Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Performance of the pear (Pyrus communis) cultivar William’s Bon Chretien grafted on seven rootstocks

T. E. Sotiropoulos
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

NAGREF, Pomology Institute, PO Box 122, 59200 Naoussa, Greece.Email: thosotir@alfanet.gr

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(5) 701-705 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA04132
Submitted: 13 July 2004  Accepted: 14 January 2005   Published: 12 May 2006

Abstract

The performance of the pear (Pyrus communis L.) cv. William’s Bon Chretien (William’s BC) grafted on 7 rootstocks was evaluated over a period of 8 years. The scions of the cultivar William’s BC were grafted on the following 7 rootstocks: (i) P. communis seedlings, (ii) quince BA 29, (iii) quince A, (iv) Pomology Institute (PI) 1, (v) PI 5, (vi) PI 27, and (vii) quince Komotinis (iv–vii are Greek local quince seedlings). Compatibility of William’s BC with P. communis, PI 1 and PI 27 was excellent and no tree losses occurred. The highest yield per tree was recorded when William’s BC was grafted on PI 5 rootstock, although it was not significantly different from P. communis. The lowest yield was recorded when the cultivar was grafted on BA 29 rootstock. Production efficiency of William’s BC was highest when grafted on PI 27, intermediate on quince A, PI 1 and PI 5 and lowest on P. communis. Iron concentration of leaves of scions grafted on P. communis, BA 29, quince A and quince Komotinis were significantly lower than those grafted on PI 5. From the results it is concluded that the rootstocks PI 1 and PI 27 are suitable for the cv. William’s BC under Greek or other similar climatic conditions.


References


Bassi D, Tagliavini M, Marangoni B (1994) Selection of clonal rootstocks of Pyrus communis (L.). Acta Horticulturae 367, 364–371. open url image1

Bell RL, Reed BM (2002) In vitro tissue culture of pear: advances in techniques for micropropagation and germplasm preservation. Acta Horticulturae 596, 412–418. open url image1

Carrera M (1994) La dissafinita d’ innesto delle cultivar di pero su cotogno. Rivista Frutticolturae. 56, 41–43. open url image1

Castro HR, Rodriguez RO (2002) The behaviour of quince selections as pear rootstocks for ‘Abbe Fetel’ and ‘Conference’ pear cultivars in the Rio Negro Valley, Argentina. Acta Horticulturae 596, 363–368. open url image1

Chaplin MH, Westwood MN (1980) Effects of Pyrus species and related genera rootstocks on mineral uptake in ‘Bartlett’ pear. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2, 335–346. open url image1

Ermel FF, Poessel JL, Faurobert M, Catesson AM (1997) Early scion/stock junction in compatible and incompatible pear/pear and pear/quince grafts: a histocytological study. Annals of Botany 79, 505–515.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fallahi E, Larsen F (1984) Rootstock influence on leaf and fruit mineral status of ‘Bartlett’ and ‘D’Anjou’ pear. Scientia Horticulturae 23, 41–49.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Garcin A, Edin M, Mathieu V, Hilaire C (1994) Poirier: maturité et qualité de William’s en fonction du porte-greffe. Infos-Ctifl 103, 30–35. open url image1

Husain S, Urbina V, Dalmases J, Pascual M, Dalmau R (2003) Performance of ‘Williams’ pear on five rootstocks. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 78, 193–196. open url image1

Jackson ML (Ed.) (1970) ‘Soil chemical analysis.’ (Prentice Hall Inc.: Madison)

Jacob H (1998) Pyrodwarf: a new clonal rootstock for high density pear orchards. Acta Horticulturae 475, 169–177. open url image1

Le Lezec M, Lecomte P, Laurens F, Michelesi JC (1997) Sensibilité varietable au feu bactérien (1re partie). L’Arboriculture Fruiterie 44, 57–62. open url image1

Lemoine J, Simon M, Costard F, Bossu V, Pradier B (1998) Le dépérissement du Poirier ou pear decline. L’ Arboriculture Fruiterie 45, 29–34. open url image1

Lombard PB, Westwood MN (1976) Performance of six pear cultivars on clonal Old Home, double rooted and seedling rootstocks. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 101, 214–216. open url image1

Lombard PB, Westwood MN (1987) Pear rootstocks. In ‘Rootstocks for fruit crops’. (Eds RC Rom, RF Carlson) pp. 145–183. (John Wiley and Sons: New York)

Loreti F, Massai R, Fei C, Cinelli F (2002) Performance of ‘Conference’ cultivar on several quince and pear rootstocks: preliminary results. Acta Horticulturae 596, 311–318. open url image1

Marangoni B, Mazzanti F (1999) I portinesti del pero. L’ Informatore Agrario 6, 33–38. open url image1

Mielke EA, Smith L (2002) Evaluation of the Horner rootstocks. Acta Horticulturae 596, 325–330. open url image1

Musacchi S, Ancarani V, Grandi M, Sansavini S (2002) Comparative field performance of cvs. Sensation Red Bartlett and Cascade grafted to six quince and pear clonal seedling rootstocks. Acta Horticulturae 596, 385–388. open url image1

Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (1982) Chemical and microbiological properties. In ‘Methods of soil analysis’. (Eds AL Page, RH Miller, DR Keeney) pp. 431–436. (ASA-SSSA: Madison)

Palmer JW (2002) Effect of spacing and rootstock on the performance of ‘Comice’ pear in New Zealand. Acta Horticulturae 596, 609–614. open url image1

Palonen P, Buszard D (1997) Current state of cold hardiness research on fruit crops. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 77, 399–420. open url image1

Shear CB, Faust M (1980) Nutritional ranges in deciduous tree fruits and nuts. Horticultural Reviews 2, 143–163. open url image1

Sugar D, Powers KA, Basile S (1999) Effect of rootstock on fruit characteristics and tree productivity in seven red-fruited pear cultivars. Fruit Varieties Journal 53, 148–154. open url image1

Wertheim S (2002) Rootstocks for European pear: a review. Acta Horticulturae 596, 299–307. open url image1

Wolf B (1971) The determination of boron in soil extracts, plant materials, composts, manures, water and nutrient solutions. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2, 363–372. open url image1