Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Variation in content of monomeric phenolics during the processing of grape seed and skin flours

J. Sun A F , G. G. Elena B , H. X. Peng A , Q. Guo C , B. Yang D and E. J. Zhu C E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Horticultural Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 44 Daxue Road, Nanning 530007, China.

B Department of Biologic Application, Miguel Hernández University, Orihuela, Alicante 03312, Spain.

C Food Science Department, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, N1G 2W1 Canada.

D South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 723 Xingke Road, Guangzhou 510650, China.

E School of Food Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, 3 Wenyuan Road, Nanjing 210003, China.

F Corresponding author. Email: jiansun@yahoo.cn

Animal Production Science 49(2) 170-175 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08189
Submitted: 26 June 2008  Accepted: 18 August 2008   Published: 20 January 2009

Abstract

Phenolic compounds were extracted from grape seed and skin flours. Three major monomeric phenolics, gallic acid, (+)-catechin and (−)-epicatechin, were identified and quantified by high performance liquid chromatography. To evaluate the feasibility of using both flours for the development of phenolic-rich functional foods, the variation in content of these monomeric phenolics were determined after baking, illumination and microwave radiation processes. The results showed that baking both flours at 110°C had no significant influence on the contents of the three monomeric phenolics. However, after baking at 145°C, the contents of gallic acid exhibited an increasing trend, while the contents of (+)-catechin and (−)-epicatechin gradually declined. During the illumination process, the contents of gallic acid and (+)-catechin in both flours increased, while (−)-epicatechin decreased after 10 days. Microwave processing baked flours for 1 min had no significant effect on the contents of these three monomeric phenolics. After processing for 3 and 5 min, the gallic acid contents significantly increased, but the other two decreased. These results indicated that producing foods containing grape seed or skin flours should avoid being baked at higher temperatures for long periods, and the microwave radiation process should be performed as quickly as possible, so that the phenolic ingredients in these foods are better retained.


Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful for the financial support of the Research Fund at the Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences.


References


Alonso AM, Guillén DA, Barroso CG, Puertas B, García A (2002) Determination of antioxidant activity of wine byproducts and its correlation with polyphenolic content. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50, 5832–5836.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Bonilla F, Mayen M, Merida J, Medina M (1999) Extraction of phenolic compounds from red grape marc for use as food lipid antioxidants. Food Chemistry 66, 209–215.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Caillet S, Salmiéri S, Lacroix M (2006) Evaluation of free radical-scavenging properties of commercial grape phenol extracts by a fast colorimetric method. Food Chemistry 95, 1–8.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Göktürk Baydar N, Özkan G, Yaşar S (2007) Evaluation of the antiradical and antioxidant potential of grape extracts. Food Control 18, 1131–1136.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

González-Paramás AM, Esteban-Ruano S, Santos-Buelga C, De Pascual-Teresa S, Rivas-Gonzalo JC (2004) Flavanol content and antioxidant activity in winery byproducts. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52, 234–238.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Guendez R, Kallithraka S, Makris DP, Kefalas P (2005) Determination of low molecular weight polyphenolic constituents in grape (Vitis vinifera sp.) seed extracts: correlation with antiradical activity. Food Chemistry 89, 1–9.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Hatzidimitriou E, Nenadis N, Tsimidou MZ (2007) Changes in the catechin and epicatechin content of grape seeds on storage under different water activity (a w) conditions. Food Chemistry 105, 1504–1511.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Lafka T-I, Sinanoglou V, Lazos ES (2007) On the extraction and antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds from winery wastes. Food Chemistry 104, 1206–1214.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Makris DP, Boskou G, Andrikopoulos NK (2007) Polyphenolic content and in vitro antioxidant characteristics of wine industry and other agri-food solid waste extracts. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 20, 125–132.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Monagas M, Garrido I, Bartolomé B, Gómez-Cordovés C (2006) Chemical characterization of commercial dietary ingredients from Vitis vinifera L. Analytica Chimica Acta 563, 401–410.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Musingo MN, Sims CA, Bates RP, O’Keefe SF, Lamikanra O (2001) Changes in ellagic acid and other phenols in muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia) juices and wine during storage. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 52, 109–114.
CAS |
open url image1

Orak HH (2007) Total antioxidant activities, phenolics, anthocyanins, polyphenoloxidase activities of selected red grape cultivars and their correlations. Scientia Horticulturae 111, 235–241.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Pastrana-Bonilla E, Akoh CC, Sellappan S, Krewer G (2003) Phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of muscadine grapes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 51, 5497–5503.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Rodríguez Montealegre R, Romero Peces R, Chacón Vozmediano JL, Martínez Gascueña J, García Romero E (2006) Phenolic compounds in skins and seeds of ten grape Vitis vinifera varieties grown in a warm climate. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 19, 687–693.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Shi J, Yu J, Pohorly J, Kakuda Y (2003) Polyphenolics in grape seeds – biochemistry and functionality. Journal of Medicinal Food 6, 291–299.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Singleton VL, Rossi JA (1965) Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolyb-dicphosphotungstic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 16, 144–158.
CAS |
open url image1

Singleton VL, Trousdale E (1983) White wine phenolics: varietal and processing differences as shown by HPLC. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 34, 27–34.
CAS |
open url image1

Souquet J-M, Cheynier V, Brossaud F, Moutounet M (1996) Polymeric proanthocyanidins from grape skins. Phytochemistry 43, 509–512.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Stagos D, Kazantzoglou G, Theofanidou D, Kakalopoulou G, Magiatis P, Mitaku S, Kouretas D (2006) Activity of grape extracts from Greek varieties of Vitis vinifera against mutagenicity induced by bleomycin and hydrogen peroxide in Salmonella typhimurium strain TA102. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 609, 165–175.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Tee E, Boland A-M, Medhurst A (2007) Voluntary adoption of Environmental Management Systems in the Australian wine and grape industry depends on understanding stakeholder objectives and drivers. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 273–283.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Yilmaz Y, Toledo RT (2004a) Health aspects of functional grape seed constituents. Trends in Food Science & Technology 15, 422–433.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Yilmaz Y, Toledo RT (2004b) Major flavonoids in grape seeds and skins: antioxidant capacity of catechin, epicatechin and gallic acid. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52, 255–260.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1