The effect of preconditioning on production and antibiotic use in a South African beef feedlot
A. H. R. Hentzen A , P. N. Thompson
A and D. E. Holm A B
A Department of Production Animal Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X04, Onderstepoort, 0110, South Africa.
B Corresponding author. Email: dietmar.holm@up.ac.za
Animal Production Science 60(15) 1822-1829 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN19495
Submitted: 3 September 2019 Accepted: 14 April 2020 Published: 7 July 2020
Abstract
Context: There is pressure on production veterinarians to reduce the use of antibiotics in intensive beef production systems.
Aims: The present study investigated whether preconditioning – the process whereby weaned calves destined for the feedlot are prepared over a period of time – reduced antibiotic treatment events, and improved health and production of calves in a South African feedlot.
Methods: Preconditioned calves (n = 301) and control calves (n = 332) were sourced from the same origin on two occasions, and arrived at the feedlot on the same day. Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) was defined as the ‘pulling’ of clinically sick calves from feedlot pens, followed by the standard protocol for treatment of BRD (including antibiotic treatment). Outcome variables related to health were BRD overall incidence (pulling), BRD re-pulling and lung lesion scores. Production outcome variables measured were carcass weight, carcass average daily gain (ADG) and days on feed (DOF). Initial carcass weight was estimated from shrunk liveweight in order to estimate the effect of preconditioning on carcass gain, the most economically relevant outcome. Statistical analyses were done using multiple linear, logistic and Cox regression. Predictor variables were preconditioning vs control, gender, starting weight, DOF, pulling for BRD and carcass ADG.
Key results: A lower proportion of preconditioned calves were pulled and a lower proportion of pulled calves were re-pulled for BRD compared with control calves (8 vs 17% and 8 vs 16%, respectively, P < 0.01). A higher proportion of preconditioned calves compared with control calves were market ready at 90 DOF (89 vs 67%, P < 0.01). In the multivariable models preconditioning was associated with a 200 g/d increase in carcass growth rate (P < 0.01) and with a 17.7 kg increase in overall carcass gain (P < 0.01) after adjusting for gender and DOF.
Conclusions: Preconditioning reduced the incidence and severity of BRD and feedlot standing time and improved production of calves in South African feedlots.
Implications: Preconditioning has the potential to add value to the beef feedlot by reducing the formation of antimicrobial resistance while improving the profitability of the feedlot.
Additional keywords: beef cattle, diseases, feedlot.
References
Apley MD (2017) The challenges of antibiotic stewardship in veterinary medicine. In ‘Proceedings of the Ruminant Veterinary Association of South Africa annual congress’. p. 47–60. (Ruminant Veterinary Association of South Africa: Johannesburg, South Africa)Avent RK, Ward CE, Lalmab DL (2002) Asymmetric value of preconditioning programs for feeder cattle. (Western Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting: Long Beach, CA, USA)
Blondeau JM (2000) Community acquired respiratory tract pathogens and increasing antimicrobial resistance. Journal of Infectious Diseases and Pharmacology 4, 1–28.
Bransby D, Gamble BE, Gregory B, Pegues M, Rawls R (1999) Feedlot gains on forages: Alabama’s stocker cattle can make significant gains on ryegrass pastures. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station. Highlight of Agricultural Research 46.
Bryant LK, Perino LJ, Griffin D, Doster AR, Wittum TE (1999) A method for recording pulmonary lesions of beef calves at slaughter, and the association of lesions with average daily gain. Bovine Practitioner 33, 163–173.
Cole NA (1985) ‘Preconditioning calves for the feedlot’. Veterinary Clinics of North America, Food Animal Practice, 1: 401–411.
Fox DG, Docksty TR, Johnson RR, Preston RL (1976) Relationship of empty body weight for carcass weight in beef cattle. Journal of Animals Science 43, 566–568.
Gifford CA, Holland BP, Mills RL, Maxwell CL, Farney JK, Terrill SJ, Step DL, Richards CJ, Burciaga Robles LO, Krehbiel CR (2012) Growth and development symposium: impacts of inflammation on cattle growth and carcass merit. Journal of Animal Science 90, 1438–1451.
| Growth and development symposium: impacts of inflammation on cattle growth and carcass merit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22573836PubMed |
Hutcheson DP, Cole NA (1986) Management of transit-stress syndrome in cattle: Nutritional and environmental effects. Journal of Animal Science 62, 555–560.
| Management of transit-stress syndrome in cattle: Nutritional and environmental effects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jesse GW, Thomson GB, Clark JL, Hedrick HB, Weimer KC (1976) Effects of ration energy and slaughter weight on composition of empty body and carcass gain of beef cattle. Journal of Animal. Science 43, 418.
John TJ, Samuel R (2000) Herd immunity and herd effect: new insights and definitions. European Journal of Epidemiology 16, 601–606.
King ME, Wittum TE, Odde KG (1996) ‘The effect of value added health programmes on the price of beef calves sold through seven superior livestock video auctions in 1995. Beef Program Report.’ (Department of Animal Science, Colorado State University: Fort Collins, CO, USA)
Nkrumah JD, Basarab JA, Price MA (2004) Different measures of energetic efficiency and their phenotypic relationship with growth, feed intake, and ultrasound and carcass merit in hybrid cattle. Journal of Animal Science 82, 2451–2459.
| Different measures of energetic efficiency and their phenotypic relationship with growth, feed intake, and ultrasound and carcass merit in hybrid cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15318746PubMed |
Nyamasika N, Spreen TH, Rae O, Moss C (1994) The bio-economic analysis of bovine respiratory disease complex. Review of Agricultural Economics No. 16.
Owens FN, Gill DR, Secrist DS, Coleman S (1995) Review of some aspects of growth and development of feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 3152–3172.
| Review of some aspects of growth and development of feedlot cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 8617688PubMed |
Rickey EJ, Prichard DL (1988) Health management of sick, newly-arrived beef cattle. Bulletin – Florida Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, FL, USA.
Schipper C, Church TH, Harris B (1989) A review of the Alberta certified preconditioned feeder program 1980–1987. The Canadian Veterinary Journal 30, 736–741.
Smith RA (2000) Effects of feedlot disease on economics, production and carcass value. The Bovine Practitioner 33, 125–128.
Speer NCYoung CRoeber D2001
Thompson P, Stone A, Schultheiss W (2006) Use of treatment records and lung lesion scoring to estimate the effect of respiratory disease on growth during early and late finishing periods in South African feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 84, 488–498.
| Use of treatment records and lung lesion scoring to estimate the effect of respiratory disease on growth during early and late finishing periods in South African feedlot cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16424278PubMed |
