Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Using a life cycle assessment method to determine the environmental impacts of manure utilisation: biogas plant and composting systems

T. Hishinuma A C , H. Kurishima B , C. Yang A and Y. Genchi A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Research Center for Life Cycle Assessment, 16-1 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8569, Japan.

B Shibaura Institute of Technology, 307 Fukasaku, Minumaku, Saitama, Saitama 337-8570, Japan.

C Corresponding author. Email: t-hishinuma@aist.go.jp

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(2) 89-92 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07246
Submitted: 6 August 2007  Accepted: 26 November 2007   Published: 2 January 2008

Abstract

The aim of this study was to use life cycle assessment methods to determine the environmental impacts of manure utilisation by a biogas plant and by a typical manure composting system. The functional unit was defined as the average annual manure utilisation on a dairy farm with 100 cows. The environmental impact categories chosen were emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) and acidification gases (AG). The GHG emissions were estimated as: 345.9 t CO2-equivalents (e) for solid composting (case 1), 625.4 t CO2-e for solid and liquid composting (case 2), and 86.3–90.1 t CO2-e for the biogas plant system. The AG emissions were estimated as: 10.1 t SO2-e for case 1, 18.4 t SO2-e for case 2, and 13.1–24.2 t SO2-e for the biogas plant system. These results show that a biogas plant system produces low GHG emissions, but comparatively high AG emissions with land application. It is suggested that land application using band spread or shallow injection attachments will decrease AG emissions (NH3) from biogas plant systems.


References


CGER (Center for Global Environmental Research) (2007) National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report of Japan. Sections 2.1–2.15. Available at http://www-gio.nies.go.jp/aboutghg/nir/2005/LULUCF-NIR-E_ver1.0.pdf [Verified 29 November 2007]

Hinata T (2004) Life cycle assessment focused on green house gases of manure treatments in dairy-farming. Journal of Rural Economics 76, 337–341. open url image1

Hojito M, Matsunami H, Hayashi K, Murano K, Mori A (2006) The status of wet deposition of nitrogen compounds in an intensive dairy farming area in central Japan. Japanese Society of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition [In Japanese] 77, 47–52.
CAS |
open url image1

LEIO (Livestock Industry’s Environmental Improvement Organization) (1998) ‘Manual of livestock manure treatment and application.’ (LEIO: Fukushima-ken, Japan) [In Japanese]

Maeda T, Masuda J, Ohmiya K (2001) Ammonia emissions from composting livestock manure (Part 2). Effects of livestock type on ammonia emission during composting. Journal of the Japanese Society of Agricultural Machinery [In Japanese] 60(1), 41–47. open url image1

MOE (Ministry of Environment) (2002) National GHGs inventory report of Japan.

Nansai K , Moriguchi Y , Touno S (2002) ‘Embodied energy and emission intensity data for Japan using input-output tables (3EID) – inventory data for LCA.’ (National Institute for Environmental Studies)

RGUEC (Rakuno Gakuen University Extension Center) (2006) ‘Evaluation of biogas system at dairy from social and economic point.’ (RGUEC) [In Japanese]

Yokohama M , Nakagawa S (2005) Effects of application conditions on movement of nitrogen compounds after application of raw or digested cattle slurry. Civil Engineering Research Institute for Cold Region. Monthly Report 627, pp. 29–41. [In Japanese]