Application of circular economy principles to pastoral farming: development of an assessment framework
V. T. Burggraaf
A * , A. M. Mazzetto B , A. J. Romera A , G. J. K. Mercer A and S. F. Ledgard A
A AgResearch Ltd, Ruakura Research Centre, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
B AgResearch Ltd, Lincoln Research Centre, Private Bag 4749, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.
Animal Production Science - https://doi.org/10.1071/AN21167
Submitted: 25 March 2021 Accepted: 17 September 2021 Published online: 8 November 2021
© 2021 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing
Abstract
Context: Circular economy principles are being adopted to design out waste, use resources more efficiently and maintain ecosystem health.
Aims: This study developed a framework to assess the ‘circularity’ of pastoral farms, using a New Zealand dairy farm as a case study.
Methods: Key resource inputs and environmental impacts to assess for the farming system were determined. Nitrogen and phosphorus flows were assessed using the OVERSEER® model, to then determine their circularity on the basis of the material circularity indicator. Life-cycle assessment was used to determine the carbon footprint and fossil fuel depletion associated with the farm. Single-use plastic disposal was calculated on the basis of farm purchases and end-points of packaging.
Key results: MCI circularity scores were 0.46 for nitrogen, 0.48 for phosphorus and total circularity 0.46, which could be improved by focusing on reducing the high rates of mineral fertiliser use and large losses of nitrogen to water and the atmosphere. Although the farm’s cradle-to-farm-gate fossil fuel resource depletion footprint (1.16 MJ/kg fat- and protein-corrected milk) was low compared with other New Zealand and European dairy farms, its carbon footprint of 0.85 kg carbon dioxide-equivalent/kg fat and protein corrected milk was high for New Zealand, with enteric methane emissions and inputs of supplementary feeds being the major sources. Plastic waste was a minor source of waste compared with nutrients, but the key sources were identified.
Conclusions and implications: This framework could be used and adapted to assess the circularity of nutrients in pastoral farming systems and help identify key areas to reduce the depletion of critical resources and negative environmental impacts. Further development and testing are required for a range of farming systems.
Keywords: bioeconomy, dairy, greenhouse gases, livestock, material losses, nitrogen, nutrient circularity, phosphorus.
References
Dey A, Dhumal CV, Sengupta P, Kumar A, Pramanik NK, Alam T (2021) Challenges and possible solutions to mitigate the problems of single-use plastics used for packaging food items: a review. Journal of Food Science and Technology 58, 3251–3269.| Challenges and possible solutions to mitigate the problems of single-use plastics used for packaging food items: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34366444PubMed |
Durlinger BM, Tyszler J, Scholten J, Broekma R, Blonk H (2014) ‘Agri-footprint; a life cycle inventory database covering food and feed production and processing.’ (American Center for Life Cycle Assessment: Vashon, WA, USA)
Elia V, Gnoni MG, Tornese F (2017) Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: a critical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 142, 2741–2751.
| Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: a critical analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2019) Circularity indicators. An approach to measuring circularity. Methodology. Available at https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/material-circularity-indicator
European Commission (2020) Study on the EU’s list of critical raw materials – final report. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/raw-materials/specific-interest/critical_en
Higham CD, Horne D, Singh R, Kuhn-Sherlock B, Scarsbrook MR (2017) Temporal and spatial water use on irrigated and nonirrigated pasture-based dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 6772–6784.
| Temporal and spatial water use on irrigated and nonirrigated pasture-based dairy farms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28624273PubMed |
IPCC (2006) ‘IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Vol. 4: agriculture, forestry, and other land use.’ Available at https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol4.html
Ledgard SF, Falconer SJ (2015) Total greenhouse gas emissions from farm systems with increasing use of supplementary feeds across different regions of New Zealand. Report for MPI. RE500/2015/033. AgResearch, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Ledgard SF, Falconer SJ (2019a) Fossil energy use and greenhouse gas emissions associated with life cycle stages of New Zealand dairy, sheep and beef products. Report to MPI. RE450/2019/073. AgResearch, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Ledgard SF, Falconer SJ (2019b) Update of the carbon footprint of fertilisers used in New Zealand. Report for the Fertiliser Association of New Zealand. RE450/2019/059. AgResearch, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Ledgard SF, Wei S, Wang X, Falconer S, Zhang N, Zhang X, Ma L (2019) Nitrogen and carbon footprints of dairy farm systems in China and New Zealand, as influenced by productivity, feed sources and mitigations. Agricultural Water Management 213, 155–163.
| Nitrogen and carbon footprints of dairy farm systems in China and New Zealand, as influenced by productivity, feed sources and mitigations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ledgard SF, Falconer SJ, Abercrombie R, Philip G, Hill JP (2020) Temporal, spatial, and management variability in the carbon footprint of New Zealand milk. Journal of Dairy Science 103, 1031–1046.
| Temporal, spatial, and management variability in the carbon footprint of New Zealand milk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31759588PubMed |
Ministry for the Environment (2020a) ‘Action for healthy waterways – decisions on national direction and regulations for freshwater management.’ (Ministry for the Environment: Wellington, New Zealand)
Ministry for the Environment (2020b) ‘New Zealand’s greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2018.’ (Ministry for the Environment: Wellington, New Zealand)
Niero M, Kalbar PP (2019) Coupling material circularity indicators and life cycle based indicators: a proposal to advance the assessment of circular economy strategies at the product level. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 140, 305–312.
| Coupling material circularity indicators and life cycle based indicators: a proposal to advance the assessment of circular economy strategies at the product level.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Payen S, Falconer S, Ledgard SF (2018) Water scarcity footprint of dairy milk production in New Zealand – a comparison of methods and spatio-temporal resolution. Science of the Total Environment 639, 504–515.
| Water scarcity footprint of dairy milk production in New Zealand – a comparison of methods and spatio-temporal resolution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pinxterhuis JB, Edwards JP (2018) Comparing nitrogen management on dairy farms – Canterbury case studies. Journal of New Zealand Grasslands 80, 201–206.
| Comparing nitrogen management on dairy farms – Canterbury case studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Scarsbrook MR, Melland AR (2015) Dairying and water-quality issues in Australia and New Zealand. Animal Production Science 55, 856–868.
| Dairying and water-quality issues in Australia and New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Selbie DR, Watkins NL, Wheeler DM, Shepherd MA (2013) Understanding the distribution and fate of nitrogen and phosphorus in OVERSEER®. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 75, 113–118.
| Understanding the distribution and fate of nitrogen and phosphorus in OVERSEER®.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van der Werf HMG, Kanyarushoki C, Corson MS (2009) An operational method for the evaluation of resource use and environmental impacts of dairy farms by life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 90, 3643–3652.
| An operational method for the evaluation of resource use and environmental impacts of dairy farms by life cycle assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ward SM, Holden NM, White EP, Oldfield TL (2016) ‘The ‘circular economy’ applied to agriculture (livestock production) sector – discussion paper. Workshop on the sustainability of the EU’s livestock production systems.’ (European Commission: Brussels, Belgium)
Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, Reinhard J, Moreno-Ruiz E, Weidema B (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 21, 1218–1230.
| The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wheeler DM, Ledgard SF, de Klein CAM, Monaghan RM, Carey PL, McDowell RW, Johns KL (2003) OVERSEER® nutrient budgets – moving towards on-farm resource accounting. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 65, 191–194.
| OVERSEER® nutrient budgets – moving towards on-farm resource accounting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
