Productive and reproductive performance of crossbred and indigenous dairy cows at smallholdings in selected towns of Jimma Zone, Ethiopia
Belay Duguma
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University, PO Box 307, Jimma, Ethiopia. Email: duguma2012@gmail.com
Animal Production Science 61(1) 92-100 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN19380
Submitted: 2 July 2019 Accepted: 8 July 2020 Published: 5 August 2020
Abstract
Context: Evaluation of the performance of dairy cows kept in different production systems is essential for the development of appropriate breeding strategies.
Aims: To examine milk production and reproductive performance of crossbred (CB) and indigenous (I) dairy cows, farmers’ traits preference for CB and I breeding females, and factors affecting the performance of dairy cattle on smallholdings in selected towns of Jimma Zone, Ethiopia.
Methods: In total, 52 smallholder dairy cattle farmers were randomly sampled and data were collected through individual face-to-face interviews by using structured questionnaires. The traits studied were daily milk yield (DMY), lactation milk yield (LMY), lactation length (LL), age at first service (AFS), age at first calving (AFC), calving interval (CI), days open (DO), and number of service per conception (NSC), all being factors affecting performance of dairy cattle and farmers’ preferred dairy traits.
Results: On average, CB cows had significantly (P < 0.05) higher DMY (6.0 ± 0.33 vs 1.8 ± 0.07 L/cow), LMY (1466.7 ± 1.13 vs 376.0 ± 21.02 L (L)), LL (8.1 ± 0.41 vs 6.9 ± 0.22 months), and lower AFS (2.69 ± 0.1 vs 3.3 ± 0.07 years), AFC (3.7 ± 0.13 vs 4.3 ± 0.07 years) and CI (21.2 ± 1.37 vs 29.8 ± 1.30 months) than did I cows. However, DO and NSC were not significantly (P > 0.05) affected by genotype. In order of perceived importance, high milk yield (mean rank = 0.306), LL (0.292) and fertility (0.199) were farmers’ most preferred traits for CB breeding cows, and the corresponding preferred traits for I cows were high milk yield (0.253), adaptability (0.229) and LL (0.192). The most important factors perceived by farmers affecting the performance of dairy cattle were breed, nutrition, diseases, breeding and management practices
Conclusions: The findings of the study indicated that even though CB cows performed better, the performance of both breeds of dairy cows in the study area was found to be generally low due to delayed AFS, late AFC, long CI, shorter LL, low daily and LMY and high NSC.
Implications: The study highlighted that there is a potential for increasing the performance of dairy cows in the study area, through improved management strategies leading to shorter AFS, AFC, CI and lower NSC. Furthermore, future breed-improvement programs should take into consideration farmers’ trait preferences in design of sustainable improvement programs.
Additional keywords: adaptive traits, dairy traits, fertility, growth rate, longevity.
References
Adebabay K (2009) Characterization of milk production systems, marketing and onfarm evaluation of the feed supplementation on milk yield and composition at Bure District, Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Bahirdar University, Bahirdar, Ethiopia.Alemselam B, Mekonnin C, Harlow R, Goitom G, Desalew T, Gidena D, Tadesse G, Simon CR (2015) Assessment of reproductive performance and problems in crossbred (Holstein Friesian × Zebu) dairy cattle in and around Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia. Animal and Veterinary Science 3, 94–101.
| Assessment of reproductive performance and problems in crossbred (Holstein Friesian × Zebu) dairy cattle in and around Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Asaminew T, Eyasu S (2009) Smallholder dairy system and emergency of dairy cooperatives in Bahir Dar Zuria and MechaWoredas, northern Ethiopia. World Journal of Dairy and Food Sciences 4, 185–192.
Aynalem H, Workneh A, Noah K, Tadele D, Azage T (2011) ‘Breeding strategy to improve Ethiopian Boran cattle for meat and milk production. IPMS (improving productivity and market success) of Ethiopian farmer project, working paper no. 26.’ (ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute: Nairobi, Kenya)
Barry S, Getachew G, Solomon D, Asfaw N, Kidus N, Gezahegn A, Henok M (2017) Ethiopia livestock sector analysis: a 15-year livestock sector strategy. ILRI project report, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya.
Belay D, Azage T, Hegde BP (2012) Smallholder livestock production system in Dandi District, Oromia Regional State, central Ethiopia. Global Veterinaria 8, 472–479.
Call EP, Stevenson JS (1985) Current challenges in reproductive management. Journal of Dairy Science 68, 2799–2805.
| Current challenges in reproductive management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CSA (2013) Agricultural sample survey. Report on livestock and livestock characteristics. The Federal Democratic republic of Ethiopia, Central Statistical Agency. Private Peasant Holdings. Statistical Bulletin 570, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
CSA (2015) Agricultural sample survey 2014/15. Vol. II report on livestock and livestock characteristics (private peasant holdings). Central Statistical Agency, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
CSA (2006) Agricultural sample survey 2005. Central Statistical Agency. Vol. II. Report on livestock and livestock characteristics. Statistical Bulletin. Central Statistical Agency, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Dematawewa CMB, Beger PJ (1998) Genetic and phenotypic parameters for 305-day yield, fertility, and survival in Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 2700–2709.
| Genetic and phenotypic parameters for 305-day yield, fertility, and survival in Holsteins.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Desta T, Ayalew W, Hegde BP (2011) Breed and trait preferences of Sheko cattle keepers in southwestern Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 43, 851–856.
| Breed and trait preferences of Sheko cattle keepers in southwestern Ethiopia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21181495PubMed |
Duguma B, Janssens G (2016) Smallholder dairy farmers’ breed and cow trait preferences and production objective in Jimma Town, Ethiopia. European Journal of Biological Science 8, 26–34.
Duguma G, Mirkena T, Haile A, Iñiguez L, Okeyo AM, Tibbo M, Wurzinger M (2010) Participatory approaches to investigate breeding objectives of livestock keepers. Livestock Research for Rural Development 22, 64
Effa K, Hunde D, Shumiye M, Silasie RH (2013) Analysis of longevity traits and lifetime productivity of crossbred dairy cows in the tropical highlands of Ethiopia. Journal of Cell and Animal Biology 7, 138–143.
| Analysis of longevity traits and lifetime productivity of crossbred dairy cows in the tropical highlands of Ethiopia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
FAO (2010) ‘Status and prospects for smallholder milk production. A global perspective.’ (Eds T Hemme, J Otte) (FAO: Rome)
FAO (2013) ‘FAOSTAT.’ Available at http://faostat3.fao.org [Verified 26 July 2020].
Garoma S, Ayalew W, Hegde PB (2013) Pastoralists and agro-pastoralists preferences for cattle breed and traits in Fentalle district of East Shoa zone of Oromia, Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research 8, 5645–5650.
Gebeyehu G, Asmera G, Asseged B (2005) Reproductive performance of Fogera cattle and their Friesian crosses in Andassa ranch, northwestern Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 17, 131.
Getahun D (2012) Assessment of the livestock extension service in Ethiopia: the case of southern region. International Journal of Science and Technology Research 1, 24–30.
Gillah KA, Kifaro GC, Madsen J (2014) Effects of management practices on yield and quality of milk from smallholder dairy units in urban and peri-urban Morogoro, Tanzania. Tropical Animal Health and Production 46, 1177–1183.
| Effects of management practices on yield and quality of milk from smallholder dairy units in urban and peri-urban Morogoro, Tanzania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24930022PubMed |
Ibrahim N, Abraha A, Mulugeta S (2011) Assessment of reproductive performance of crossbred dairy cattle (Holstein–Friesian × Zebu) in Gondar town. Global Veterinaria 6, 561–566.
Islam SS, Ahmed AR, Ashraf A, Khanam N (2004) Genetic and phenotypic parameters on reproductive traits of crossbred cattle in a selected farm of Bangladesh. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 7, 1269–1273.
| Genetic and phenotypic parameters on reproductive traits of crossbred cattle in a selected farm of Bangladesh.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jansen J (1985) Genetic aspects of fertility in dairy cattle based on analysis of AI data: a review with emphasis on areas for further research. Livestock Production Science 12, 1–12.
| Genetic aspects of fertility in dairy cattle based on analysis of AI data: a review with emphasis on areas for further research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kafi M, Zibaei M, Rahbari A (2007) Accuracy estrus detection in cows and its economic impact on Shiraz dairy farms. International Journal of Veterinary Research 8, 131–137.
King JM, Parsons DJ, Turnpenny JR, Nyangaga J, Bakari P, Wathes CM (2006) Modeling energy metabolism of Friesians in Kenya smallholdings shows how heat stress and energy deficit constrain milk yield and cow replacement rate. Animal Science 82, 705–716.
| Modeling energy metabolism of Friesians in Kenya smallholdings shows how heat stress and energy deficit constrain milk yield and cow replacement rate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kiwuwa GH, Trail JCM, Kurtu MY, Worku G (1983) Crossbred dairy cattle productivity in Arsi region, Ethiopia. Research report no. 11. ILCA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Kumar N, Tkui K (2014) Reproductive performance of crossbred dairy cows in Mekelle, Ethiopia. Journal of Animal Science 3, 35–40.
Kumar N, Alemayehu E, Berhanu GK, Endale BG (2014) Reproductive performance of HF crossbred dairy cows in Gondar, Ethiopia. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 7, 56–61.
| Reproductive performance of HF crossbred dairy cows in Gondar, Ethiopia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lemma A, Kebede S (2011) The effect of mating system and herd size on reproductive performance of dairy cows in market oriented urban dairy farms in and around Addis Ababa. Revue de Medecine Veterinaire 162, 526–530.
Lobago F, Bekana M, Gustafsson H, Kindahl H (2007) Longitudinal observation on reproductive and lactation performance of smallholder crossbred dairy cattle in Fitche, Oromia Region, central Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 39, 395–403.
| Longitudinal observation on reproductive and lactation performance of smallholder crossbred dairy cattle in Fitche, Oromia Region, central Ethiopia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17966269PubMed |
Mekonnen T, Bekana M, Abayneh T (2010) Reproductive performance and efficiency of artificial insemination smallholder dairy cows/heifers in and around Arsi-Negelle, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 22, 61.
Melaku M, Zeleke M, Getinet M, Mengistie T (2011) Reproductive performances of Fogera cattle at Metekel cattle breeding and multiplication ranch, north west Ethiopia. Online Journal of Animal Feed Research 1, 99–106.
Mukasa-Mugerwa E (1989) ‘A review of reproductive performance of female Bos indicus (Zebu) cattle.’ ILCA Monograph no. 6. (International Livestock Centre for Africa: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia)
Mukasa-Mugerwa E, Tegegne A, Mesfin T, Teklu Y (1991) Reproductive efficiency of Bos indicus (Zebu) cows under AI management in Ethiopia. Animal Reproduction Science 24, 63–72.
| Reproductive efficiency of Bos indicus (Zebu) cows under AI management in Ethiopia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mulugeta A (1990) Borena cattle herds: productivity, constraints, and possible interventions. MSc Thesis, Department of Range Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Mulugeta A, Belayeneh A (2013) Reproductive and lactation performances of dairy cows in Chacha Town and nearby selected kebeles, North Shoa Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 1, 8–17.
Mureda E, Mekuriaw Z (2007) Reproductive performance of crossbred dairy cows in eastern lowlands of Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 19, 161.
Mwacharo JM, Drucker AG (2005) Productive objectives and management strategies of livestock keepers in southeast Kenya: implications for breeding program. Tropical Animal Health and Production 37, 635–652.
| Productive objectives and management strategies of livestock keepers in southeast Kenya: implications for breeding program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16619880PubMed |
Negussie E, Brannang E, Banjaw K, Rottmann OU (1998) Reproductive performance of dairy cattle at Assella livestock farm, Arsi, Ethiopia. I: indigenous cows versus their F1 crosses. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 115, 267–280.
| Reproductive performance of dairy cattle at Assella livestock farm, Arsi, Ethiopia. I: indigenous cows versus their F1 crosses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
OPEDJZ (2002) ‘Statistical abstract (1996–2000).’ January 2002. (The office of Planning and Economic Development for Jimma Zone (OPEDJZ): Jimma, Oromia, Ethiopia)
Peters AR, Ball PJH (1995) ‘Reproduction in cattle.’ 2nd edn. (Blackwell: Oxford, UK)
Rahman MMIslam MNDev A1998
Roessler R, Drucker AG, Scarpa R, Markemanna A, Lemkea U, Thuye LT, Zarate AV (2008) Using choice experiments to assess smallholder farmers’ preferences for pig breeding traits in different production systems in north-west Vietnam. Ecological Economics 66, 184–192.
| Using choice experiments to assess smallholder farmers’ preferences for pig breeding traits in different production systems in north-west Vietnam.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Safiullah AM (2001) Economic analysis of calving interval of Hungarian dairy cattle. Journal of Applied Animal Research 19, 237–246.
| Economic analysis of calving interval of Hungarian dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shiferaw Y, Tenhagen BA, Bekana M, Kassa T (2003) Reproductive performance of crossbred dairy cows in different production system in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 35, 551–561.
| Reproductive performance of crossbred dairy cows in different production system in the central highlands of Ethiopia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14690092PubMed |
Stein J, Ayalew W, Rege GEO, Mulatu W, Malmfors B, Dessie T, Philpsson J (2009) Livestock keeper perceptions of four indigenous cattle breeds in tsetse infested areas of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 41, 1335–1346.
| Livestock keeper perceptions of four indigenous cattle breeds in tsetse infested areas of Ethiopia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19234873PubMed |
Swenson C, Schaar J, Brännäng E, Meskel LB (1981) Breeding activities of the Ethio-Swedish integrated rural development project: 3. Reproductive performance of Zebu and crossbred cattle. World Animal Review 38, 31–36.
Tada O, Muchenje V, Dzama K (2013) Preferential traits for breeding Nguni cattle in low-input in situ conservation production systems. SpringerPlus 2, 195
| Preferential traits for breeding Nguni cattle in low-input in situ conservation production systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23705106PubMed |
Tadele A, Nibret M (2014) Study on reproductive performance of indigenous dairy cows at small holder farm conditions in and around Maksegnit Town. Global Veterinaria 13, 450–454.
Teshager A, Belay D, Taye T (2013) Prevalence of cattle diseases and productive and reproductive traits of cattle in Ilu Aba Bora zone, south western Ethiopia. Global Veterinaria 10, 614–619.
Vandeplassche M (1982) Reproductive efficiency in cattle: a guideline for projects in developing countries. (FAO: Rome)
Yifat D, Bahilibi W, Desie S (2012) Reproductive performance of Boran cows at Tatesa cattle breeding center. Advances in Biological Research 6, 101–105.
Yilma Z, Guernebleich E, Sebsibe A, Fombad R (2011) ‘A review of the Ethiopian dairy sector.’ (FAO Sub Regional Office for Eastern Africa (FAO/SFE): Addis Ababa, Ethiopia)
