Pregnancy scanning can be used as a source of data for genetic evaluation of reproductive traits of ewes
Kim L. Bunter A C , Andrew A. Swan A , Ian W. Purvis B and Daniel Brown AA Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit (AGBU)*, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B CSIRO Animal, Food and Health Sciences, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: kbunter2@une.edu.au
Animal Production Science 56(4) 679-689 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14630
Submitted: 10 June 2014 Accepted: 3 November 2014 Published: 2 July 2015
Abstract
Reproductive traits generated from mothering up lambs to ewes (n = 59 603 records) were compared with data resulting from pregnancy scanning (n = 46 663 records), to examine the consistency between the two data sources for deriving specific reproductive traits and to estimate genetic parameters. The reproductive traits considered were fertility (FERT: 0/1) of ewes joined, total litter size (LSIZE: lambs born), the number of lambs surviving at weaning (LSIZEW: lambs weaned) and the percentage of lambs surviving (LSURV = LSIZEW/LSIZE) for ewes that lambed, along with the composite traits number of lambs born (NLB) and number weaned (NLW) for ewes joined. Corresponding trait values were derived from pregnancy scan data (FERT_S, LSIZE_S and NLB_S) for comparison, and were classified as inconsistent if the trait values did not match from scanning and lambing records. Data were obtained from four flocks, representing different time frames, locations, management and breeds or bloodlines. Each flock recorded scan data separately from lambing outcomes. Genetic parameters were estimated separately within each flock. Average levels of inconsistency between scan- and lambing-data values varied between 4.6% and 14.8% across flocks, tending to be highest (9.1–18.5%) for litter size of ewes scanned with multiple fetuses, and lowest (0.29–7.3%) for assignment of fertility. Inconsistencies did not have a significant impact on estimates of trait heritabilities, suggesting recording errors were independent of genetic merit. In three flocks, the genetic correlations (ra) between comparable traits derived from the different data sources were not different from unity (ra ≥ 0.99) even when phenotypic correlations (rp) were lower (rp ≥ 0.84). In the flock with the highest inconsistency rate between data sources, the range in ra varied between 0.60 (fertility) and 1.0 (litter size). Therefore, pregnancy scan data can be directly substituted for reproductive traits traditionally based on lambing data, but attention should be paid to ensuring accuracy of the data sources used. Scan data also provide no information on lamb-survival outcomes after birth, so does not constitute complete data on reproductive outcomes. Genetic evaluation systems might also benefit from fine tuning for scale-induced effects (due to litter size) on parameters to improve the accuracy of across flock prediction of breeding values for reproductive traits.
Additional keywords: correlation, fertility, heritability, lamb survival, litter size.
References
Amer PR, McEwan JC, Dodds KG, Davis GH (1999) Economic values for ewe prolificacy and lamb survival in New Zealand sheep. Livestock Production Science 58, 75–90.| Economic values for ewe prolificacy and lamb survival in New Zealand sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Anonymous (2009a) ‘Pregnancy scan tips.’ (Sheep Improvement Limited: Christchurch, New Zealand)
Anonymous (2009b) ‘Successful pregnancy scanning.’ (Sheep CRC Organisation: Armidale, NSW)
Anonymous (2010) ‘Sheep and cattle pregnancy scanning.’ (Australian Livestock Scanning Service: Glen Innes, NSW)
Anonymous (2012) ‘The Merck veterinary manual online.’ (Eds SE Aiello, MA Moses) (Merck Sharp and Dohme Corporation: Whitehouse Station, NJ)
Barnett NL, Purvis IW, van Hest B, Franklin IR (1999) The accuracy of current dam pedigree recording strategies employed by stud merino breeders. In ‘Proceedings of the Association for Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics’, Mandurah, Western Australia. (Eds P Vercoe, N Adams, D Masters) pp. 373–376. (Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics)
Brown DJ, Huisman AE, Swan AA, Graser HU, Woolaston RR, Ball AJ, Atkins KD, Banks RG (2007) Genetic evaluation for the Australian sheep industry. In ‘Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics’, Armidale, NSW, Australia. (Eds K Donoghue, B Pattie, B Restall, B Kinghorn) pp. 187–194. (Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics)
Bunter KL, Brown DJ (2013) Yearling and adult expressions of reproduction in maternal sheep breeds are genetically different traits. In ‘Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics’, 20–23 October, Napier, New Zealand. (Ed. NL Villalobos) pp. 82–85. (Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics)
Farmer RJ, Davis GH (1999) Experiences of a pioneer in the commercial sheep pregnancy scanning business. In ‘Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production’, Mosgiel, New Zealand. (New Zealand Society of Animal Production)
Fowler DG, Wilkins JF (1982) The accuracy of ultrasonic imaging with real time scanners in determining litter number in pregnant ewes. In ‘Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production’. p. 636. (Australian Society of Animal Production)
Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2006) ‘ASREML user guide release 2.0.’ (VSN International: Hemel Hempstead, UK)
Gunduz MC, Turna O, Ucmak M, Apaydin S, Kasikci G, Ekiz B, Gezer NI (2010) Prediction of gestational week in Kivircik ewes using fetal ultrasound measurements. Agricultural Journal 5, 110–115.
| Prediction of gestational week in Kivircik ewes using fetal ultrasound measurements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hatcher S, Atkins KD, Safari E (2010) Lamb survival in Australian Merino sheep: a genetic analysis. Journal of Animal Science 88, 3198–3205.
| Lamb survival in Australian Merino sheep: a genetic analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cfgvVWitQ%3D%3D&md5=b8d890eccadd57df85baa265f625f1f9CAS | 20562357PubMed |
Kader GD, Perry M (2007) Variability for categorical variables. Journal of Statistics Education 15, 1–17.
Lee GJ, Sladek MA, Hatcher S, Richards JS (2014) Using partial records to identify productive older ewes to retain in the breeding flock to increase the flock net reproduction rate. Animal Production Science 54, 1631–1634.
| Using partial records to identify productive older ewes to retain in the breeding flock to increase the flock net reproduction rate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pickering NK, Dodds KG, Blair HT, Hickson RE, Johnson PL, McEwan JC (2012) Genetic parameters for production traits in New Zealand dual purpose sheep, with an emphasis on dagginess. Journal of Animal Science 90, 1411–1420.
| Genetic parameters for production traits in New Zealand dual purpose sheep, with an emphasis on dagginess.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xns1eis70%3D&md5=22aad8c636c4f515cb9bfc019c9fca3fCAS | 22100586PubMed |
Piper LR, Bindon BM (1982) Genetic segregation for fecundity in Booroola Merino sheep. In ‘Proceedings of the world congress on sheep and cattle breeding’, Palmerston North, New Zealand. (Eds RA Barton, WC Smith) pp. 395–400. (Dunmore Press: Palmerston North, New Zealand)
Ponzoni RW, Grimson RJ, Jaensch KS, Smith DH, Gifford DR, Ancell PMC, Walkley JRW, Hynd PI (1995) The Turretfield sheep breeding project: messages on phenotypic and genetic parameters for South Australian Merino sheep. In ‘Proceedings of the Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics’, Roseworthy, South Australia. (Ed. W Pitchford) pp. 303–306. (Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics)
Ponzoni RW, Jaensch KS, Grimson RJ, Smith DH, Ingham VM (2001) South Australian Merino Selection Demonstration Flocks: background and update with 1999 drop hogget results. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 49, 172–192.
Redden R, Dahlen C (2012) ‘Ultrasound pregnancy detection in sheep.’ (Ed. North Dakota State University) AS1611. (North Dakota State University: Fargo, ND)
Scott PR (2006) ‘Sheep medicine.’ (Manson Publishing: London, UK)
Swan AA, Purvis IW, Piper LR (2008) Genetic parameters for yearling wool production, wool quality and bodyweight traits in fine wool Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1168–1176.
| Genetic parameters for yearling wool production, wool quality and bodyweight traits in fine wool Merino sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vaňková D, Bartos L, Cizova-Schroffelova D, Nespor F, Jandurova O (2001) Mother-offspring bonding in farmed red deer: accuracy of visual observation verified by DNA analysis. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 73, 157–165.
| Mother-offspring bonding in farmed red deer: accuracy of visual observation verified by DNA analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11358612PubMed |
Wilkins JF, Fowler DG (1982) Real time ultrasound for diagnosing litter number in naturally mated flocks. In ‘Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production’. p. 638.
