systems of fallow deer in relation to ecology. Ethology 1989; 83 195–214.
| Variation in mating systems of fallow deer in relation to ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[187]  Thirgood SJ. Alternative mating strategies and reproductive success in fallow deer. Behaviour 1991; 116 1–10.
| Alternative mating strategies and reproductive success in fallow deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[188]  Cadman WA. The fallow deer. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 1966.

[189]  Heideman G. Zur Biologie de Damwildes. Hamburg: Verlag Paul Parey; 1973.

[190]  Espmark Y, Brunner W. Observations on the rutting behaviour of fallow deer. Säugetierkundliche Mitteilungen 1974; 22 135–42.

[191]  Chapman DI, Chapman NG. Fallow deer: their history, distribution and biology. Lavenham, Suffolk: Terence Dalton; 1975.

[192]  Schaal A. Variation of mating system in fallow deer (Dama dama). Abstract, 19th International Congress of Ethology, Toulouse; 1985.

[193]  Schaal A. Le polymorphisme du comportement reproducteur chez le daim d’Europe (Dama d. dama L.). PhD Thesis, Universite Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg; 1987.

[194]  Pemberton JM, Balmford AP. Lekking in fallow deer. J Zool 1987; 213 762–5.
| Lekking in fallow deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[195]  Clutton Brock TH, Green D, Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M, Albon SD. Passing the buck: resource defence, lek breeding and mate choice in fallow deer. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1988; 23 281–96.
| Passing the buck: resource defence, lek breeding and mate choice in fallow deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[196]  Clutton-Brock TH, Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M, Robertson A. Mate choice on fallow deer leks. Nature 1989; 340 463–5.
| Mate choice on fallow deer leks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 2755506PubMed |

[197]  Apollonio M, Festa-Bianchet M, Mari F, Mattioli S, Sarno B. To lek or not to lek: mating strategies of male fallow deer. Behav Ecol 1992; 3 25–31.
| To lek or not to lek: mating strategies of male fallow deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[198]  Alvarez F, Braza F, San Jose C. Coexistence of territoriality and harem defense in a rutting fallow deer population. J Mammal 1990; 71 692–5.
| Coexistence of territoriality and harem defense in a rutting fallow deer population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[199]  Moore NP, Kelly PF, Cahill JP, Hayden TJ. Mating strategies and mating success of fallow bucks in a non-lekking population. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1995; 36 91–100.
| Mating strategies and mating success of fallow bucks in a non-lekking population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[200]  Putman RJ. Sika deer. London: British Deer Society/Mammal Society; 2000.

[201]  Larner JB. Sika deer damage to mature woodlands of southwestern Ireland. In: Peterle TJ, editor. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Game Biologists. Atlanta: Wildlife Management Institute; 1977. pp. 192–202.

[202]  Carter NA. Bole scoring by sika deer (Cervus nippon) in England. Deer 1984; 6 77–8.

[203]  Bartos L, Sustr P, Janovsky P, Bertagnoli J. Sika deer (Cervus nippon) lekking in a free-ranging population in Northern Austria. Folia Zool (Brno) 2003; 52 1–10.

[204]  Bartos L, Herrmann H, Siler J, Losos S, Mikes J. Variation of mating systems of introduced sika deer. Rev Ecol 1998; 52 1–10.

[205]  Carranza J, Alvarez F, Redondo T. Territoriality as a mating strategy in red deer. Anim Behav 1990; 40 79–88.
| Territoriality as a mating strategy in red deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[206]  Carranza J, Garcia-Munoz A, Dios Vargas J. Experimental shifting from harem defence to territoriality in rutting red deer. Anim Behav 1995; 49 551–4.
| Experimental shifting from harem defence to territoriality in rutting red deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[207]  Smith-Flueck JM, Flueck WT. Defense of territories by rutting red deer stags, Cervus elaphus, in Patagonia, Argentina. In: Bartos L, Dusek A, Kotrba R, Bartosova J, editors. Advances in deer biology. Prague: Research Institute of Animal Production; 2006. pp. 174–8.

[208]  Liberg O, Johanssen A, Wahlstrom K, Axen AH. Mating tactics and success in male roe deer – effects of age and territory. In: Johansson A, editor. Territorial dynamics and marking behaviour in male roe deer. PhD Thesis, University of Stockholm; 1996.

[209]  Liberg O, Johansson A, Andersen R, Linnell JDC. Mating system, mating tactics and the function of male territoriality in roe deer. In: Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC, editors. The European roe deer: the biology of success. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press; 1998. pp. 221–56.

[210]  Andersen R, Linnell JDC, Aanes R. Radyr i kulturlandskapet. Sluttrapport. NINA Fagrapport 1995; 10 1–80.

[211]  Lovari S, Bartolommei P, Meschi F, Pezzo F. Going out to mate: excursion behaviour of female roe deer. Ethology 2008; 114 886–96.
| Going out to mate: excursion behaviour of female roe deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[212]  Richard E, Morellet N, Cargnelutti B, Angibault JM, Vanpe C, Hewison AJM. Ranging behaviour and excursions of female roe deer during the rut. Behav Processes 2008; 79 28–35.
| Ranging behaviour and excursions of female roe deer during the rut.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18555619PubMed |

[213]  Ellenberg H. Zur Populationsökologie des Rehes (Capreolus capreolus) in Mitteleuropa. Spixiana 1978; 2 (Suppl.) 211

[214]  Kurt F. Das Reh in der Kulturlandschaft. Berlin: Paul Parey; 1991.

[215]  Vanpé C, Kjellander P, Gaillard JM, Cosson JF, Galan M, Hewison AJM. Multiple paternity occurs with low frequency in the territorial roe deer, Capreolus capreolus. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 2009b; 97 128–39.
| Multiple paternity occurs with low frequency in the territorial roe deer, Capreolus capreolus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[216]  DeYoung RW, Demarais S, Gee KL, Honeycutt RL, Hellickson MW, Gonzales RA. Molecular evaluation of the white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) mating system. J Mammal 2009; 90 946–53.
| Molecular evaluation of the white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) mating system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[217]  Endo A, Doi T. Multiple copulations and post-copulatory guarding in a free-living population of Sika deer (Cervus nippon). Ethology 2002; 108 739–47.
| Multiple copulations and post-copulatory guarding in a free-living population of Sika deer (Cervus nippon).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[218]  Corti P. Organisation sociale, dynamique de population, et conservation du cerf huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) dans la Patagonie du Chili. Dissertation, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada; 2008.

[219]  Guineo P, Guineo Garay R, Garay G. Conociendo al huemul de Torres del Paine. Punta Arenas, Chile: La Prensa Austral; 2008.

[220]  Ellers J, Stuefer JF. Frontiers in phenotypic plasticity research: new questions about mechanisms, induced responses and ecological impacts. Evol Ecol 2010; 24 523–6.
| Frontiers in phenotypic plasticity research: new questions about mechanisms, induced responses and ecological impacts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[221]  Maher CR. Activity budget and mating system of male pronghorn antelope at Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada. J Mammal 1991; 72 739–44.
| Activity budget and mating system of male pronghorn antelope at Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[222]  Stearns SC. The evolution of life histories. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1992.

[223]  Komers PE. Behavioural plasticity in variable environments. Can J Zool 1997; 75 161–9.
| Behavioural plasticity in variable environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[224]  Givnish TJ. Ecological constraints on the evolution of plasticity in plants. Evol Ecol 2002; 16 213–42.
| Ecological constraints on the evolution of plasticity in plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |