Use of dry-matter intake recorded at multiple time periods during lactation increases the accuracy of genomic prediction for dry-matter intake and residual feed intake in dairy cattle
Sunduimijid Bolormaa A * , Mekonnen Haile-Mariam A L , Leah C. Marett B C , Filippo Miglior D E , Christine F. Baes E F , Flavio S. Schenkel E , Erin E. Connor G H , Coralia I. V. Manzanilla-Pech I , Eileen Wall J , Mike P. Coffey J , Michael E. Goddard A K , Iona M. MacLeod A and Jennie E. Pryce A LA Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Vic. 3083, Australia.
B Agriculture Victoria Research, Ellinbank, Vic. 3821, Australia.
C Centre for Agricultural Innovation, School of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.
D LACTANET, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X 3R4, Canada.
E CGIL, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
F Institute of Genetics, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern 3002, Switzerland.
G Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
H Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
I Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, C. F Møllers allé 3, Aarhus DK-8000, Denmark.
J Scotland’s Rural College, Roslin Institute, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.
K School of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia.
L School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic. 3083, Australia.
Animal Production Science 63(11) 1113-1125 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN23022
Submitted: 12 January 2023 Accepted: 8 May 2023 Published: 29 May 2023
© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)
Abstract
Context: Feed is the largest expense on a dairy farm, therefore improving feed efficiency is important. Recording dry-matter intake (DMI) is a prerequisite for calculating feed efficiency. Genetic variation of feed intake and feed efficiency varies across lactation stages and parities. DMI is an expensive and difficult-to-measure trait. This raises the question of which time periods during lactation would be most appropriate to measure DMI.
Aims: The aim was to evaluate whether sequence variants selected from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for DMI recorded at multiple lactation time periods and parities would increase the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) for DMI and residual feed intake (RFI).
Methods: Data of 2274 overseas lactating cows were used for the GWAS to select sequence variants. GWAS was performed using the average of the DMI phenotypes in a 30-day window of six different time periods across the lactation. The most significant sequence variants were selected from the GWAS at each time period for either first or later parities. GEBVs for DMI and RFI in Australian lactating cows were estimated using BayesRC with 50 k single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and selected GWAS sequence variants.
Key results: There were differences in DMI genomic correlations and heritabilities between first and later parities and within parity across lactation time periods. Compared with using 50 k single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) only, the accuracy of DMI GEBVs increased by up to 11% by using the 50 k SNPs plus the selected sequence variants. Compared with DMI, the increase in accuracy for RFI was lower (by 6%) likely because the sequence variants were selected from GWAS for DMI not RFI. The accuracies for DMI and RFI GEBVs were highest by using selected sequence variants from the DMI GWAS in the mid- to late-lactation periods in later parity.
Conclusions: Our results showed that DMI phenotypes in late lactation time periods could capture more genetic variation and increase genomic prediction accuracy through the use of custom genotype panels in genomic selection.
Implications: Collecting DMI at the optimal time period(s) of lactation may help develop more accurate and cost-effective breeding values for feed efficiency in dairy cattle.
Keywords: BayesRC, DMI, days in milk, disentangling phenotypes, genomic accuracy, genomic correlation, GWAS, hierarchical clustering, lactation time periods, RFI.
References
Arthur PF, Archer JA, Herd RM, Richardson EC, Exton SC, Oswin C, Dibley KCP, Burton DA (1999) Relationship between postweaning growth, net feed intake and cow performance. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 13, 484–487.Begli HE, Torshizi RV, Masoudi AA, Ehsani A, Jensen J (2016) Longitudinal analysis of body weight, feed intake and residual feed intake in F2 chickens. Livestock Science 184, 28–34.
| Longitudinal analysis of body weight, feed intake and residual feed intake in F2 chickens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Berry DP, Coffey MP, Pryce JE, de Haas Y, Løvendahl P, Krattenmacher N, Crowley JJ, Wang Z, Spurlock D, Weigel K, Macdonald K, Veerkamp RF (2014) International genetic evaluations for feed intake in dairy cattle through the collation of data from multiple sources. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 3894–3905.
| International genetic evaluations for feed intake in dairy cattle through the collation of data from multiple sources.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bignardi AB, El Faro L, Torres Júnior RAA, Cardoso VL, Machado PF, Albuquerque LG (2011) Random regression models using different functions to model test-day milk yield of Brazilian Holstein cows. Genetics and Molecular Research 10, 3565–3575.
| Random regression models using different functions to model test-day milk yield of Brazilian Holstein cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bionaz M, Loor JJ (2008) ACSL1, AGPAT6, FABP3, LPIN1, and SLC27A6 are the most abundant isoforms in bovine mammary tissue and their expression is affected by stage of lactation. The Journal of Nutrition 138, 1019–1024.
| ACSL1, AGPAT6, FABP3, LPIN1, and SLC27A6 are the most abundant isoforms in bovine mammary tissue and their expression is affected by stage of lactation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bolormaa S, Pryce JE, Kemper K, Savin K, Hayes BJ, Barendse W, Zhang Y, Reich CM, Mason BA, Bunch RJ, Harrison BE, Reverter A, Herd RM, Tier B, Graser H-U, Goddard ME (2013) Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 91, 3088–3104.
| Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bolormaa S, Swan AA, Brown DJ, Hatcher S, Moghaddar N, van der Werf JH, Goddard ME, Daetwyler HD (2017) Multiple-trait QTL mapping and genomic prediction for wool traits in sheep. Genetics Selection Evolution 49, 62
| Multiple-trait QTL mapping and genomic prediction for wool traits in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bolormaa S, Chamberlain AJ, Khansefid M, Stothard P, Swan AA, Mason B, Prowse-Wilkins CP, Duijvesteijn N, Moghaddar N, van der Werf JH, Daetwyler HD, MacLeod IM (2019) Accuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence in sheep. Genetics Selection Evolution 51, 1
| Accuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bolormaa S, MacLeod IM, Khansefid M, Marett LC, Wales WJ, Miglior F, Baes CF, Schenkel FS, Connor EE, Manzanilla-Pech CIV, Stothard P, Herman E, Nieuwhof GJ, Goddard ME, Pryce JE (2022) Sharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiency. Genetics Selection Evolution 54, 60
| Sharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brøndum RF, Su G, Janss L, Sahana G, Guldbrandtsen B, Boichard D, Lund MS (2015) Quantitative trait loci markers derived from whole genome sequence data increases the reliability of genomic prediction. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 4107–4116.
| Quantitative trait loci markers derived from whole genome sequence data increases the reliability of genomic prediction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Callegaro S, Niero G, Penasa M, Finocchiaro R, Invernizzi G, Cassandro M (2022) Greenhouse gas emissions, dry matter intake and feed efficiency of young Holstein bulls. Italian Journal of Animal Science 21, 870–877.
| Greenhouse gas emissions, dry matter intake and feed efficiency of young Holstein bulls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Das S, Forer L, Schönherr S, Sidore C, Locke AE, Kwong A, Vrieze SI, Chew EY, Levy S, McGue M, Schlessinger D, Stambolian D, Loh P-R, Iacono WG, Swaroop A, Scott LJ, Cucca F, Kronenberg F, Boehnke M, Abecasis GR, Fuchsberger C (2016) Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods. Nature Genetics 48, 1284–1287.
| Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
de Haas Y, Calus MPL, Veerkamp RF, Wall E, Coffey MP, Daetwyler HD, Hayes BJ, Pryce JE (2012) Improved accuracy of genomic prediction for dry matter intake of dairy cattle from combined European and Australian data sets. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 6103–6112.
| Improved accuracy of genomic prediction for dry matter intake of dairy cattle from combined European and Australian data sets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Erbe M, Hayes BJ, Matukumalli LK, Goswami S, Bowman PJ, Reich CM, Mason BA, Goddard ME (2012) Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 4114–4129.
| Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2009) ‘ASReml user guide release 3.0.’ (VSN International: Hemel Hempstead, UK)
Grisart B, Coppieters W, Farnir F, Karim L, Ford C, Berzi P, Cambisano N, Mni M, Reid S, Simon P, Spelman R, Georges M, Snell R (2002) Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition. Genome Research 12, 222–231.
| Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hayes BJ, Daetwyler HD (2019) 1000 bull genomes project to map simple and complex genetic traits in cattle: applications and outcomes. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences 7, 89–102.
| 1000 bull genomes project to map simple and complex genetic traits in cattle: applications and outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Herd RM, Arthur PF, Donoghue KA, Bird SH, Bird-Gardiner T, Hegarty RS (2014) Measures of methane production and their phenotypic relationships with dry matter intake, growth, and body composition traits in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 92, 5267–5274.
| Measures of methane production and their phenotypic relationships with dry matter intake, growth, and body composition traits in beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hurley AM, López-Villalobos N, McParland S, Lewis E, Kennedy E, O’Donovan M, Burke JL, Berry DP (2017) Genetics of alternative definitions of feed efficiency in grazing lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 5501–5514.
| Genetics of alternative definitions of feed efficiency in grazing lactating dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kang H, Zhou L, Mrode R, Zhang Q, Liu J-F (2017) Incorporating the single-step strategy into a random regression model to enhance genomic prediction of longitudinal traits. Heredity 119, 459–467.
| Incorporating the single-step strategy into a random regression model to enhance genomic prediction of longitudinal traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kemper KE, Reich CM, Bowman PJ, vander Jagt CJ, Chamberlain AJ, Mason BA, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2015) Improved precision of QTL mapping using a nonlinear Bayesian method in a multi-breed population leads to greater accuracy of across-breed genomic predictions. Genetics Selection Evolution 47, 29
| Improved precision of QTL mapping using a nonlinear Bayesian method in a multi-breed population leads to greater accuracy of across-breed genomic predictions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Li B, Fikse WF, Løvendahl P, Lassen J, Lidauer MH, Mäntysaari P, Berglund B (2018) Genetic heterogeneity of feed intake, energy-corrected milk, and body weight across lactation in primiparous Holstein, Nordic Red, and Jersey cows. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 10011–10021.
| Genetic heterogeneity of feed intake, energy-corrected milk, and body weight across lactation in primiparous Holstein, Nordic Red, and Jersey cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Loh P-R, Danecek P, Palamara PF, Fuchsberger C, Reshef YA, Finucane HK, Schoenherr S, Forer L, McCarthy S, Abecasis GR, Durbin R, Price AL (2016) Reference-based phasing using the Haplotype Reference Consortium panel. Nature Genetics 48, 1443–1448.
| Reference-based phasing using the Haplotype Reference Consortium panel.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Macdonald KA, Pryce JE, Spelman RJ, Davis SR, Wales WJ, Waghorn GC, Williams YJ, Marett LC, Hayes BJ (2014) Holstein-Friesian calves selected for divergence in residual feed intake during growth exhibited significant but reduced residual feed intake divergence in their first lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 1427–1435.
| Holstein-Friesian calves selected for divergence in residual feed intake during growth exhibited significant but reduced residual feed intake divergence in their first lactation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacLeod IM, Bowman PJ, Vander Jagt CJ, Haile-Mariam M, Kemper KE, Chamberlain AJ, Schrooten C, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2016) Exploiting biological priors and sequence variants enhances QTL discovery and genomic prediction of complex traits. BMC Genomics 17, 144
| Exploiting biological priors and sequence variants enhances QTL discovery and genomic prediction of complex traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Manzanilla Pech CIV, Veerkamp RF, Calus MPL, Zom R, van Knegsel A, Pryce JE, De Haas Y (2014) Genetic parameters across lactation for feed intake, fat- and protein-corrected milk, and liveweight in first-parity Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 5851–5862.
| Genetic parameters across lactation for feed intake, fat- and protein-corrected milk, and liveweight in first-parity Holstein cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Manzanilla-Pech CIV, Løvendahl P, Mansan Gordo D, Difford GF, Pryce JE, Schenkel F, Wegmann S, Miglior F, Chud TC, Moate PJ, Williams SRO, Richardson CM, Stothard P, Lassen J (2021) Breeding for reduced methane emission and feed-efficient Holstein cows: an international response. Journal of Dairy Science 104, 8983–9001.
| Breeding for reduced methane emission and feed-efficient Holstein cows: an international response.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moghaddar N, Khansefid M, van der Werf JHJ, Bolormaa S, Duijvesteijn N, Clark SA, Swan AA, Daetwyler HD, MacLeod IM (2019) Genomic prediction based on selected variants from imputed whole-genome sequence data in Australian sheep populations. Genetics Selection Evolution 51, 72
| Genomic prediction based on selected variants from imputed whole-genome sequence data in Australian sheep populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Negussie E, Mehtiö T, Mäntysaari P, Løvendahl P, Mäntysaari EA, Lidauer MH (2019) Reliability of breeding values for feed intake and feed efficiency traits in dairy cattle: when dry matter intake recordings are sparse under different scenarios. Journal of Dairy Science 102, 7248–7262.
| Reliability of breeding values for feed intake and feed efficiency traits in dairy cattle: when dry matter intake recordings are sparse under different scenarios.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pryce JE, Gonzalez-Recio O, Nieuwhof G, Wales WJ, Coffey MP, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2015) Hot topic: definition and implementation of a breeding value for feed efficiency in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 7340–7350.
| Hot topic: definition and implementation of a breeding value for feed efficiency in dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sargolzaei M, Chesnais JP, Schenkel FS (2014) A new approach for efficient genotype imputation using information from relatives. BMC Genomics 15, 478
| A new approach for efficient genotype imputation using information from relatives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schaeffer LR, Jamrozik J (2008) Random regression models: a longitudinal perspective. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 125, 145–146.
| Random regression models: a longitudinal perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schennink A, Stoop WM, Visker MHPW, Heck JML, Bovenhuis H, van der Poel JJ, van Valenberg HJF, van Arendonk JAM (2007) DGAT1 underlies large genetic variation in milk-fat composition of dairy cows. Animal Genetics 38, 467–473.
| DGAT1 underlies large genetic variation in milk-fat composition of dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Strucken EM, de Koning DJ, Rahmatalla SA, Brockmann GA (2011) Lactation curve models for estimating gene effects over a timeline. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 442–449.
| Lactation curve models for estimating gene effects over a timeline.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Strucken EM, Bortfeldt RH, de Koning DJ, Brockmann GA (2012) Genome-wide associations for investigating time-dependent genetic effects for milk production traits in dairy cattle. Animal Genetics 43, 375–382.
| Genome-wide associations for investigating time-dependent genetic effects for milk production traits in dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Strucken EM, Laurenson YCSM, Brockmann GA (2015) Go with the flow-biology and genetics of the lactation cycle. Frontiers in Genetics 6, 118
| Go with the flow-biology and genetics of the lactation cycle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tempelman RJ, Spurlock DM, Coffey M, Veerkamp RF, Armentano LE, Weigel KA, de Haas Y, Staples CR, Connor EE, Lu Y, VandeHaar MJ (2015) Heterogeneity in genetic and nongenetic variation and energy sink relationships for residual feed intake across research stations and countries. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 2013–2026.
| Heterogeneity in genetic and nongenetic variation and energy sink relationships for residual feed intake across research stations and countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van den Berg I, Boichard D, Lund MS (2016) Sequence variants selected from a multi-breed GWAS can improve the reliability of genomic predictions in dairy cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution 48, 83
| Sequence variants selected from a multi-breed GWAS can improve the reliability of genomic predictions in dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van den Berg I, Bowman PJ, MacLeod IM, Hayes BJ, Wang T, Bolormaa S, Goddard ME (2017) Multi-breed genomic prediction using Bayes R with sequence data and dropping variants with a small effect. Genetics Selection Evolution 49, 70
| Multi-breed genomic prediction using Bayes R with sequence data and dropping variants with a small effect.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
VanRaden PM, Tooker ME, O’connell JR, Cole JB, Bickhart DM (2017) Selecting sequence variants to improve genomic predictions for dairy cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution 49, 32
| Selecting sequence variants to improve genomic predictions for dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Verbyla KL, Verbyla AP (2009) Estimated breeding values and association mapping for persistency and total milk yield using natural cubic smoothing splines. Genetics Selection Evolution 41, 48
| Estimated breeding values and association mapping for persistency and total milk yield using natural cubic smoothing splines.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wang Y, Diao C, Kang H, Hao W, Mrode R, Chen J, Liu J, Zhou L (2022) A random regression model based on a single-step method for improving the genomic prediction accuracy of residual feed intake in pigs. Frontiers in Genetics 12, 769849
| A random regression model based on a single-step method for improving the genomic prediction accuracy of residual feed intake in pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yang J, Lee SH, Goddard ME, Visscher PM (2011) GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. The American Journal of Human Genetics 88, 76–82.
| GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |