Effects of feeding additional pasture hay in autumn to dairy cows grazing irrigated perennial ryegrass-white clover pasture and supplemented with barley grain

Abstract

Two experiments were undertaken to investigate responses by dairy cows grazing irrigated perennial pastures in autumn to supplementation with barley grain and pasture hay. Cows in late lactation were offered limited amounts of perennial ryegrass–white clover pasture at 26 kg DM/cow. day. Supplements were offered as nil or 6.0 kg DM/cow.day plus perennial pasture hay at 0, 0.5, 1.2, 2.0 or 3.0 kg DM/cow. day in a replicated experiment with 6 treatments using 36 cows (3 cows/treatment replication). The second experiment, which was conducted concurrently with experiment 1, measured aspects of rumen function and blood parameters in 3 groups of 3 rumen fistulated lactating cows grazing at the same herbage allowance and supplemented with barley (6.0 kg DM/cow. day) and 0, 1.0 or 3.0 kg DM of pasture hay daily.

The in vitro DM digestibility and crude protein and neutral detergent fibre content of the barley and perennial pasture hay was 863 and 640 g/kg DM, 134 and 87 g/kg DM and 192 and 615 g/kg DM, respectively. In experiment 1, the cows from all treatments consumed herbage (mean s.d.) with an in vitro DM digestibility of 811 21.8 g/kg DM, crude protein content of 233 26.0 g/kg DM and neutral detergent fibre content of 404 39.4 g/kg DM compared with the pregrazed herbage on offer of 710, 152 and 526 g/kg DM, respectively.

The mean pregrazing herbage mass of 3.75 t DM/ha in experiment 1 consisted of perennial ryegrass (580 g/kg DM), white clover (100 g/kg DM), weeds (110 g/kg DM) and dead material (210 g/kg DM). Without supplements, cows consumed 10.0 kg DM/day of this pasture with a neutral detergent fibre intake of 4.43 kg/day. The herbage grazed in experiment 2 was similar. Herbage intake did not decline to a large degree when barley was included in the diet indicating a very low substitution rate under the prevailing conditions where herbage allowance was only 26 kg DM/cow. day. Inclusion of hay progressively decreased (P<0.05) herbage intake, with substitution averaging 1.2 kg DM of herbage/kg DM of hay. Total DM intakes (15.5 kg DM/cow. day) were similar for the barley and the barley plus hay treatments up to 2.0 kg DM hay/cow. day; total DM intake was higher (P<0.05) for the 3.0 kg hay treatment. Milk production increased (P<0.05) with grain and hay supplementation, the marginal response being 0.8–1.0 kg milk/kg DM supplement, however, there was no significant difference between the 5 supplemented treatments. Supplementation with hay had no significant effect (P>0.05) on milk fat or milk protein contents which averaged 44.6 and 35.2 g/kg milk, respectively.

The ratio of acetate + butyrate:propionate was 4.1:1 when cows consumed 6.0 kg barley, which was around the critical ratio of 4:1 for milk fat of 40 g/kg. Increasing the amount of hay in the diet did not alter this ratio. Because of the high levels of substitution of hay for pasture, changes in neutral detergent fibre intake were small between supplemented treatments. The rumen pH, ammonia-N concentration and volatile fatty acid concentration were relatively stable during the day because of a relatively slow rate of eating (1.5 kg DM/h) and long rumination time (about 6.8 h/day). Ruminal pH was rarely below 6.0, even when barley was given alone, suggesting that fibre digestion was not compromised. Additional fibre as supplemental hay to cows in late lactation grazing irrigated pasture did not improve milk production when the neutral detergent fibre content of the diet was above an average of 336 g/kg DM. Use of hay as a means of providing additional fibre could reduce herbage utilisation.