Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA04185
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 46(9)

Understanding farmers’ monitoring of water tables for salinity management

S. P. Marsh A C , M. P. Burton A and D. J. Pannell A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

B CRC for Plant-Based Management of Dryland Salinity, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: spmarsh@cyllene.uwa.edu.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(9) 1113-1122 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA04185
Submitted: 30 August 2004  Accepted: 18 November 2005   Published: 4 August 2006

Abstract

Given the prominence of dryland salinity as a resource management problem in Australia, it might be expected that farmers would keenly monitor the levels of saline groundwater under their farms. However, many farmers choose not to monitor, in some cases even when they have previously installed bores suitable for this purpose. We investigated this apparent paradox by analysing the monitoring behaviour of a group of farmers in the Jerramungup region of southern Western Australia. The farmers are unusual in displaying a very high rate of monitoring compared with other regions, although this rate has fallen over the past decade. A range of physical, economic and social influences on monitoring behaviour are identified by statistical analysis of survey and physical data. A key finding is that farmers who are using the information from monitoring to assess salinity management strategies implemented on their farms are likely to monitor more frequently. This suggests that monitoring frequency may be driven in large part by the availability of suitable salinity management practices that can be implemented, in contrast to the view that adoption of salinity management practices may be enhanced by programs that encourage monitoring.


Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the contributions to this work of Don McFarlane and Arjen Ryder (Department of Agriculture Western Australia), Carolyn Daniel (Jerramungup LCDC) and farmers in the Jerramungup LCD, particularly Bob Twigg and Geoff Bee. Thanks also to 3 anonymous reviewers who provided very helpful comments on the paper. The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the Grains Research and Development Corporation.


References


Davis J (1997) The effectiveness of public funding for Landcare: a case study from Jerramungup, Western Australia. MSc thesis (Natural Resource Management), Faculty of Agriculture, University of Western Australia.

Greene WH (1997) ‘Econometric analysis.’ 3rd edn. (Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ)

Kenny N (1998) Avon water quality: sustainable community water quality monitoring. In ‘Proceedings of the national Waterwatch conference: getting better at getting wet’. pp. 159–164. (University of Adelaide: Roseworthy)

Kington EA, Pannell DJ (2003) Dryland salinity in the upper Kent River catchment of Western Australia: farmer perceptions and practices. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 19–28.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

McFarlane D, Ryder A (1993) Groundwater trends in the Jerramungup region. A report compiled for the JERAC EXPO, October 1993.

Marsh SP (1998) Researchers and the sustainability message. Agricultural Science 11(4), 29–32. open url image1

Marsh SP, Burton MP, Pannell DJ (2001) Understanding farmer monitoring of a ‘sustainability indicator’: depth to saline groundwater in Western Australia. In ‘Land degradation’. (Ed. A Conacher) pp. 207–222. (Kluwer: Dordrecht)

National Land and Water Resources Audit (2001) ‘Australian dryland salinity assessment 2000.’ (National Land and Water Resources Audit: Canberra)

Pannell DJ (1999) Social and economic challenges in the development of complex farming systems. Agroforestry Systems 45, 395–409.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pannell DJ (2001a) Explaining non-adoption of practices to prevent dryland salinity in Western Australia: implications for policy. In ‘Land degradation’. (Ed. A Conacher) pp. 335–346. (Kluwer: Dordrecht)

Pannell DJ (2001b) Dryland salinity: economic, scientific, social and policy dimensions. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 45, 517–546.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pannell DJ, Glenn NA (2000) A framework for economic evaluation and selection of sustainability indicators in agriculture. Ecological Economics 33, 135–149.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

StataCorp (1999) ‘Stata statistical software: release 6.0.’ pp. 65–79. (Stata Corporation: College Station, TX)

Veall MR, Zimmermann KF (1994) Goodness of fit measures in the Tobit model. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 56, 485–499. open url image1

Wilkinson R (1996) Resource monitoring by Hawke’s Bay farmers. Landcare Research Science Series report number 16. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, New Zealand.