Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Sheep residual feed intake and feeding behaviour: are ‘nibblers’ or ‘binge eaters’ more efficient?

S. K. Muir A D , N. Linden B , M. Knight A , R. Behrendt A and G. Kearney C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Agriculture Victoria, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Hamilton, Vic 3300, Australia.

B Agriculture Victoria, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Rutherglen, Vic 3685, Australia.

C Paynes Road, Hamilton, Vic. 3300, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: stephanie.muir@ecodev.vic.gov.au

Animal Production Science 58(8) 1459-1464 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17770
Submitted: 8 November 2017  Accepted: 3 April 2018   Published: 24 April 2018

Abstract

Efficient liveweight gain is an important component of profitable livestock systems. In cattle, studies of residual feed intake (RFI) suggest that there are behavioural differences between efficient and inefficient animals; more efficient animals have less frequent, larger feed events. There is limited understanding of the association between feeding behaviour and feed conversion efficiency (measured as RFI) in sheep. We hypothesised that more efficient sheep would have lower daily number of meals but larger meal size than would less efficient sheep and that feeding behaviour would be repeatable between measurements conducted using the same sheep at different ages. Feeding behaviour was monitored at post-weaning (average 311 days) and hogget (average 533 days) age in a single cohort of maternal composite 2014-born ewes undergoing feed-efficiency testing. Feed intake (kg/day) and daily feeding behaviour (meal number, meal size and eating rate) were recorded by using automated feeders. Feed intake was recorded daily for a minimum of 40 days (mean 41 days), following a 14-day adaptation period. Animals were fed a pelleted hay-based diet, with liveweight measured three times per week. At both ages of measurement, a positive (P < 0.01) linear relationship was established between average daily number of meals and RFI. In these cohorts, as daily number of meals increased, RFI became more positive (less efficient). Meal size (kg DM) was also related to RFI (P < 0.05) when measured at the hogget age, with meal size decreasing with an increasing RFI (less efficient animals had smaller meals). These analyses suggest that sheep feeding behaviour, and in particular daily meal number, is associated with feed efficiency.

Additional keywords: feed efficiency, meal number, meal size.


References

Bingham GM, Friend TH, Lancaster PA, Carstens GE (2009) Relationship between feeding behaviour and residual feed intake in growing Brangus heifers. Journal of Animal Science 87, 2685–2689.
Relationship between feeding behaviour and residual feed intake in growing Brangus heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXptV2gtLo%3D&md5=e8a7c11eafb5bf09b32a9147dd0ec210CAS |

Braastad BO, Katie J (1989) Behavioural differences between laying hen populations selected for high and low efficiency of food utilisation. British Poultry Science 30, 533–544.
Behavioural differences between laying hen populations selected for high and low efficiency of food utilisation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2FlvVWlsA%3D%3D&md5=00adb907551600f249f833686fb1e12fCAS |

Cammack KM, Leymaster KA, Jenkins TG, Nielsen MK (2005) Estimates of genetic parameters for feed intake, feeding behaviour and daily gain in composite ram lambs. Journal of Animal Science 83, 777–785.
Estimates of genetic parameters for feed intake, feeding behaviour and daily gain in composite ram lambs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXivVCqs7s%3D&md5=4d79a946e9730d65f50b62bada2657b5CAS |

Cockrum RR, Stobart RH, Lake SL, Cammack KM (2013) Phenotypic variation in residual feed intake and performance traits in rams. Small Ruminant Research 113, 313–322.

Gomes RC, Sainz RD, Leme PR (2013) Protein metabolism, feed energy partitioning, behaviour patterns and plasma cortisol in Nellore steers with high and low residual feed intake. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 42, 44–50.
Protein metabolism, feed energy partitioning, behaviour patterns and plasma cortisol in Nellore steers with high and low residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

de Haer LCM, Luiting P, Aarts HLM (1993) Relations among individual (residual) feed intake, growth performance and feed intake pattern of growing pigs in group housing. Livestock Production Science 36, 233–253.
Relations among individual (residual) feed intake, growth performance and feed intake pattern of growing pigs in group housing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fogarty NM, Lee GJ, Ingham VM, Gaunt GM, Cummins LJ (2006) Variation in feed intake of grazing crossbred ewes and genetic correlations with production traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 1037–1044.
Variation in feed intake of grazing crossbred ewes and genetic correlations with production traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Golden JW, Kerley MS, Kolath WH (2008) The relationship of feeding behaviour to residual feed intake in crossbred Angus steers fed traditional and no-roughage diets. Journal of Animal Science 86, 180–186.
The relationship of feeding behaviour to residual feed intake in crossbred Angus steers fed traditional and no-roughage diets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVOqsr7E&md5=5677c3d9452c129be82eaa30e1d718c3CAS |

Jackson T, Heard J, Malcolm B (2014) System changes to a lamb farm in south-west Victoria: some pre-experimental modelling. AFBM Journal 11, 1–18.

Kelly AK, McGee M, Crews DH, Sweeney T, Boland TM, Kenny DA (2010a) Repeatability of feed efficiency, carcass ultrasound, feeding behaviour, and blood metabolic variables in finishing heifers divergently selected for residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 88, 3214–3225.
Repeatability of feed efficiency, carcass ultrasound, feeding behaviour, and blood metabolic variables in finishing heifers divergently selected for residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtF2rtb%2FO&md5=738a23a5aa7edfa9282bbeb71b6557fcCAS |

Kelly AK, McGee M, Crews DH, Fahey AG, Wylie AR, Kenny DA (2010b) Effect of divergence in residual feed intake on feeding behaviour, blood metabolic variables and body composition traits in growing beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 88, 109–123.
Effect of divergence in residual feed intake on feeding behaviour, blood metabolic variables and body composition traits in growing beef heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXls1yktQ%3D%3D&md5=46c12f819a8d6b51e3b44b6b80f5279fCAS |

Kennedy BW, van der Werf JH, Meuwissen TH (1993) Genetic and statistical properties of residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 71, 3239–3250.
Genetic and statistical properties of residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2c7isVentw%3D%3D&md5=2e8f0db06eda66da2b9f901f5e2425ddCAS |

Knott SA, Cummins LJ, Dunshea FR, Leury BJ (2008) The use of different models for the estimation of residual feed intake (RFI) as a measure of feed efficiency in meat sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 143, 242–255.
The use of different models for the estimation of residual feed intake (RFI) as a measure of feed efficiency in meat sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Knott SA, Cummins LJ, Dunshea FR, Leury BJ (2010) Feed efficiency and body composition are related to cortisol response to adrenocotricotropin hormone and insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in rams. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 39, 137–146.
Feed efficiency and body composition are related to cortisol response to adrenocotricotropin hormone and insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in rams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXosVGnsbg%3D&md5=e716537eb900432161e0fbcc8b0eefd8CAS |

Lancaster PA, Carstens GE, Riberio FRB, Tedeschi LO, Crews DH (2009) Characterisation of feed efficiency traits and relationships with feeding behaviour and ultrasound carcass traits in growing bulls. Journal of Animal Science 87, 1528–1539.
Characterisation of feed efficiency traits and relationships with feeding behaviour and ultrasound carcass traits in growing bulls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjsFKisb8%3D&md5=d1be30d170a8c08548c2acf796700a8aCAS |

National Health and Medical Research Council (2013) ‘Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes.’ 8th edn. (National Health and Medical Research Council: Canberra)

Nkrumah JD, Crews CH, Basarab JA, Price MA, Okine EK, Wang Z, Li C, Moore SS (2007) Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feeding behavior and temperament with performance, feed efficiency, ultrasound, and carcass merit of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 85, 2382–2390.
Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feeding behavior and temperament with performance, feed efficiency, ultrasound, and carcass merit of beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFSjtrrP&md5=01c0863f78b4f3f28087d69a1020314fCAS |

Paganoni B, Rose G, Macleay C, Jones C, Brown DJ, Kearney G, Ferguson M, Thompson AN (2017) More feed efficient sheep produce less methane and carbon dioxide when eating high-quality pellets. Journal of Animal Science 95, 3839–3850.
More feed efficient sheep produce less methane and carbon dioxide when eating high-quality pellets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXksl2jsL8%3D&md5=e5cb64d1ff20b3131c2817f08575381fCAS |

Pryce JE, Gonzalez-Recio O, Nieuwhof G, Wales WJ, Coffey MP, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2015) Hot topic: definition and implementation of a breeding value for feed efficiency in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 7340–7350.
Hot topic: definition and implementation of a breeding value for feed efficiency in dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhtlSjtbnE&md5=b22ea53c53ad2296cf257887b41e6631CAS |

Redden RR, Surder LMM, Roeder BL, Nichols BM, Paterson JA, Kott RW (2011) Residual feed efficiency established in a post-weaning growth test may not result in more efficient ewes on the range. Small Ruminant Research 96, 155–159.
Residual feed efficiency established in a post-weaning growth test may not result in more efficient ewes on the range.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Richardson EC, Herd RM (2004) Biological basis for variation in residual feed intake in beef cattle. 2. Synthesis of results following divergent selection. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 431–440.
Biological basis for variation in residual feed intake in beef cattle. 2. Synthesis of results following divergent selection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Richardson EC, Herd RM, Colditz IG, Archer JA, Arthur PF (2002) Blood cell profiles of steer progeny from parents selected for and against residual feed intake. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 901–908.
Blood cell profiles of steer progeny from parents selected for and against residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Robinson DL, Oddy VH (2004) Genetic parameters for feed efficiency, fatness, muscle area and feeding behaviour of feedlot finished beef cattle. Livestock Production Science 90, 255–270.
Genetic parameters for feed efficiency, fatness, muscle area and feeding behaviour of feedlot finished beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shenk JS, Westerhaus MO (1991) Population definition, sample selection and calibration procedures for near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Crop Science 31, 469–474.
Population definition, sample selection and calibration procedures for near infrared reflectance spectroscopy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Waghorn GC, Hegarty RS (2011) Lowering ruminant methane emissions through improved feed conversion efficiency. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 291–301.
Lowering ruminant methane emissions through improved feed conversion efficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Webster AJF (1978) Prediction of the energy requirements for growth in beef cattle. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 30, 189–226.
Prediction of the energy requirements for growth in beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE1M%2FnvVyisA%3D%3D&md5=a4ee25c23eabb2a4dda7c82931c87a5aCAS |

Young JM, Cai W, Dekkers JCM (2011) Effect of selection for residual feed intake on feeding behaviour and daily feed intake patterns in Yorkshire swine. Journal of Animal Science 89, 639–647.
Effect of selection for residual feed intake on feeding behaviour and daily feed intake patterns in Yorkshire swine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXjtlSmt74%3D&md5=b20a7fb2343fc11673f8615c5368d2d2CAS |