Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA05086
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 46(11)

Landowners’ perceptions of the benefits and barriers to adopting centre pivot and lateral move irrigators on dairy farms

R. Maskey A C , M. Bethune A and D. Lawler B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Primary Industries, Ferguson Road, Tatura, Vic. 3616, Australia.

B Department of Primary Industries, Corner Annesley Street and Ogilvie Avenue, Echuca, Vic. 3564, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: rabi.maskey@dpi.vic.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(11) 1433-1437 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05086
Submitted: 16 March 2005  Accepted: 23 February 2006   Published: 9 October 2006

Abstract

Maintaining profitability under conditions of limited water availability is a key issue facing dairy farmers in the Shepparton Irrigation Region. These farmers predominantly use border-check irrigation. Pressurised irrigation methods are seen as one option for increasing productivity from the limited water resources. This study reports on landowners’ perceptions towards the adoption of centre pivot and lateral move irrigators, based on survey and factor analysis. The survey was of 20 landowners using face-to-face interviews. Factor analysis was used to identify broad categories of benefits and barriers that best summarised farmers’ responses to survey questions. Improved farm management, productivity benefits, lifestyle benefits and improved marketability of farms were identified as the key benefits of adopting centre pivot and lateral move irrigators perceived by farmers. Capital cost, operation and maintenance costs, layout of the farm and unreliability of systems were seen as the key barriers. An understanding of these perceived benefits and barriers is the first step towards the development of extension information relating to the adoption of centre pivot and lateral move irrigation systems.


Acknowledgments

This work was funded through the Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment and Department of Primary Industries. Chris Linehan, Alan Lavis and Alfred Heuperman are acknowledged for their comments on the paper. The authors would also like to thank the referees for their useful suggestions and comments.


References


ADC (2002) ‘Australian dairy industry in focus 2002.’ (Australian Dairy Corporation: Melbourne)

Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) ‘Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour.’ (Prentice-Hall International: London)

Austin N (1998) Sustainable use of water and fertiliser in the irrigated dairy industry of Australia. PhD thesis, University of Melbourne, Australia.

Bethune M (2004) Towards effective control of deep drainage under border-check irrigated pasture in the Murray–Darling Basin: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 485–494.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bethune M, Armstrong D (2004) Overview of the irrigated dairy industry. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 127–129.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bethune M, Finger L, Wood M, Wang QJ (2003) Sprinkler, subsurface drip and surge irrigation experiment. (DAV11163: extension of DAV422) Final Report, June 2003. Department of Primary Industries, Tatura, Vic.

Clemmens AJ (2000) ‘Measuring and improving irrigation system performance at the field level.’ (Irrigation Association of Australia: Melbourne)

De Vaus DA (2002) ‘Surveys in social research.’ (Allen and Unwin: Crows Nest, NSW)

Ebbert JC, Kim MH (1988) Relation between irrigation method, sediment yields and losses of pesticides and nitrogen. Journal of Environmental Quality 27, 372–380. open url image1

Fishbein M (1967) ‘Readings in attitude theory and measurement.’ (John Wiley: New York, NY)

Foley J, Raine S (2001) ‘Centre pivot and lateral move machines in the Australian cotton industry.’ (University of Southern Queensland: Toowoomba, Qld)

Guerin LJ, Guerin TF (1994) Constraints to the adoption of innovations in agricultural research and environmental management: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 34, 549–571.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) ‘Multivariate data analysis.’ (Prentice-Hall International: London)

Hill M, Linehan C, Murdoch H (2004) ‘Market research report, efficient irrigation technology to match soils and dairy farming systems.’ (Department of Primary Industries: Tatura, Vic.)

Linehan C, Armstrong D, Doyle P, Johnson F (2004) A survey of water use efficiency on irrigated dairy farms in northern Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 131–136.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Maskey R, Lawler D (2002) ‘Attitudes of farmers about the automation of flood irrigation.’ (Department of Natural Resources and Environment: Tatura, Vic.)

Maskey R, Roberts G, Graetz B (2001) Farmers attitudes to the benefits and barriers of adopting automation for surface irrigation on dairy farms in Australia. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 15, 39–51.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pomfret S (2000) Sustaining our natural resources, dairying for tomorrow: a survey of natural resource management on Australian dairy farms. Project report to the dairy research and development corporation. IRIS Research, Wollongong, NSW.

Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (1996) ‘Using multivariate statistics.’ 3rd edn. (Harper and Row: New York, NY)

Wood M, Martin M (2000) Improved irrigation practices for forage production: module 2. Alternative irrigation technology desktop analysis: final report. (Department of Natural Resources and Environment: Tatura, Vic.)