Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Whole-body protein metabolism and energy expenditure in sheep selected for divergent wool production when fed above or below maintenance

L. Li A B C , V. H. Oddy A and J. V. Nolan A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Rural Science and Agriculture, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

B The Australian Sheep Industry CRC, Chiswick New England Highway, Locked Bag 1, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: lli@une.edu.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(5) 657-665 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07231
Submitted: 1 August 2007  Accepted: 8 January 2008   Published: 7 April 2008

Abstract

Rates of whole-body protein turnover and energy expenditure were measured in two groups of wethers differing in estimated breeding values (EBVs) for wool growth, but with similar EBVs for fibre diameter and liveweight (LW). The sheep were offered a pelleted diet at 1.2 times their metabolisable energy (ME) requirement for maintenance (1.2 M) followed by either 0.8 M or 1.8 M for 5 weeks. In the 5th week, whole-body protein metabolism was estimated by using intravenous injection of 15N-glycine (g N/day) and whole-body energy expenditure rate (EE) was predicted by the CO2 entry rate technique using intravenous injection of NaH13CO3. The higher N intake (8.7 v. 20.4 g N/day, P < 0.001) was associated with a higher whole-body protein flux (22.1 v. 34.2 g N/day, P < 0.001), and a higher whole-body protein synthesis rate (17.0 v. 25.5 g N/day, P < 0.001) and protein degradation rate (15.9 v. 20.7 g N/day, P < 0.001). Irrespective of feeding levels, sheep with high-fleece EBVs (F+) synthesised and degraded more body protein N (g N/day) than sheep with low-fleece EBVs (F–), and F+ sheep also retained more ingested protein N (P < 0.05) in wool and body tissue than F– sheep, but the significant differences due to genotypes disappeared when whole-body protein flux, synthesis and degradation were expressed as g N/kg LW0.75.day (metabolic weight). Estimates of EE were lower when the sheep were offered 0.8 M than when offered 1.8 M (5.85 v. 7.68 MJ/day, P < 0.001) and were higher in F+ than in F– sheep (6.95 v. 6.58 MJ/day; P < 0.05), but F+ sheep had a significantly lower (P < 0.05) EE (MJ/kg LW0.75.day) than F– sheep. F+ animals also retained more energy in wool and wool-free body tissue than F– animals (P < 0.05). The present study indicates that genetic selection for wool growth has resulted in increased efficiency of dietary protein and energy use for wool production and body-tissue growth in these sheep. Furthermore, there is no ‘trade off’ between deposition of nutrients in the body and wool in sheep with high EBVs for wool growth.

Additional keywords: feeding level, heat production, genotype, protein turnover.


Acknowledgements

Financial support for this project was provided by the Australian Sheep Industry CRC. We also thank Mr Simon Stachiw, Mrs Jenny Hegarty, Mr David Creed and Dr Ian Godwin for technical assistance.


References


Adams NR (2005) ‘Biology of nutrient partitioning.’ Available at http://www.sheepcrc.org.au/articles.php3?rc=41 [Verified 11 March 2008]

Adams NR, Cronjé PB (2003) A review of the biology linking fibre diameter with fleece weight, liveweight, and reproduction in Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 1–10.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [Verified 11 March 2008]

Nolan JV, Leng RA (1974) Isotope techniques for studying the dynamics of nitrogen metabolism in ruminants. The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 33, 1–8.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | [Verified 11 March 2008]

Waterlow JC, Garlick PJ, Millward DJ (1978) ‘Protein turnover in mammalian tissues and in the whole body.’ (North-Holland Publishing Company: Amsterdam)

Webster AJF (1983) Energetics of maintenance and growth. In ‘Mammalian thermogenesis’. (Eds L Girardier, MJ Stock) pp. 178–204. (Chapman and Hall Ltd: London)

Williams AJ (1978) Speculation on the biological mechanisms responsible for genetic variation in the rate of wool growth. In ‘Physiological & environmental limitations to wool growth (proceedings of a national workshop)’. (Eds JL Black, PJ Reis) pp. 337–354. (The University of New England Publishing Unit: Leura, NSW)

Williams AJ (1995) Some comparative studies of sulfate metabolism in Merino sheep genetically different in wool production. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 415–427.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Young BA (1968) Maintenance energy requirement of grazing sheep. PhD Thesis, University of New England, Armidale.