Validating economic and environmental sustainability of a short-term summer forage legume in dryland wheat cropping systems in south-west Queensland
D. K. Singh A C , R. Strahan A , N. Christodoulou A and S. Cawley BA Primary Industries and Fisheries, Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
B Primary Industries and Fisheries, Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, PO Box 61, Miles, Qld 4461, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: dhananjay.singh@dpi.qld.gov.au
Animal Production Science 49(10) 816-825 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN09016
Submitted: 23 January 2009 Accepted: 6 May 2009 Published: 16 September 2009
Abstract
The present study set out to test the hypothesis through field and simulation studies that the incorporation of short-term summer legumes, particularly annual legume lablab (Lablab purpureus cv. Highworth), in a fallow–wheat cropping system will improve the overall economic and environmental benefits in south-west Queensland. Replicated, large plot experiments were established at five commercial properties by using their machineries, and two smaller plot experiments were established at two intensively researched sites (Roma and St George). A detailed study on various other biennial and perennial summer forage legumes in rotation with wheat and influenced by phosphorus (P) supply (10 and 40 kg P/ha) was also carried out at the two research sites. The other legumes were lucerne (Medicago sativa), butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea) and burgundy bean (Macroptilium bracteatum). After legumes, spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) was sown into the legume stubble. The annual lablab produced the highest forage yield, whereas germination, establishment and production of other biennial and perennial legumes were poor, particularly in the red soil at St George. At the commercial sites, only lablab–wheat rotations were experimented, with an increased supply of P in subsurface soil (20 kg P/ha). The lablab grown at the commercial sites yielded between 3 and 6 t/ha forage yield over 2–3 month periods, whereas the following wheat crop with no applied fertiliser yielded between 0.5 to 2.5 t/ha. The wheat following lablab yielded 30% less, on average, than the wheat in a fallow plot, and the profitability of wheat following lablab was slightly higher than that of the wheat following fallow because of greater costs associated with fallow management. The profitability of the lablab–wheat phase was determined after accounting for the input costs and additional costs associated with the management of fallow and in-crop herbicide applications for a fallow–wheat system. The economic and environmental benefits of forage lablab and wheat cropping were also assessed through simulations over a long-term climatic pattern by using economic (PreCAPS) and biophysical (Agricultural Production Systems Simulation, APSIM) decision support models. Analysis of the long-term rainfall pattern (70% in summer and 30% in winter) and simulation studies indicated that ~50% time a wheat crop would not be planted or would fail to produce a profitable crop (grain yield less than 1 t/ha) because of less and unreliable rainfall in winter. Whereas forage lablab in summer would produce a profitable crop, with a forage yield of more than 3 t/ha, ~90% times. Only 14 wheat crops (of 26 growing seasons, i.e. 54%) were profitable, compared with 22 forage lablab (of 25 seasons, i.e. 90%). An opportunistic double-cropping of lablab in summer and wheat in winter is also viable and profitable in 50% of the years. Simulation studies also indicated that an opportunistic lablab–wheat cropping can reduce the potential runoff + drainage by more than 40% in the Roma region, leading to improved economic and environmental benefits.
Additional keywords: deep placement, phosphorus, short-term summer forage legume, sustainability, wheat.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge financial support from GRDC and Queensland Government for the Western Farming Systems and Maranoa–Balonne Grain & Graze Projects in this region. We also acknowledge valuable time and suggestions given by Dr Ron Hacker and reviewers for improving the quality of the manuscript.
Alston AM
(1980) Response of wheat to deep placement of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilisers on a soil high in phosphorus in the surface layer. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 31, 13–24.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Armstrong RD,
McCosker KJ,
Millar G,
Kuskopf B,
Johnson S,
Walsh K,
Probert ME, Standley J
(1999) Legume and opportunity cropping systems in central Queensland. 2. Effect of legumes on following crops. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 925–936.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bell LW,
Robertson MJ,
Revell DK,
Lilley JM, Moore A
(2008) Approaches for assessing some attributes of feed-base systems in mixed farming enterprises. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 789–798.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cheruiyot EK,
Mumera LM,
Nakhone LN, Mwonga SM
(2003) Effect of legume-managed fallow on weeds and soil nitrogen in following maize (Zea mays L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crops in the Rift Valley highlands of Kenya. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 597–604.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dalal RC,
Strong WM,
Weston EJ,
Cooper JE,
Lehane KJ,
King AJ, Chicken CJ
(1995) Sustaining productivity of a vertisol at Warral, Queensland, with fertilisers, no-till or legumes. 1. Organic matter status. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35, 903–913.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Dear BS, Ewing MA
(2008) The search for new pasture plants to achieve more sustainable production systems in southern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 387–396.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fengrui L,
Songling Z, Geballe GT
(2000) Water use patterns and agronomic performance for some cropping systems with and without fallow crops in a semiarid environment of northwest China. Agriculture, Economics and Environment 79, 129–142.
| Crossref |
Freebairn DM,
Loch RJ, Cogle AL
(1993) Tillage methods and soil and water conservation in Australia. Soil & Tillage Research 27, 303–325.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hatfield JL,
Thomas JS, Prueger JH
(2001) Managing soils to achieve greater water use efficiency: a review. Agronomy Journal 93, 271–280.
Howden SM,
Crimp SJ, Stokes CJ
(2008) Climate change and Australian livestock systems: impacts, research and policy issues. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 780–788.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jarvis RJ, Bolland MDA
(1991) Lupin grain yields and fertiliser effectiveness are increased by banding superphosphate below the seed. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 31, 357–366.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Keating BA,
Carberry PS,
Hammer GL,
Probert ME, Robertson MJ , et al.
(2003) An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 267–288.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lloyd DL,
Smith KP,
Clarkson NM,
Weston EJ, Johnson B
(1991) Sustaining multiple production systems. 3. Ley pastures in the subtropics. Tropical Grasslands 25, 181–188.
Nuruzzaman Z,
Lambers H,
Bolland MDA, Veneklass EJ
(2005) Phosphorus uptake by grain legumes and subsequently grown wheat at different levels of residual phosphorus fertiliser. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 1041–1047.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Pengelly BC, Conway MJ
(2000) Pastures on cropping soils: which tropical pasture legume to use? Tropical Grasslands 34, 162–168.
Singh DK,
Sale PWG, Routley RA
(2005) Increasing phosphorus supply in subsurface soil in northern Australia: rationale for deep placement and the effects with various crops. Plant and Soil 269, 35–44.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Singh DK,
McGuckian N,
Routley RA,
Thomas GA,
Dalal RC,
Dang YP,
Hall TJ,
Strahan R,
Christodoulou N,
Cawley S, Ward L
(2009) Poor adoption of ley-pastures in south-west Queensland: biophysical, economic and social constraints. Animal Production Science 49, 894–906.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Teasdale JR,
Beste CE, Potts WE
(1991) Response of weeds to tillage and cover crop residue. Weed Science 39, 195–199.
Zhang L,
Dawes WR,
Hatton TJ,
Hume IH,
O’Connell MG,
Mitchell DC,
Millthorpe PL, Yee M
(1999) Estimating episodic recharge under different crop/pasture rotations in the Mallee region. Part 2. Recharge control by agronomic practices. Agricultural Water Management 42, 237–249.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
