A regional-scale assessment of nutritional-system strategies for abatement of enteric methane from grazing livestock
A. K. Almeida
A B * , F. C. Cowley A and R. S. Hegarty A
A School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11-2221, 4440 Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Animal Production Science 63(15) 1461-1472 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN22315
Submitted: 5 September 2022 Accepted: 17 July 2023 Published: 15 August 2023
Abstract
Progress towards methane (CH4) mitigation for the red meat, milk and wool sectors in Australia and reduced CH4 emissions intensity (g CH4/kg animal product, typically milk or liveweight gain) involves not only reduced net emissions but also improved productive efficiency. Although nutritional additives have potential to reduce CH4 production rate of livestock (g CH4/head.day), systemic improvement of the nutrition of grazing breeding females, the largest source of CH4 emissions in Australian agriculture, will also be required to reduce emissions intensity. Systemic changes that increase productive efficiency for producers are part of the economic and environmental ‘win–win’ of reducing emissions intensity, and so offer good potential for adoption by industry. For sheep and cattle breeding enterprises, improved nutrition to achieve a younger age at first joining and increased reproductive rate will reduce the proportion of CH4-emitting, but unproductive, animals in a herd. However, if breeding stock are managed to be more productive (e.g. by superior nutrition leading to greater product/breeder) and more efficient (e.g. greater product per kilogram DMI) the producer is faced with the following management challenge. Should the enterprise increase stock numbers to utilise surplus feed and gain extra product, or reduce stock numbers to maintain previous product output with smaller enterprise net emissions (and emissions intensity), and so make land available for other uses (e.g. tree plantings, conservation zones). The right balance of incentives and price on carbon is necessary to achieve a result whereby total emissions from Australian agriculture are reduced, and so a positive impact on climate change is achieved.
Keywords: emissions, farm-level solutions, GHG inventory, greenhouse gases, methane, mitigation pathways, ruminant, simulation.
References
ABS (2018) ‘Australian Bureau of Statistics.’ 7121.0 - Agricultural Commodities Australia. (Canberra, ACT, Australia). Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/7121.0 [Accessed October 2020]
Alcock D, Hegarty RS (2006) Effects of pasture improvement on productivity, gross margin and methane emissions of a grazing sheep enterprise. International Congress Series 1293, 103-106.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Alcock DJ, Hegarty RS (2011) Potential effects of animal management and genetic improvement on enteric methane emissions, emissions intensity and productivity of sheep enterprises at Cowra, Australia. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 749-760.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Alcock DJ, Harrison MT, Rawnsley RP, Eckard RJ (2015) Can animal genetics and flock management be used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions but also maintain productivity of wool-producing enterprises? Agricultural Systems 132, 25-34.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Alford AR, Cafe LM, Greenwood PL, Griffith GR (2009) Economic effects of nutritional constraints early in life of cattle. Animal Production Science 49, 479-492.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Almeida AK, Hegarty RS, Cowie A (2021) Meta-analysis quantifying the potential of dietary additives and rumen modifiers for methane mitigation in ruminant production systems. Animal Nutrition 7, 1219-1230.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Arnold GW, Dudzinski ML (1967) Studies on the diet of grazing animal. III. The effect of pasture species and pasture structure on the herbage intake of sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 18, 657-666.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Australian Government (2020) Australian greenhouse emissions information system. Available at https://ageis-activity-table-1990-2021-agriculture-livestock-national.xlsx (2020) [Accessed October 2020]
Banchero GE, Stefanova K, Lindsay DR, Quintans G, Baldi F, Milton JTB, Martin GB (2021) Ovulation and ovulation rate in ewes under grazing conditions: factors affecting the response to short-term supplementation. Animal 15(2), 100100.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Banik BK, Durmic Z, Erskine W, Ghamkhar K, Revell C (2013) In vitro ruminal fermentation characteristics and methane production differ in selected key pasture species in Australia. Crop and Pasture Science 64(9), 935-942.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Beukes PC, Gregorini P, Romera AJ, Levy G, Waghorn GC (2010) Improving production efficiency as a strategy to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions on pastoral dairy farms in New Zealand. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 136(3–4), 358-365.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Boadi DA, Wittenberg KM, McCaughey W (2002) Effects of grain supplementation on methane production of grazing steers using the sulphur (SF6) tracer gas technique. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 82, 151-157.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Boval M, Archimède H, Cruz P, Duru M (2007) Intake and digestibility in heifers grazing a Dichanthium spp. dominated pasture, at 14 and 28 days of regrowth. Animal Feed Science and Technology 134, 18-31.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bruinje TC, Rosadiuk JP, Moslemipur F, Sauerwein H, Steele MA, Ambrose DJ (2021) Differing planes of pre- and postweaning phase nutrition in Holstein heifers: II. Effects on circulating leptin, luteinizing hormone, and age at puberty. Journal of Dairy Science 104, 1153-1163.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Capper JL, Cady RA, Bauman DE (2009) The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007. Journal of Animal Science 87(6), 2160-2167.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Charmley E, Williams SRO, Moate PJ, Hegarty RS, Herd RM, Oddy VH, Reyenga P, Staunton KM, Anderson A, Hannah MC (2016) A universal equation to predict methane production of forage-fed cattle in Australia. Animal Production Science 56, 169-180.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Christie KM, Harrison MT, Trevaskis LM, Rawnsley RP, Eckard RJ (2016) Modelling enteric methane abatement from earlier mating of dairy heifers in subtropical Australia by improving diet quality. Animal Production Science 56(3), 565-573.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cottle DJ, Nolan JV, Wiedemann SG (2011) Ruminant enteric methane mitigation: a review. Animal Production Science 51, 491-514.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cullen BR, Eckard RJ, Timms M, Phelps DG (2016) The effect of earlier mating and improving fertility on greenhouse gas emissions intensity of beef production in northern Australian herds. The Rangeland Journal 38, 283-290.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Doran-Browne N, Behrendt R, Kingwell R, Eckard R (2015) Modelling the potential of birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) to reduce methane emissions and increase production on wool and prime lamb farm enterprises. Animal Production Science 55(9), 1097-1105.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Durmic Z, Moate PJ, Eckard R, Revell DK, Williams R, Vercoe PE (2014) In vitro screening of selected feed additives, plant essential oils and plant extracts for rumen methane mitigation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 94(6), 1191-1196.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Durmic Z, Black JL, Martin GB, Vercoe PE (2022) Harnessing plant bioactivity for enteric methane mitigation in Australia. Animal Production Science 62, 1160-1172.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
D’Occhio MJ, Baruselli PS, Campanile G (2019) Influence of nutrition, body condition, and metabolic status on reproduction in female beef cattle: a review. Theriogenology 125, 277-284.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Eckard RJ, Grainger C, de Klein CAM (2010) Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production: a review. Livestock Science 130(1–3), 47-56.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ehhalt D, Prather MJ, Dentener F, Derwent RG, Dlugokencky E, Holland E, Isaksen ISA, Katima J, Kirchhoff V, Matson P, Midgley P, Wang M (2001) Atmospheric chemistry and greenhouse gases. In ‘Climate change 2001; Working Group 1: the scientific basis’. (Eds JT Houghton, Y Ding, DJ Griggs, M Noguer, PJ van der Linden, D Xiaosu) pp. 241–287. (Cambridge University Press)
Farrell LJ, Tozer PR, Kenyon PR, Ramilan T, Cranston LM (2019) The effect of ewe wastage in New Zealand sheep and beef farms on flock productivity and farm profitability. Agricultural Systems 174, 125-132.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gerssen-Gondelach SJ, Lauwerijssen RBG, Havlík P, Herrero M, Valin H, Faaij APC, Wicke B (2017) Intensification pathways for beef and dairy cattle production systems: impacts on GHG emissions, land occupation and land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 240, 135-147.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Grainger C, Beauchemin KA (2011) Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production? Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 308-320.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Harrison MT, Jackson T, Cullen BR, Rawnsley RP, Ho C, Cummins L, Eckard RJ (2014) Increasing ewe genetic fecundity improves whole-farm production and reduces greenhouse gas emissions intensities: 1. Sheep production and emissions intensities. Agricultural Systems 131, 23-33.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Harrison MT, Cullen BR, Tomkins NW, McSweeney C, Cohn P, Eckard RJ (2016) The concordance between greenhouse gas emissions, livestock production and profitability of extensive beef farming systems. Animal Production Science 56(3), 370-384.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hartmann T (2007) From waste products to ecochemicals: fifty years research of plant secondary metabolism. Phytochemistry 68, 2831-2846.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Hegarty RS, Alcock D, Robinson DL, Goopy JP, Vercoe PE (2010) Nutritional and flock management options to reduce methane output and methane per unit product from sheep enterprises. Animal Production Science 50, 1026.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Herrero M, Henderson B, Havlík P, Thornton PK, Conant RT, Smith P, Wirsenius S, Hristov AN, Gerber P, Gill M, Butterbach-Bahl K, Valin H, Garnett T, Stehfest E (2016) Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector. Nature Climate Change 6, 452-461.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Howden SM, White DH, Mckeon GM, Scanlan JC, Carter JO (1994) Methods for exploring management options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from tropical grazing systems. Climatic Change 27, 49-70.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hristov AN, Oh J, Firkins JL, Dijkstra J, Kebreab E, Waghorn G, Makkar HPS, Adesogan AT, Yang W, Lee C, Gerber PJ, Henderson B, Tricarico JM (2013) Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options. Journal of Animal Science 91, 5045-5069.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Le Cozler Y, Lollivier V, Lacasse P, Disenhaus C (2008) Rearing strategy and optimizing first-calving targets in dairy heifers: a review. Animal 2, 1393-1404.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Lean IJ, Moate PJ (2021) Cattle, climate and complexity: food security, quality and sustainability of the Australian cattle industries. Australian Veterinary Journal 99, 293-308.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Lehmann JO, Mogensen L, Kristensen T (2014) Extended lactations may improve cow health, productivity and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from organic dairy production. Organic Agriculture 4(4), 295-299.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Martin C, Morgavi DP, Doreau M (2010) Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal 4, 351-365.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Michell PJ (1973) Digestibility and voluntary intake measurements on regrowths of six Tasmanian pasture species. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 13, 158-164.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Minson DJ, McDonald CK (1987) Estimating forage intake from the growth of beef cattle. Tropical Grasslands 21, 116-122.
| Google Scholar |
MLA (2019) Industry projections 2019 Australian cattle. Meat & Livestock Australia. Available at https://www.mla.com.au/globalassets/mla-corporate/prices--markets/documents/trends--analysis/cattle-projections/mla-australian-cattle-industry-projections-2019.pdf
Naranjo A, Johnson A, Rossow H, Kebreab E (2020) Greenhouse gas, water, and land footprint per unit of production of the California dairy industry over 50 years. Journal of Dairy Science 103, 3760-3773.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Newton JE, Brown DJ, Dominik S, van der Werf JHJ (2017) Impact of young ewe fertility rate on risk and genetic gain in sheep-breeding programs using genomic selection. Animal Production Science 57, 1653-1664.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Niu M, Kebreab E, Hristov AN, Oh J, Arndt C, Bannink A, Bayat AR, Brito AF, Boland T, Casper D, Crompton LA, Dijkstra J, Eugene MA, Garnsworthy PC, Haque MN, Hellwing ALF, Huhtanen P, Kreuzer M, Kuhla B, Lund P, Madsen J, Martin C, McClelland SC, McGee M, Moate PJ, Muetzel S, Munoz C, O’Kiely P, Peiren N, Reynolds CK, Schwarm A, Shingfield KJ, Storlien TM, Weisbjerg MR, Yanez-Ruiz DR, Yu Z (2018) Prediction of enteric methane production, yield, and intensity in dairy cattle using an intercontinental database. Global Change Biology 24, 3368-3389.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Nkrumah JD, Okine EK, Mathison GW, Schmid K, Li C, Basarab JA, Price MA, Wang Z, Moore SS (2006) Relationships of feedlot feed efficiency, performance, and feeding behavior with metabolic rate, methane production, and energy partitioning in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 84(1), 145-153.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Nunez-Dominguez R, Cundiff LV, Dickerson GE, Gregory KE, Koch RM (1991) Lifetime production of beef heifers calving first at two vs three years of age. Journal of Animal Science 69(9), 3467-3479.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
Pinares-Patiño CS, Waghorn GC, Hegarty RS, Hoskin SO (2009) Effects of intensification of pastoral farming on greenhouse gas emissions in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 57(5), 252-261.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Pitchford WS, Accioly JM, Banks RG, Barnes AL, Barwick SA, Copping KJ, Deland MPB, Donoghue KA, Edwards N, Hebart ML, Herd RM, Jones FM, Laurence M, Lee SJ, McKiernan WA, Parnell PF, Speijers EJ, Tudor GD, Graham JF (2018) Genesis, design and methods of the Beef CRC Maternal Productivity Project. Animal Production Science 58, 20-32.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Schillo KK, Hall JB, Hileman SM (1992) Effects of nutrition and season on the onset of puberty in the beef heifer. Journal of Animal Science 70, 3994-4005.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Short RE, Bellows RA (1971) Relationships among weight gains, age at puberty and reproductive performance in heifers. Journal of Animal Science 32, 127-131.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Stobbs TH (1973) The effect of plant structure on the intake of tropical pastures. I. Variation in the bite size of grazing cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24, 809-819.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Suybeng B, Charmley E, Gardiner CP, Malau-Aduli BS, Malau-Aduli AEO (2019) Methane emissions and the use of desmanthus in beef cattle production in Northern Australia. Animals 9(8), 542.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Tocker J, Behrendt R, Raeside M, Malcolm B (2020) The impact of ewe lamb mating and different feeding strategies over summer–autumn on profit and risk: a case study in south-west Victoria. Animal Production Science 61, 1137-1150.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tomkins N, Harrison M, McSweeney CS, Denman S, Charmley E, Lambrides CJ, Dalal R (2019) Greenhouse gas implications of leucaena-based pastures. Can we develop an emissions reduction methodology for the beef industry? Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales 7(4), 267-272.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Walmsley BJ, Lee SJ, Parnell PF, Pitchford WS (2018) A review of factors influencing key biological components of maternal productivity in temperate beef cattle. Animal Production Science 58, 1-19.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
White DH, Bowman PJ, Morley FHW, McManus WR, Filan SJ (1983) A simulation model of a breeding ewe flock. Agricultural Systems 10, 149-189.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
