Comparison of sire breeding values for milk yield traits based on daughters milked once or twice daily in New Zealand
F. Lembeye
A D , N. López-Villalobos B , J. L. Burke B , S. R. Davis C and D. Garrick B
A Soprole SA, Avenida Jorge Alessandri Rodriguez 10800, San Bernardo, Chile.
B Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
C Livestock Improvement Corporation, 605 Ruakura Road, Newstead 3286, New Zealand.
D Corresponding author. Email: F.Lembeye@gmail.com; Felipe.Lembeye@soprole.cl
Animal Production Science 61(14) 1403-1411 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20194
Submitted: 18 April 2020 Accepted: 22 April 2021 Published: 1 June 2021
Abstract
Context: In New Zealand, cows are usually milked twice a day (TAD), but in ~8% of herds, cows are milked once a day (OAD) for the entire lactation. If a genetic correlation (rg) of the same trait expressed in two environments (such as TAD and OAD) is substantially <1.0, then the genetic merit assessed from TAD herds may not be reliable for predicting genetic merit in OAD herds. Initial evaluation of sires has been undertaken from progeny test herds with TAD milking, and the best sires have then been made widely available for use in TAD or OAD herds.
Aim: The study was designed to test formally whether sire re-rankings occur in widely used sires at different milking frequencies.
Methods: Regression coefficients and rank correlations (rS) for estimated breeding values (EBVs) of 242 widely used sires (86 Holstein-Friesian, 96 Jersey and 60 crossbred) were calculated for yields of milk, fat and protein, and for somatic cell score (SCS). The rS values were contrasted with expected rank correlations (rE) between TAD and OAD EBVs assuming rg = 1.0 between true BVs expressed at the two milking frequencies and accounting for the fact that sires were highly selected.
Key results: Within and across breeds, regression coefficients of OAD on TAD EBVs for the same traits were <1.0, but rS values between TAD and OAD EBVs of the same sires were strong (>0.75) for milk yield, moderate–strong for fat and protein yield (0.55–0.77), and moderate for SCS (0.41–0.65). Estimates of rS were higher than their critical rE values, indicating no significant sire re-ranking across milking frequencies.
Conclusions: On the basis of the results, a separate selection program to generate sires for use in OAD herds is not justified.
Implications: Farmers operating under OAD systems can rely on genetic evaluation of sires evaluated in TAD systems and used in the OAD population. However, producers should recognise that the realised productive and economic advantage of daughters of elite sires born in OAD herds is diminished relative to that expected in TAD herds.
Keywords: once-a-day milking, breeding values, rank correlation, expected correlation, sire × milking frequency interaction.
References
Bryant JR, López-Villalobos N, Pryce JE, Holmes CW, Johnson DL, Garrick DJ (2007) Environmental sensitivity in New Zealand dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1538–1547.| Environmental sensitivity in New Zealand dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17297127PubMed |
Cameron N (1997) Selection Indices and Prediction of Genetic Merit in Animal Breeding. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
Clark DA, Phyn CVC, Tong MJ, Collis SJ, Dalley DE (2006) A systems comparison of once-versus twice daily milking of pastured dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 1854–1862.
| A systems comparison of once-versus twice daily milking of pastured dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16606757PubMed |
Cooper C (2000) Once-a-day milking: possible and profitable? In ‘Healthy, wealthy and wise. South Island Dairy Event Proceedings’. 5–7 July 2000. pp. 152–163. (SIDE: Invercargill, New Zealand)
DairyNZ (2019a) Economic values. DairyNZ, Hamilton, New Zealand. Available at https://www.dairynz.co.nz/animal/animal-evaluation/interpreting-the-info/economic-values [Verified 27 November 2019]
DairyNZ (2019b) New Zealand dairy statistics 2018–2019. DairyNZ, Hamilton, New Zealand. Available at https://www.dairynz.co.nz/media/5792471/nz_dairy_statistics_2018-19_web_v2.pdf [Verified 04 December 2019]
Davis SR, Farr VC, Stelwagen K (1999) Regulation of yield loss and milk composition during once-daily milking: a review. Livestock Production Science 59, 77–94.
| Regulation of yield loss and milk composition during once-daily milking: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dickerson GE (1973) Inbreeding and heterosis in animals. In ‘Proceedings of the animal breeding and genetic symposium in honor of Dr. J.L. Lush’, pp. 54–57. (American Society of Animal Science and American Dairy Science Association: Champaign, IL, USA)
Garrick D (2005) Calculating the distribution of the correlation between estimated breeding values from different analysis. Journal of Animal Science 83, 73
Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2009) ASReml user guide. Release 3.0. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK. Available at http://www.vsni.co.uk
Guinard-Flament J, Gallard Y, Larroque H (2011) Lactose in blood plasma and the ability of dairy cows to tolerate once-daily milking in terms of milk loss and milk recovery. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 3446–3454.
| Lactose in blood plasma and the ability of dairy cows to tolerate once-daily milking in terms of milk loss and milk recovery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21700030PubMed |
Hammami H, Rekik B, Gengler N (2009) Genotype by environment interaction in dairy cattle. Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement 13, 155–164.
Harris BL, Winkelman AM (2004) Test-day model for genetic evaluation of somatic cell count in New Zealand. Interbull Bulletin 32, 101–104.
Henderson CR (1973) Sire evaluation and genetic trends. In ‘Proceedings of the animal breeding and genetic symposium in honor of Dr. J.L. Lush’. pp. 10–41. (American Society of Animal Science and American Dairy Science Association: Champaign, IL, USA)
Hickson RE, López-Villalobos N, Dalley DE, Clark DA, Holmes CW (2006) Yields and persistency of lactation in Friesian and Jersey cows milked once a day. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 2017–2024.
| Yields and persistency of lactation in Friesian and Jersey cows milked once a day.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16702265PubMed |
Koots KR, Gibson JP, Wilton JW (1994) Analyses of published genetic parameter estimates for beef production traits. 2. Phenotypic and genetic correlations. Animal Breeding Abstracts 62, 825–843.
Lembeye F, López-Villalobos N, Burke JL, Davis SR (2015) Estimation of breed and heterosis effects for milk traits and somatic cell scores in cows milked once and twice daily in New Zealand. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 75, 60–63.
Lembeye F, López-Villalobos N, Burke JL, Davis SR (2016) Estimation of genetic parameters for production milk traits in cows milked once- or twice-daily in New Zealand. Livestock Science 185, 142–147.
| Estimation of genetic parameters for production milk traits in cows milked once- or twice-daily in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lembeye F, López-Villalobos N, Burke JL, Davis SR (2018) Genotype-by-milking frequency for milk production traits in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 61, 92–101.
| Genotype-by-milking frequency for milk production traits in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McPherson AW, Pryce JE, Winkelman AM (2007) The genetic improvement of cows for once-a-day (OAD) milking. In ‘The once-a-day Milking conference’. (Eds CVC Phyn, DA Clark) pp. 44–48. (Dexcel and LIC: Hamilton, New Zealand)
Mrode RA (2014) ‘Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding.’ (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)
Notter DR, Díaz C (1993) Use of covariance’s between predicted breeding values to assess the genetic correlation between expressions of a trait in two environments. Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 25, 353–372.
| Use of covariance’s between predicted breeding values to assess the genetic correlation between expressions of a trait in two environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robertson A (1959) The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics 15, 469–485.
| The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schneider A (2012) About GPS Visualizer. GPS Visualizer, Portland, OR, USA. Available at http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/about.html [Verified 20 June 2014]
Stachowicz K, Jenkins G, Am P, Phyn CVC (2014) Genetic evaluation of milk traits under whole-season once-a-day milking. In ‘Proceedings of 10th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production’. Vancouver, Canada. Abstract No. 821. (World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production)
Stelwagen K, Phyn CVC, Davis SR, Guinard-Flament J, Pomiès D, Roche JR, Kay JK (2013) Invited review: reduced milking frequency: Milk production and management implications Journal of Dairy Science 96, 3401–3413.
| Invited review: reduced milking frequency: Milk production and management implicationsCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23548302PubMed |
