Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Co-digestion of pig slurry with an algae-rich municipal wastewater sludge

N. N. Cheng A B and H. J. Fallowfield A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042.

B Corresponding author. Email: ryan.cheng@flinders.edu.au

Animal Production Science 55(12) 1454-1454 https://doi.org/10.1071/ANv55n12Ab092
Published: 11 November 2015

Increasingly, covered anaerobic lagoons are being considered by the Australian pork industry to manage greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and recover methane (CH4) for energy production. Algal biomass produced in high-rate algal ponds (HRAP) treating piggery wastewater removes CO2, contributing to GHG mitigation, and is an additional source of biomass energy that could be released via co-digestion with pig slurry (Buchanan et al. 2013). The objective of this study was to investigate an optimum feed ratio for co-digestion of wastewater grown algal biomass with pig slurry for CH4 production.

Algae-rich sludge (ALBAZOD; a mixture of algae, bacteria, zooplankton and detritus) was collected from a dissolved air flotation plant and a pig slurry sample was collected from a piggery in South Australia. Experiments were established in 30 L plastic batch anaerobic digester vessels, which were seeded with 20 L of anaerobically digested sludge obtained from the two sites described. The reactors were purged with N2 gas and digested under room temperature (17−25°C) for 3 months with manual mixing by rotating the vessels once per day. Six experimental groups were studied as follows: 100% pig slurry (PS); 96.5% PS + 3.5% ALBAZOD (A); 92.9% PS + 7.1% A; 85.4% PS + 14.6% A; 67.8% PS + 32.2% A; and 100% A. All experiments were performed with triplicate analysis (n = 3) and the ALBAZOD percentages were calculated based on volatile solids (VS) per g of dry weight (APHA 1995). The results were statistically analysed by independent samples T-Test (95% confidence interval, P ≤ 0.05).

The highest CH4 production was observed from the 96.5% PS + 3.5% A mixture (Fig. 1), with a production of 0.344 L/g VS removed and a slightly lower production of 0.339 L/g VS removed from 100% PS. However, no significant difference was found on CH4 production compared to the 100% PS. The CH4 production decreased as the ratio of ALBAZOD increased in the mixture. When the ALBAZOD ratio was beyond 7.1% A, the CH4 production decreased to below 0.200 L/g VS removed. The lowest CH4 (L/g VS removed) was observed from the 100% A control experiment with an average of 0.040 L/g VS removed over the first 73 day period, that then rapidly increased up to 0.174 L/g VS removed at d 91.


Fig. 1.  Cumulative methane (CH4) production calculated based on per gram of volatile solid (VS) removed from co-digestion of pig slurry (PS) and ALBAZOD (A) over 91-day period. Values are means ± SE (n = 2). ▵: 100% PS; ANv55n12Ab092_E1a.gif: 96.5% PS + 3.5% A; ANv55n12Ab092_E1b.gif: 92.9% PS + 7.1% A; ANv55n12Ab092_E1c.gif: 85.4% PS + 14.6% A; ANv55n12Ab092_E1d.gif: 67.8% PS + 32.2% A; ANv55n12Ab092_E1e.gif: 100% A.
Click to zoom

The results suggested that although there was a slightly increase in overall CH4 production with the optimum ALBAZOD mixture, the ratio is crucial in order to achieve optimum CH4 production between pig slurry and ALBAZOD because it is known as poorly degradable. In conclusion, anaerobic digestion and co-digestion can capture energy in the form of CH4 which can be converted into electrical energy further enhancing the sustainability of the pork industry (Miao et al. 2014; Astals et al. 2015). Further investigations of pre-treatment with ALBAZOD to increase its biodegradability would seem warranted to optimise this research.



References

APHA (1995) “Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19 ed.” American Public Health Association., USA.

Astals S, Musenze RS, Bai X, Tannock S, Tait S, Pratt S, Jensen PD (2015) Bioresource Technology 181, 97–104.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Buchanan AN, Bolton N, Moheimani N, Svoboda IF, Grant T, Batten D, Cheng NN, Borowitzka M, Fallowfield HJ (2013) Algae for energy and feed: a wastewater solution: A review Pork CRC Project 4A-101, 112.

Miao H, Wang S, Zhao M, Huang Z, Ren H, Yan Q, Ruan W (2014) Energy Conversion and Management 77, 643–649.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |


Supported by Pork CRC Limited Australia.