Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

pH: a promising indicator of feed waste in piggery effluent?

Chris Pratt A B , Jaye Hill A , Alan Skerman A and Matthew Redding A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, 203 Tor Street, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: c.pratt@griffith.edu.au

Animal Production Science 59(3) 581-592 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17388
Submitted: 12 June 2017  Accepted: 17 January 2018   Published: 17 April 2018

Abstract

Feed waste in pork production sheds can amount to substantial economic losses. No simple methods exist to quantify this waste, which commonly ends up in the effluent stream. Monitoring piggery effluent might offer producers a practical alert solution for feed waste losses. We investigated piggery effluent pH as a potential marker of feed waste, given that most feed substrates and breakdown products are acidic whereas effluent is alkaline. To explore this prospective relationship, we constructed simulated effluent streams comprising faeces, urine and feed. These waste components were acquired from a commercial batch grower shed, at four different times over the 12-week growth cycle. In laboratory settings (25°C) we used the collected wastes to simulate the two stages of typical flushing piggery effluent systems: (1) Faeces + urine + feed waste accumulation in flushing channels, and (2) flush water mixing with these wastes in an effluent collection sump. We repeated the exercise for a one-off sampling event at a sow facility. For all events, at the grower and sow facility, the pH of the simulated effluents yielded exponentially decreasing relationships with increasing feed waste level (P < 0.05). For the grower facility we applied each of the four laboratory-derived relationships to the farm’s sump effluent pH, which was measured during each of these sampling events. The predicted feed waste levels were commensurate with estimates of feed waste for the same facility derived from alternative, time intensive approaches reported in other studies. Further work is needed to transition the promising results uncovered here into an alert system to help farmers improve profitability and minimise waste.

Additional keywords: agriculture, effluent, feed waste, pH, pig production.


References

Australian Government (2017) Australian National Greenhouse Accounts – National Inventory Report 2015 Volume 1, ACT, Australia.

Banhazi TJ, Aarnink AT, Thuy H, Pedersen S, Hartung J, Payne H, Mullan B, Berckmans D (2008) Review of issues related to heat stress in intensively housed pigs. In ‘Livestock environment VIII’, 31 August–4 September 2008, Iguassu Falls, Brazil. p. 107. (American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers: St Joseph, MI)

Black J, Davies G, Fleming J (1993a) Role of computer simulation in the application of knowledge to animal industries. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 541–555.
Role of computer simulation in the application of knowledge to animal industries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Black J, Mullan BP, Lorschy ML, Giles LR (1993b) Lactation in the sow during heat stress. Livestock Production Science 35, 153–170.
Lactation in the sow during heat stress.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chu L, Tian X, Yang G (2014) Effect of inoculation dosage and fermentation temperature on cow manure anaerobic fermentation. Henan Nongye Kexue 43, 147–150.

Conn KL, Topp E, Lazarovits G (2007) Factors influencing the concentration of volatile fatty acids, ammonia, and other nutrients in stored liquid pig manure. Journal of Environmental Quality 36, 440–447.
Factors influencing the concentration of volatile fatty acids, ammonia, and other nutrients in stored liquid pig manure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjsV2js7Y%3D&md5=b0d01e103ae6ba5b2a4dd599ca666048CAS |

Dai X, Karring H (2014) A determination and comparison of urease activity in feces and fresh manure from pig and cattle in relation to ammonia production and pH changes. PLoS One 9,
A determination and comparison of urease activity in feces and fresh manure from pig and cattle in relation to ammonia production and pH changes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Derikx PJL, Willers HC, ten-Have PJW (1994) Effect of pH on the behaviour of volatile compounds in organic manures during dry-matter determination. Bioresource Technology 49, 41–45.
Effect of pH on the behaviour of volatile compounds in organic manures during dry-matter determination.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXntVOmtL8%3D&md5=8b76ff3581ea0218d48acf3fc062369cCAS |

Domínguez F, Cejudo FJ (1999) Patterns of starchy endosperm acidification and protease gene expression in wheat grains following germination. Plant Physiology 119, 81–88.
Patterns of starchy endosperm acidification and protease gene expression in wheat grains following germination.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dunshea FR, Watt M, Kerton DJ, Hofmeyr CD, Eason PJ (2003) A marker method to estimate feed waste. In ‘Manipulating pig production IX’. (Ed. JE Paterson) p. 155. (Australasian Pig Science Association: Melbourne)

El-Mashad HM, Zhang R (2010) Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste. Bioresource Technology 101, 4021–4028.
Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXitlWrs7g%3D&md5=0a201636bc020937bfc2dc0e5592c7bbCAS |

Evers T, Millar S (2002) Cereal grain structure and development: some implications for quality. Journal of Cereal Science 36, 261–284.
Cereal grain structure and development: some implications for quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Galanopoulos K, Aggelopoulos S, Kamenidou I, Mattas K (2006) Assessing the effects of managerial and production practices on the efficiency of commercial pig farming. Agricultural Systems 88, 125–141.
Assessing the effects of managerial and production practices on the efficiency of commercial pig farming.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Genstat (2013) ‘Genstat, 14th edition for Windows, release 15.3.’ (VSN International Ltd: Oxford, UK)

Green M, Mels A, Lahav O, Tarre S (1996) Biological-ion exchange process for ammonium removal from secondary effluent. Water Science and Technology 34, 449–458.

Hofmeyr CD, Kerton DJ, Dunshea FR (2005) Acid insoluble ash as a marker to estimate feed wastage. In ‘Manipulating pig production X’. (Ed. JE Paterson) p. 94. (Australasian Pig Science Association: Melbourne)

Huang GF, Wu QT, Wong JWC, Nagar BB (2006) Transformation of organic matter during co-composting of pig manure with sawdust. Bioresource Technology 97, 1834–1842.
Transformation of organic matter during co-composting of pig manure with sawdust.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XmsVyjsb4%3D&md5=2f83b8025ed61dff1a6c8fdee069a31dCAS |

Mason VC, Hartley RD, Keene AS, Cobby JM (1988) The effect of ammoniation on the nutritive value of wheat, barley and oat straws: changes in chemical composition in relation to digestibility in vitro and cell wall degradability. Animal Feed Science and Technology 19, 159–171.
The effect of ammoniation on the nutritive value of wheat, barley and oat straws: changes in chemical composition in relation to digestibility in vitro and cell wall degradability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL1cXitVeltLs%3D&md5=d4deb785aab8ea8893945ac5467a1284CAS |

McGahan E, Watts P, Wiedemann S (2010) Validation and development of the PigBal Model – literature review. Final report prepared for Australian Pork Limited. Project No. 4446. Canberra, ACT.

McGahan EJ, Phillips FA, Wiedemann SG, Naylor TA, Warren B, Murphy CM, Griffith DWT, Desservettaz M (2016) Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions from an Australian piggery with short and long hydraulic retention-time effluent storage. Animal Production Science 56, 1376–1389.
Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions from an Australian piggery with short and long hydraulic retention-time effluent storage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28Xht1Krs7bP&md5=1bba394e141ef7e76257b5f95455a602CAS |

Møller HB, Sommer SG, Ahring BK (2002) Separation efficiency and particle size distribution in relation to manure type and storage conditions. Bioresource Technology 85, 189–196.
Separation efficiency and particle size distribution in relation to manure type and storage conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moore KL, Mullan BP, Kim JC (2013) Blend-feeding or feeding a single diet to pigs has no impact on growth performance or carcass quality. Animal Production Science 53, 52–56.
Blend-feeding or feeding a single diet to pigs has no impact on growth performance or carcass quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nelson PN, Su N (2010) Soil pH buffering capacity: a descriptive function and its application to some acidic tropical soils. Soil Research 48, 201–207.
Soil pH buffering capacity: a descriptive function and its application to some acidic tropical soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Oscarsson M, Andersson R, Salomonsson AC, Åman P (1996) Chemical composition of barley samples focusing on dietary fibre components. Journal of Cereal Science 24, 161–170.
Chemical composition of barley samples focusing on dietary fibre components.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XmsVaksLk%3D&md5=3a92658ede0f640d00c947ab78d3eaedCAS |

Paul JW, Beauchamp EG (1989) Relationship between volatile fatty acids, total ammonia, and pH in manure slurries. Biological Wastes 29, 313–318.
Relationship between volatile fatty acids, total ammonia, and pH in manure slurries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3cXht1Cmsb8%3D&md5=24ad68a836e3895707fe4a09ba7cdf68CAS |

Skerman A, Willis S, Tait S, Yap SD (2016) Effect of feed wastage on piggery manure characteristics and methane potential. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, University of Queensland. Industry Report (ref. 2015/010) prepared for Australian Pork Limited, Barton, Canberra, Australia.

Sparks DL (Ed.) (1996) ‘Methods of soil analysis part 3 – chemical methods, SSSA Book Series 5.3.’ (Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI)

Sutton AL, Kephart KB, Verstegen MW, Canh TT, Hobbs PJ (1999) Potential for reduction of odorous compounds in swine manure through diet modification. Journal of Animal Science 77, 430–439.
Potential for reduction of odorous compounds in swine manure through diet modification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXis12ksr8%3D&md5=2251b52770a519df8bad0b3ee80a4569CAS |

Tadesse I, Green FB, Puhakka JA (2004) Seasonal and diurnal variations of temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen in advanced integrated wastewater pond system® treating tannery effluent. Water Research 38, 645–654.
Seasonal and diurnal variations of temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen in advanced integrated wastewater pond system® treating tannery effluent.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXit1Wisw%3D%3D&md5=da1f2912ebffb8e157e59e104bcb888bCAS |

Tucker R, McGahan EJ, Galloway J, O’Keefe M (2010) ‘National environmental guidelines for piggeries.’ 2nd edn. (Australian Pork Ltd: Canberra)

Vedrenne F, Béline F, Dabert P, Bernet N (2008) The effect of incubation conditions on the laboratory measurement of the methane producing capacity of livestock wastes. Bioresource Technology 99, 146–155.
The effect of incubation conditions on the laboratory measurement of the methane producing capacity of livestock wastes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFers7jE&md5=1ee40bf427d84fd539b577fbf08e69dbCAS |

Velthof GL, Nelemans JA, Oenema O, Kuikman PJ (2005) Gaseous nitrogen and carbon losses from pig manure derived from different diets. Journal of Environmental Quality 34, 698–706.
Gaseous nitrogen and carbon losses from pig manure derived from different diets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXislOltbk%3D&md5=d85f22813c235bf52865a33f25c5e1bfCAS |

Ye ZH, Wong JWC, Wong MH, Lan CY, Baker AJM (1999) Lime and pig manure as ameliorants for revegetating lead/zinc mine tailings: a greenhouse study. Bioresource Technology 69, 35–43.
Lime and pig manure as ameliorants for revegetating lead/zinc mine tailings: a greenhouse study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXjs1GjsLw%3D&md5=cdaff8e4ab226f991783df37a9cbc280CAS |

Ye Z, Li B, Cheng B, Chen G, Zhang G, Shi Z, Wei X, Xi L (2007) A concrete slatted floor system for separation of faeces and urine in pig houses. Biosystems Engineering 98, 206–214.
A concrete slatted floor system for separation of faeces and urine in pig houses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yuan Q, Sparling R, Oleszkiewicz JA (2011) VFA generation from waste activated sludge: effect of temperature and mixing. Chemosphere 82, 603–607.
VFA generation from waste activated sludge: effect of temperature and mixing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhs1agt7nK&md5=e38baf8f854cedb26ff8c093bae140a2CAS |

Zahn JA, Hatfield JL, Laird DA, Hart TT, Do YS, DiSpirito AA (2001) Functional classification of swine manure management systems based on effluent and gas emission characteristics. Journal of Environmental Quality 30, 635–647.
Functional classification of swine manure management systems based on effluent and gas emission characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXltVegs7g%3D&md5=e7496601b6de14fbdefa2ee84472fe68CAS |

Zhu J (2000) A review of microbiology in swine manure odor control. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 78, 93–106.
A review of microbiology in swine manure odor control.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zijlstra RT, Lange CFMD, Patience JF (1999) Nutritional value of wheat for growing pigs: chemical composition and digestible energy content. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 79, 187–194.
Nutritional value of wheat for growing pigs: chemical composition and digestible energy content.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |