The role of farming systems group approaches in achieving sustainability in Australian agriculture
A. M. RidleyCooperative Research Centre for Plant-based Management of Dryland Salinity, Department of Primary Industries, RMB 1145 Rutherglen, Vic. 3685, Australia. Email: anna.ridley@dpi.vic.gov.au
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45(6) 603-615 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA03247
Submitted: 21 November 2003 Accepted: 18 February 2005 Published: 29 June 2005
Abstract
The concepts surrounding sustainability are outlined and economic, environmental and social sustainability are defined for Australian farming systems — including the issue of scale at which sustainability can be practically applied. Farming systems work in Australia is often a farmer–scientist partnership, with research mainly conducted at the paddock/farm scale, this being where management decisions are made. Farming systems research as conducted currently has concentrated on components of the ‘system’ and could be described as systems in name more than substance. Farming systems groups have primarily focused on issue of profitability and economic sustainability (soil resource). Some groups have focused on salinity and recharge related issues using perennial pastures, but work on biodiversity has been limited, despite its role as a key environmental sustainability issue, at least, in southern Australia. Several groups are addressing issues of social sustainability at scales larger (e.g. local community or region) than the farm.
Farming systems groups need to progress towards more sustainable farming systems involving increased complexity and consideration of multiple values for a number of reasons outlined in this paper. Important factors in this evolution include investment in developing new technologies, the knowledge and learning environment, increased emphasis on environmental and social sustainability, progression to larger scales (e.g. catchment or region), and different relationships in view of changing institutional arrangements. Social learning and ‘soft systems’ approaches will become more important to provide skills to deal with complexity, conflict, and multiple values of people. Farming systems groups need to become more actively engaged with a wider group of stakeholders including catchment management organisations and other non-farming members of the community. Such engagement is occurring in some groups. However, there are large training needs, particularly for facilitators to effectively deal with the increasing complexity of work conducted by groups that are involving larger scales and using a multi-disciplinary approach.
Acknowledgments
Thank you to farming systems groups for help in interpreting their work on sustainability, and to Alex Gartmann, Cameron Weeks, John Doughton, David Scholz, Amanda Just, Col Hacking, Chris Bluett, Sam Doudle and Catherine Evans. Garry McDonald, David Pannell, Phil Price and Tony Fay are thanked for providing critical and helpful comments.
Cooper D,
Olsen G, Bartle J
(2005) Capture of agricultural surplus water determines the productivity and scale of new dryland woody crop industries. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45(11), (in press).
(verified 10 October 2004).
Holling CS
(2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological and social systems. Ecosystems 4, 390–405.
| Crossref |
(accessed 5 November 2004).
Pannell DJ
(2001) Dryland salinity: economic, scientific, social and policy dimensions. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 45, 517–546.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Passioura JB
(1979) Accountability, philosophy and plant physiology. Search 10, 347–350.
Passioura JB
(1999) Can we bring about a perennially peopled and productive countryside? Agroforestry Systems 45, 411–421.
| Crossref |
Ridley AM
(2005) The role of applied science in helping farmers make decisions about environmental sustainability. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 1–10.
Ridley AM, Pannell DJ
(2005) The role of plants and plant-based R and D in managing dryland salinity in Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45(11), (in press).
Ridley AM,
Paramore T, Seymour E
(2003) Towards ‘clean and green’ farming systems using group learning to implement Environmental Management Systems. Australian Journal of Botany 51, 637–645.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schusler TM, Decker DJ
(2003) Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 15, 309–326.
Scott BJ,
Ridley AM, Conyers MK
(2000) Management of soil acidity in long-term pastures of south-eastern Australia: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40, 1173–1198.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Seymour EJ, Ridley AM
(2005) Towards Environmental Management Systems (EMS) in Australian agriculture to achieve better environmental outcomes at the catchment scale — a review. Environmental Management 35, 311–329.
| Crossref |
PubMed |
Stoneham G,
Eigenraam M,
Ridley AM, Barr N
(2003) The application of sustainability indicators to Australian agriculture: an overview. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 195–203.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
