Defining the key attributes of resilience in mixed ration dairy systems
D. G. Barber A D , M. J. Auldist B , A. R. Anstis A and C. K. M. Ho C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Agri-Science Queensland, University of Queensland, Gatton Campus, John Mahon Building 8105, Lawes, Qld 4343, Australia.
B Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions, 1301 Hazeldean Road, Ellinbank, Vic. 3821, Australia.
C Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, Vic. 3083, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: david.barber@daf.qld.gov.au
Animal Production Science 60(1) 17-25 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN18590
Submitted: 18 September 2018 Accepted: 1 March 2019 Published: 10 May 2019
Abstract
Dairy feeding systems in Australia and New Zealand have seen an increase in the use of mixed rations to manage variability in climate and market conditions and enable a certain degree of resilience in the operating environment. In this review, resilience was defined as the ability of the farm system to respond to challenges, optimise productivity and profitability for a given set of circumstances, and persist over time. Specific attributes of a dairy system that contribute to resilience were considered as flexibility, consistency, adaptation, sustainability and profitability. A flexible forage base that uses water efficient forage species provides a consistent supply of nutrients from home-grown forages across the year and is a key driver of resilience. Consistent milk production from purchased concentrates adds value to the forage base and will ensure that the system is profitable in the long term. Appropriate investment in infrastructure and careful management of debt has a positive impact on technical and financial efficiency and improves overall economic performance and resilience of the system. Nutrients, feed wastage, cow comfort and welfare were also identified as key areas to focus on for improved sustainability. Future research investigating the interaction between forages and concentrates, and the subsequent milk production response will be important for the future resilience of mixed ration systems. Adaptive management at a tactical and strategic level across several technical areas will further underpin the resilience of a mixed ration dairy system, and minimise the impact of climate and price variability. This will have flow on benefits to animal welfare and resource sustainability, which will have a positive impact of the public perception of these systems within the Australian and New Zealand dairy industries.
Additional keywords: flexible forage base, management, mixed ration feeding systems, production responses, profitable, resilience.
References
Allen MS, Voelker JA, Oba M (2006) Physically effective fibre and regulation of ruminal pH: more than just chewing. In ‘Production diseases in farm animals’. (Eds NP Joshi, TH Herdt) pp. 270–278. (Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands)Auldist MJ, Walsh BJ, Thomson NA (1998) Seasonal and lactational influences on bovine milk composition in New Zealand. The Journal of Dairy Research 65, 401–411.
| Seasonal and lactational influences on bovine milk composition in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9718493PubMed |
Auldist MJ, Marett LC, Greenwood JS, Hannah M, Jacobs JL, Wales WJ (2013) Effects of different strategies for feeding supplements on milk production responses in cows grazing a restricted pasture allowance. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 1218–1231.
| Effects of different strategies for feeding supplements on milk production responses in cows grazing a restricted pasture allowance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23219117PubMed |
Auldist MJ, Marett LC, Greenwood JS, Wright MM, Hannah M, Jacobs JL, Wales WJ (2014) Replacing wheat with canola meal in a partial mixed ration increases the milk production of cows grazing at a restricted pasture allowance in spring. Animal Production Science 54, 869–878.
| Replacing wheat with canola meal in a partial mixed ration increases the milk production of cows grazing at a restricted pasture allowance in spring.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Auldist MJ, Marett LC, Greenwood JS, Wright MM, Hannah M, Jacobs JL, Wales WJ (2016) Milk production responses to different strategies for feeding supplements to grazing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 657–671.
| Milk production responses to different strategies for feeding supplements to grazing dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26585473PubMed |
Auldist MJ, Wright MM, Marett LC, Jacobs JL, Wales WJ (2017) Effects of pasture allowance on milk production of dairy cows offered increasing amounts of partial mixed rations in spring. Animal Production Science 57, 1305–1310.
| Effects of pasture allowance on milk production of dairy cows offered increasing amounts of partial mixed rations in spring.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Auldist MJ, Wright MM, Marett LC, Hannah MC, Kennedy E, Jacobs JL, Wales WJ (2018) Milk production of cows grazing pasture supplemented by a partial mixed ration with or without canola meal. Animal Production Science 59, 778–786.
| Milk production of cows grazing pasture supplemented by a partial mixed ration with or without canola meal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barberg AE, Endres MI, Salfer JA, Reneau JK (2007) Performance and welfare of dairy cows in an alternative housing system in Minnesota. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1575–1583.
| Performance and welfare of dairy cows in an alternative housing system in Minnesota.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17297131PubMed |
Bargo F, Muller LD, Delahoy JE, Cassidy TW (2002) Performance of high producing dairy cows with three different feeding systems combining pasture and total mixed rations. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 2948–2963.
| Performance of high producing dairy cows with three different feeding systems combining pasture and total mixed rations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12487461PubMed |
Barnard CS, Nix JS (1979) ‘Farm planning and control.’ 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)
Bauman DE, Griinari JM (2003) Nutritional regulation of milk fat synthesis. Annual Review of Nutrition 23, 203–227.
| Nutritional regulation of milk fat synthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12626693PubMed |
Beever DE, Sutton JD, Reynolds CK (2001) Increasing the protein content of cow’s milk. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 56, 138–149.
Chapman DF, Kenny SN, Beca D, Johnson IR (2008) Pasture and forage crop systems for non-irrigated dairy farms in southern Australia. 2. Inter-annual variation in forage supply, and business risk. Agricultural Systems 97, 126–138.
| Pasture and forage crop systems for non-irrigated dairy farms in southern Australia. 2. Inter-annual variation in forage supply, and business risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chataway RG, Walker RG, Callow MN (2010) Development of profitable milk production systems for northern Australia: a field assessment of the productivity of five potential farming systems using farmlets. Animal Production Science 50, 246–264.
| Development of profitable milk production systems for northern Australia: a field assessment of the productivity of five potential farming systems using farmlets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cowley FC, Barber DG, Houlihan AV, Poppi DP (2015) Immediate and residual effects of heat stress and restricted intake on milk protein and casein composition and energy metabolism. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 2356–2368.
| Immediate and residual effects of heat stress and restricted intake on milk protein and casein composition and energy metabolism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25648800PubMed |
Dairy Australia (2011a) ‘Situation and outlook.’ Available at www.dairyaustralia.com.au [Verified 5 April 2019]
Dairy Australia (2011b) ‘Performance, profit and risk in pasture-based dairy feeding systems: findings from the TasMilk60 study,’ (Dairy Australia: Melbourne)
Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources (2018) Dairy farm monitor project: Victoria, annual report 2017–18. Victorian Government, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Melbourne.
Fariña SR, Garcia SC, Fulkerson WJ (2011) A complimentary forage system whole-farm study: forage utilisation and milk production. Animal Production Science 51, 460–470.
| A complimentary forage system whole-farm study: forage utilisation and milk production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fulkerson WJ, Slack K, Hennessy DW, Hough GM (1998) Nutrients in ryegrass (Lolium spp.), white clover (Trifoilium repens) and kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) pastures in relation to season and stage of regrowth in a subtropical environment. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38, 227–240.
| Nutrients in ryegrass (Lolium spp.), white clover (Trifoilium repens) and kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) pastures in relation to season and stage of regrowth in a subtropical environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Garcia SC, Fulkerson WJ, Brookes SU (2008) Dry matter production, nutritive value and efficiency of nutrient utilization of a complimentary forage rotation compared to a grass pasture system. Grass and Forage Science 63, 284–300.
| Dry matter production, nutritive value and efficiency of nutrient utilization of a complimentary forage rotation compared to a grass pasture system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
García SC, Fulkerson WJ (2005) Opportunities for future Australian dairy systems: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1041–1055.
Golder HM, Denman SE, McSweeney C, Wales WJ, Auldist MJ, Wright MM, Marett LC, Greenwood JS, Hannah MC, Celi P, Bramley E, Lean IJ (2014) Effects of partial mixed rations and supplement amounts on milk production and composition, ruminal fermentation, bacterial communities, and ruminal acidosis. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 5763–5785.
| Effects of partial mixed rations and supplement amounts on milk production and composition, ruminal fermentation, bacterial communities, and ruminal acidosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24997657PubMed |
Gourley CJP, Powell JM, Dougherty WJ, Weaver DM (2007) Nutrient budgeting as an approach to improving nutrient management on Australian dairy farms. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 1064–1074.
| Nutrient budgeting as an approach to improving nutrient management on Australian dairy farms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greenwood JS, Auldist MJ, Marett LC, Hannah MC, Jacobs JL, Wales WJ (2014) Ruminal pH and whole-tract digestibility in dairy cows consuming fresh cut herbage plus concentrates and conserved forage fed either separately or as a partial mixed ration. Animal Production Science 54, 1056–1063.
| Ruminal pH and whole-tract digestibility in dairy cows consuming fresh cut herbage plus concentrates and conserved forage fed either separately or as a partial mixed ration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Haley DB, Rushen J, de Passillé AM (2000) Behavioural indicators of cow comfort: activity and resting behaviour of dairy cows in two types of housing. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 80, 257–263.
| Behavioural indicators of cow comfort: activity and resting behaviour of dairy cows in two types of housing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Henty S, Ho C, Malcolm B (2017) ‘A whole-farm investment analysis of a partial mixed ration feed system.’ (Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources: Melbourne)
Ho CKM, Newman M, Dalley DE, Little S, Wales WJ (2013) Performance, return and risk of different dairy systems in Australia and New Zealand. Animal Production Science 53, 894–906.
Ho CKM, Malcolm B, Doyle PT (2015) Supplementary feeding options to alleviate the impacts of decreased water availability on dairy-farm economic performance in northern Victoria. Animal Production Science 55, 194–200.
Ho CKM, Wales WJ, Auldist MJ, Malcolm B (2018) Evaluating the economics of short-term partial mixed ration feeding decisions for dairy cows. Animal Production Science 58, 1531–1537.
Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4, 1–23.
Huhtanen P, Hetta M, Swensson C (2011) Evaluation of canola meal as a protein supplement for dairy cows: a review and a meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 91, 529–543.
| Evaluation of canola meal as a protein supplement for dairy cows: a review and a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hutson JL, Pitt RE, Koelsch JB, Houser JB, Wagenet RJ (1998) Improving dairy farm sustainability. II: environmental losses and nutrient flows. Journal of Production Agriculture 11, 233–239.
| Improving dairy farm sustainability. II: environmental losses and nutrient flows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kellaway R, Harrington T (2004) Feeding concentrates: supplements for dairy cows. Revised edn. (Landlinks Press: Melbourne)
Lin BB (2011) Resilience in agriculture through crop diversification: adaptive management for environmental change. Bioscience 61, 183–193.
Mills JAN, France J, Dijkstra J (1999) A review of starch digestion in the lactating dairy cow and proposals for a mechanistic model: 1. Dietary starch characterisation and ruminal starch digestion. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 8, 291–340.
| A review of starch digestion in the lactating dairy cow and proposals for a mechanistic model: 1. Dietary starch characterisation and ruminal starch digestion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mould FL, Ørskov ER, Mann SO (1983) Associative effects of mixed feeds. I. Effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 10, 15–30.
| Associative effects of mixed feeds. I. Effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Murphy (2017) ‘Balancing dairy production and profits in northern Australia; QDAS financial and production trends – 2017.’ (Queensland Government, Department Of Agriculture and Fisheries: Brisbane)
Neal M, Neal J, Fulkerson WJ (2007) Optimal choice of dairy forages in eastern Australia. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 3044–3059.
| Optimal choice of dairy forages in eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17517747PubMed |
Neal JS, Fulkerson WJ, Hacker RB (2011a) Differences in water use efficiency among annual forages used by the dairy industry under optimum and deficient irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 98, 759–774.
| Differences in water use efficiency among annual forages used by the dairy industry under optimum and deficient irrigation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Neal J, Fulkerson W, Sutton B (2011b) Differences in water-use efficiency among perennial forages used by the dairy industry under optimum and deficit irrigation. Irrigation Science 29, 213–232.
Norring M, Manninen E, de Passillé AM, Rushen J, Munksgaard L, Saloniemi H (2008) Effects of sand and straw bedding on the lying behavior, cleanliness, and hoof and hock injuries of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 570–576.
| Effects of sand and straw bedding on the lying behavior, cleanliness, and hoof and hock injuries of dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18218743PubMed |
Rogers MJ, Lawson A, Kelly K (2017) Forage options for dairy farms with reduced water availability in the southern Murray Darling Basin of Australia. Sustainability 9, 2369–2389.
| Forage options for dairy farms with reduced water availability in the southern Murray Darling Basin of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shadbolt N, Olubode-Awosola F, Rutsito B (2017) Resilience in dairy farm businesses; to ‘bounce without breaking’. Journal of Advances in Agriculture 7, 1138–1150.
| Resilience in dairy farm businesses; to ‘bounce without breaking’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sinnett A, Ho CKM, Malcolm B (2017) Expanding a dairy business affects business and financial risk. Animal Production Science 57, 2167–2174.
| Expanding a dairy business affects business and financial risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stockdale CR, Callaghan A, Trigg TE (1987) Feeding high energy supplements to pasture-fed dairy cows, effects of stage of lactation and level of supplement. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38, 927–940.
| Feeding high energy supplements to pasture-fed dairy cows, effects of stage of lactation and level of supplement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tucker CB, Weary DM, Frazer D (2003) Effects of three types of free-stall surfaces on preferences and stall usage by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 521–529.
| Effects of three types of free-stall surfaces on preferences and stall usage by dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12647958PubMed |
Wales WJ, Kolver ES (2017) Challenges of feeding dairy cows in Australia and New Zealand. Animal Production Science 57, 1366–1383.
| Challenges of feeding dairy cows in Australia and New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wales WJ, Marett LC, Greenwood JS, Wright MM, Thornhill JB, Jacobs JL, Ho CKM, Auldist MJ (2013) Use of partial mixed rations in pasture-based dairying in temperate regions of Australia. Animal Production Science 53, 1167–1178.
| Use of partial mixed rations in pasture-based dairying in temperate regions of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
West JW (2003) Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2131–2144.
| Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12836950PubMed |
Wright MM, Auldist MJ, Kennedy E, Galvin N, Dunshea FR, Wales WJ (2017) Dry matter intake and feeding behaviour of grazing dairy cows offered a mixed ration with or without canola meal. Animal Production Science 57, 1277–1282.
| Dry matter intake and feeding behaviour of grazing dairy cows offered a mixed ration with or without canola meal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
