Priority environmental issues for monitoring – mismatch between farmers and catchment management perspectives
A. M. Ridley A C , E. J. Seymour A , K.-J. Huhn A and G. Park BA Department of Primary Industries, RMB 1145, Rutherglen, Vic. 3685, Australia.
B North Central Catchment Management Authority, 51 Bull Street, Bendigo, Vic. 3550, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: anna.ridley@dpi.vic.gov.au
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47(3) 356-366 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA06028
Submitted: 19 December 2005 Accepted: 25 June 2006 Published: 12 February 2007
Abstract
Monitoring is an essential part of an environmental management system (EMS) if landholders are to demonstrate improved environmental performance. This paper reports results of two surveys to determine environmental issues and priorities for monitoring. The first survey was conducted on 12 EMS pilot projects, and the second on 18 catchment management organisations in Australia. With the exception of pastoral zones, EMS facilitators identified moderate to major issues in land condition, water balance, riparian zone, native vegetation condition and pests. Water quality issues were rated as minor to moderate problems. Issues raised by the greatest number of respondents were water balance problems and weed and pest issues. Catchment managers reported widespread degradation issues in land condition, water balance problems, altered water flow, water quantity and availability and water quality. Degradation of the riparian zone and native vegetation were also reported. Both EMS facilitators and catchment management organisations understood the need for environmental monitoring; however, few EMS pilot projects have addressed it. This was due, in part, to a lack of readily available tools and concentration on the EMS process itself. Tools of most interest to facilitators were soil erosion risk, soil test interpretation, soil structure assessment, soil health, water leakage and perenniality, water quality, riparian zone management, herbicide resistance, greenhouse emissions and energy use. Facilitators also suggested that tools should be delivered in several formats, but workshops delivered by experts were of most interest. Catchment managers had realistic and pragmatic views about the role of landholder monitoring in assessing catchment outcomes and there is a mismatch between landholder monitoring and catchment reporting requirements. Landholders are likely to monitor only what is in their direct interests and this will be mainly on land condition. We conclude that on-farm environmental monitoring conducted by landholders will be of limited use for catchment management organisation reporting. However, it will be very important in helping farmers to make more informed decisions about their environmental management, together with education and support. The issue of catchment condition monitoring and reporting requires serious attention as current monitoring and reporting is likely to be inadequate.
Carruthers G, Tinning G
(2003) Where, and how, do monitoring and sustainability indicators fit into environmental management systems? Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 307–323.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hutchinson MF,
McIntrye S,
Hobbs RJ,
Stein JL,
Garnett S, Kinloch J
(2005) Integrating a global agro-climatic classification with bio-regional boundaries in Australia. Global Ecology and Biogeography 14, 197–212.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
King C,
Gunton J,
Freebairn D,
Coutts J, Webb I
(2000) The sustainability indicators industry: where to from here? A focus group study to explore the potential of farmer participation in the development of indicators. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40, 631–642.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reid CL, Ridley AM
(2007) Environmental monitoring by landholders in north-east Victoria; fantasy, fact and future implications for catchment management. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 346–355.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ridley AM
(2007) Preparing Australian broadacre agriculture for environmental scrutiny using Environmental Management Systems: implications for extension services. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 367–377.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ridley AM,
Paramore T,
Beverly C,
Dunin FX, Froelich V
(2003a) Developing environmental monitoring tools from sustainability indicators in the southern Riverina. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 271–284.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ridley AM,
Paramore T, Seymour EJ
(2003b) Towards ‘clean and green’ farming systems using group learning to implement environmental management systems. Australian Journal of Botany 51, 637–645.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Seymour EJ, Ridley AM
(2005) Towards environmental management systems (EMS) in Australian agriculture to achieve better environmental outcomes at the catchment scale – a review. Environmental Management 35, 311–329.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
