Frequent handling of grazing beef cattle maintained under the rotational stocking method improves temperament over time
Maria C. Ceballos A B , Karen Camille R. Góis A B , Aline C. Sant’Anna B C and Mateus J. R. Paranhos da Costa B D E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Programa de Pós-graduação em Zootecnia, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 14.884-900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
B Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisas em Etologia e Ecologia Animal (Grupo ETCO), Departamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 14.884-900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
C Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, 36.036-330 Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
D Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 14.884-900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
E Corresponding author. Email: mpcosta@fcav.unesp.br
Animal Production Science 58(2) 307-313 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16025
Submitted: 13 January 2016 Accepted: 5 August 2016 Published: 23 September 2016
Abstract
Our aims were to assess the effects of handling frequency on temperament evolution in cattle kept under rotational stocking method (RSM), as well as to compare the temperament of animals maintained under rotational versus alternate stocking (ASM) methods. We evaluated 4256 males raised on pasture from four private properties (Farms 1–4), for a total of 9628 observations. The study was divided into two complementary approaches. In the first one, monthly visits were conducted at 35-day intervals to assess the cattle temperament (n = 1979) raised on grazing system using RSM, while, in the second approach, we evaluated the temperament of cattle (n = 3600) kept under two different stocking methods, namely, (1) RSM (n = 2007), characterised by a high frequency of animal handling and a 4-day grazing period, and (2) ASM (n = 1593), characterised by a low frequency of handling and a 20-day grazing period. Composite reactivity score (RS), and flight speed (FS) were considered as temperament indicators. Reductions of RS and FS means were observed during successive assessments under RSM. Significant effects of stocking method on FS (P < 0.05) and RS (P < 0.01) were found, with lower FS and RS means for animals under RSM than for those under ASM. In conclusion, the frequent handling in the rotational stocking method favoured the improvement of cattle temperament over time, with lower levels of reactivity among cattle raised under this stocking method than with animals raised under the alternate stocking method.
Additional keywords: animal behaviour, grazing management, stocking arrangement.
References
Allen VG, Batello C, Berretta EJ, Hodgson J, Kothmann M, Li X, Mclvor J, Milne J, Morris C, Peeters A, Sanderson M (2011) An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass and Forage Science 66, 2–28.| An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Andrade O, Orihuela A, Solano J, Galina CS (2001) Some effects of repeated handling and the use of a mask on stress responses in zebu cattle during restraint. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 71, 175–181.
| Some effects of repeated handling and the use of a mask on stress responses in zebu cattle during restraint.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11230898PubMed |
Barbosa Silveira ID, Fischer V, Wiegand MM (2008) Temperamento em bovinos de corte: métodos de medida em diferentes sistemas produtivos. Archivos de Zootecia 57, 321–332.
Becker BG, Lobato JFP (1997) Effect of gentle handling on the reactivity of zebu crossed calves to humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 53, 219–224.
| Effect of gentle handling on the reactivity of zebu crossed calves to humans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Boivin X, Le Neidre P, Chupin JM (1992) Establishment of cattle–human relationships. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32, 325–335.
| Establishment of cattle–human relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Boivin X, Marcantognini L, Boulesteix P, Godet J, Brulé A, Veissier I (2007) Attitudes of farmers towards Limousin cattle and their handling. Animal Welfare 16, 147–151.
Burrow HM (1997) Measurements of temperament and their relationships with performance traits of beef cattle. Animal Breeding Abstracts 65, 477–495.
Burrow HM, Corbet NJ (2000) Genetic and environmental factors affecting temperament of zebu and zebu-derived beef cattle grazed at pasture in the tropics. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 155–162.
| Genetic and environmental factors affecting temperament of zebu and zebu-derived beef cattle grazed at pasture in the tropics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burrow HM, Seifert GW, Corbet NJ (1988) A new technique for measuring temperament in cattle. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 17, 154–157.
Cafe LM, Robinson DL, Ferguson DM, Mcintyre BL, Geesink GH, Greenwood PL (2011) Cattle temperament: persistence of assessments and associations with productivity, efficiency, carcass and meat quality traits. Journal of Animal Science 89, 1452–1465.
| Cattle temperament: persistence of assessments and associations with productivity, efficiency, carcass and meat quality traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXls1Oiu74%3D&md5=01370a514f2d9ac0a6e63fe2935a46c9CAS | 21169516PubMed |
Cooke RF, Arthington JD, Araujo DB, Lamb GC (2009a) Effects of acclimation to human interaction on performance, temperament, physiological responses, and pregnancy rates of Brahman-crossbred cows. Journal of Animal Science 87, 4125–4132.
| Effects of acclimation to human interaction on performance, temperament, physiological responses, and pregnancy rates of Brahman-crossbred cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsVOhsL7P&md5=571a100a17c65e257616d26761bcaafaCAS | 19717779PubMed |
Cooke RF, Arthington JD, Austin BR, Yelich JV (2009b) Effects of acclimation to handling on performance, reproductive, and physiological responses of Brahman-crossbred heifers. Journal of Animal Science 87, 3403–3412.
| Effects of acclimation to handling on performance, reproductive, and physiological responses of Brahman-crossbred heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXht1WksL3J&md5=4617bf1b3cc0a72446aca15dd4f0eceeCAS | 19617508PubMed |
Cooke RF, Bohnert DW, Cappellozza BI, Mueller CJ, Delcurto T (2012) Effects of temperament and acclimation to handling on reproductive performance of Bos taurus beef females. Journal of Animal Science 90, 3547–3555.
| Effects of temperament and acclimation to handling on reproductive performance of Bos taurus beef females.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhsFKrs7bE&md5=25c7bcfc15ff7ba69f395a6f9d7646f7CAS | 22585788PubMed |
Curley KO, Paschal JC, Welsh TH, Randel RD (2006) Technical note: exit velocity as a measure of cattle temperament is repeatable and associated with serum concentration of cortisol in Brahman bulls. Journal of Animal Science 84, 3100–3103.
| Technical note: exit velocity as a measure of cattle temperament is repeatable and associated with serum concentration of cortisol in Brahman bulls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtFartr3M&md5=96179ad67153d36bd8e094c62e8c4a4bCAS | 17032804PubMed |
de Passillé AM, Rushen J (2005) Food safety and environmental issues in animal welfare. Scientific and Technical Review of the Office International des Epizooties 24, 757–766.
| Food safety and environmental issues in animal welfare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2006) ‘Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options.’ (FAO: Rome)
Fina M, Casellas J, Manteca X, Piedrafita J (2006) Analysis of temperament development during the fattening period in the semi-feral bovine calves of the Alberes Massif. Animal Research 55, 389–395.
| Analysis of temperament development during the fattening period in the semi-feral bovine calves of the Alberes Massif.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fordyce G, Goddard ME, Seifert GW (1982) The measurement of temperament in cattle and the effect of experience and genotype. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 14, 329–332.
Fordyce G, Goddard ME, Tyler R, Williams G, Toleman MA (1985) Temperament and bruising of Bos indicus cross cattle. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 25, 283–288.
| Temperament and bruising of Bos indicus cross cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grandin T, Deesing D (1998) Genetics and behavior during handling, restraint, and herding. In ‘Genetics and the behavior of domestic animals’. (Eds T Grandin, D Deesing) pp. 319–341. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA)
Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ, Barnett JL, Borg S (2000) Relationships between human–animal interactions and productivity of commercial dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 78, 2821–2831.
| Relationships between human–animal interactions and productivity of commercial dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXnslKrtLo%3D&md5=18744749198e705a79c11aac10436000CAS | 11063304PubMed |
Jago JG, Krohn CC, Matthews LR (1999) The influence of feeding and handling on the development of the human–animal interactions in young cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62, 137–151.
| The influence of feeding and handling on the development of the human–animal interactions in young cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kerr SGC, Wood-Gush DGM (1987) The development of behaviour patterns and temperament in dairy heifers. Behavioural Processes 15, 1–16.
| The development of behaviour patterns and temperament in dairy heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2cfitlSgug%3D%3D&md5=f8194a39d4a964953d76615a94820c98CAS |
King DA, Schuehle Pfeiffer CE, Randel RD, Welsh TH, Oliphint RA, Baird BE, Curley KO, Vann RC, Hale DS, Savell JW (2006) Influence of animal temperament and stress responsiveness on the carcass quality and beef tenderness of feedlot cattle. Meat Science 74, 546–556.
| Influence of animal temperament and stress responsiveness on the carcass quality and beef tenderness of feedlot cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3MbnsFCgug%3D%3D&md5=6f81ef7d5bd1bc386e4359a597c8cf9dCAS | 22063059PubMed |
Le Neindre P, Boivin X, Boissy A (1996) Handling of extensively kept animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49, 73–81.
| Handling of extensively kept animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacKay JRD, Turner SP, Hyslop J, Deag JM, Haskell MJ (2013) Short-term temperament tests in beef cattle relate to long-term measures of behavior recorded in the home pen. Journal of Animal Science 91, 4917–4924.
| Short-term temperament tests in beef cattle relate to long-term measures of behavior recorded in the home pen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhs1SqtLjK&md5=efd010fdb5b6d75d1f21c555b5b1531dCAS |
Malhi Y, Roberts JT, Betts RA, Killeen TJ, Li W, Nobre CA (2008) Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science 319, 169–172.
| Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXis1alsQ%3D%3D&md5=86a14095b69fb8481b0fc05432d6cd86CAS | 18048654PubMed |
Manteca X, Deag JM (1993) Individual differences in temperament of domestic animals: a review of methodology. Animal Welfare 2, 247–268.
Nepstad D, Soares-Filho BS, Merry F, Lima A, Moutinho P, Carter J, Bowman M, Cattaneo A, Rodrigues H, Schwartzman S, McGrath DG, Stickler CM, Lubowski R, Piris-Cabezas P, Rivero S, Alencar A, Almeida O, Stella O (2009) The end of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 326, 1350–1351.
| The end of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsFOgsr7O&md5=76c881c05fd40511073ce87a31093794CAS | 19965742PubMed |
Perin R, Martins GC, Muniz SR, Linhares GM (2009) Sistema de pastejo rotacionado intensivo como alternativa para a recuperação de áreas degradadas no Estado do Amazonas. Amazônia Ciência e Desenvolvimento 4, 235–243.
Petherick JC, Holroyd RG, Doogan VJ, Venus BK (2002) Productivity, carcass and meat quality of lot-fed Bos indicus cross steers grouped according to temperament. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 389–398.
| Productivity, carcass and meat quality of lot-fed Bos indicus cross steers grouped according to temperament.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Petherick JC, Doogan VJ, Holroyd RG, Olsson P, Venus BK (2009) Quality of handling and holding yard environment, and beef cattle temperament: 1. Relationships with flight speed and fear of humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 120, 18–27.
| Quality of handling and holding yard environment, and beef cattle temperament: 1. Relationships with flight speed and fear of humans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Réale D, Reader SM, Sol D, McDougall PT, Dingemanse NJ (2007) Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 82, 291–318.
| Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17437562PubMed |
Sant’Anna AC, Paranhos da Costa MJR, Baldi F, Albuquerque LG (2013) Genetic variability for temperament indicators of Nellore cattle. Journal of Animal Science 91, 3532–3537.
| Genetic variability for temperament indicators of Nellore cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhtlOjsbvF&md5=f3a403eb71054fca73b865d854492bf9CAS | 23658324PubMed |
Sato T (1995) Habituação e sensibilização comportamental. Psicologia USP 6, 231–276.
Sebastian T, Watts J, Stookey J, Buchanan F, Waldner C (2011) Temperament in beef cattle: methods of measurement and their relationship to production. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 91, 557–565.
| Temperament in beef cattle: methods of measurement and their relationship to production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Spielberger CD, Douglas L (1966) Descriptive behaviorism versus cognitive theory in verbal operant conditioning. Psychological Review 73, 306–326.
| Descriptive behaviorism versus cognitive theory in verbal operant conditioning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaF287msFOltw%3D%3D&md5=a89020e7915ff7644b3d3059ad5457cdCAS | 5943981PubMed |
Titto EAL, Titto CG, Gatto EG, Silva NCM, Mourão GB, Nogueira Filho JCM, Pereira AMF (2010) Reactivity of Nellore steers in two feedlot housing systems and its relationship with plasmatic cortisol. Livestock Science 129, 146–150.
| Reactivity of Nellore steers in two feedlot housing systems and its relationship with plasmatic cortisol.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Turner SP, Navajas EA, Hyslop JJ, Ross DW, Richardson RI, Prieto N, Bell M, Jack MC, Roehe R (2011) Associations between response to handling and growth and meat quality in frequently handled Bos taurus beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 89, 4239–4248.
| Associations between response to handling and growth and meat quality in frequently handled Bos taurus beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhs1SqtbbF&md5=a8e268749f6822f267f8d1b41f20b89aCAS | 21841078PubMed |
