Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Crossbreeding with a tropically adapted Bos taurus breed (Senepol) to improve meat quality and production from Brahman herds in northern Australia. 2. Female performance

T. Schatz https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1392-3675 A * , M. Hearnden A and J. Wheeler B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A NT Department of Industry Tourism and Trade, GPO Box 3000, Darwin, NT 0801, Australia.

B NT Department of Industry Tourism and Trade, Katherine Research Station, Katherine, NT 0850, Australia.

* Correspondence to: tim.schatz@nt.gov.au

Handling Editor: Forbes Brien

Animal Production Science 62(13) 1219-1228 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN21499
Submitted: 30 September 2021  Accepted: 7 April 2022   Published: 6 June 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context: Cattle producers with Brahman herds considering crossbreeding with a tropically adapted Bos taurus breed would like to know how the females retained for breeding are likely to perform. Currently, there is little relevant information available on their performance in the harsher regions of northern Australia.

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of F1 Senepol × Brahman (F1 Senepol) females in a harsh north Australian environment by comparing them with Brahmans.

Methods: The performance of four year groups of Brahman (total n = 499) and F1 Senepol (total n = 317) heifers was compared in the Katherine region (NT, Australia) using measures for growth, reproduction and survival. Heifers were first mated as 2-year-olds and the study concluded when the oldest year group was 9.5 years old. Cattle were mustered twice a year for data collection and weaning of calves.

Key results: F1 Senepol females were heavier (P < 0.001) than Brahmans at weaning (+25 kg) and at each subsequent muster. Mature F1 Senepol cows were on average 50 kg heavier (P < 0.001), 2 cm taller (P < 0.001) and had 2.4 mm lower P8 fat depth (P < 0.001). The mean pregnancy rate was higher in F1 Senepol maiden heifers (F1 Senepol 89.4%, Brahman 70.0%, P < 0.001), calf loss was higher for Brahman heifers calving for the first time (Brahman 14.4%, F1 Senepol 6.0%, P < 0.01), but there were no significant differences in these measures between breeds at any other ages. The average annual weaning rates for the breeds were similar (F1 Senepol 59%, Brahman 57%), as was the mean annual female liveweight production (change in female liveweight plus weight of calf weaned). Average weaner weights were significantly heavier from F1 Senepol for first lactation heifers and 5.5-year-old cows (by 6 and 10 kg, respectively, P < 0.05), but only slightly heavier in all other years. There were no significant differences in cumulative mortality rates, for year groups or overall, between breeds.

Conclusions: This study found that F1 Senepol heifers outperformed Brahman heifers, and that mature cow performance of the breeds was similar.

Implications: These findings should reassure north Australian cattle producers who are considering crossbreeding Brahmans with a tropically adapted Bos taurus breed that the performance of crossbred breeder herds will be similar to that of Brahmans.

Keywords: Brahman, cattle, crossbreeding, fertility, growth, heifer, mortality, northern Australia, Senepol.


References

Australian Senepol Cattle Breeders Association website (2021) Available at https://www.senepol.com.au/breed#history. (sourced 5 August 2021)

Bates D, Mäechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1–48.
Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Beggs D, Bertram J, Chenoweth P, Entwistle KW, Fordyce G, Johnston H, Johnston P, McGowan MR, Niethe G, Norman S, Perry V (2013) Veterinary bull breeding soundness evaluation. Australian Cattle Veterinarians, Brisbane.

BOM (2021) Bureau of Meteorology website. Available at http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_014932.shtml (Sourced 22 July 2021)

Burrow HM (2006) Utilization of diverse breed resources for tropical beef production. In ‘Proceedings of the 8th World congress on genetics applied to livestock production, 13–18 August 2006, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil’. pp. 31–39. ISBN No. 85-60088-01-6. Available at www.wcgalp8.org.br/wcgalp8/articles

Butts WT (1999) Feedlot performance and carcass traits of purebred and crossbred Senepol cattle. In ‘Senepol Cattle. Proceedings, International Senepol Research Symposium’. (Ed. S Wildeus) pp. 105–107. (University of the Virgin Islands: St. Croix)

Chambers JM, Hastie TJ (1992) ‘Statistical Models in S.’ (Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole: Pacific Grove, CA)

Chase CC, Olson TA, Hammond AC, Menchaca MA, West RL, Johnson DD, Butts WT (1998) Preweaning growth traits for Senepol, Hereford, and reciprocal crossbred calves and feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of steers. Journal of Animal Science 76, 2967–2975.
Preweaning growth traits for Senepol, Hereford, and reciprocal crossbred calves and feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of steers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9928599PubMed |

Crouse JD, Cundiff LV, Koch RM, Koohmaraie M, Seideman SC (1989) Comparisons of Bos indicus and Bos taurus inheritance for carcass beef characteristics and meat palatability. Journal of Animal Science 67, 2661–2668.
Comparisons of Bos indicus and Bos taurus inheritance for carcass beef characteristics and meat palatability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davis GP (1993) Genetic parameters for tropical beef cattle in northern Australia: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 179–198.
Genetic parameters for tropical beef cattle in northern Australia: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fordyce G, Holroyd RG (2003) Management of extensive northern beef breeding herds. In ‘Proceedings of the Australian cattle veterinarians conference’, May 2003, Cairns. pp. 16–30. (Australian Association of Cattle Veterinarians: Brisbane)

Fordyce G, Barnes TS, McGowan MR, Perkins NR, Smith DR, McCosker KD (2021) Defining the primary business measure of liveweight production for beef cows in northern Australia. Animal Production Science
Defining the primary business measure of liveweight production for beef cows in northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Frisch JE (1987) Physiological reasons for heterosis in growth of Bos inducus × Bos taurus. Journal of Agricultural Science 109, 213–230.
Physiological reasons for heterosis in growth of Bos inducus × Bos taurus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Frisch JE, Vercoe JE (1984) An analysis of growth of different cattle genotypes reared in different environments. Journal of Agricultural Science 103, 137–153.
An analysis of growth of different cattle genotypes reared in different environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hearnshaw H, Arthur PF, Barlow R, Kohun PJ, Darnell RE (1994) Evaluation of Bos indicus and Bos taurus straightbreds and crosses. II. Postweaning growth, puberty and pelvic size of heifers. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 795–805.
Evaluation of Bos indicus and Bos taurus straightbreds and crosses. II. Postweaning growth, puberty and pelvic size of heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal 50, 346–363.
Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18481363PubMed |

Johnson ER (1987) Comparison of twelfth rib and rump fat thickness measurements for predicting commercial beef yield in local market carcasses. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 27, 613–617.
Comparison of twelfth rib and rump fat thickness measurements for predicting commercial beef yield in local market carcasses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnson DD, Huffman RD, Williams SE, Hargrove DD (1990) Effects of percentage Brahman and Angus breeding, age-season of feeding and slaughter end point on meat palatability and muscle characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 68, 1980–1986.
Effects of percentage Brahman and Angus breeding, age-season of feeding and slaughter end point on meat palatability and muscle characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 2384388PubMed | 2384388PubMed |

Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Corbet NJ, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG, Williams PM, Burrow HM (2009) Genetics of heifer puberty in two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia and associations with heifer- and steer-production traits. Animal Production Science 49, 399–412.
Genetics of heifer puberty in two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia and associations with heifer- and steer-production traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kosmidis I (2021) brglm2: Bias Reduction in Generalized Linear Models. R package version 0.8.0. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=brglm2

Kosmidis I, Kenne Pagui EC, Sartori N (2020) Mean and median bias reduction in generalized linear models. Statistics and Computing 30, 43–59.
Mean and median bias reduction in generalized linear models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2017) lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software 82, 1–26.
lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lenth R (2021) emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.6.1. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans

McGowan MR, McCosker KD, Fordyce G, Smith DR, Perkins NR, O’Rourke PK, Barnes T, Marquart L, Menzies D, Newsome T, Joyner D, Phillips N, Burns BM, Morton JM, Jephcott S (2013) Insights from Cash Cow. Proceedings of the Northern Beef Research Update Conference, 12–15 August 2013. Cairns Qld. pp 61–66.

O’Rourke PK, Entwistle KW, Arman C, Esdale CR, Burns BM (1991) Fetal development and gestational changes in Bos taurus and Bos indicus genotypes in the tropics. Theriogenolgy 36, 839–853.

O’Connor SF, Tatum JD, Wulf DM, Green RD, Smith GC (1997) Genetic effects on beef tenderness in Bos indicus composite and Bos taurus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 75, 1822–1830.
Genetic effects on beef tenderness in Bos indicus composite and Bos taurus cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9222838PubMed |

Olson TA, Lucena CC, Chase CC, Hammond AC (2003) Evidence of a major gene influencing hair length and heat tolerance in Bos taurus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 81, 80–90.
Evidence of a major gene influencing hair length and heat tolerance in Bos taurus cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12597376PubMed | 12597376PubMed |

Prayaga KC (2003) Evaluation of beef cattle genotypes and estimation of direct and maternal genetic effects in a tropical environment. 1. Growth traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 1013–1025.
Evaluation of beef cattle genotypes and estimation of direct and maternal genetic effects in a tropical environment. 1. Growth traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at https://www.R-project.org/

Rudder TH, Seifert GW, Bean KG (1975) Growth performance of Brahman and Charolais × Brahman cattle in a tropical environment. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 15, 156–158.
Growth performance of Brahman and Charolais × Brahman cattle in a tropical environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schatz TJ (2017) A comparison of the growth of Brahman and F1 Senepol × Brahman steers in an Indonesian feedlot. Animal Production Science 57, 2096–2099.
A comparison of the growth of Brahman and F1 Senepol × Brahman steers in an Indonesian feedlot.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schatz TJ, Thomas S, Geesink G (2014) Comparison of the growth and meat tenderness of Brahman and F1 Senepol × Brahman steers. Animal Production Science 54, 1867–1870.
Comparison of the growth and meat tenderness of Brahman and F1 Senepol × Brahman steers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schatz T, Thomas S, Reed S, Hearnden M (2020) Crossbreeding with a tropically adapted Bos taurus breed (Senepol) to improve meat quality and production from Brahman herds in Northern Australia. 1. Steer performance. Animal Production Science 60, 487–491.
Crossbreeding with a tropically adapted Bos taurus breed (Senepol) to improve meat quality and production from Brahman herds in Northern Australia. 1. Steer performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wildeus S (1999) Performance of Senepol cows at two locations on St Croix. In ‘Senepol Cattle. Proceedings, international senepol research symposium’. (Ed. S Wildeus) pp. 15–23. (University of the Virgin Islands: St. Croix)