Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA07297
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 48(2)

Reliability of the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique for methane emission measurement from individual animals: an overview

C. S. Pinares-Patiño A B and H. Clark A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Land, Climate & Environment Section, AgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Tennent Drive, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

B Corresponding author. Email:cesar.pinares@agresearch.co.nz

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(2) 223-229 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07297
Submitted: 24 August 2007  Accepted: 11 October 2007   Published: 2 January 2008

Abstract

Measurements of enteric methane (CH4) emissions from individual animals have traditionally been made with indirect calorimetry techniques, which are both accurate and reliable. However, the expense and need for animal training and the extent to which calorimetric results can be extrapolated to free-ranging animals have been questioned and stimulated the development of the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique. The tracer technique is now widely used in New Zealand and many other countries for CH4 emission measurements on grazing and pen-fed cattle, sheep, deer and alpacas. Few studies with cattle and sheep have examined the validity of the SF6 tracer technique. Most of these studies have concluded that estimations of CH4 emission by this technique do not differ from those of calorimetric techniques, though some exceptions have been reported. There is general agreement that the tracer technique is associated with large between-animal variability in the CH4 emission estimates from animals on the same diet, but it remains unknown whether this is due to the environment, housing conditions or the technique itself. High within-animal variability has also been reported from tracer CH4 measurements. There is growing evidence that CH4 emission estimates by the tracer technique are positively influenced by the permeation rate (PR) of the SF6 gas from permeation tubes and it has been suggested that fate of the tracer in the rumen rather than unrepresentative breath sample collection is the likely reason for the latter. It is concluded that although some issues related to the tracer technique need to be clarified, using a narrow range in PR and balancing of PR between treatments should be practised in order to overcome the relationship between PR and CH4 emission estimates.


Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the New Zealand Pastoral Greenhouse Gas Research Consortium.


References


Arnold GW (1981) Grazing behaviour. In ‘Grazing animals’. World Animal Science, B1. (Ed. FHW Morley) pp. 79–104. (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Blaxter KL, Clapperton JL (1965) Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. The British Journal of Nutrition 19, 511–522.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | [Verified 16 November 2007].

Goopy JP, Hegarty RS (2004) Repeatability of methane production in cattle fed concentrate and forage diets. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences Suppl. 1 13, 75–78. open url image1

Grainger C, Clarke T, McGinn SM, Auldist MJ, Beauchemin KA, Hannah MC, Waghorn GC, Clark H, Eckard RJ (2007) Methane emissions from dairy cows measured using the sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer and chamber techniques. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 2755–2766.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Hofmeyr HS, Slabbert N, Pienaar JP (1984) Partitioning of methane production between ruminal and hindgut fermentation sites in sheep. Canadian Journal of Animal Science Suppl. 64, 171–172.
|  CAS |
open url image1

Johnson DE, Ferrell CL, Jenkings TG (2003) The history of energetic efficiency research: where have we been and where are we going? Journal of Animal Science 81(E. Suppl. 1), E27–E38. open url image1

Johnson KA, Johnson DE (1995) Methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2483–2492.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Johnson K, Huyler M, Westberg H, Lamb B, Zimmerman P (1994a) Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a SF6 tracer technique. Environmental Science & Technology 28, 359–362.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Johnson KA , Huyler MT , Westberg HH , Lamb BK , Zimmerman P (1994 b) Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. In ‘Energy metabolism of farm animals’. EAAP Publication No. 76. (Ed. JF Aguilera) pp. 335−338. (Servicio de Publicaciones, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas: Granada, Spain)

Johnson KA , Westberg HH , Lamb BK , Kincaid RL (1998) The use of sulphur hexafluoride for measuring methane production by cattle. In ‘Energy metabolism of farm animals’. (Eds KJ McCracken, EF Unsworth, ARG Wylie) pp. 189−192. (CAB International: Oxon, UK)

Kennedy PM, Milligan LP (1978) Effects of cold exposure on digestion, microbial synthesis and nitrogen transformations in sheep. The British Journal of Nutrition 39, 105–117.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Khalil MAK, Shearer MJ (2006) Decreasing emissions of methane from rice agriculture. International Congress Series 1293, 33–41.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Klein L, Wright A-DG (2006) Construction and operation of open-circuit methane chambers for small ruminants. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1257–1262.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Lassey KR (2007) Livestock methane emission: from the individual grazing animal through national inventories to the global methane cycle. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 142, 120–132.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lassey KR, Ulyatt MJ, Martin RJ, Walker CF, Shelton ID (1997) Methane emissions measured directly from grazing livestock in New Zealand. Atmospheric Environment 31, 2905–2914.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Lassey KR, Walker CF, McMillan AMS, Ulyatt MJ (2001) On the performance of SF6 permeation tubes used in determining methane emission from grazing livestock. Chemosphere: Global Science Change 3, 367–376.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Lockyer DR, Jarvis SC (1995) The measurement of methane losses from grazing animals. Environmental Pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) 90, 383–390.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

McGinn SM, Beauchemin KA, Iwaasa AD, McAllister TA (2006) Assessment of the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique for measuring enteric methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Environmental Quality 35, 1686–1691.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

McLean JA , Tobin G (1987) ‘Animal and human calorimetry.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Miller WH, Koes RM (1988) Construction and operation of an open-circuit indirect calorimetry system for small ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 66, 1042–1047.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Murray PJ, Moss A, Lockyer DR, Jarvis SC (1999) A comparison of systems for measuring methane emissions from sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 133, 439–444.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Murray RM, Bryant AM, Leng RA (1976) Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep. The British Journal of Nutrition 36, 1–14.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Odongo NE , Alzahal O , Las JE , Kramer A , Kerrigan B , Kebreab E , France J , McBride BW (2007) Development of a mobile open-circuit ventilated hood system for measuring real-time gaseous emissions in cattle. In ‘Mathematical modelling in animal nutrition’. (Eds J France, E Kebreab) (CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK), in press.

Ørskov ER (1994) Recent advances in understanding of microbial transformation in ruminants. Livestock Production Science 39, 53–60.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pinares-Patiño CS (2000) Methane emission from forage-fed sheep, a study of variation between animals. PhD Thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Pinares-Patiño CS, Baumont R, Martin C (2003a) Methane emissions by Charolais cows grazing a monospecific pasture of timothy at four stages of maturity. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 83, 769–777. open url image1

Pinares-Patiño CS, Ulyatt MJ, Holmes CW, Barry TN, Lassey KR (2003b) Persistence of the between-sheep variation in methane emission. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 140, 227–233.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pinares-Patiño CS , Vlaming B , Cavanagh A , Molano G , Clark H (2005) Persistence of dairy cows in animal-to-animal variation in methane emission. In ‘Proceedings of the 2nd international conference in greenhouse gases and animal agriculture’. (Eds CR Soliva, J Takahashi, M Kreuzer) pp. 401–404. (ETH Zurich: Zurich, Switzerland)

Pinares-Patiño CS , Holmes CW , Lassey KR , Ulyatt MJ (2007) Measurement of methane emission from sheep by the sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique and by the calorimetric chamber: failure and success. Animal, in press.

Standing Committee on Agriculture (1990) ‘Feeding standards for Australian livestock – ruminants.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Torrent J , Johnson DE (1994) Methane production in the large intestine of sheep. In ‘Energy metabolism of farm animals’. (Ed. JF Aguilera) pp. 391–394 (CSIC Servicio de Publicaciones: Mojacar, Spain)

Ulyatt MJ, Baker SK, McCrabb GJ, Lassey KR (1999) Accuracy of SF6 tracer technology and alternatives for field measurements. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 1329–1334.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ulyatt MJ, Lassey KR, Shelton ID, Walker CF (2002) Seasonal variation in methane emission from dairy cows and breeding ewes grazing ryegrass/white clover pasture in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 217–226.
|  CAS |
open url image1

Vermorel M (1989) Energy: the feed unit systems. In ‘Ruminant nutrition, recommended allowances and feed tables’. (Ed. R Jarrige) pp. 23–32. (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: Paris, France)

Vlaming JB, Brookes IM, Hoskin SO, Pinares-Patiño CS, Clark H (2007) The possible influence of intra-ruminal sulphur hexafluoride release rates on calculated methane emissions from cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 87, 269–275.
|  CAS |
open url image1

Webb P (1991) The measurement of energy expenditure. Journal of Nutrition 121, 1897–1901.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Wolin MJ (1960) A theoretical rumen fermentation balance. Journal of Dairy Science 43, 1452–1459.
|  CAS |
open url image1

Wolin MJ , Miller TL (1988) Microbe interactions in the rumen microbial ecosystem. In ‘The rumen ecosystem’. (Ed. PN Hobson) pp. 343–359. (Elsevier Applied Science: New York)

Wright ADG, Kennedy P, O’Neill CJ, Toovey AF, Popovski S, Rea SM, Pimm CL, Klein L (2004) Reducing methane emissions in sheep by immunization against rumen methanogens. Vaccine 22, 3976–3985.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Young BA, Kerrigan B, Christopherson RJ (1975) A versatile respiratory pattern analyzer for studies of energy metabolism of livestock. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 55, 17–22. open url image1