Breeding strategies for the development of the Australian beef industry: an overview
K. HammondAustralian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(2) 183-198 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05230
Submitted: 16 August 2005 Accepted: 6 February 2006 Published: 3 March 2006
Abstract
Strategic directions for the period 2010 to 2020 and research and development needs are considered for the Australian Beef Industry from the breeding sector’s perspective. These are related to the way major technologies are developed for an industry, the current status and likely trends in market development and appropriation of benefits to the consumer, processor, commercial beef producer and breeding sectors. The primary strategic needs identified are: (i) understand the functional biology for the major production environments (supply chain packages), (ii) accelerate the speed of genetic improvement for production environment breeding goals based on commercial sector profitability and the dissemination of superior genetic material to this sector, and (iii) retain and develop the Beef Cooperative Research Centre concept over the period. Tactics for realising each strategy are considered. Rigorously designed industry-level studies based on a genotype × environment interaction approach, involving all major production environments and breeds, have an important role to play, as do the serial development of measuring equipment and procedures for carcass quality and yield, body maintenance, disease management and maternal performance. Information and communication, molecular genetics and artificial insemination technologies, along with formal progeny testing and an extended BREEDPLAN system, will be increasingly used by the breeding as well as commercial industry sectors to more consistently meet particular market demands. Carefully executed progeny testing is a pragmatic and necessary breeding approach for the period, serving a number of important purposes. The beef industry as a whole will need to take more responsibility for its genetic improvement element by: managing the appropriation of benefits across sectors, developing an increasingly effective system of value-based marketing and, for each sector and production environment, a more appropriate program of capacity building. The industry could now usefully consider the further development of its activity to address these longer-term strategic needs.
Additional keywords: adaptive fitness, artificial insemination, Beef Cooperative Research Centre (CRC), breeding, BREEDOBJECT, BREEDPLAN, carcass quality and yield, cattle, extension, feed intake, genetic improvement, genotype × environment interaction (GEI), management groups, production systems, progeny testing, value-added marketing.
Acknowledgments
Assistance with initial discussion by Stephen Barwick, David Johnston and John Thompson, and comment on manuscript drafts by Bob Freer, Hans-Ulrich Graser, Don Nicol and Wayne Upton is much appreciated.
Barendse W
(2005) The transition from quantitative trait loci to diagnostic test in cattle and other livestock. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 831–836.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(verified 7 February 2006)
Kinghorn BP
(1982) Genetic effects in crossbreeding. I Models of merit. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 99, 59–68.
McKiernan WA,
Wilkins JF,
Barwick SA,
Tudor GD,
McIntyre BL,
Graham JF,
Deland MPD, Davies L
(2005) CRC ‘Regional Combinations’ project — effects of genetics and growth paths on beef production and meat quality: experimental design, methods and measurements. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 959–969.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Paddison PJ,
Caudy AA,
Bernstein E,
Hannon GJ, Conklin DS
(2002) Short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) induce sequence-specific silencing in mammalian cells. Genes & Development 16, 948–958.
| Crossref |
PubMed |
Parnell PF
(2004) Industry application of marbling genetics: a brief review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 697–703.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Polkinghorne R,
Philpott J,
Gee A,
Doljanin A, Innes J
(2006) Development of a commercial system to apply the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) grading model to a beef supply chain to optimise eating quality to the consumer. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture ,
Raadsma HW, Tammen I
(2005) Biotechnologies and their potential impact on animal breeding and production: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1021–1032.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reverter A,
Barris W,
Moreno-Sánchez N,
McWilliam S,
Wang YH,
Harper GS,
Lehnert SA, Dalrymple BP
(2005) Construction of gene interaction and regulatory networks in Bovine skeletal muscle from expression data. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 821–829.
| Crossref |
Solkner J, James JW
(1990) Optimum designs of crossbreeding experiments. III. Efficiency of designs without all purebreds. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 107, 421–430.
Upton W,
Burrow HM,
Dundon A,
Robinson DL, Farrell E
(2001) CRC breeding program design, measurements and database: methods that underpin CRC research results. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 943–952.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Van Vleck LD
(1999) Implications of cloning for breed improvement strategies: Are traditional methods of animal improvement obsolete? Journal of Animal Science 82(suppl. 2), 111–121.
