Evaporative cooling efficiency of a fogging system in a rose greenhouse
H. H. OzturkDepartment of Agricultural Machinery, Faculty of Agriculture, Cukurova University, 01330, Adana, Turkey. Email: hhozturk@cu.edu.tr
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(9) 1231-1237 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA04213
Submitted: 19 October 2004 Accepted: 27 October 2005 Published: 4 August 2006
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of a fogging system on the microclimate of a rose greenhouse. The experiments were carried out in a multi-span plastic greenhouse, 106 wide by 205 m long, made of 11 spans. The fogging system consisted of a water softener and filters to prevent nozzle clogging, a water reservoir, pumps and a pressure regulator, and fog generating nozzles. Three nozzle lines with 82 fog generating nozzles were installed in each span of the plastic greenhouse. At each nozzle line, 82 fog generating nozzles were uniformly located at 2.5 m nozzle spacing. The fog generating nozzle parameters were determined to characterise the efficiency of the fogging system based on air flow rate and evaporation flow rate. The results showed that the fogging system was able to keep the air temperature inside the plastic greenhouse 6.6°C lower than that outside. The average ventilation rate of the plastic greenhouse was 13.6 m3/s during the experimental period. The efficiency of the fogging system ranged from 11.7 to 80%. The efficiency of the fogging system increased as the difference between the dry-bulb temperature and wet-bulb temperature rose. The results indicated that air relative humidity inside the plastic greenhouse was increased by 25% on average by means of the fogging system examined in this study. The evaporation flow rate varied between 130 and 1223 g/h.m2, whereas the air flow rate ranged from 39.3 to 298 kg/h.m2. Fogging system efficiency increased linearly with evaporation flow rate and the absolute humidity difference between the inside and outside air.
Additional keywords: evaporation flow rate, fogging system, greenhouse, microclimate.
Al-Amri AMS
(2000) Comparative use of greenhouse cover materials and their effectiveness in evaporative cooling systems under conditions in eastern province of Saudi Arabia. AMA 31, 61–66.
Arbel A,
Yekutieli O, Barak M
(1999) Performance of a fog system for cooling greenhouses. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 72, 129–136.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Arbel A,
Shklyar A, Barak M
(2000) Buoyancy-driven ventilation in a greenhouse cooled by a fogging system. Acta Horticulturae 534, 327–334.
Bailey BJ,
Montero J,
Biel C,
Wilkinson A, Jolliet A
(1993) Transpiration of ficus benjamina. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 65, 229–243.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Baptista FJ,
Bailey BJ,
Randall JM, Meneses JF
(1999) Greenhouse ventilation rate: theory and measurement with tracer gas techniques. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 72, 363–374.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Critten DL
(1988) Direct sunlight losses in North-South, aligned multispan greenhouse with symmetric roofs at UK latitudes. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 40, 71–79.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Elbatawi IEA
(1998) Air temperature prediction model to control solar energy heating in a germination greenhouse at night. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38, 409–417.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Firth DJ,
Johns GG, Whalley RDB
(2003) Glasshouse and field studies on the effects of groundcovers on banana and macadamia growth and water relations. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 1245–1254.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Giacomelli GA,
Ginigers MS,
Krass AE, Mears DR
(1985) Improved methods of greenhouse evaporative cooling. Acta Horticulturae 174, 49–55.
Gupta CP,
Abbas A, Bhutta MS
(1995) Thermal comfort inside a tractor cab by evaporative cooling system. Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers 38, 1667–1675.
Healey KD,
Hammer GL,
Rickert KG, Bange MP
(1998) Radiation use efficiency increases when the diffuse component of incident radiation is enhanced under shade. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 665–672.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ibarra-Jiménez L,
Quezada-Martín MR, de la Rosa-Ibarra M
(2004) The effect of plastic mulch and row covers on the growth and physiology of cucumber. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 91–94.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kittas C,
Bartzanas T, Jaffrin A
(2001) Greenhouse evaporative cooling: measurement and data analysis. Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers 44, 683–689.
Montero JI,
Anton A,
Biel C, Franquet A
(1990) Cooling of greenhouse with compressed air fogging nozzles. Acta Horticulturae 281, 199–209.
Morgan A, Sedgley M
(2002) Environmental control of bud formation and flowering of clonal Acacia baileyana F. Muell. for ornamental horticulture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 211–216.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Öztürk HH, Başçetinçelik A
(1997) The nocturnal heat loss and internal temperatures in plastic tunnel greenhouses. Acta Horticulturae 443, 79–84.
Öztürk HH, Başçetinçelik A
(2003) Effect of thermal screens on microclimate and overall heat loss coefficient in plastic tunnel greenhouses. Türk Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 27, 123–134..
Seginer I
(1994) Transpirational cooling of a greenhouse crop with partial ground cover. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 71, 265–281.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tegg RS, Lane PA
(2004) A comparison of the performance and growth of a range of turfgrass species under shade. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 353–358.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
