Effects of increasing rates of molasses supplementation and forage quality on the productivity of steers
R. A. Hunter A B D and P. M. Kennedy A CA CSIRO, Livestock Industries, PO Box 5545, Rockhampton Mail Centre, Qld 4701, Australia.
B Present address: CSIRO Agriculture Flagship, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, 306 Carmody Road, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia.
C Present address: CSIRO Agriculture Flagship, ATSIP, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: bob.hunter@csiro.au
Animal Production Science 56(5) 871-881 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14846
Submitted: 1 October 2014 Accepted: 20 January 2015 Published: 22 April 2015
Abstract
This study consisted of several experiments that investigated the feed intakes, and growth rates of steers fed low-quality Angleton grass (Dichanthium aristatum) supplemented with urea and sulfur (dry matter (DM) digestibility, 45%) and medium-quality Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) (DM digestibility, 58%) when fed either alone or with molasses mixtures (MM, molasses plus nitrogen and phosphorus). Some digestion characteristics of the basal forage diets were also measured. Addition of MM at 1.2 times calculated maintenance energy requirements (M) was associated with about a four-fold increase in microbial crude protein production and a 42% decrease in neutral detergent fibre digestibility. In the first growth experiment, MM at 0M, 0.45M, 0.90M and 1.35M was offered and mostly consumed before forage was offered ad libitum. The initial mean weight of the steers was 240 kg. Consumed MM comprised 0%, 21%, 38% and 50% of the total DM intake for Angleton grass and 0%, 19%, 33% and 41% for Rhodes grass. The corresponding mean liveweight (LW) gains were 0.06, 0.31, 0.73 and 0.83 kg/day for steers fed Angleton grass and 0.61, 0.90, 1.02 and 1.13 kg/day for steers fed Rhodes grass. In a second experiment, MM was offered to steers (initially 370 kg) at the same time as forage. Offered MM comprised 0, 0.40, 0.80 and 1.20M of the calculated metabolisable energy (ME) requirements for maintenance. Consumed MM comprised 0%, 20%, 36% and 48% of the total DM intake for Angleton grass diets and 0%, 18%, 28% and 32% for Rhodes grass diets. The corresponding mean LW gains were –0.09, 0.36, 0.58 and 0.70 kg/day for Angleton grass diets and 0.63, 0.67, 0.80 and 0.94 kg/day for Rhodes grass diets. The method of presentation of the MM had only minor effects on the amounts and proportions of forage and the MM consumed and on the LW gains of the steers, expressed as g/kg0.75 LW per day to allow for differences in initial LW between experiments. Using modifications to the scheme of SCA (1990) to predict maintenance energy requirements, a value for efficiency of use of ME for growth was calculated from growth rates of steers fed Rhodes grass. When MM with an assumed content of 11 MJ ME/ kg DM was added to the forage diets, the calculated ME content of forage decreased with increased MM content, consistent with depression of fibre digestion. The relationships for the separate experiments indicated that at 50% MM in the diet, the magnitudes of the depression in the calculated ME content of the forages were 20–37% for Rhodes grass and 18–33% for Angleton grass.
Additional keywords: cattle, growth, intake.
References
Anon. (2012) ‘Australian Molasses Trading Pty Ltd.’ Available at http://www.ausmolasses.com.au/company.htm. [Verified 15 August 2014]ARC (1980) ‘The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock.’ (Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux: Farnham Royal, UK)
Bortolussi G, O’Neill CJ (2006) Variation in molasses composition from eastern Australian sugar mills. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1455–1465.
| Variation in molasses composition from eastern Australian sugar mills.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtVGhs7bL&md5=f0254e3a5e24a5e743e74392e565e784CAS |
Bowen MK, Poppi DP, McLennan SR, Doogan VJ (2006) A comparison of the excretion rate of purine derivatives in the urine of Bos indicus and Bos taurus steers. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 173–177.
CSIRO (2007) ‘Nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
de Vega A, Poppi DP (2012) The effect of sucrose addition on intake of tropical grass hay by sheep. Animal Production Science 52, 578–583.
Dove H, McLennan SR, Poppi DP (2010) Application of nutrient requirement schemes to grazing animals. In ‘Proceedings of the 4th grazing livestock nurition conference, Estes Park, CO, USA’. (Eds BW Hess, T Delcurto, JPG Bowman, RC Waterman) pp. 133–149. (Western Section, American Society of Animal Science: Champaign, IL)
Freer M, Moore AD, Donnelly JR (2012) ‘The GRAZPLAN animal biology model for sheep and cattle and the GrazFeed decision support tool.’ CSIRO Plant Industry technical paper (revised December 2012). Available at www.csiro.au/en/Organisation-Structure/Divisions/Plant-Industry/GRAZPLAN-supporting-documents-and-programs. [Verified 15 August 2014]
Genstat (2012) ‘Genstat for windows.’ 15th edn. (VSN International: Hemel Hempstead, UK)
Heldt JS, Cochran RC, Stokka GL, Farmer CG, Mathis CP, Titgemeyer EC, Nagaraja TG (1999) Effects of different supplemental sugars and starch fed in combination with degradable intake protein on low-quality forage use by beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2793–2802.
Hunter RA (2012) High-molasses diets for intensive feeding of cattle. Animal Production Science 52, 787–794.
| High-molasses diets for intensive feeding of cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhtFKntbjK&md5=3f5321d2cd8e78a6a2f51bf3de69d5daCAS |
Kempton TJ, Hiscox JF (1984) Performance of weaner cattle given molasses and supplements under feedlot and grazing conditions. Animal Production in Australia 15, 408–411.
Kennedy PM, Charmley E (2012) Methane yields from Brahman cattle fed tropical grasses and legumes. Animal Production Science 52, 225–239.
Khalili H (1993) Supplementation of grass hay with molasses in crossbred (Bos taurus × Bos indicus) non-lactating cows: effect of level of molasses on feed intake, digestion, rumen fermentation and rumen digesta pool size. Animal Feed Science and Technology 41, 23–38.
| Supplementation of grass hay with molasses in crossbred (Bos taurus × Bos indicus) non-lactating cows: effect of level of molasses on feed intake, digestion, rumen fermentation and rumen digesta pool size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXltlyht7Y%3D&md5=0afe3fffd51c78f0c6fb0f4462f3ed3dCAS |
Lindsay JA, Cooper NJ, Batterham I (1998) A molasses based production feeding system for Brahman cattle. Animal Production in Australia 22, 119–121.
Losada H, Preston TR (1973) Effect of forage on performance, content of the reticulo-rumen and VFA in rumen and caecum of calves fed diets based on molasses-urea. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science 7, 185–190.
Marcondes MI, Tedeschi LO, Valadares Filho SC, Glonbelli MP (2013) Predicting efficiency of use of metabolizable energy to net energy for gain and maintenance of Nellore cattle. Journal of Animal Science 91, 4887–4898.
| Predicting efficiency of use of metabolizable energy to net energy for gain and maintenance of Nellore cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhs1SqtLjP&md5=8e31fac3f2bd61643c394ee16ab0236cCAS | 23978609PubMed |
McLennan SJ, Poppi DP, Campbell J (2014) Prediction of herbage intake of cattle from animal performance, using the Australian feeding standards. In ‘Optimising growth paths of beef cattle in northern Australia for increased profitability’. pp. 158–182. Final report of Project B.NBP.0391. Meat and Livestock Australia, Sydney.
Mears PT, Hennessy DW, Williamson PJ, McLennan DJ (1996) Growth and forage intake of Hereford steers fed giant Parramatta grass hay (Sporobolus indicus) and the effects of dietary nitrogen supplements. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 36, 1–7.
| Growth and forage intake of Hereford steers fed giant Parramatta grass hay (Sporobolus indicus) and the effects of dietary nitrogen supplements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
NRC (1996) ‘Nutrient requirements of beef cattle.’ (National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences: Washington, DC)
Ørskov ER, McDonald I (1979) The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 499–503.
| The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pate FM (1983) Molasses in beef nutrition. In ‘Molasses in animal nutrition’. pp. 2–56. (National Feed Ingredients Association: Des Moines, IA)
Poppi DJ, McLennan SR (1995) Protein and energy utilisation by ruminants at pasture. Journal of Animal Science 73, 278–290.
Preston TR (1972) Molasses as an energy source for cattle. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 17, 250–311.
Rowe JB, Bobadilla B, Fernandez A, Encarnacion JC, Preston TR (1979a) Molasses toxicity in cattle: rumen fermentation and blood glucose entry rates associated with this condition. Tropical Animal Production 4, 78–89.
Rowe JB, Loughnan ML, Nolan JV, Leng RA (1979b) Secondary fermentation in the rumen of a sheep given a diet based on molasses. The British Journal of Nutrition 41, 393–397.
| Secondary fermentation in the rumen of a sheep given a diet based on molasses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaE1MXktFyktLo%3D&md5=b5200a0a047a1213c1cefe6650b8d440CAS | 427091PubMed |
SCA (1990) ‘Feeding standards for Australian livestock, ruminants.’ Standing Committee on Agriculture, Ruminants Subcommittee. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
Shingfield KJ, Offer NW (1998) Determination of allantoin in bovine milk by high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography. B. Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences 706, 342–346.
SPSS (2001) ‘SigmaPlot® 7.0 for Windows®.’ (SPSS Inc.: Chicago, IL)
Sundstrom B, Palmer WA (1977) ‘Molasses based fattening rations for beef cattle.’ Technical Bulletin 17. (Department of Agriculture: Sydney)
Tuyen DV, Tolosa XM, Poppi DP, McLennan SR (2015) Effect of varying the proportion of molasses in the diet on intake, digestion and microbial protein production by steers. Animal Production Science 55, 17–26.
| Effect of varying the proportion of molasses in the diet on intake, digestion and microbial protein production by steers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXitVKqsrvM&md5=2e6b5fe7d616a3ede14668975a876ddaCAS |
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
| Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK38%2FnvVCltA%3D%3D&md5=e5c1ebe000070887297cc2a8c330cfc1CAS | 1660498PubMed |
Vercellotti SV, Clarke MA (1994) Comparison of modern and traditional methods of sugar analysis. International Sugar Journal 96, 437–445.
Williams CH, Twine JR (1967) ‘Determination of nitrogen, sulphur, phosphorus, sodium, calcium, and magnesium in plant material by auto analysis.’ Technical paper no. 24. (CSIRO Division of Plant Industries: Canberra)
