Maternal productivity of Angus cows divergently selected for post-weaning residual feed intake
P. F. Arthur A F G , R. M. Herd B F , J. F. Wilkins C F and J. A. Archer D E FA NSW Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.
B NSW Department of Primary Industries, Beef Industry Centre, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
C NSW Department of Primary Industries, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.
D NSW Department of Primary Industries, Agricultural Research Centre, Trangie, NSW 2823, Australia.
E Present address: AgResearch Ltd, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Mosgiel, New Zealand.
F Cooperative Research Centre for Cattle and Beef Quality, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
G Corresponding author. Email: paul.arthur@dpi.nsw.gov.au
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45(8) 985-993 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05052
Submitted: 12 February 2005 Accepted: 18 May 2005 Published: 26 August 2005
Abstract
Data on 185 Angus cows were used to study the effect of divergent selection for residual feed intake on maternal productivity across 3 mating seasons, starting from 2000. The cows were the result of 1 to 2.5 generations of selection (mean of 1.5), and differed in estimated breeding value for residual feed intake by 0.8 kg/day. In general, cows lost subcutaneous fat (measured 2 times a year) during the period when they were nursing calves, and gained fat thereafter. No significant selection line differences in fatness were observed except for those measured at the start of the 2000 (10.8 ± 0.4 v. 9.3 ± 0.4 mm), 2001 (11.3 ± 0.4 v. 9.8 ± 0.4 mm) and 2002 (7.0 ± 0.5 v. 5.7 ± 0.5 mm) mating seasons, where high residual feed intake cows had significantly (P<0.05) higher rib fat depths. No significant selection line differences in weight (measured 4 times a year) were observed. However, the cows either maintained or lost weight during the calf nursing period, and gained weight thereafter, with mean weights ranging from 450 to 658 kg. There were no significant selection line differences in pregnancy (mean 90.4%), calving (mean 88.7%) and weaning (mean of 80.8%) rates, milk yield (mean 7.7 kg/day) and weight of calf weaned per cow exposed to bull (mean 195 kg). The study indicates that after 1.5 generations of divergent selection for residual feed intake there are no significant selection line differences for maternal productivity traits.
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by NSW Department of Primary Industries, Meat and Livestock Australia and the Cooperative Research Centre for Cattle and Beef Quality. The assistance provided by P. Parnell, S. Exton, J. Smith, B. Cumming, R. Woodgate, K. Dibley, R. Snelgar, D. Mula and present and former staff at the Trangie Agricultural Research Centre is appreciated.
Ahunu BK,
Arthur PF,
Danbaro G, Aboagye GS
(1993) Preweaning growth performance of West African Shorthorn cattle and their Jersey crossbreds in Ghana. Tropical Animal Health and Production 25, 33–40.
| PubMed |
Anderson JH, Wilham RL
(1978) Weaning weight correction factors from Angus field data. Journal of Animal Science 47, 124–130.
Archer JA,
Reverter A,
Herd RM,
Johnston DJ, Arthur PF
(2002) Genetic variation in feed intake and efficiency of mature beef cows and relationships with postweaning measurements. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 31, 221–224.
Archer JA,
Richardson EC,
Herd RM, Arthur PF
(1999) Potential for selection to improve efficiency of feed use in beef cattle: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 147–161.
Arthur PF,
Archer JA, Herd RM
(2004) Feed intake and efficiency in beef cattle: overview of recent Australian research and challenges for the future. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 361–369.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Arthur PF,
Archer JA,
Herd RM, Melville GJ
(2001a) Response to selection for net feed intake in beef cattle. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 13, 135–138.
Arthur PF,
Archer JA,
Johnston DJ,
Herd RM,
Richardson EC, Parnell PF
(2001b) Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2805–2811.
| PubMed |
Arthur PF,
Hearnshaw H,
Barlow R,
Williamson PJ,
Stephenson P, Dibley K
(1997) Evaluation of Hereford and first-cross cows on three pasture systems. III. Milk yield and its influence on calf performance. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 129, 91–98.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Arthur PF,
Renand G, Krauss D
(2001c) Genetic and phenotypic relationships among different measures of growth and feed efficiency in young Charolais bulls. Livestock Production Science 68, 131–139.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bailey PJ,
Hall MA, Bishop AH
(1975) Effect of weaning age and postweaning nutrition on the growth of calves and liveweight of their dams. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 15, 581–586.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barlow R,
Hearnshaw H,
Arthur PF, Darnell RE
(1994) Evaluation of Hereford and first-cross cows on three pasture systems. I. Calf growth and reproductive performance of young cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 122, 121–129.
Cundiff LV,
Wilham RL, Pratt CA
(1966) Additive versus multiplicative correction factors for weaning weight in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 25, 983–987.
Hagger C
(1994) Relationships between income minus feed cost and residual feed consumption in laying hens. Poultry Science 73, 1341–1344.
Herd RM,
Archer JA, Arthur PF
(2003) Reducing the cost of beef production through genetic improvement in residual feed intake: opportunity and challenges to application. Journal of Animal Science 81, E9–E17.
Hughes TE, Pitchford WS
(2004) Does pregnancy and lactation affect efficiency of female mice divegently selected for postweaning net feed intake? Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 501–506.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jenkins TG, Ferrell CL
(1984) A note on lactation curves on crossbred cows. Animal Production 39, 479–482.
Jenkins TG, Ferrell CL
(1992) Lactation characteristics of nine breeds of cattle fed various quantities of dietary energy. Journal of Animal Science 70, 1652–1660.
| PubMed |
Montaño-Bermudez M, Nielsen MK
(1990) Biological efficiency to weaning and to slaughter of crossbred beef cattle with different genetic potential for milk. Journal of Animal Science 68, 2297–2309.
| PubMed |
Nielsen MK,
Freking BA,
Jones LD,
Nelson SM,
Vorderstrasse TL, Hussey BA
(1997) Divergent selection for heat loss in mice. 2. Correlated responses in feed intake, body mass, body composition, and number born through fifteen generations. Journal of Animal Science 75, 1469–1476.
| PubMed |
Parnell PF,
Herd RM,
Perry D, Bootle B
(1994) The Trangie experiment — response in growth rate, size, maternal ability, reproductive performance, carcase composition, feed requirements and herd profitability. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 20, 17–26.
Pell EW, Thayne WV
(1978) Factors influencing weaning weight and grade of West Virginia beef calves. Journal of Animal Science 46, 596–603.
Renand G,
Fouilloux MN, Menissier F
(1998) Genetic improvement in beef production traits by performance testing beef bulls in France. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Animal Production 23, 77–80.
Schenkel FS,
Miller SP, Wilton JW
(2004) Genetic parameters and breed differences for feed efficiency, growth and body composition traits of young beef bulls. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 84, 153–158.
Totusek R,
Arnett DW,
Holland GL, Whiteman JV
(1973) Relation of estimation method, sampling interval and milk composition to milk yield of beef cows and calf gain. Journal of Animal Science 37, 177–185.
