Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Shelterbelts in agricultural landscapes suppress invertebrate pests

A. Tsitsilas B , S. Stuckey A , A. A. Hoffmann A , A. R. Weeks B and L. J. Thomson A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Environmental Stress and Adaptation Research, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia.

B Centre for Environmental Stress and Adaptation Research, Zoology Department, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: lthom@unimelb.edu.au.

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(10) 1379-1388 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05137
Submitted: 16 May 2005  Accepted: 15 March 2006   Published: 13 September 2006

Abstract

The homogenous nature of agricultural landscapes generally reduces biodiversity of invertebrate species, but this can be partly offset by developing refuges at field margins. In Australia, shelterbelts are widely planted to provide protection for livestock and to counter salinity problems associated with rising water tables. Shelterbelts may also play a role in acting as reservoirs for organisms that are beneficial to pastures, although this has rarely been directly evaluated. We sampled invertebrates along transects running from replicated shelterbelts into pastures, and in glasshouse trials we tested the impact of the beneficial organisms from the shelterbelts on the collected pests. Contrary to popular views, numbers of pest mites and lucerne fleas were low within shelterbelts. Moreover, numbers were typically lower adjacent to shelterbelts compared with >30 m into the pasture, an effect that was much more apparent when shelterbelts carried a groundcover of high (>30 cm) grass. Numbers of predatory mites and spiders were higher in shelterbelts and in adjacent pasture when there was taller grass and higher grass cover in the shelterbelts. Samples of potential predators collected from a shelterbelt were more effective at suppressing pest mite numbers than those collected in pasture. Shelterbelts with ground cover appear to harbour a diversity of beneficial organisms that suppress pest numbers in adjacent pastures.

Additional keywords: field margins, natural enemies, pasture mites, predatory mites, spiders.


Acknowledgments

We thank farmers who participated in this study (M. Roberts, R. Stevenson, W. Weatherly, J. Napier and R. Weatherly),Victoria Mack of Landcare for assistance in finding interested land managers, Peter Codd of the Corangamite Catchment Management Authority and the Australian Research Council (ARC) for support via their Special Research Centre Program. This work was undertaken while ARW was the recipient of an ARC Postdoctoral Fellowship.


References


Ahern RG, Brewer MJ (2002) Effect of different wheat production systems on the presence of two parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae; Braconidae) of the Russian wheat aphid in the North American Great Plains. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 92, 201–210.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Annells AJ, Strickland GR (2002) Evaluation of companion crops as part of an integrated pest management package for genetically modified cotton in the Kimberley. In ‘Proceedings of the 11th Australian cotton conference’. pp. 105–110. (CSIRO: Canberra)

Asteraki EJ, Hart BJ, Ings TC, Manley WJ (2004) Factors influencing the plant and invertebrate diversity of arable field margins. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 102, 219–231.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Baggen LR, Gurr GM (1998) The influence of food on Copidosoma koehleri (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), and the use of flowering plants as a habitat management tool to enhance biological control of potato moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Biological Control 11, 9–17.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 182–187.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bird PR, Bicknell D, Bulman PA, Burke SJA, Leys JF, Parker JN, van der Somme GI, Voller P (1992) The role of shelter in Australia for protecting soils, plants and livestock. Agroforestry Systems 20, 59–86.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Cardinale BJ, Harvey CT, Gross K (2003) Biodiversity and biocontrol: emergent impacts of a multi-enemy assemblage on pest suppression and crop yield in an agroecosystem. Ecology Letters 6, 857–865.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dennis P, Thomas MB, Sotherton NW (1994) Structural features of field boundaries which influence the overwintering densities of beneficial arthropod predators. Journal of Applied Ecology 31, 361–370.
Crossref |
open url image1

Dix ME, Leatherman D (1988) Insect management in windbreaks. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 22–23, 513–537.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Holland JM, Luff ML (2000) The effects of agricultural practices on Carabidae in temperate agroecosystems. Integrated Pest Management Reviews 5, 109–129.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

James DG (1995) Biological control of earthmites in pasture using endemic natural enemies. Plant Protection Quarterly 2, 58–59. open url image1

Krebs JR, Wilson JD, Bradbury RB, Siriwardena GM (1999) The second silent spring? Nature 400, 611–612.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM (2000) Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology 45, 175–201.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Mensah RK (1999) Habitat diversity: implications for the conservation and use of predatory insects of Helicoverpa spp. in cotton systems in Australia. International Journal of Insect Pest Management 43, 221–225.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mensah RK, Sequiera RV (2004) Habitat manipulation for insect pest management in cotton cropping systems. In ‘Ecological engineering for pest management’. (Eds GM Gurr, SD Wratten, MA Altieri) pp. 187–198. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Merton E, McDonald G, Hoffmann AA (1995) Cultural control of redlegged earth mite, blue oat mite and lucerne flea in canola. Plant Protection Quarterly 10, 65–66. open url image1

Naumann ID (Ed.) (1991) ‘Insects of Australia.’ 2nd edn. (Melbourne University Press: Melbourne)

Nicholls CI, Parella MP, Altieri MA (2001) The effects of a vegetational corridor on the abundance and dispersal of insect biodiversity within a northern Californian organic vineyard. Landscape Ecology 16, 133–146.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Nuberg JK (1998) Effect of shelter on temperature crops; a review to define research for Australian conditions. Agroforestry Systems 41, 3–34.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pasek JE (1988) Influence of wind and windbreaks on local dispersal of insects. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 22–23, 539–554.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Schmidt MH, Roschewitz I, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2005) Differential effects of landscape and management on diversity and density of ground dwelling farmland spiders. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 281–287.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Slosser JE (1991) Effects of windbreaks on overwintering of boll weevils. US Forest Service General Technical Report 10, pp. 13–16.

Slosser JE, Boring EP (1980) Shelterbelts and boll weevils: a control strategy based on management of overwintering habitat. Environmental Entomology 9, 1–6. open url image1

Solomon MG (1981) Windbreaks as a source of orchard pests and predators. In ‘Pests, pathogens and vegetation: the role of weeds and wild plants in the ecology of crop pests and diseases’. (Ed. JM Thresh) pp. 273–283. (Pitman Books Ltd: London)

Sotherton NW (1984) The distribution and abundance of predatory arthropods overwintering on farmland. Annals of Applied Biology 105, 423–429. open url image1

Szentkiralyi F, Kozar F (1991) How many species are there in apple insect communities? Testing the resource diversity and intermediate disturbance hypotheses. Ecological Entomology 16, 491–503. open url image1

Thomas CFG, Marshall EJP (1999) Arthropod abundance and diversity in differently vegetated margins of arable fields. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 72, 131–144.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Thomas MB, Wratten SD, Sotherton NW (1991) Creation of ‘island’ habitats in farmland to manipulate populations of beneficial arthropods: predator densities and emigration. Journal of Applied Ecology 28, 906–917.
Crossref |
open url image1

Umina PA, Hoffmann AA (2003) Diapause implications for the control of Pentathaleus species and Halotydeus destructor (Acari: Penthaleidae) in south eastern Australia. Experimental and Applied Acarology 31, 209–223.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Umina PA, Hoffmann AA (2004) Plant host associations of Penthaleus species and Halotydeus destructor (Acari: Penthaleidae) and implications for integrated pest control. Experimental and Applied Acarology 33, 1–20.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Umina PA, Hoffmann AA, Weeks AR (2003) Biology, ecology and control of the Penthaleus species complex (Acari: Penthaleidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology 34, 211–237. open url image1

Weeks AR, Turelli M, Hoffmann AA (2000) Dispersal patterns of pest earthmites (Acari: Penthaleidae) in pastures and crops. Journal of Economic Entomology 93, 1415–1423.
PubMed |
open url image1

Wilkinson TK, Landis DA (2005) Habitat diversification in biological control: the role of plant resources. In ‘Plant-provided food for carnivorous insects: a protective mutualism and its applications’. (Eds FL Wackers, PCJ van Rijn, J Bruin) pp. 305–325. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge)