Technical and economic analysis, and benchmarking associated with dairy farms in Minas Geraiz, Brazil
Jardeson de Souza Pinheiro A , Lucas Henrique de Souza Matias A , Claudia Batista Sampaio A and Marcos Inácio Marcondes B *A Animal Science Department, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
B Department of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Animal Production Science 63(2) 178-191 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN22050
Submitted: 15 February 2022 Accepted: 6 September 2022 Published: 30 September 2022
© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing
Abstract
Context: Dairy operations have adopted benchmarking as a methodology to rank farms and establish target indexes; however, a connection between benchmarking and farms in the tropics is still warranted.
Aims: To evaluate the technical and economic quartiles based on farm return on assets (ROA) of three regions (Centre, South and Triangle) of Minas Gerais state, Brazil, and use them to establish benchmarks for dairy farms.
Methods: We collected data from 128 dairy farms (from January to December of 2019). All properties were part of the Educampo® project/Sebrae-MG. Farms were grouped into the Centre, South and Triangle regions, and subdivided into three groups within each region according to their ROA, where 25% of the farms that presented the lowest ROA were classified as the first quartile, 50% of farms were classified as interquartile and the 25% remaining farms were classified as the fourth quartile. Data were analysed as a randomised block design in a split-plot scheme, where the production systems were blocks, the regions were the main plots and the groups were the split plots. Differences were declared when P ≤ 0.10.
Key results: Total operating cost ($/L; $ – this currency is in US dollars and it applies throughout the paper); accrual operating cost ($/L); production costs, such as roughage ($/L), hired labour ($/L), percentage of concentrate and hired labour in accrual operating cost (%), were affected by regions and groups. The South and fourth quartile had the greatest total operating cost (0.24 $/L; 0.26 $/L) and accrual operating cost (0.27 $/L; 0.30 $/L), respectively. The majority of economic indexes were higher for Triangle than South and Centre, respectively. The fourth quartile had the greatest net margin (0.09 $/L), profit (0.07 $/L), return on assets (2%) and assets turnover rate (24%).
Conclusions: We suggest that benchmarks should be established by region, as there were too many variations among regions. In addition, this study demonstrated the importance of understanding the behaviour of the technical and economic indicators to stratify farms based on their return on assets.
Implications: We evaluated technical and economic indexes from three regions and stratified by ROA. Then, we established benchmarks by regions to better guide the producer in decision-making in dairy operations.
Keywords: animal production, benchmarks, dairy cows, dairy operation, financial, heifers, production costs, profitability.
References
Alem H, Lien G, Hardaker JB, Guttormsen A (2019) Regional differences in technical efficiency and technological gap of Norwegian dairy farms: a stochastic meta-frontier model. Applied Economics 51, 409–421.| Regional differences in technical efficiency and technological gap of Norwegian dairy farms: a stochastic meta-frontier model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Anand G, Kodali R (2008) Benchmarking the benchmarking models. Benchmarking: An International Journal 15, 257–291.
| Benchmarking the benchmarking models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Anderson K, McAdam R (2004) A critique of benchmarking and performance measurement: lead or lag? Benchmarking: An International Journal 11, 465–483.
| A critique of benchmarking and performance measurement: lead or lag?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Atkinson DJ, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM (2017) Benchmarking passive transfer of immunity and growth in dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 3773–3782.
| Benchmarking passive transfer of immunity and growth in dairy calves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Atzori AS, Tedeschi LO, Cannas A (2013) A multivariate and stochastic approach to identify key variables to rank dairy farms on profitability. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 3378–3387.
| A multivariate and stochastic approach to identify key variables to rank dairy farms on profitability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bach A, Terré M, Vidal M (2020) Symposium review: decomposing efficiency of milk production and maximizing profit. Journal of Dairy Science 103, 5709–5725.
| Symposium review: decomposing efficiency of milk production and maximizing profit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bezerra EEA, Magalhães JA, Azevêdo DMMR, Pereira RGdeA, Townsend CR, Costa NdeL (2011) Milk production and calving interval of a herd of crossbred cows in Northern Piauí. PubVet v. 5, Art. 992–998. Available at https://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/bitstream/doc/914856/1/PubVet2011Costa992.pdf
Blair CA, Foley DV, McAllister J (2001) Kentucky farm business management: 2000 dairy enterprise analysis. Agricultural Economics-Extension No 2001–14. University Kentucky, Lexington.
Cabrera VE, Kalantari AS (2016) Economics of production efficiency: nutritional grouping of the lactating cow. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 825–841.
| Economics of production efficiency: nutritional grouping of the lactating cow.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Castillo-Gallegos E, Marín-Mejía BdeJ (2019) Segmented regression to describe cumulative milk production of grazing dual-purpose Holstein-Zebu cows. Tropical Animal Health and Production 51, 809–818.
| Segmented regression to describe cumulative milk production of grazing dual-purpose Holstein-Zebu cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chapinal N, Barrientos AK, von Keyserlingk MAG, Galo E, Weary DM (2013) Herd-level risk factors for lameness in freestall farms in the northeastern United States and California. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 318–328.
| Herd-level risk factors for lameness in freestall farms in the northeastern United States and California.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
De Araujo AEM, De Vries A, Giesy RG, Ely LO, Webb DW (2004) Ranking of dairy farms based on economic measures per CWT milk sold and per CWT milk equivalent. The Professional Animal Scientist 20, 483–489.
| Ranking of dairy farms based on economic measures per CWT milk sold and per CWT milk equivalent.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
de Oliveira AS, Da Cunha DdNFV, Campos JMdS, do Vale SMLR, de Assis AJ (2007) Identification and quantification of benchmarks of milk production systems. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 36, 507–516.
| Identification and quantification of benchmarks of milk production systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
de Vries A, Giesy R, Ely L, de Araujo A, Andreasen A, Broaddus B, Eubanks S, Mayo D, Miller P, Seawright T, Vann C (2004) Dairy business analysis project: financial summary for 1995–2001. EDIS 2004, 1–35.
| Dairy business analysis project: financial summary for 1995–2001.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
De Vries A, Dechassa H, Hogeveen H (2016) Economic evaluation of stall stocking density of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 3848–3857.
| Economic evaluation of stall stocking density of lactating dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Educampo Project S (1997) Brazilian micro and small business support service - SEBRAE. Available at https://www.educampo.com.br/
Ferreira ADM (1991) ‘Reproductive management and its importance in the efficiency of the dairy operations.’ (Embrapa-CNPGL: Coronel Pacheco, Brazil)
Ferris A, Malcolm B (1999) Sense and nonsense in dairy farm management economic analysis. In ‘43rd Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, Christchurch, New Zealand. AARES, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia’. pp. 1–31. Available at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/123803/2/FerrisMalcolm.pdf
Fraser I, Cordina D (1999) An application of data envelopment analysis to irrigated dairy farms in Northern Victoria, Australia. Agricultural Systems 59, 267–282.
| An application of data envelopment analysis to irrigated dairy farms in Northern Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fong SW, Cheng EWL, Ho DCK (1998) Benchmarking: a general reading for management practitioners. Management Decision 36, 407–418.
| Benchmarking: a general reading for management practitioners.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gosnell H, Gill N, Voyer M (2019) Transformational adaptation on the farm: processes of change and persistence in transitions to ‘climate-smart’ regenerative agriculture. Global Environmental Change 59, 101965
| Transformational adaptation on the farm: processes of change and persistence in transitions to ‘climate-smart’ regenerative agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Halberg N, van Der Werf HMG, Basset-Mens C, Dalgaard R, De Boer IJM (2005) Environmental assessment tools for the evaluation and improvement of European livestock production systems. Livestock Production Science 96, 33–50.
| Environmental assessment tools for the evaluation and improvement of European livestock production systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
IGP-DI (1947) General price index of the Brazilian Institute of Economics of the Getúlio Vargas Foundation, Brazil. Available at https://portalibre.fgv.br/
Jago JG, Berry DP (2011) Associations between herd size, rate of expansion and production, breeding policy and reproduction in spring-calving dairy herds. Animal 5, 1626–1633.
| Associations between herd size, rate of expansion and production, breeding policy and reproduction in spring-calving dairy herds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Khade AS, Metlen SK (1996) An application of benchmarking in the dairy industry. Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology 3, 34–41.
| An application of benchmarking in the dairy industry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Krpalkova L, Cabrera VE, Kvapilik J, Burdych J (2016) Dairy farm profit according to the herd size, milk yield, and number of cows per worker. Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic) 62, 225–234.
| Dairy farm profit according to the herd size, milk yield, and number of cows per worker.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Langemeier M (2018) What should my farm benchmark? farmdoc daily 8: 167. pp. 1–4. Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Available at https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/282961/files/fdd070918.pdf
Marcondes MI, Mariano WH, De Vries A (2020) Production, economic viability and risks associated with switching dairy cows from drylots to compost bedded pack systems. Animal 14, 399–408.
| Production, economic viability and risks associated with switching dairy cows from drylots to compost bedded pack systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Matsunaga M, Demehnans PF, Toledo PEN, Dulley RD, Pedroso IA (1976) ‘Methodology to estimate cost of production.’ pp. 123–137. (Applied Economics Institute, Secretaria de Agricultura de São Paulo: São Paulo, SP, Brazil)
Mor RS, Bhardwaj A, Singh S (2018) Benchmarking the interactions among performance indicators in dairy supply chain: an ISM approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal 25, 3858–3881.
| Benchmarking the interactions among performance indicators in dairy supply chain: an ISM approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
NRC (2001) ‘Nutrient requirements of dairy Cattle.’ (National Academies Press: Washington, DC)
Pinheiro JS, De Vries A, Rodrigues JPP, Marcondes MI (2021) Production costs, economic viability, and risks associated with compost bedded pack, freestall, and drylot systems in dairy farms. Animal 15, 100404
| Production costs, economic viability, and risks associated with compost bedded pack, freestall, and drylot systems in dairy farms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Polzin L, Wolf CA, Black JR (2018) Accelerated tax depreciation and farm investment: evidence from Michigan. Agricultural Finance Review 78, 364–375.
| Accelerated tax depreciation and farm investment: evidence from Michigan.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ramsbottom G, Horan B, Pierce KM, Roche JR (2020) Dairy expansion: a case study of spring-calving pasture-based dairy production systems in Ireland. The Journal of Agricultural Science 158, 406–415.
| Dairy expansion: a case study of spring-calving pasture-based dairy production systems in Ireland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ramsbottom G, Läpple D, Pierce KM (2021) Financial benchmarking on dairy farms: exploring the relationship between frequency of use and farm performance. Journal of Dairy Science 104, 3169–3180.
| Financial benchmarking on dairy farms: exploring the relationship between frequency of use and farm performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reboita MS, Rodrigues M, Silva LF, Alves MA (2016) Climate aspects in Minas Gerais state. Revista Brasileira de Climatologia 18, 307–326.
Rentero N, Martins PdoC, Zoccal R, Bernardo WF, Albuquerque A (2021) Unique and total health. Anuário Leite, EMBRAPA Gado Leite 1–53. Available at https://www.%20embrapa.%20br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1132875/anuario-leite-2021-saude-unica-e-total
Resende JC, Freitas AF, Pereira RAN, Silva HCM, Pereira MN (2016) Determinants of profitability in Minas Gerais dairy farms. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia 68, 1053–1061.
| Determinants of profitability in Minas Gerais dairy farms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Roth S, Hyde J (2001) Pennsylvania dairy farm business analysis. (Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park)
Silveira RMF, Vasconcelos ÂMde, Araújo JM, Ferreira JB, Oliveira PGA, Brito TM (2018) Influence of reproductive indices on milk production of crossbred cows raised on the coast of Ceará. Agropecuária Científica No Semiárido 14, 117–122.
| Influence of reproductive indices on milk production of crossbred cows raised on the coast of Ceará.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sumner CL, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM (2018) How benchmarking motivates farmers to improve dairy calf management. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 3323–3333.
| How benchmarking motivates farmers to improve dairy calf management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |