Resource use and greenhouse gas emissions from grain-finishing beef cattle in seven Australian feedlots: a life cycle assessment
Stephen Wiedemann A D , Rod Davis B , Eugene McGahan , Caoilinn Murphy and Matthew Redding C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Integrity Ag Services, 36a Highfields Road, Highfields, Qld 4352, Australia.
B Ostwald Bros., PO Box 279, Dalby, Qld 4405, Australia.
C AgriScience Queensland, Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry, PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: stephen.wiedemann@integrityag.net.au
Animal Production Science 57(6) 1149-1162 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15454
Submitted: 17 August 2015 Accepted: 2 March 2016 Published: 5 July 2016
Abstract
Grain finishing of cattle has become increasingly common in Australia over the past 30 years. However, interest in the associated environmental impacts and resource use is increasing and requires detailed analysis. In this study we conducted a life cycle assessment (LCA) to investigate impacts of the grain-finishing stage for cattle in seven feedlots in eastern Australia, with a particular focus on the feedlot stage, including the impacts from producing the ration, feedlot operations, transport, and livestock emissions while cattle are in the feedlot (gate-to-gate). The functional unit was 1 kg of liveweight gain (LWG) for the feedlot stage and results are included for the full supply chain (cradle-to-gate), reported per kilogram of liveweight (LW) at the point of slaughter. Three classes of cattle produced for different markets were studied: short-fed domestic market (55–80 days on feed), mid-fed export (108–164 days on feed) and long-fed export (>300 days on feed). In the feedlot stage, mean fresh water consumption was found to vary from 171.9 to 672.6 L/kg LWG and mean stress-weighted water use ranged from 100.9 to 193.2 water stress index eq. L/kg LWG. Irrigation contributed 57–91% of total fresh water consumption with differences mainly related to the availability of irrigation water near the feedlot and the use of irrigated feed inputs in rations. Mean fossil energy demand ranged from 16.5 to 34.2 MJ lower heating values/kg LWG and arable land occupation from 18.7 to 40.5 m2/kg LWG in the feedlot stage. Mean greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the feedlot stage ranged from 4.6 to 9.5 kg CO2-e/kg LWG (excluding land use and direct land-use change emissions). Emissions were dominated by enteric methane and contributions from the production, transport and milling of feed inputs. Linear regression analysis showed that the feed conversion ratio was able to explain >86% of the variation in GHG intensity and energy demand. The feedlot stage contributed between 26% and 44% of total slaughter weight for the classes of cattle fed, whereas the contribution of this phase to resource use varied from 4% to 96% showing impacts from the finishing phase varied considerably, compared with the breeding and backgrounding. GHG emissions and total land occupation per kilogram of LWG during the grain finishing phase were lower than emissions from breeding and backgrounding, resulting in lower life-time emissions for grain-finished cattle compared with grass finishing.
Additional keywords: agricultural systems, feedlots, global climate change.
References
ABS (2006) ‘Water use on Australian farms 2005–06.’ (Australian Bureau of Statistics: Canberra)ABS (2011) ‘Water use on Australian farms, 2009–10.’ (Australian Bureau of Statistics: Canberra, ACT) Available at http://www.abs.gov.au/ [Verified 2 April 2016]
ALFA and MLA (2007) ‘National accredited feedlot survey. October–December 2007.’ (Australian Lot Feeders Association: Sydney) Available at http://www.feedlots.com.au/pdf/2MRDec07.pdf [Verified 21 July 2010]
ALFA and MLA (2008) ‘National accredited feedlot survey. October–December 2008.’ (Australian Lot Feeders Association: Sydney) Available at http://www.feedlots.com.au/images/stories/SURVEY/mrdec08.pdf [Verified 21 July 2010]
Bindon B, Jones N (2001) Cattle supply, production systems and markets for Australian beef. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 861–877.
| Cattle supply, production systems and markets for Australian beef.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brock P, Madden P, Schwenke G, Herridge D (2012) Greenhouse gas emissions profile for 1 tonne of wheat produced in Central Zone (East) New South Wales: a life cycle assessment approach. Crop and Pasture Science 63, 319–329.
| Greenhouse gas emissions profile for 1 tonne of wheat produced in Central Zone (East) New South Wales: a life cycle assessment approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XptVWltLo%3D&md5=73f91b1b83fdcca82aa5a471ff45abf1CAS |
Brock PM, Graham P, Madden P, Alcock DJ (2013) Greenhouse gas emissions profile for 1 kg of wool produced in the Yass Region, New South Wales: a life cycle assessment approach. Animal Production Science 53, 495–508.
| Greenhouse gas emissions profile for 1 kg of wool produced in the Yass Region, New South Wales: a life cycle assessment approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXmvFyku7o%3D&md5=e167ad37bb02bef0cf86ffd844a64149CAS |
Commonwealth of Australia (2015a) Australian Greenhouse Emissions Information System: National Greenhouse Gas Inventory – Kyoto Protocol classifications. Department of the Environment, Canberra, ACT. Available at http://ageis.climatechange.gov.au/NGGI.aspx [Verified 16 December 2015]
Commonwealth of Australia (2015b) ‘Australian National Greenhouse Accounts: National Inventory Report 2013 Volume 1.’ (Department of the Environment: Canberra, ACT)
Commonwealth of Australia (2015c) ‘Australian National Greenhouse Accounts: National Inventory Report 2013 Volume 2.’ (Department of the Environment: Canberra, ACT)
Davis R, Wiedemann S, Watts P (2010a) Quantifying the water and energy usage of individual activities within Australian feedlots – Part A report: water usage at Australian feedlots 2007–2009. Meat & Livestock Australia Limited No. B.FLT.0350, North Sydney, NSW.
Davis R, Wiedemann S, Watts P (2010b) Quantifying the water and energy usage of individual activities within Australian feedlots – Part B report: energy usage at Australian feedlots 2007–2009. Meat & Livestock Australia Limited No. B.FLT.0350, North Sydney, NSW.
De Klein C, Novoa RSA, Ogle S, Smith KA, Rochette P, Wirth TC, McConkey BG, Mosier A, Rypdal K, Walsh M, Williams SA (2006) N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application. In ‘2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories’. (Eds HS Eggleston, L Buendia, K Miwa, T Ngara, K Tanabe) pp. 11.1–11.54. (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies: Kanagawa, Japan)
DEWR (2007) ‘Emission estimation technique manual for intensive livestock – beef cattle, Version 3.1.’ (Department of the Environment and Water Resources, Australian Government: Canberra, ACT)
Dong H, Mangino J, McAllister TA, Hatfield JL, Johnson DE, Lassey KR, Aparecida de Lima M, Romanovskaya A, Bartram D, Gibb DJ, Martin JHJ (2006) Emissions from livestock and manure management. In ‘IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Vol. 4: agriculture, forestry and other land use’. (Eds S Eggleston, L Buendia, K Miwa, T Ngara, K Tanabe) pp. 10.1–10.87. (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies: Kanagawa, Japan)
Eady S, Viner J, MacDonnell J (2011) On-farm greenhouse gas emissions and water use: case studies in the Queensland beef industry. Animal Production Science 51, 667–681.
| On-farm greenhouse gas emissions and water use: case studies in the Queensland beef industry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXpvVOhtrk%3D&md5=642ae427c7a557e8f8f9d814a39e35ecCAS |
Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H, Bauer C, Doka G, Dones R, Hischier R, Hellweg S, Humbert S, Köllner T (2007) ‘Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods.’ (Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories: Dübendorf, Switzerland)
Henry BK, Butler D, Wiedemann SG (2015) Quantifying carbon sequestration on sheep grazing land in Australia for life cycle assessment studies. The Rangeland Journal 37, 379–388.
| Quantifying carbon sequestration on sheep grazing land in Australia for life cycle assessment studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hunter RA, Niethe GE (2009) Efficiency of feed utilisation and methane emission for various cattle breeding and finishing systems. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia 17, 75–80.
ISO (2014) ‘Environmental management – water footprint – principles, requirements and guidelines.’ (International Organisation for Standardisation: Geneva, Switzerland)
LEAP (2014) Environmental performance of animal feed supply chains: guidelines for quantification: draft for public review. Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance Partnership. FAO, Rome, Italy.
Lesslie R, Mewett J (2013) Land use and management: the Australian context. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) Available at http://data.daff.gov.au/data/warehouse/9aal/2013/RR13.1lumAc/RR13.1LandUseManageAust Context_v1.0.0.pdf [Verified 2 April 2016]
Life Cycle Strategies (2007) Australian unit process LCI library and methods. Available at http://www.lifecycles.com.au/#!australasian-database/cbm5 [Verified 28 April 2014]
Luo Z, Wang E, Sun OJ (2010) Soil carbon change and its responses to agricultural practices in Australian agro-ecosystems: a review and synthesis. Geoderma 155, 211–223.
| Soil carbon change and its responses to agricultural practices in Australian agro-ecosystems: a review and synthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXitlWgtb0%3D&md5=2f361ffa2e00f1dc19b308aa23f4bd2fCAS |
McGinn SM, Chen D, Loh Z, Hill J, Beauchemin KA, Denmead OT (2008) Methane emissions from feedlot cattle in Australia and Canada. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48,
| Methane emissions from feedlot cattle in Australia and Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXovVGk&md5=19b3de95900aafdb9f97c045494aa854CAS |
Moe PW, Tyrrell HF (1979) Methane production in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 62, 1583–1586.
| Methane production in dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL3cXlt1Og&md5=0841dc684fe0c582ecc9d37de8a32a18CAS |
Pelletier N, Pirog R, Rasmussen R (2010) Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States. Agricultural Systems 103, 380–389.
| Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Peters GM, Rowley HV, Wiedemann SG, Tucker RW, Short MD, Schulz MS (2010a) Red meat production in Australia: life cycle assessment and comparison with overseas studies. Environmental Science & Technology 44, 1327–1332.
| Red meat production in Australia: life cycle assessment and comparison with overseas studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXkt1agug%3D%3D&md5=65db28af46e91931bc8d32c5c1c6519bCAS |
Peters GM, Wiedemann SG, Rowley HV, Tucker RW (2010b) Accounting for water use in Australian red meat production. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15, 311–320.
| Accounting for water use in Australian red meat production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXis1eitb4%3D&md5=ffaf401a03edfec7dfb7bfa542baf0e2CAS |
Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S (2009) Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environmental Science & Technology 43, 4098–4104.
| Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXkvVyktLY%3D&md5=aa2886abaca7650a6a9bee53df96fce9CAS |
PRé-Consultants (2014) ‘SimaPro 8.0 software.’ (PRé-Consultants BV: Amersfoort, Netherlands)
R Development Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at http://www.r-project.org/ [Verified 2 April 2016]
Rebitzer G, Loerincik Y, Jolliet O (2002) Input-output life cycle assessment: from theory to applications 16th discussion forum on life cycle assessment Lausanne, April 10, 2002. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7, 174–176.
| Input-output life cycle assessment: from theory to applications 16th discussion forum on life cycle assessment Lausanne, April 10, 2002.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Redding M, Devereux J, Phillips F, Lewis R, Naylor T, Kearton T, Hill J, Wiedemann S (2015) Field measurement of beef pen manure methane and nitrous oxide reveals a surprise for inventory calculations. Journal of Environmental Quality 44, 720–728.
| Field measurement of beef pen manure methane and nitrous oxide reveals a surprise for inventory calculations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXns1Wgsbk%3D&md5=f9f44b15db27e206a93053d6e37fc965CAS | 26024253PubMed |
Ridoutt BG, Pfister S (2010) A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity. Global Environmental Change 20, 113–120.
| A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ridoutt BG, Sanguansri P, Freer M, Harper GS (2012) Water footprint of livestock: comparison of six geographically defined beef production systems. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 17, 165–175.
| Water footprint of livestock: comparison of six geographically defined beef production systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Skerman A (2000) ‘Reference manual for the establishment and operation of beef cattle feedlots in Queensland.’ (Queensland Department of Primary Industries: Toowoomba, Qld)
Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Alley RB, Berntsen T, Bindoff NL, Chen A, Chidthaisong A, Gregory JM, Hegerl GC, Heimann M, Hewitson B, Hoskins BJ, Joos F, Juozel J, Kattsov V, Lohmann U, Matsuno T, Molina M, Nicholls N, Overpeck J, Raga G, Ramaswamy V, Ren J, Rusticucci M, Somerville R, Stocker TF, Whetten P, Wood RA, Wratt D (2007) Technical Summary. In ‘Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’. (Eds S Solomon, D Qin, M Manning, Z Chen, M Marquis, KB Averyt, M Tignor, HL Miller) pp. 19–91. (Cambridge University Press: United Kingdom and New York, USA)
Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories (2010) Ecoinvent Database v2.2. Available at www.ecoinvent.org [Verified 5 April 2016]
Tan D, Brock P, Hulugalle N, Quigley G (2013) ‘Life cycle assessment of cotton-corn farming systems in the Namoi Valley, Australia, 8th Life Cycle Conference – Pathways to Greening Global Markets’, Sydney, NSW, Australia. (ALCAS: Sydney)
USDA NRCS (2007) Chapter 10, part 630 – hydrology. Estimation of direct runoff from storm rainfall. In ‘National engineering handbook’. (Eds V Mockus, AT Hjelmfelt, HF Moody) pp. 1–79. (US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service: Washington, DC)
Watts P, McGahan E, Bonner SL, Wiedemann S (2012) Feedlot Mass Balance and Greenhouse Gas Emissions – A Literature Review. Meat & Livestock Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Wiedemann SG, McGahan EJ (2011) Environmental assessment of an egg production supply chain using life cycle assessment. Australian Egg Corporation Limited, Sydney, Australia.
Wiedemann S, McGahan E, Grist S, Grant T (2010) Environmental assessment of two pork supply chains using life cycle assessment. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Barton, ACT. Available at https://rirdc.infoservices.com.au/items/09-176 [Verified 2 April 2016]
Wiedemann S, Henry BK, McGahan E, Grant T, Murphy C, Niethe G (2015) Resource use and greenhouse gas intensity of Australian beef production: 1981 to 2010. Agricultural Systems 133, 109–118.
| Resource use and greenhouse gas intensity of Australian beef production: 1981 to 2010.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wiedemann S, McGahan E, Murphy C, Yan M (2016a) Resource use and environmental impacts from beef production in eastern Australia investigated using life cycle assessment. Animal Production Science 56, 882–894.
| Resource use and environmental impacts from beef production in eastern Australia investigated using life cycle assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wiedemann SG, McGahan EJ, Murphy CM (2016b) Environmental impacts and resource use from Australian pork production assessed using life-cycle assessment. 1. Greenhouse gas emissions. Animal Production Science 56, 1418–1431.
| Environmental impacts and resource use from Australian pork production assessed using life-cycle assessment. 1. Greenhouse gas emissions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wiedemann SG, Yan M-J, Murphy CM (2016c) Resource use and environmental impacts from Australian export lamb production: a life cycle assessment. Animal Production Science 56, 1070–1080.
| Resource use and environmental impacts from Australian export lamb production: a life cycle assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wiedemann SG, McGahan EJ, Murphy CM (2017) Resource use and environmental impacts from Australian chicken meat production. Journal of Cleaner Production 140, 675–684.
| Resource use and environmental impacts from Australian chicken meat production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
