Performance of Angus weaner heifers varying in residual feed intake-feedlot estimated breeding values grazing severely drought-affected pasture
F. A. P. Alvarenga
A B E , H. Bansi C , R. C. Dobos A D , K. L. Austin A B , A. J. Donaldson A , R. T. Woodgate A and P. L. Greenwood A B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A NSW Department of Primary Industries, Armidale Livestock Industries Centre, J. S. F. Barker Building, Trevenna Road, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B CSIRO Agriculture and Food, FD McMaster Laboratory Chiswick, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.
C School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
D Precision Agriculture Research Group, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: flavio.alvarenga@dpi.nsw.gov.au
Animal Production Science 61(3) 337-343 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20152
Submitted: 17 April 2020 Accepted: 13 October 2020 Published: 20 November 2020
Abstract
Context: Beef industry productivity and profitability would be enhanced by improved efficiency at pasture. Our research is evaluating performance at pasture of Angus heifers divergent in estimated breeding values for residual feed intake determined from feedlot data (RFI-f-EBV) under a range of grazing conditions.
Aims: To determine whether Low- and High-RFI-f-EBV cattle differ in their growth response when pasture quality and availability become limiting to performance.
Methods: Eight-month-old heifers (n = 40) weaned at 6 months of age grazed within two replicates of 20, each with 10 low feedlot-efficiency (High-RFI-f-EBV) and 10 high feedlot-efficiency (Low-RFI-f-EBV) heifers. Each replicate grazed each of eight 1.25-ha paddocks comprising severely drought-affected, low-quality (mean dry-matter (DM) digestibility 44.1%, crude protein 7.3% DM, and 6.1 MJ metabolisable energy/kg DM) mixed perennial and annual native temperate grasses at 7-day intervals during repeated 28-day cycles, with Phase 1 with 2834 kg DM/ha and Phase 2 with 1890 kg DM/ha mean starting biomass. Heifers were yard-weighed weekly on nine occasions during the 8-week study.
Key results: During Phase 1 of grazing, the heifers gained 6.2 kg liveweight (LW) and during Phase 2 of grazing they lost 10 kg LW on average. Differences in LW between the RFI-f-EBV groups were not evident at the start or end of the study. However, over the 56 days of study, average daily change in LW calculated from the difference between starting and final LW was higher for Low-RFI-f-EBV heifers than for High-RFI-f-EBV heifers (–33 vs –127 g/day, s.e.m. = 41 g/day, P = 0.026). A similar result was evident when average daily LW change was determined from regression of LW on the day of study (–6 vs –96 g/day, s.e.m. = 41 g/day, P = 0.033). No significant interactions between grazing Phase and RFI-EBV group were evident for the growth responses.
Conclusions: Higher feedlot-efficiency (Low-RFI-f-EBV) weaner heifers maintained LW somewhat better than lower feedlot-efficiency (High-RFI-f-EBV) heifers, as the nutritional availability at pasture became more limiting.
Implications: Low-RFI-f-EBV weaner heifers may be more nutritionally resilient than are High-RFI-f-EBV heifers under drought conditions and, hence, may require less supplementary feed to maintain growth performance.
Keywords: beef cattle, genetics, grazing efficiency, growth, net feed intake.
References
ABRI (2017). ‘BREEDPLAN. A modern genetic evaluation system for beef cattle.’ (Agricultural Business Research Institute: Armidale, NSW, Australia.) Available at http://breedplan.une.edu.au/brochures/BREEDPLAN%20Flyer%20Web.pdf [Verified 4 October 2020]Alvarenga FAP, Bansi H, Austin KL, Woodgate RT, Greenwood PL (2020) Comparison of walk-over-weigh and yard weighing of Angus weaner heifers grazing drought affected pasture. In ‘Proceedings of Australian Association of Animal Sciences biennial conference’. Australian Society of Animal Sciences, Fremantle, Australia.
Anderton L, Accioly JM, Copping KJ, Deland MPB, Hebart ML, Herd RM, Jones FM, Laurence M, Lee SJ, Speijers EJ, Walmsley BJ, Pitchford WS (2018) Divergent genotypes for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 7. Low-fat and low-RFI cows produce more liveweight and better gross margins than do high-fat and high-RFI cows when managed under the same conditions. Animal Production Science 58, 103–116.
| Divergent genotypes for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 7. Low-fat and low-RFI cows produce more liveweight and better gross margins than do high-fat and high-RFI cows when managed under the same conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Archer JA, Reverter A, Herd RM, Johnston DJ, Arthur PF (2002) Genetic variation in feed intake and efficiency of mature beef cows and relationships with postweaning measurements. In ‘7th world congress on genetics applies to livestock production’, 19–23 August 2002, Montpellier, France. Vol 31, pp. 221–224, 2002.
Arthur PF, Herd RM (2005) Efficiency of feed utilization by livestock: implications and benefits of genetic improvement. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 85, 281–290.
| Efficiency of feed utilization by livestock: implications and benefits of genetic improvement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Arthur JPF, Herd RM (2008) Residual feed intake in beef cattle. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37, 269–279.
| Residual feed intake in beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Arthur PF, Archer JA, Herd RM, Richardson EC, Exton SC, Oswin C, Dibley KCP, Burton DA (1999) Relationship between postweaning growth, net feed intake and cow performance. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 13, 484–486.
Arthur PF, Herd RM, Donoghue KA, Greenwood PL, Bird-Gardiner T (2019) Genetic improvement of pasture intake and efficiency in beef cattle: are we there yet? Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 23, 428–431.
Bonilha SFM, Branco RH, Mercadante MEZ, Dos Santos Gonçalves Cyrillo JN, Monteiro FM, Ribeiro EG (2017) Digestion and metabolism of low and high residual feed intake Nellore bulls. Tropical Animal Health and Production 49, 529–535.
| Digestion and metabolism of low and high residual feed intake Nellore bulls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28124731PubMed |
Dobos RC, Alvarenga FAP, Bansi H, Austin KL, Donaldson AJ, Woodgate RT, Greenwood PL (2020) Pasture yield and disappearance mapping to enhance grazing efficiency. In ‘Proceedings of Australian Association of Animal Sciences biennial conference’, Australian Society of Animal Sciences, Fremantle, Australia.
Elolimy AA, Abdelmegeid MK, McCann JC, Shike DW, Loor JJ (2018) Residual feed intake in beef cattle and its association with carcass traits, ruminal solid-fraction bacteria, and epithelium gene expression. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 9, 67
| Residual feed intake in beef cattle and its association with carcass traits, ruminal solid-fraction bacteria, and epithelium gene expression.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30258628PubMed |
Greenwood PL, Valencia P, Overs L, Paull DP, Purvis IW (2014) New ways of measuring intake, efficiency and behaviour of grazing livestock. Animal Production Science 54, 1796–1804.
| New ways of measuring intake, efficiency and behaviour of grazing livestock.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greenwood PL, Bishop-Hurley GJ, Gonzalez LA, Ingham AB (2016) Development and application of a livestock phenomics platform to enhance productivity and efficiency at pasture. Animal Production Science 56, 1299–1311.
| Development and application of a livestock phenomics platform to enhance productivity and efficiency at pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greenwood PL, Paull DR, McNally J, Kalinowski T, Ebert D, Little B, Smith DV, Rahman A, Valencia P, Ingham AB, Bishop-Hurley GJ (2017) Use of sensor-determined behaviours to develop algorithms for pasture intake by individual grazing cattle. Crop and Pasture Science 68, 1091–1099.
| Use of sensor-determined behaviours to develop algorithms for pasture intake by individual grazing cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gregorini P, Gunter SA, Beck PA, Soder KJ, Tamminga S (2008) Review: the interaction of diurnal grazing pattern, ruminal metabolism, nutrient supply, and management in cattle. The Professional Animal Scientist 24, 308–318.
| Review: the interaction of diurnal grazing pattern, ruminal metabolism, nutrient supply, and management in cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hebart ML, Accioly JM, Copping KJ, Deland MPB, Herd RM, Jones FM, Laurence M, Lee SJ, Lines DS, Speijers EJ, Walmsley BJ, Pitchford WS (2018) Divergent breeding values for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 5. Cow genotype affects feed efficiency and maternal productivity. Animal Production Science 58, 80–93.
| Divergent breeding values for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 5. Cow genotype affects feed efficiency and maternal productivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Herd RM, Arthur PF, Archer JA (2005) When pastures limit growth rate of steers those bred for low residual feed intake grow faster. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 16, 330–333.
Herd RM, Arthur PF, Archer JA (2011) Associations between residual feed intake on ad libitum, pasture and restricted feeding in Angus cows. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 19, 47–50.
Herd RM, Velazco JI, Smith S, Arthur PF, Hine H, Oddy H, Dobos RC, Hegarty RS (2019) Genetic variation in residual feed intake is associated with body composition, behavior, rumen, heat production, hematology, and immune competence traits in Angus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 97, 2202–2219.
| Genetic variation in residual feed intake is associated with body composition, behavior, rumen, heat production, hematology, and immune competence traits in Angus cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30789654PubMed |
Kenny DA, Fitzsimmons C, Waters SM, McGee M (2018) Invited review: improving the efficiency of beef cattle – the current state of the art and future challenges. Animal 12, 1815–1826.
| Invited review: improving the efficiency of beef cattle – the current state of the art and future challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29779496PubMed |
Lawrence P, Kenny DA, Early B, McGee M (2012) Grazed grass herbage intake and performance of beef heifers with predetermined phenotypic residual intake classification. Animal 6, 1648–1661.
| Grazed grass herbage intake and performance of beef heifers with predetermined phenotypic residual intake classification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23031564PubMed |
Lawrence P, Kenny DA, Early B, McGee M (2013) Intake of conserved and grazed grass and performance traits in beef suckler cows differing in phenotypic residual feed intake. Livestock Science 152, 154–166.
| Intake of conserved and grazed grass and performance traits in beef suckler cows differing in phenotypic residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lines DS, Pitchford WS, Bottema CDK, Herd RM, Oddy VH (2018) Selection for residual feed intake affects appetite and body composition rather than energetic efficiency. Animal Production Science 58, 175–184.
| Selection for residual feed intake affects appetite and body composition rather than energetic efficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Manafiazar G, Basarab JA, Baron VS, McKeown L, Doce RR, Swift M, Undi M, Wittenberg K, Ominski K (2015) Effect of post-weaning residual feed intake classification on grazed grass intake and performance in pregnant beef heifers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 95, 369–381.
| Effect of post-weaning residual feed intake classification on grazed grass intake and performance in pregnant beef heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nielsen MK, MacNeil MD, Dekkers JCM, Crews DH, Rathje TA, Enns RM, Weaber RL (2013) Review: life-cycle, total-industry genetic improvement of feed efficiency in beef cattle: blueprint for the Beef Improvement Federation. The Professional Animal Scientist 29, 559–565.
| Review: life-cycle, total-industry genetic improvement of feed efficiency in beef cattle: blueprint for the Beef Improvement Federation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Oliveira LF, Roggieri AC, Branco RH, Cota OL, Canesin RC, Costa HJU, Mercadante MEZ (2018) Feed efficiency and enteric methane production of Nellore cattle in the feedlot and on pasture. Animal Production Science 58, 886–893.
| Feed efficiency and enteric methane production of Nellore cattle in the feedlot and on pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Redden RR, Surber LMM, Grove AV, Kott RW (2013) Efficiency of ewe lambs classified into residual feed intake groups and pen fed a restricted amount of feed. Small Ruminant Research 114, 214–219.
| Efficiency of ewe lambs classified into residual feed intake groups and pen fed a restricted amount of feed.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Richardson EC, Herd RM, Archer JA, Arthur PF (2004) Metabolic differences in Angus steers divergently selected for residual feed intake. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 441–452.
| Metabolic differences in Angus steers divergently selected for residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sainz RD, De la Torre F, Oltjen JW (1995) Compensatory growth and carcass quality in growth-restricted and refed beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2971–2979.
| Compensatory growth and carcass quality in growth-restricted and refed beef steers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 8617667PubMed |
Sprinkle JE, Taylor JB, Clark PE, Hall JB, Strong NK, Roberts-Lew MC (2020) Grazing behavior and production characteristics among cows differing in residual feed intake while grazing late season Idaho rangeland. Journal of Animal Science 98,
| Grazing behavior and production characteristics among cows differing in residual feed intake while grazing late season Idaho rangeland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31820799PubMed |
Taussat S, Saintilan R, Krauss D, Maupetit D, Fouilloux MN, Renand G (2019) Relationship between feed efficiency and slaughter traits of French Charolais bulls. Journal of Animal Science 97, 2308–2319.
| Relationship between feed efficiency and slaughter traits of French Charolais bulls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30957842PubMed |
Velazco JI, Herd RM, Cottle DJ, Hegarty RS (2017) Daily methane emissions and emissions intensity of grazing beef cattle genetically divergent for residual feed intake. Animal Production Science 57, 627–635.
| Daily methane emissions and emissions intensity of grazing beef cattle genetically divergent for residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
VSN International (2019) ‘Genstat for Windows.’ 20th edn. (VSN International: Hemel Hempstead, UK) Available at www.genstat.co.uk [Verified 15 December 2019]
Walmsley BJ, Henzell AL, Barwick SA (2017) Genetic trends in the estimated feed intake of Angus cattle. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 22, 61–64.
Wilson JR, Kennedy PM (1996) Plant and animal constraints to voluntary feed intake associated with fibre characteristics and particle breakdown and passage in ruminants. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 199–225.
| Plant and animal constraints to voluntary feed intake associated with fibre characteristics and particle breakdown and passage in ruminants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zorzi K, Bonilha SFM, Queiroz AC, Branco RH, Sobrinho TL, Duarte MS (2013) Meat quality of young Nellore bulls with low and high residual feed intake. Meat Science 93, 593–599.
| Meat quality of young Nellore bulls with low and high residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23273469PubMed |
