Twinning in cattle: a pathway for reducing the methane intensity of beef
J. N. Gebbels
A * , M. E. Kragt A and P. E. Vercoe A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
B Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Animal Production Science 63(13) 1340-1348 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN23088
Submitted: 1 March 2023 Accepted: 11 May 2023 Published: 2 June 2023
© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY)
Abstract
Context: Reducing livestock emissions, the largest single contributor to agricultural emissions, is increasingly recognised as a high priority. The low biological efficiency of beef cattle, due to their long gestation period, long generational interval, and propensity to be uniparous, contributes to the high methane emissions intensity (kg CO2-e/kg product) of beef compared to most other food products.
Aims: We evaluate the potential of increasing the frequency of multiparous births (twinning) as a pathway to reducing the methane intensity of beef and the net methane emissions of intensive beef systems.
Methods: We simulate a uniparous herd structure and emissions profile using GrassGro™ livestock systems modelling software and then calculate the effects of an increasing frequency of multiparous births (twinning), up to 1.53 calves per cow joined, on methane emissions.
Key results: Our results demonstrate that beef from calves reared as twins has a 22% lower methane intensity than beef from a single reared calf. Although twinning reduces the methane intensity of beef, at the herd level, net methane emissions could rise by as much as 23% at 1.53 calves per cow joined if overall herd size is allowed to grow through an increased number of calves. If we decrease stocking rates, whilst also increasing twinning rates, it is possible to reduce net emissions by up to 14%, without changing productivity.
Conclusions: Our results illustrate the significant potential of twinning to decrease the methane intensity of beef and to increase the productivity per cow in intensive beef systems.
Implications: Despite this, twinning is unlikely to be a viable net emissions reduction pathway – as twinning will increase stocking rate unless herd structure is altered – unless a commercial or policy driver to reduce net methane emissions is established.
Keywords: Beef, biological efficiency, calving rate, enteric fermentation, GrassGro™, livestock emissions, methane intensity, twinning.
References
AHDB (2020) UK milk productivity: the global context. Agricultural & Horticultural Development Board – UK. Available at https://ahdb.org.uk/news/uk-milk-productivity-the-global-context [Accessed 15 September 2022]Alcock DJ, Hegarty RS (2011) Potential effects of animal management and genetic improvement on enteric methane emissions, emissions intensity and productivity of sheep enterprises at Cowra, Australia. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 749–760.
| Potential effects of animal management and genetic improvement on enteric methane emissions, emissions intensity and productivity of sheep enterprises at Cowra, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Australian Government (2020) State Greenhouse Gas Inventory. Australian Government. Available at https://ageis.climatechange.gov.au [Accessed 29 August 2021]
Baharin K, Beilharz RG (1977) A survey of reproductive performance in herds of beef cattle from 13 properties in Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 17, 181–186.
| A survey of reproductive performance in herds of beef cattle from 13 properties in Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bar-Anan R, Bowman JC (1974) Twinning in Israeli-Friesian dairy herds. Animal Science 18, 109–115.
| Twinning in Israeli-Friesian dairy herds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barlow R, Hearnshaw H, Arthur PF, Darnell RE (1994) Evaluation of Hereford and first-cross cows on three pasture systems. I. Calf growth and reproductive performance of young cows. The Journal of Agricultural Science 122, 121–129.
| Evaluation of Hereford and first-cross cows on three pasture systems. I. Calf growth and reproductive performance of young cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Beauchemin KA, Ungerfeld EM, Eckard RJ, Wang M (2020) Review: fifty years of research on rumen methanogenesis: lessons learned and future challenges for mitigation. Animal 14, s2–s16.
| Review: fifty years of research on rumen methanogenesis: lessons learned and future challenges for mitigation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bell MJ, Eckard RJ, Harrison MT, Neal JS, Cullen BR (2013) Effect of warming on the productivity of perennial ryegrass and kikuyu pastures in south-eastern Australia. Crop and Pasture Science 64, 61–70.
| Effect of warming on the productivity of perennial ryegrass and kikuyu pastures in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bergin A, Kenny D, McGee M, Kelly A, Crosson P (2022) Modelling the effects of twinning on the economics of pasture-based suckler beef systems. Animal – Science Proceedings 13, 48–49. 10.1016/j.anscip.2022.03.073
Blaxter KL, Clapperton JL (1965) Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition 19, 511–522.
| Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chapman C (2016) Calving alert systems: know exactly when your cow is calving. Pennsylvania State University. Available at https://extension.psu.edu/calving-alert-systems-know-exactly-when-your-cow-is-calving [Accessed 06 June 2022]
Charmley E, Williams SRO, Moate PJ, Hegarty RS, Herd RM, Oddy VH, Reyenga P, Staunton KM, Anderson A, Hannah MC (2016) A universal equation to predict methane production of forage-fed cattle in Australia. Animal Production Science 56, 169–180.
| A universal equation to predict methane production of forage-fed cattle in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clune S, Crossin E, Verghese K (2017) Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories. Journal of Cleaner Production 140, 766–783.
| Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Çobanoğlu Ö (2010) Twinning in cattle: desirable or undesirable. Journal of Biological & Environmental Sciences 4, 1–8.
Cottle DJ, Harrison MT, Ghahramani A (2016) Sheep greenhouse gas emission intensities under different management practices, climate zones and enterprise types. Animal Production Science 56, 507–518.
| Sheep greenhouse gas emission intensities under different management practices, climate zones and enterprise types.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cummins LJ (1992) Contract review: twinning in cattle. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 19, 438–447.
Cummins LJ, Cummins ES (2018) Productivity of a beef twinner herd in Western Victoria. In ‘Abstracts from 32nd Biennial Conference of the Australian Society of Animal Production’. p. 2594. (Australian Association of Animal Sciences)
Cummins LJ, Morris CA, Kirkpatrick BW (2008) Developing twinning cattle for commercial production. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 930–934.
| Developing twinning cattle for commercial production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Davies BL, Alford AR, Griffith GR (2009) Economic effects of alternate growth path, time of calving and breed type combinations across southern Australian beef cattle environments: feedlot finishing at the New South Wales experimental site. Animal Production Science 49, 535–541.
| Economic effects of alternate growth path, time of calving and breed type combinations across southern Australian beef cattle environments: feedlot finishing at the New South Wales experimental site.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
de Rose EP, Wilton JW (1991) Productivity and profitability of twin births in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 69, 3085–3093.
| Productivity and profitability of twin births in beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
DEDJTR (2015) Drought feeding and management of beef cattle. Department of Economic Development Jobs Transport and Resources, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Available at https://www.feedinglivestock.vic.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Beef-cattle-drought-feeding-guide.pdf [Accessed 09 August 2022]
DEFRA (2019) Cattle farm practices survey 2019. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, Newport, United Kingdom. Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/831119/Cattle_Farm_practices_survey_April_2019-12sep19.pdf [Accessed 28 September 2022]
DPIF – QLD (2015) Beef cattle nutrition. Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Available at https://www.daf.qld.gov.au/business-priorities/biosecurity/animal-biosecurity-welfare/welfare-ethics/drought-feeding [Accessed 12 July 2022]
DPIRD (2021) Managing the beef breeder herd in southern Western Australia. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Perth, Western Australia. Available at https://www.agric.wa.gov.au/management-reproduction/managing-breeder-herd-southern-western-australia [Accessed 11 July 2022]
DPIRD (2022) Livestock equivalents for estimating stocking rates and grazing pressure in the rangelands of Western Australia. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Perth, Western Australia. Available at https://www.agric.wa.gov.au/rangelands/livestock-equivalents-estimating-stocking-rates-and-grazing-pressure-rangelands-western [Accessed 19 August 2022]
Drouillard JS (2018) Current situation and future trends for beef production in the United States of America – a review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 31, 1007–1016.
| Current situation and future trends for beef production in the United States of America – a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Eady S, Viner J, MacDonnell J (2011) On-farm greenhouse gas emissions and water use: case studies in the Queensland beef industry. Animal Production Science 51, 667
| On-farm greenhouse gas emissions and water use: case studies in the Queensland beef industry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Echternkamp SE, Gregory KE (1999) Effects of twinning on postpartum reproductive performance in cattle selected for twin births. Journal of Animal Science 77, 48–60.
| Effects of twinning on postpartum reproductive performance in cattle selected for twin births.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Echternkamp SE, Thallman RM, Cushman RA, Allan MF, Gregory KE (2007) Increased calf production in cattle selected for twin ovulations. Journal of Animal Science 85, 3239–3248.
| Increased calf production in cattle selected for twin ovulations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
FAO (2020) Emissions due to agriculture. Global, regional and country trends 2000–2018. FAOSTAT Analytical Brief Series No 18. Food & Agriculture Organisation, Rome, Italy. Available at https://www.fao.org/3/cb3808en/cb3808en.pdf [Accessed 01 October 2022]
Freer M, Moore AD, Donnelly JR (1997) GRAZPLAN: decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises – II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS. Agricultural Systems 54, 77–126.
| GRAZPLAN: decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises – II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fulkerson WJ, Slack K, Hennessy DW, Hough GM (1998) Nutrients in ryegrass (Lolium spp.), white clover (Trifolium repens) and kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) pastures in relation to season and stage of regrowth in a subtropical environment. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38, 227–240.
| Nutrients in ryegrass (Lolium spp.), white clover (Trifolium repens) and kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) pastures in relation to season and stage of regrowth in a subtropical environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gebbels JN, Kragt ME, Thomas DT, Vercoe PE (2022) Improving productivity reduces methane intensity but increases the net emissions of sheepmeat and wool enterprises. Animal 16, 100490
| Improving productivity reduces methane intensity but increases the net emissions of sheepmeat and wool enterprises.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G (2013) Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)).
Gonzalez Fischer C, Bilenca D (2020) Can we produce more beef without increasing its environmental impact? Argentina as a case study. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 18, 1–11.
| Can we produce more beef without increasing its environmental impact? Argentina as a case study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gordon I, Williams G, Edwards J (1962) The use of serum gonadotropin (P.M.S.) in the induction of twin-pregnancy in the cow. The Journal of Agricultural Science 59, 143–198.
| The use of serum gonadotropin (P.M.S.) in the induction of twin-pregnancy in the cow.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gregory KE, Echternkamp SE, Dickerson GE, Cundiff LV, Koch RM, Van Vleck LD (1990) Twinning in cattle: III. Effects of twinning on dystocia, reproductive traits, calf survival, calf growth and cow productivity. Journal of Animal Science 68, 3133–3144.
| Twinning in cattle: III. Effects of twinning on dystocia, reproductive traits, calf survival, calf growth and cow productivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gregory KE, Echternkamp SE, Cundiff LV (1996) Effects of twinning on dystocia, calf survival, calf growth, carcass traits, and cow productivity. Journal of Animal Science 74, 1223–1233.
| Effects of twinning on dystocia, calf survival, calf growth, carcass traits, and cow productivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Guerra-Martinez P, Dickerson GE, Anderson GB, Green RD (1990) Embryo-transfer twinning and performance efficiency in beef production. Journal of Animal Science 68, 4039–4050.
| Embryo-transfer twinning and performance efficiency in beef production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harrison MT, Jackson T, Cullen BR, Rawnsley RP, Ho C, Cummins L, Eckard RJ (2014) Increasing ewe genetic fecundity improves whole-farm production and reduces greenhouse gas emissions intensities: 1. Sheep production and emissions intensities. Agricultural Systems 131, 23–33.
| Increasing ewe genetic fecundity improves whole-farm production and reduces greenhouse gas emissions intensities: 1. Sheep production and emissions intensities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hegarty RS, Alcock D, Robinson DL, Goopy JP, Vercoe PE (2010) Nutritional and flock management options to reduce methane output and methane per unit product from sheep enterprises. Animal Production Science 50, 1026–1033.
| Nutritional and flock management options to reduce methane output and methane per unit product from sheep enterprises.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hennessy DW, Wilkins JF (2005) Efficiency of calf production from twin-bearing beef cows on an intensive pasture system in subtropical Australia. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 18, 1735–1740.
| Efficiency of calf production from twin-bearing beef cows on an intensive pasture system in subtropical Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hocquette J-F, Chatellier V (2011) Prospects for the European beef sector over the next 30 years. Animal Frontiers 1, 20–28.
| Prospects for the European beef sector over the next 30 years.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Horizon Agriculture (2021) GrassGro 3. St Ives, New South Wales. Available at https://www.hzn.com.au/ [Accessed 28 March 2021]
Hossein-Zadeh NG (2010) The effect of twinning on milk yield, dystocia, calf birth weight and open days in Holstein dairy cows of Iran. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 94, 780–787.
| The effect of twinning on milk yield, dystocia, calf birth weight and open days in Holstein dairy cows of Iran.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirkpatrick BW (2002) Management of twinning cow herds. Journal of Animal Science 80, E14–E18.
| Management of twinning cow herds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Komisarek J, Dorynek Z (2002) Genetic aspects of twinning in cattle. Journal of Applied Genetics 43, 55–68.
Koong LJ, Anderson GB, Garrett WN (1982) Maternal energy status of beef cattle during single and twin pregnancy. Journal of Animal Science 54, 480–484.
| Maternal energy status of beef cattle during single and twin pregnancy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McCutcheon GA, Caffrey PJ, Kelleher DL, Brophy PO (1991) Twinning in a suckler herd: 1. Effects on performance of cows and their calves. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 1–9.
McKiernan B (2007) Dressing percentages for cattle. New South Wales – Department of Primary Industries, Australia. Available at https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/103992/dressing-percentages-for-cattle.pdf [Accessed 11 June 2021]
MLA (2021) Male and female carcase weights break records. Meat and Livestock Australia, Sydney, New South Wales. Available at https://www.mla.com.au/prices-markets/market-news/2021/male-and-female-carcase-weights-break-records/ [Accessed 28 April 2022]
MLA (2022) Carbon Neutral 2030. Meat and Livestock Australia. Sydney, New South Wales. Available at https://www.mla.com.au/research-and-development/Environment-sustainability/carbon-neutral-2030-rd/ [Accessed 14 November 2022]
Mokany K, Moore AD, Graham P, Simpson RJ (2009) Optimal management of fertiliser and stocking rate in temperate grazing systems. Animal Production Science 50, 6–16.
| Optimal management of fertiliser and stocking rate in temperate grazing systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moran J (2005) Nutrient requirements of dairy cows. CSIRO Publishing, Clayton South, Victoria.
Nephawe K (2002) Twinning in beef cattle: an opportunity to improve reproductive and economic efficiency of beef production? Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved April, 4, 2019. Available at http://www.bifconference.com/bif2002/baker_essay_pdfs/nephawe_02bif.pdf
Neville WE, McCullough ME (1969) Calculated energy requirements of lactating and non-lactating Hereford cows. Journal of Animal Science 29, 823–829.
| Calculated energy requirements of lactating and non-lactating Hereford cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
NFF (2020) NFF calls for net carbon zero by 2050. National Farmers Federation, Canberra, ACT, Australia. Available at https://nff.org.au/media-release/nff-calls-for-net-carbon-zero-by-2050/ [Accessed 07 December 2022]
NFU (2019) Achieving net zero – farming’s 2040 goal. National Farmers Union, Stoneleigh, Warwickshire. Available at https://www.nfuonline.com/media/jq1b2nx5/achieving-net-zero-farming-s-2040-goal.pdf [Accessed 07 December 2022]
Opio C, Gerber P, Mottet A, Falcucci A, Tempio G, Macleod M, Vellinga T, Henderson B, Steinfeld H (2013) ‘Greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant supply chains – a global life cycle assessment.’ (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations)
Pachauri RK, Allen MR, Barros VR, Broome J, Cramer W, Christ R, Church JA, Clarke L, Dahe Q, Dasgupta P (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (IPCC) Available at https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/ [Accessed 20 March 2021]
Patterson DC, Steen RWJ, Kilpatrick DJ (1993) A comparison of growth, food efficiency and carcass characteristics of single and twin beef calves derived by embryo transfer. Animal Science 57, 81–89.
| A comparison of growth, food efficiency and carcass characteristics of single and twin beef calves derived by embryo transfer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pulina G, Acciaro M, Atzori AS, Battacone G, Crovetto GM, Mele M, Pirlo G, Rassu SPG (2021) Animal board invited review – Beef for future: technologies for a sustainable and profitable beef industry. Animal 15, 100358
| Animal board invited review – Beef for future: technologies for a sustainable and profitable beef industry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sawa A, Bogucki M, Głowska M (2015) Effect of single and multiple pregnancies on performance of primiparous and multiparous cows. Archives Animal Breeding 58, 43–48.
| Effect of single and multiple pregnancies on performance of primiparous and multiparous cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shukla PR, Skea J, Calvo Buendia E, Masson-Delmotte V, Portner H-O, Roberts DC, Zhain P, Slade R, Connors S, Van Diemen R, Ferrat M, Haughey M, Luz E, Neogi S, Pathak M, Petzold J, Portugal Pereira J, Vyas P, Huntley E, Kissick K, Belkacemi M, Malley J (2019) Summary for policymakers. Climate change and land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Available at https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/ [Accessed 9 June 2021]
Small JA, Charmley E, Kennedy AD (2000) The performance of primiparous and multiparous beef cows rearing single and simulated-twin calves. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 80, 569–576.
| The performance of primiparous and multiparous beef cows rearing single and simulated-twin calves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Utsunomiya YT, Milanesi M, Fortes MRS, Porto-Neto LR, Utsunomiya ATH, Silva MVGB, Garcia JF, Ajmone-Marsan P (2019) Genomic clues of the evolutionary history of Bos indicus cattle. Animal Genetics 50, 557–568.
| Genomic clues of the evolutionary history of Bos indicus cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Van Vleck LD, Gregory KE, Echternkamp SE (1991) Ovulation rate and twinning rate in cattle: heritabilities and genetic correlation. Journal of Animal Science 69, 3213–3219.
| Ovulation rate and twinning rate in cattle: heritabilities and genetic correlation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Velazco JI, Herd RM, Cottle DJ, Hegarty RS (2017) Daily methane emissions and emission intensity of grazing beef cattle genetically divergent for residual feed intake. Animal Production Science 57, 627–635.
| Daily methane emissions and emission intensity of grazing beef cattle genetically divergent for residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vermeulen SJ, Campbell BM, Ingram JSI (2012) Climate change and food systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37, 195–222.
| Climate change and food systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wakchaure R, Ganguly S (2016) Twinning in cattle: a review. ARC Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1, 1–4.
| Twinning in cattle: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Webster AJF (1989) Bioenergetics, bioengineering and growth. Animal Science 48, 249–269.
| Bioenergetics, bioengineering and growth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wiedemann SG, Henry BK, Mcgahan EJ, Grant T, Murphy CM, Niethe G (2015a) Resource use and greenhouse gas intensity of Australian beef production: 1981–2010. Agricultural Systems 133, 109–118.
| Resource use and greenhouse gas intensity of Australian beef production: 1981–2010.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wiedemann SG, Ledgard SF, Henry BK, Yan M-J, Mao N, Russell SJ (2015b) Application of life cycle assessment to sheep production systems: investigating co-production of wool and meat using case studies from major global producers. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 20, 463–476.
| Application of life cycle assessment to sheep production systems: investigating co-production of wool and meat using case studies from major global producers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, Garnett T, Tilman D, Declerck F, Wood A, Jonell M, Clark M, Gordon LJ, Fanzo J, Hawkes C, Zurayk R, Rivera JA, De Vries W, Majele Sibanda L, Afshin A, Chaudhary A, Herrero M, Agustina R, Branca F, Lartey A, Fan S, Crona B, Fox E, Bignet V, Troell M, Lindahl T, Singh S, Cornell SE, Srinath Reddy K, Narain S, Nishtar S, Murray CJL (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet (British edition) 393, 447–492.
| Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
