Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA06057
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 48(5)

Growth performance, feed efficiency and carcass and meat quality of tropically adapted breed types from different farming systems in South Africa

P. E. Strydom A D , L. Frylinck A , J. van der Westhuizen B and H. M. Burrow C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Nutrition and Food Science, Livestock Business Division: Agricultural Research Council of South Africa, Private Bag X2, Irene, Gauteng 0062, South Africa.

B Animal Recording and Improvement, Livestock Business Division: Agricultural Research Council of South Africa, Private Bag X2, Irene, Gauteng 0062, South Africa.

C CRC for Beef Genetic Technologies, CJ Hawkins Homestead, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: pstrydom@arc.agric.za

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(5) 599-607 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA06057
Submitted: 15 February 2006  Accepted: 12 December 2007   Published: 7 April 2008

Abstract

Two experiments measured the ability of tropically adapted beef breeds from resource-poor farmer herds in South Africa to produce high quality beef under commercial feedlot conditions. The resource-poor farming sector consists of ‘emerging’ and communal farmers. The herd and breed groups consisted of Sanga types (tropically adapted Bos taurus breed) including Nguni, Tuli, Bonsmara and Drakensberger, as well as Brahman and non-descript groups. The cattle were slaughtered after an average of 97 days in the first experiment and after an average of 92, 140 and 169 days on a grain-based diet in the second experiment. Growth performance, carcass quality and yield, occurrence of disease and meat quality were measured.

The performance of the breeds groups was a function of their genetic potential and herd type (carcass weight and condition at arrival). Steers from emerging and communal farmer herds enter the feedlot at a lighter weight, but show similar growth performance to achieve acceptable, albeit lighter carcass weights, than their commercial counterparts. The incidence of disease was no different between commercial, emerging and communal herds. Carcass and meat quality analyses indicate small or no differences between herd types or breeds, except that Brahman produced tougher meat. It was concluded that cattle from resource-poor farmer herds have the ability to meet the specifications of South Africa’s commercial beef markets, indicating a genuine opportunity for import substitution, whereby the more than 5 million cattle in resource-poor farmer herds could be used to overcome the significant shortfall in South Africa’s domestic beef market demand.


Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) and their participating officers for financial and technical support South Africa’s Agricultural Research Council personnel for technical support and the South African emerging, communal and commercial farmers who contributed animals to the trial.


References


AMSA (1978) ‘Guidelines for cooking and sensory evaluation of meat.’ (American Meat Science Association, National Livestock and Meat Board: Chicago, IL)

Anon.  (1990) ‘Agricultural Product Standards Act No. 119. Regulations regarding the classification and marking of meat in South Africa.’ Available at http://www.samic.co.za [Verified 15 February 2008]

AOAC (1985) ‘Official methods of analysis.’ 14th edn. (Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC)

Arthington JD, Spears JW, Miller DC (2005) The effect of early weaning on feedlot performance and measures of stress in beef calves. Journal of Animal Science 83, 933–939.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Bester J, Matjuda LE, Rust JM, Fourie HJ (2001) The Nguni: a case study. In ‘Proceedings of the community-based management of animal genetic resources workshop, Mbabane, Swaziland’. A SADC/UNDP/FAO Project. pp. 45–68. Available at http://www.fao.org/documents/pub_dett.asp?pub_id=141648&lang=en [Verified 15 February 2008]

Bindon BM (2004) A review of genetic and non-genetic opportunities for manipulation of marbling. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 687–696.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Casas E, Cundiff LV (2003) Maternal grandsire, granddam, and sire breed effects on growth and carcass traits of crossbred cattle. Journal of Animal Science 81, 904–911.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Crouse JD, Cundiff LV, Koch RM, Koohmaraie M, Seideman SC (1989) Comparisons of Bos indicus and Bos taurus inheritance for carcass beef characteristics and meat palatability. Journal of Animal Science 67, 2661–2668. open url image1

Devine CE, Payne SR, Peachey BM, Lowe TE, Ingram JR, Cook CJ (2002) High and low rigor temperature effects on sheep meat tenderness and ageing. Meat Science 60, 141–146.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Frylinck L, Strydom PE, Smith MF, Heinze PH (2001) Evaluation of meat tenderness of indigenous South African cattle breeds. In ‘Proceedings of the 47th international congress of meat science and technology, Krakow, Poland’. pp. 26–27. (Meat and Fat Research Institute: Warszawa, Poland)

Gazzola C, O’Neill CJ, Frisch JE (1999) Comparative evaluation of the meat quality of beef cattle breeds of Indian, African and European origins. Animal Science (Penicuik, Scotland) 69, 135–142. open url image1

GenStat for Windows (2000) ‘Committee of the statistics department. Rothamsted Experimental Station’. Release 4.2. 5th edn. (Claredon Press: Oxford, UK)

Grau R, Hamm R (1953) Eine einfache Methode zur Bestimmung der Wasserbindung im Muskel. Die Naturwissenschaften 40, 29.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Harper GS, Pethick DW (2004) How might marbling begin? Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 653–662.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Instron (1990) ‘Instron series IX automated materials testing system. Version 5’. (Instron Corporation Limited: Buckinghamshire, England)

Irie M, Izumo A, Mohri S (1996) Rapid method for determining water-holding capacity in meat using Video Image Analysis and simple formulae. Meat Science 42, 95–102.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kilpatrick DJ, Steen RWJ (1999) A predictive model for beef cattle growth and carcass. Composition. Agricultural Systems 61, 95–107.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

MacDougall DB (1977) Colour in meat. In ‘Sensory properties of foods’. (Eds GG Birch, JG Brennan, K Parker) p. 59. (Applied Science Publishers: London, UK)

O’Connor SF, Tatum JD, Wulf RD, Green RD, Smith GC (1997) Genetic effects on beef tenderness in Bos indicus composite and Bos taurus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 75, 1822–1830.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Offer G (1991) Modelling of the formation of pale, soft and exudative meat: effects of chilling regime and rate and extent of glycolysis. Meat Science 30, 157–184.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Offer G, Knight P (1988) The structural basis of water-holding in meat. In ‘Developments in meat science – 4’. (Ed. RA Lawrie) p. 63. (Elsevier Applied Science: London, UK)

Offer G, Trinick J (1983) On the mechanism of water holding in meat: the swelling and shrinking of myofibrils. Meat Science 8, 245–281.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Pethick DW, Harper GS, Oddy VH (2004) Growth, development and nutritional manipulation of marbling in cattle: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 705–715.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pringle TD, Williams SE, Lamb BS, Johnson DD, West RL (1997) Carcass characteristics, the calpain system, and aged tenderness of Angus and Brahman crossbred steers. Journal of Animal Science 75, 2955–2961.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Sainz RD, Vernazza Paganini RF (2004) Effects of different grazing and feeding periods on performance and carcass traits of beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 82, 292–297.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Sawyer JE, Mathis CP, Davis B (2004) Effects of feeding strategy and age on live animal performance, carcass characteristics, and economics of short-term feeding programs for culled beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 82, 3646–3653.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Scholtz MM, Bergh L, Bosman D, Alberts C (2000) Statistics of the National Beef Cattle Improvement Scheme 1993–1998. In ‘Beef breeding in South Africa’. pp. 106–217 (Agricultural Research Council: Irene, South Africa)

Shackelford SD, Morgan JB, Cross HR, Savell JW (1991a) Identification of threshold levels for Warner–Bratzler shear force in beef top loin steaks. Journal of Muscle Foods 2, 289–296.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Shackelford SD, Koohmaraie M, Miller MF, Crouse JD, Reagan JO (1991b) An evaluation of tenderness of the longissimus muscle of Angus by Hereford versus Brahman crossbred heifers. Journal of Animal Science 69, 171–177.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Sleper PS, Hunt MC, Kropf DH, Kastner CL, Dikeman ME (1983) Electrical stimulation effects on myoglobin properties of bovine longissimus muscle. Journal of Food Science 48, 479–483.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1980) ‘Statistical methods.’ 7th edn. (Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA)

Strydom PE, Naudé RT, Scholtz MM, Van Wyk JB (2000a) Characterisation of indigenous cattle breeds in relation to carcass characteristics. Animal Production 70, 241–252. open url image1

Strydom PE, Naudé RT, Scholtz MM, Van Wyk JB (2000b) Characterisation of indigenous cattle breeds in relation to meat quality characteristics. Meat Science 55, 79–88.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Tornberg E (1996) Biophysical aspects of meat tenderness. Meat Science 43, S175–S191.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wheeler TL, Cundiff LV, Shackelford SD, Koohmaraie M (2001) Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle V): carcass traits and longissimus palatability. Journal of Animal Science 79, 1209–1222.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Whipple G, Koohmaraie M, Dikeman ME, Crouse JD, Hunt MC, Klemm RD (1990) Evaluation of attributes that effect longissimus muscle tenderness in Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 68, 2716–2728.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1