Reducing variation in pork production systems through maternal and pre- and post-weaning nutrition strategies
R. J. van Barneveld A B and R. J. E. Hewitt AA SunPork Farms, c/- PO Box 5950, Manly, Qld 4179, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: robert.vanbarneveld@sunporkfarms.com.au
Animal Production Science 56(8) 1248-1253 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15396
Submitted: 22 July 2015 Accepted: 12 November 2015 Published: 24 March 2016
Abstract
Variation is inherent in any biological system and is a challenge to manage in modern pork-production businesses. In the case of the growing and finishing herd, inherent variation within a population of pigs represents a significant cost as a result of the need to select on farm to meet market specifications, poor matching of diet specifications to nutrient requirements, grading losses, higher pre-weaning mortality, and challenges associated with health management. As a consequence, any management practice that can be applied to reduce variation at the point of sale has the potential to improve the profitability and overall efficiency of a pig enterprise. The present paper considers nutritional interventions of sows during gestation, lactation and the weaning to oestrus interval to minimise inherent variation in the progeny and then pre- and post-weaning nutrition of piglets to limit further variation. Prior to birth, there are many factors that can influence variation in the birthweight and growth potential of the progeny. In gestating sows, dietary energy will not influence variation in birthweight, but supplementation with free arginine and glutamine will reduce variation in birthweight of piglets born and piglets born alive. In lactating sows, maintenance of feed intake to optimise milk production and minimise weight loss of the sow during lactation not only minimises variation in progeny weight at weaning, but enhances subsequent birthweight heterogeneity due to the influence of the sow’s metabolic status on follicle and oocyte quality. Supplementation with dextrose during the weaning to oestrus interval can also reduce variation in birthweight due to a pronounced effect on plasma glucose and insulin concentrations. Prior to weaning, light weight piglets appear to have an enhanced capacity for growth compared with their larger counterparts. To this end, split suckling has been shown to reduce weaning-weight variation, despite no effect on average growth rate or weaning weight for litters with nine piglets or more born alive. Supplemental milk before weaning has reduced variation in weaning weights, but creep feeding has proved equivocal in this regard. Post-weaning, it appears that remedial feeding strategies will do little to improve the growth potential of light-weight pigs, and while high specification diets may contribute to a slight reduction in variation at slaughter, this strategy is unlikely to be economically viable. As with many aspects of commercial pork production, it would seem that the greatest potential to reduce variation in the slaughter weight of market pigs vests with careful management of gestating and lactating sows, with some potential for dietary interventions to further reduce variation in birth and weaning weights.
Additional keywords: gestation, lactation, management.
References
Appleby MC, Pajor EA, Fraser D (1992) Individal variation in feeding and growth of piglets: effects of increased access to creep food. Animal Production 55, 147–152.| Individal variation in feeding and growth of piglets: effects of increased access to creep food.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ball RO, Samuel RS, Moehn S (2008) Nutrient requirements of prolific sows. Advances in Pork Production 19, 223–236.
Campos PHRF, Silva BAN, Donzele JL, Oliveira RFM, Knol EF (2012) Effects of sow nutrition during gestation on within-litter birth weight variation: a review. Animal 6, 797–806.
| Effects of sow nutrition during gestation on within-litter birth weight variation: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC38ngsFeisA%3D%3D&md5=d7ffd3e0b8caa7b96ced030b92243505CAS |
Donovan TS, Dritz SS (2000) Effect of split nursing on variation in pig growth from birth to weaning. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 217, 79–81.
| Effect of split nursing on variation in pig growth from birth to weaning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvjs12qtg%3D%3D&md5=a39db8486a6e0163b5218951663bbabbCAS | 10909452PubMed |
Douglas SL, Edwards SA, Sutcliffe E, Knap PW, Kyriazakis I (2013) Identification of risk factors associated with poor lifetime growth performance in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 91, 4123–4132.
| Identification of risk factors associated with poor lifetime growth performance in pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhsVOlsb3L&md5=eec7c24411a61619a4fc4ca741593e76CAS | 23825336PubMed |
Douglas SL, Edwards SA, Kyriazakis I (2014a) Management strategies to improve the performance of low birth weight pigs to weaning and their long-term consequences. Journal of Animal Science 92, 2280–2288.
| Management strategies to improve the performance of low birth weight pigs to weaning and their long-term consequences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXot12itbk%3D&md5=fc7d80c2b9d96dc8a801b7dcf1ea3466CAS | 24671578PubMed |
Douglas SL, Edwards SA, Kyriazakis I (2014b) Too late to catch up: a high nutrient specification diet in the grower phase does not improve the performance of low birth weight pigs. Journal of Animal Science 92, 4577–4584.
| Too late to catch up: a high nutrient specification diet in the grower phase does not improve the performance of low birth weight pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2M%2FnvFCnsg%3D%3D&md5=7473cd8a97900fd3d9791768d4514c2fCAS | 25186954PubMed |
Douglas SL, Wellock I, Edwards SA, Kyriazakis I (2014c) High specification starter diets improve the performance of low birth weight pigs to 10 weeks of age. Journal of Animal Science 92, 4741–4750.
| High specification starter diets improve the performance of low birth weight pigs to 10 weeks of age.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2M%2FnsFOgtw%3D%3D&md5=34308970e2adf93f72a4e60cedf1ef36CAS | 25184839PubMed |
Dunshea FR (2005) Sex and porcine somatotropin impact on variation in growth performance and back fat thickness. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 677–682.
| Sex and porcine somatotropin impact on variation in growth performance and back fat thickness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXls1SlsLs%3D&md5=fd9cf71cdc98f2f09a97cfb739305d67CAS |
Foxcroft GR (1997) Mechanisms mediating nutritional effects on embryonic survival in pigs. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. Supplement 52, 47–61.
Foxcroft GR (2007) Pre-natal programming of variation in post-natal performance: how and when? Advances in Pork Production 18, 167–189.
Foxcroft GR, Town S (2004) Prenatal programming of postnatal performance: the unseen cause of variance. Advances in Pork Production 15, 269–279.
Fraser D, Feddes JJR, Pajor EA (1994) The relationship between creep feeding behavior of piglets and adaptation to weaning: effect of diet quality. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 74, 1–6.
| The relationship between creep feeding behavior of piglets and adaptation to weaning: effect of diet quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hewitt RJE, Corso A, van Barneveld RJ (2015) Reducing variation in finisher growth performance through early post-weaning dietary intervention. Animal Production Science 55, 1573
| Reducing variation in finisher growth performance through early post-weaning dietary intervention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lawlor PG, Lynch PB, O’Connell MK, McNamara L, Reid P, Stickland NC (2007) The influence of over feeding sows during gestation on reproductive performance and pig growth to slaughter. Archives of Animal Breeding 50, 82–91.
O’Connell NE, Beattie VE, Watt D (2005) Influence of regrouping strategy on performance, behavior and carcass parameters in pigs. Livestock Production Science 97, 107–115.
| Influence of regrouping strategy on performance, behavior and carcass parameters in pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pajor EA, Fraser D, Kramer DL (1991) Consumption of solid food by suckling pigs: individual variation and relation to weight gain. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32, 139–155.
| Consumption of solid food by suckling pigs: individual variation and relation to weight gain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Patience JF, Engele K, Beaulieu AD, Gonyou HW, Zijlstra RT (2004) Variation: costs and consequences. Advances in Pork Production 15, 257–266.
Pluske JR, Williams IH, Aherne FX (1995) ‘Nutrition of the neonatal pig.’ (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)
Quesnel H, Brossard L, Valancogne A, Quiniou N (2008) Influence of some sow characteristics on within-litter variation of piglet birth weight. Animal 2, 1842–1849.
| Influence of some sow characteristics on within-litter variation of piglet birth weight.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC38vptFeltw%3D%3D&md5=c499764a57ae43ce6f8d9944486081edCAS | 22444091PubMed |
Quiniou N, Dagorn J, Gaudré D (2002) Variation of piglets’ birth weight and consequences on subsequent performance. Livestock Production Science 78, 63–70.
| Variation of piglets’ birth weight and consequences on subsequent performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rehfeldt C, Kuhn G, Nürnberg G, Kanitz E, Schneider F, Beyer M, Nürnberg K, Ender K (2001) Effects if exogenous somatotropin during early gestation on maternal performance, fetal growth, and compositional traits in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 79, 1789–1799.
Tokach M (2004) Dealing with variation in market weight. Advances in Pork Production 15, 281–290.
Van den Brand H, Soede NM, Schrama JW, Kemp B (1998) Effects of dietary energy source on plasma glucose and insulin concentration in gilts. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 79, 27–32.
| Effects of dietary energy source on plasma glucose and insulin concentration in gilts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXkvFChsbs%3D&md5=0733514b59bc551561b835aecd5b5922CAS |
Van den Brand H, Soede NM, Kemp B (2006) Supplementation of dextrose to the diet during the weaning to estrus interval affects subsequent variation in within-litter piglet birth weight. Animal Reproduction Science 91, 353–358.
| Supplementation of dextrose to the diet during the weaning to estrus interval affects subsequent variation in within-litter piglet birth weight.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXht1Gns7jL&md5=6e521c4e71b848bee1b9f73f332691ccCAS | 15967602PubMed |
Widdowson EM (1976) Environmental control of growth: The maternal environment. In ‘Meat animals: growth and productivity’. (Eds D Lister, DN Rhodes, VR Fowler, MF Fuller) pp. 273–284. (Plenum Press: London)
Wolter BF, Ellis M, Corrigan BP, DeDecker JM (2002) The effect of birth weight and feeding of supplemental milk replacer to piglets during lactation on preweaning and postweaning growth performance and carcass characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 80, 301–308.
Wu G, Ott TL, Kanbe DA, Bazer FW (1999) Animal acid composition of the fetal pig. The Journal of Nutrition 129, 1031–1038.
Wu G, Bazer FW, Davis TA, Jaegar LA, Johnson GA, Kim SW, Knabe DA, Meininger CJ, Spencer TE, Yin Y-L (2007) Important roles for the arginine family of amino acids in swine nutrition and production. Livestock Science 112, 8–22.
| Important roles for the arginine family of amino acids in swine nutrition and production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wu G, Bazer FW, Burghardt RC, Johnson GA, Kim SW, Li XL, Satterfield MC, Spencer TE (2010) Impacts of amino acid on pregnancy outcome in pigs: mechanisms and implications for swine production. Journal of Animal Science 88, E195–E204.
| Impacts of amino acid on pregnancy outcome in pigs: mechanisms and implications for swine production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3c3pslOrsA%3D%3D&md5=5b7b1ea481f4470ff8604285f5dd3866CAS | 19854987PubMed |
