Predicting livestock productivity and methane emissions in northern Australia: development of a bio-economic modelling approach
E. Charmley A B , M. L. Stephens A and P. M. Kennedy AA CSIRO Livestock Industries, JM Rendel Laboratory, PO Box 5545, Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: ed.charmley@csiro.au
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(2) 109-113 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07264
Submitted: 9 August 2007 Accepted: 1 November 2007 Published: 2 January 2008
Abstract
Enteric fermentation from livestock is a large source of methane, which has a global warming potential 23 times that of carbon dioxide. In Australia, enteric emissions from the livestock sector contribute 10% of Australia’s greenhouse gases. The northern Australian beef industry about 16 million animals is a major contributor to these emissions. However, relative to temperate systems, comparatively little research has been conducted on enteric methane emissions from tropical feeding systems. This paper describes a modelling approach that estimates cattle methane emissions for various bioregions of northern Australia. The approach incorporates a metabolisable energy based model of animal production linked to a property herd economic model. This provides a flexible tool to evaluate animal and property herd dynamics on regional methane yields and liveweight productivity, as well as to assess financial impacts. The model predicts that an important determinant of methane output per unit of product is reduced days to market. Reduced days to market may be achieved through a range of energy supplementation and marketing strategies.
Alford AR,
Hegarty RS,
Parnell PF,
Cacho OJ,
Herd RM, Griffith GR
(2006) The impact of breeding to reduce residual feed intake on enteric methane emissions from the Australian beef industry. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 813–820.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Benchaar C,
Pomar C, Chiquette J
(2001) Evaluation of dietary strategies to reduce methane production in ruminants: a modelling approach. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 81, 563–574.
Hall WB,
McKeon GM,
Carter JO,
Day KA,
Howden SM,
Scanlan JC,
Johnston PW, Burrows WH
(1998) Climate change in Queensland’s grazing lands: II. An assessment of the impact of animal production from native pastures. The Rangeland Journal 20, 177–205.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hunter RA
(2007) Methane production by cattle in the tropics. The British Journal of Nutrition 98, 657.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Hunter RA, Magner T
(1988) The effect of supplements of formaldehyde-treated casein on the partitioning of nutrients between cow and calf in lactating Bos indicus × Bos taurus heifers fed a roughage diet. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 39, 1151–1162.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnson KA, Johnson DE
(1995) Methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2483–2492.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Kurihara M,
Magner T,
Hunter RA, McCrabb GJ
(1999) Methane production and energy partition of cattle in the tropics. The British Journal of Nutrition 81, 227–234.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
McKeon GM,
Day KA,
Howden SM,
Mott JJ,
Orr DM,
Scattini WJ, Weston EJ
(1990) Northern Australia savannas: management for pastoral production. Journal of Biogeography 17, 355–372.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |